Posts

The Obvious Question No One’s Asking Obama

It’s clear Obama has no use for Donald Trump. But that’s not really the point here . . .

The question this harsh, unprecedented attack by a sitting president on a major-party nominee to succeed him raises should be obvious: What happens if Donald Trump wins the election in November?

Given what Obama has said about Trump, would he not have an obligation to prevent Trump from assuming office? And what would that mean to the peaceful process America has enjoyed for more than two centuries of transitions of power?

These are questions Americans have never before been confronted with in American history.

Should we not be concerned about what Obama might do? (Read more from “The Obvious Question No One’s Asking Obama” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

White House to Trump: Election Won’t Be ‘Rigged’

Donald Trump’s declaration that the general election could be “rigged” against him reeks of a candidate poised for defeat, the White House suggested Wednesday.

“I know this is the subject of debate at the end of the last presidential election when some supporters of Gov. [Mitt] Romney complained of skewed polling. So this is not a new claim. I would just note that it is often a claim made by people who don’t end up winning elections,” press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters at the daily briefing. “What I’ll just say in general is that the cornerstone of our democracy is the ability of eligible voters, citizens to cast a ballot and to have it counted and the more people participate in that system, the more people that participate in that process, then the stronger our democracy.”

Earnest went on to note that President Barack Obama has made a similar case in front of bipartisan audiences.

“You’ve seen the United States Department of Justice pursue cases in the court to ensure that the rights of eligible voters are protected when it comes to participating in elections and the president has actually worked in bipartisan fashion including signing up the lawyer for Gov. Romney’s campaign to offer up advice about what we can do to make it easier for eligible voters to participate in the process,” Earnest said. “And the reason for all of that is the president believes our democracy benefits when the American people are engaged in that debate and when as many eligible voters as possible cast ballots.” (Read more from “White House to Trump: Election Won’t Be ‘Rigged'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Conservative Icon Speaks out Against Paul Ryan

Republican nominee Donald Trump has recently come under fire for withholding an endorsement for current House Speaker Paul Ryan. Trump told The Washington Post Tuesday that, as far as endorsing Ryan, he was “not quite there yet.”

While many within the GOP criticized the move, conservative legend Phyllis Schlafly has spoken out with even stronger language than Trump against the speaker. In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News, she called on all Americans to “get rid of him.”

Ryan’s opponent in the race, Paul Nehlen, is a businessman who has been rapidly catching up in the polls, as the Wisconsin primary closes in for next week.

The 91-year-old Schlafly had plenty of criticisms for the Speaker, primarily those that dealt with immigration, trade, and Ryan’s failure to represent the Republican electorate.

“Get rid of him! We don’t want anybody who believes in open borders,” she said. “Obviously Paul Ryan is not an ‘America first’ guy.”

Schlafly hopes for someone to replace Ryan and help defeat the “kingmakers” — that is, the political elite who have a donor class agenda. She has been particularly troubled by Ryan’s negative comments toward Trump.

Nehlen has said similar, saying previously that “Ryan’s repeated betrayals of the GOP nominee is beneath the dignity of the Speakers’ office and is morally disqualifying.” He predicted that if Ryan were to be re-elected, he would do his best to sabotage Trump even if he won the presidency.

In particular, Schlafly is against the philosophy of globalism. She has commended Trump on his “America First” motto, and explained that’s what the GOP really represents. In her interview with Breitbart, the conservative icon said she is hopeful of the future and believes Trump’s prowess and allegiance to the commonplace U.S. citizen will revive the Republican party. (For more from the author of “Conservative Icon Speaks out Against Paul Ryan” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

More Trump Turmoil, and More on Khan

Despite Donald Trump’s attempt at an “urgent pivot” away from his clash with the Khan family, his clash with the parents of the slain Muslim U.S. soldier continue to take a toll on the GOP nominee. Even Newt Gingrich, who many thought was an eyelash away from becoming Trump’s VP choice, told The Washington Post that Trump’s behavior this week is “unacceptable.”

It began last week at the Democratic National Convention, with a speech by Khizr Khan, father of a Muslim soldier killed in Iraq. Mr. Khan, a Pakistan-born Muslim, condemned Trump for his immigration stance, particularly his call to pause immigration from Muslim countries that are a hotbed for terrorism. At one moment in the speech, Khan asked Trump if he’d read the Constitution, offered Trump his copy, and insisted that the billionaire has “sacrificed nothing.”

Asked about the comments by George Stephanopoulos on ABC News’ This Week, Trump called their son a hero, but rather than leave it there, he suggested that Mr. Khan didn’t write the speech and perhaps Mrs. Khan couldn’t say anything because she was Muslim. That response — widely dubbed an “attack on a Gold Star family — has drawn a deluge of harsh criticism from military officials and media, pundits and politicians — even those from within the Republican Party. Sen. John McCain (AZ-R) said that Trump’s remarks “do not represent the views of our Republican Party, its officers or candidates.”

In separate statements, House Speaker Rep. Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell disagreed with Trump’s stance on Muslim immigration and described the Khans’ son as “selfless” and “brave.”

And Rich Lowry of the conservative National Review wrote, “It’s not that grief validates a particular point of view, or someone who has suffered a terrible loss should be above criticism. But the grieving mother or father deserves an extra measure of respect. This isn’t just Politics 101, but Decency 101.”

With less restraint, left-leaning outlets such as The Atlantic are breathlessly declaring Trump’s campaign in complete collapse while Vanity Fair predicts mass defections amid allegations that Trump campaign staffers are “suicidal.” On Thursday a group of military veterans will team with the left-wing activist group Moveon.org for a Capitol Hill rally to call on GOP leaders to withdraw their endorsements for Trump over the Khan affair.

One of Trump’s sons, Eric Trump, defended his father on CBS’s This Morning, insisting the reaction to the Khan comments are “blown hugely out of proportion.” He said his father’s stance on Muslims is “not an anti-Muslim message, it’s anti-terror message,” and that the GOP nominee is concerned about ISIS “running rampant in the world.”

Khizr Khan, Immigration Attorney

Meanwhile, more information has emerged about Khizr Khan’s ties to the DNC and exactly what he does for a living. As Breitbart reported Tuesday, Mr. Khan has removed his law firm’s website from the Internet, a law firm specializing in immigration and the acquiring of immigration visas, among other services. So, while nothing should take away from the Khan’s status as a Gold Star family, it is fair to observe that it was an immigration lawyer standing at a political convention blasting a candidate’s contrary immigration policies.

Also, Mr. Khan’s previous law firm, Hogan & Hartson (now Hogan Lovells) is the same powerful D.C. law firm that has worked on the Clintons’ tax filings since 2004 and patented the computer software that handled Hillary Clinton’s private email server. From 2002 through 2010 it was also the professional home of Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who did not prosecute Hillary Clinton over her failure to keep confidential emails and information secure.

Khan Coverage vs. Pat Smith Coverage
The wall-to-wall coverage of the Khans at the DNC Convention contrasts sharply with the lack of coverage given Pat Smith at the GOP Convention. Like the Khans she grieves. Smith’s son Sean was killed at Benghazi. Unlike the Khans, the candidate she opposes has a direct connection to the events that resulted in her son’s death, since Hillary was Secretary of State when the fatal embassy attack occurred.

Nonetheless, as Fox News reported, the Khans have received 40 times more coverage than Smith by mainstream media. And while Trump is roasted for his Sunday comments about the Khans, Clinton is receiving mostly a free pass for her comments the same day when she insisted once again that the grieving Smith misunderstood her when she spoke to families at the return ceremony after the Benghazi attack. According to Hillary, when she met with them at the ceremony she did not in fact blame the attacks on a YouTube video.

Unfortunately for Clinton, the Khan uproar brought Charles Woods, the father of Navy SEAL Ty Woods, back into the public eye. In appearances on CNN and Fox News, Mr. Woods read from his diary of that day at Joint Base Andrews, scribbled down shortly after meeting the Secretary of State.

“I gave Hillary a hug and shook her hand,” he read, “And she said we are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of my son.’”

When asked if he thought Trump should apologize to Khan, Woods said, “I know who should apologize, and that would be Hillary Clinton, for lying to the American families who lost their loved ones, as well as to the American public.” (For more from the author of “More Trump Turmoil, and More on Khan” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

New Information on Khizr Khan Sheds Light on His Opposition to Trump

Featured at the Democratic National Convention as an ardent critic of Donald Trump, Khizr Khan — the father of a Muslim-American U.S. soldier killed in Iraq — has been hailed as a hero as he continues to speak out against the Republican presidential nominee.

However, details about Khan’s background are emerging that might at least partially explain the motivation behind his dislike of Trump, the Washington Times reports.

According to his website, Khan — an immigration lawyer — helps clients gain E-2 and EB-5 visas, which provide green cards to foreign investors along with their families. Yet this particular visa program is highly controversial and has been accused of allowing foreigners to buy residency.

“The E-2 and EB-5 are two of the most notoriously abused visa categories that essentially allow wealthy foreigners to buy their way to U.S. residency, and possibly citizenship, with a relatively modest investment,” said Jessica Vaughan, policy director for the Center of Immigration Studies.

“The EB-5 is literally a ‘citizenship for sale’ program in which a visa for a whole family can be bought for as little $500,000. … It’s an amazing deal. Compared to other countries, America is the Walmart of investor visa programs,” she added.

In exchange for their $500,000 investment, immigrants who opt for this program receive green cards for themselves, their spouses and all of their children under the age of 21.

In addition to complaints about the pay-to-play nature of these visas, there have also been instances where immigrant investors are scammed out of their money.

While there is no indication that Khan has been involved in any shady business dealings, some individuals might see Trump’s stance on immigration as a threat to such lawyers, who undoubtedly stand to profit from our current immigration system.

Furthermore, Khan’s background in Islamic law has raised several questions pertaining to his ideological motivations. Writing in 1983 for the Houston Journal of International Law, Khan said that all judicial systems must be subordinate to Sharia law, otherwise known as Islamic law.

“All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims,” wrote Khan in his work, “Juristic Classification Of Islamic Law.”

In other words, all legal systems and juridical works should be open to reconsideration by Muslims and must be subordinate to the law of Islam, including the U.S. Constitution.

To make matters worse, Khan credits Said Ramadan — the head of the Islamic Center in Geneva and a major figure within the Muslim Brotherhood — as a contributor to his writings.

Considering this background, it is interesting that he would question Trump’s support for, or knowledge of, the Constitution. (For more from the author of “New Information on Khizr Khan Sheds Light on His Opposition to Trump” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Will Not Endorse Two Major Republicans for Reelection

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump announced Tuesday that he has not yet decided whether he will endorse House Speaker Paul Ryan in his bid for re-election.

During an interview, Trump said, “I like Paul, but these are horrible times for our country. We need…very, very strong leadership. And I’m just not quite there yet…”

His statement seemed to intentionally mimic Ryan himself who once said he was “just not ready” to endorse Trump.

In the Wisconsin election scheduled for August 9, Ryan is fighting to retain his seat in the House against his opponent, Paul Nehlen.

Trump has commended Nehlen for running “a very good campaign,” but says that, as for endorsing Ryan, he is “giving it very serious consideration.”

The decision by Trump to withhold his support from Ryan has been called “an extraordinary breach of political decorum,” and is further evidence the Republican Party still lacks unity.

Ryan withheld his endorsement of Trump until June, when he was named the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.

A few weeks prior to Ryan announcing his endorsement, Ryan spoke to CNN’s Jake Tapper and said he was not ready to give Trump his support.

The two men have found themselves on opposite sides of several issues recently.

Ryan criticized Trump for remarks he made about Khizr and Ghazala Khan, whose son, U.S. Army Captain Humayun Khan, was killed in service to his country.

Calling Captain Khan a brave example of the sacrifice made by many Muslim Americans, Ryan said, “His sacrifice — and that of Khizr and Ghazala Khan — should always be honored. Period.”

Ryan’s spokesman Zack Roday issued a statement which said, “Neither Speaker Ryan nor anyone on his team has ever asked for Donald Trump’s endorsement. And we are confident in a victory next week regardless.”

Another top Republican is also lacking a Trump endorsement.

Senator John McCain, R-Ariz, issued a statement Monday, in which he too rebuked Trump for his remarks about the Khans.

Responding to McCain’s statement, Trump said, “I haven’t endorsed John McCain.”

Trump asserts he takes issue with McCain because of his failure to do more for veterans. Trump said, “He has not done a good job for the vets and I’ve always felt that he should have done a much better job for the vets…. They’re not being treated fairly.”

McCain has not responded to Trump’s remarks. (For more from the author of “Trump Will Not Endorse Two Major Republicans for Reelection” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Say What? After Trump Has Crying Infant Removed, Planned Parenthood Says Babies Are Welcomed at His Rallies

Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the United States, chastised Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump for booting a wailing infant from a Virginia rally Tuesday. Trump, not one to suffer interruptions during his rallies, initially acknowledged the outburst with grace. “I love babies,” he said. “I hear that baby crying, I like it.”

“What a baby. What a beautiful baby, don’t worry,” he continued.

His patience was exhausted in short order.

“Actually, I was only kidding, you can get the baby out of here,” he said moments later. “I think she really believed me that I love having a baby crying while I’m speaking,” he added.

(Read more from “Say What? After Trump Has Crying Infant Removed, Planned Parenthood Says Babies Are Welcomed at His Rallies” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

‘Careless’ Purple Heart Remarks Put Trump in Hot Water With Veterans

Republican nominee for president Donald Trump has upset several United States military veterans with comments he made Tuesday, seemingly joking about earning a Purple Heart.

Speaking at a rally in Virginia, Mr. Trump announced that a veteran had given him his Purple Heart as a gift. Trump said “I always wanted to get the Purple Heart. This was much easier.”

The Purple Heart is a United States military decoration awarded in the name of the president to those wounded or killed while serving with the U.S. military.

Trump’s comments, which seem to make light of the sacrifice involved in earning that decoration, have upset several veterans who did not take kindly to Mr. Trump’s remarks.

One veteran took special offense at the fact that Mr. Trump had the opportunity to join the armed forces repeatedly and yet deferred the draft five times.

“Obviously he didn’t ‘always want a purple heart’ or he wouldn’t have deferred his draft multiple times over and over rather than heading into the service when his country needed him,” Mohammed M. Shaker, told Conservative Review in reference to Trump’s comments.

Shaker is the chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus of Tampa Bay and a veteran of OIF 09-10 with the 82nd Airborne Division. He served as a specialist, combat medic.

“Here’s the thing,” Shaker said. “It isn’t fun getting a purple heart. Nobody wants a purple heart. Purple hearts are awarded posthumously and awarded to servicemen whom have lost life, limb, or eye sight. Even mental capacity.”

“Sure it’s easy some dude gave him a purple heart and I can respect that but that doesn’t mean other veterans and their families see his comments as a matter of being funny,” Shaker continued. “If he wanted one that badly they cost about $35 at Amazon or any Army Navy store.”

Conservative writer and one-time speculative independent candidate for president David French, who is also an Iraq War veteran and Bronze Star recipient, had a more cynical take on Trump’s comments. He suggested that Mr. Trump was not aware of what it meant to earn the Purple Heart.

Trump’s comments about the Purple Heart follow a controversy that emerged over the weekend in which Mr. Trump criticized the Muslim parents of a decorated American soldier that was killed in Iraq after they spoke at the Democratic National Convention and condemned Mr. Trump’s negative rhetoric concerning Muslim-Americans.

For a candidate who repeatedly assures voters that he’ll take care of veterans and who brags about all the money he’s raised for veterans’ groups, comments like those made Tuesday run the risk of alienating veterans and voters who strongly support them.

In the 2008 presidential election, 54% of veterans and those that were currently serving in the military at the time voted for the Republican candidate. In 2012, 59% of those voters went to the Republican ticket.

Donald Trump is currently under-performing in the polls with demographics Republican candidates historically need to win. He’s on track to be the first Republican candidate to lose white college graduates in 60 years. His favorability is underwater with women, with Latino voters, and he is losing Catholics. He cannot expect to win the election if he loses veterans and active military personnel as well.

So what can he do to improve his standing with veterans? Shaker suggested that Mr. Trump should use a little more tact when he speaks rather than always trying to be the entertainer and the showman. “If I was in the position to actually say something, I would say to use a little more tact when referring to something like the Purple Heart, especially so carelessly,” he told Conservative Review.

“He may see it as funny and so many his supporters in that room,” he added. “But the guy in the wheelchair probably doesn’t think it’s funny.” (For more from the author of “‘Careless’ Purple Heart Remarks Put Trump in Hot Water With Veterans” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Makes Ominous Prediction About November Vote

In his latest expression of the odds he sees against him, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said Monday he has concerns about the integrity of this fall’s presidential election.

“I’m afraid the election’s going to be rigged, I have to be honest,” Trump told a crowd in Columbus, Ohio, during a campaign appearance. He did not go into detail.

Complaints about a “rigged system” have been a feature of Trump’s campaign, targeting first the Republican establishment and later the efforts of the Democratic Party to hamstring the campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

“We’ll will never be able to fix a rigged system by counting on the same people who have rigged it in the first place,” Trump said in a June speech. “The insiders wrote the rules of the game to keep themselves in power and in the money. That’s why we’re asking Bernie Sanders’ voters to join our movement: so together we can fix the system for all Americans. So important. This includes fixing all of our many disastrous trade deals. … Because it’s not just the political system that’s rigged, it’s the whole economy. It’s rigged by big donors who want to keep wages down. It’s rigged by big businesses who want to leave our country, fire our workers, and sell their products back into the United States with absolutely no consequences for them. It’s rigged by bureaucrats who are trapping kids in failing schools. It’s rigged against you, the American people.”

As for the impact of the “rigged” system on the election, Trump supporter Roger Stone has said voter fraud is “widespread” and that if Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton wins a state like Florida after polls show Trump in the lead, the election would be “illegitimate.”

“If there’s voter fraud, this election will be illegitimate, the election of the winner will be illegitimate, we will have a constitutional crisis, widespread civil disobedience, and the government will no longer be the government,” Stone said. He also promised a “bloodbath” if the Democrats attempt to “steal” the election.

During Trump’s Columbus appearance on Monday, he focused on the economy.

“They call it the Rust Belt for a reason: because everything is rusting and rotting,” Trump said. “They’ve lost their jobs, they’re moving to Mexico.

He said that if elected, he would end the cycle of companies that move U.S. jobs to Mexico.

“If you leave Ohio, you’re not going to make your product and sell it back to Ohio . … You’re going to have a tax to pay,” Trump said. (For more from the author of “Trump Makes Ominous Prediction About November Vote” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

A Marine Veteran’s Open Letter to Trump Critic Khizr Khan

Dear Mr. Khan,

I want to preface this letter by stating that I respect your son’s sacrifice for this great nation. By all accounts, he is a true hero that sacrificed himself in service to our country. For that I am thankful.

As a veteran, I watched your comments at the Democratic National Convention with a mixture of sadness, and anger. The United States has a military comprised of volunteers. Every single member has made the conscious choice to join the military and serve. There is not a single service member who has been forced into service. It is important for all service members (and apparently, their families) to understand that service to this great nation does not imbue one with special privileges or rights. I found your comments troubling when you said: “Have you ever been to Arlington cemetery? Go look at the graves of brave patriots who died defending the United States of America. You will see all faiths, genders and ethnicities. You have sacrificed nothing and no one.”

Does it matter whether Mr. Trump has sacrificed “…nothing and no one?”…has Ms. Clinton “..sacrificed” for this nation? How about Mr. Obama? Your comment stating that Mr. Trump “…has sacrifice no one” is alarming. Are you intimating that YOU sacrificed? Sir, your son willingly sacrificed himself. As a father I cannot imagine the pain you must feel but his sacrifice is his own. He was not forced to serve.

I am troubled that you would allow a party that has little more than contempt for the US Service Member to parade you into the DNC to denounce Donald Trump. Did you watch when protesters at the DNC booed and heckled Medal of Honor recipient Capt. Florent Groberg? Did you notice your party interrupting the moment of silence for slain police officers? Your own hypocrisy in not denouncing these acts and instead using the DNC as a platform to make a political point is disgraceful. The simple fact is that whether one served or sacrificed does not give greater power to their statements. One vote is as valuable as another. That sir, is why our Country is great. Your condemnation of one person for a statement while standing idly as your party disparages veterans and police officers is the height of hypocrisy.

To conflate the need to prevent potential terrorists from entering our country with the belief that ‘all Muslims’ should be banned is simply wrong and disingenuous. As a reminder, Mr. Trump said: ” “Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life,” The irony of your son’s own death at the hands of these very people in Iraq should not be ignored. I have little doubt that your son would have recognized the need to protect our country from these very people. In fact, he held is own troops back so that he could check on a suspicious car. Your son understood sacrifice and how to protect “his people”…’his soldiers’….’his fellow Americans’…

As you continue to make the media circuit and bask in the glow of affection cast upon you by a party that has little regard for your son’s own sacrifice, and veterans in general, I would ask you to consider your comments and your position more closely.

Respectfully,

Chris Mark

US Marine and Navy Veteran.

(“A Marine Veteran’s Open Letter to Trump Critic Khizr Khan” originally posted HERE)

_________________________________________

Lewandowski: Khans’ Son Would Be Alive If Trump Had Been President

By Sandy Fitzgerald. A Gold Star Muslim couple’s son, who was killed in military action 12 years ago, would not have lost his life if Donald Trump had been president at the time, former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski argued Monday in a heated exchange on CNN.

“Their son is a hero, and every person who’s ever died fighting for our country and their families are heroes,” Lewandowski said in the segment, aired as a discussion after the couple, Khizr Khan and his wife, Ghazala, wrapped up an interview minutes before. “The difference is we’ve got 7,000 soldiers who have died, $6 trillion wasted in wars overseas that if Donald Trump was the president, we would never have had. And Captain Khan would be alive today” . . .

Trump has come under fire by Democrats and Republicans alike for his criticism of the Khans, who took the stage at the Democratic National Convention last week. Khizr Khan delivered a stinging indictment of Trump’s calls against Muslim immigration as his wife silently stood at his side. Trump criticized Ghazala Khan for her silence and questioned if she was allowed to speak. (Read more from “Lewandowski: Khans’ Son Would Be Alive If Trump Had Been President” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.