Posts

The Latest: Neighbors Say London Attacker Tried to Radicalize Kids

Neighbors of one of the dead suspects in the London Bridge attacks say he was trying to radicalize young people, and that they reported him to police.

Jibril Palomba said he and his wife worried because the man, whom they knew as Abu Mohammed and recognized in photos of the attack, gave their children candy and preached about Islam. Erica Gasparri said she also saw him and two other men proselytizing outside a school.

Another neighbor, Michael Mimbo, said the van later used to ram pedestrians on the bridge was blocking the road at the suspect’s housing complex on Friday. The next day, Mimbo says that same van sped erratically down the street. (Read more from “The Latest: Neighbors Say London Attacker Tried to Radicalize Kids” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Syria Activists Say Founder of ISIS’ Aamaq Killed in Airstrike

The founder of the Islamic State group news agency was reportedly killed in an airstrike in eastern Syria, activists and his brother said.

The militant group itself has not reported the death of the founder of Aamaq news agency, Baraa Kadek.

But his brother, Hozaifa, posted on his Facebook that Kadek and his young daughter were killed in an airstrike in Mayadeen town in Deir el-Zour province. (Read more from “Syria Activists Say Founder of ISIS’ Aamaq Killed in Airstrike” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Does Kathy Griffin Want to Join ISIS?

These are confusing times. If there’s a memo which explains what it’s safe to think and say nowadays, I didn’t get it. Neither may have many of you. So I decided to write one, which lays out the basic, unquestionable facts of life in 2017:

Islam is a religion of peace, and if you say otherwise, Muslims will kill you.

Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. Don’t deny that, you’ll just provoke them!

Feminism is for female empowerment. Except when it runs interference for polygamous sheiks who favor female genital mutilation and the torture of rape victims. But, on everything else, it’s solid.

The left supports equality and opposes all exclusion. Except when they want all-female movie screenings and all-black dorms. But your Christian college had better have a gay activist group on campus, or else.

Liberals favor freedom. Except when you offend them, they’ll try to wreck your career and maybe put you in prison.

Progressives want democracy. But if you elect someone they disapprove of, they will fantasize about overthrowing the government, removing the president over fake scandals, or just outright murdering the guy.

We learned the last item on this list first from Rosie O’Donnell, who greeted the inauguration of Donald Trump by calling for a military coup, as we reported here at The Stream.

Kathy Griffin Auditions for ISIS

But we didn’t really know what it meant until today, when comedienne Kathy Griffin released an ISIS-style beheading selfie. She was holding the blood-soaked head of the president of the United States by the hair.

What can we really say to this? It’s probably illegal, but it’s doubtful that the feds will prosecute her. That’s exactly what she’s hoping will happen, to make her a martyr for free speech or something. Because it’s okay to urge violence against the president. That’s completely covered by the First Amendment. What isn’t covered is teaching divergent political opinions in college courses. Because that could “trigger” students and make them feel unsafe.

You know who should be most offended by Griffin’s stunt? Not Donald Trump. Not even his voters, though Griffin is proving her scorn for half of America. The half that has never heard of her, by the way. Those who should be most upset, I’d say were the survivors of ISIS’s actual victims. You know, the Christians who were in fact beheaded by the group whom Obama dismissed as the “JV team” of terror. And the families of anyone else who was beheaded by terrorists. John Podhoretz pointed this out on Twitter:

To the survivors of those who died in this particularly gruesome way, this stunt is just as funny as those sick Alt-Right cartoons picturing American Jews in ovens. Both were equally squalid and stupid.

That Moment in the Exorcism

Is there something deep and dark in the soul of the cultural left that is finally crawling out to see the light of day?

When Katy Perry isn’t mindlessly calling for peace love and brotherhood as the answer to Muslim slaughter bombings of schoolgirls, she’s releasing cannibalistic fetish videos [WARNING: Vile, graphic content].

When Planned Parenthood isn’t telling pregnant women who want pre-natal care to go look for it on Google, its representatives are joking about the butchered parts of babies. It doesn’t seem too far-fetched to say of our culture that this is the moment in the exorcism when the head starts to spin around. How ironic is it that “baby-Christian” Donald Trump was the man who has provoked all this! God works in funny ways.

The Left’s Campaign of Terror

Or maybe it’s not demonic. Wielding Occam’s Razor, we don’t absolutely need a preternatural explanation for the devilish ways of the left. There’s political theory here that could go some way toward explaining what we see. The left was savagely disappointed in the defeat of Hillary Clinton. They saw her chance to pack the courts and spur the federal Leviathan as a golden opportunity to silence Christians forever — while flooding the country with new natural Democratic voters. They came so achingly close to sealing the deal that they can taste it. So they flail around for scapegoats:

James Comey sandbagged us.

Half of Americans are racists.

The Russians hacked Vermont’s voting machines.

The Russians hacked our brains using Wikileaks.

Unable to contain their impotent rage, many leftists have decided on a course of “resistance.” That means pulling out every stop, breaking every rule, abandoning every previous standard of decency. The goal? To create or simulate a national crisis, and call into question the legitimacy of our government. Political scientist Thomas Molnar called such a strategy “cultural terrorism.” See my January column explaining this theory in detail.

The power of this strategy is that it feeds on our very outrage. The more people who thunder about Kathy Griffin’s vile stunt, the better she likes it (though of course she’ll officially apologize). She and her allies want to produce division, rage, and extremist counter-stunts. That helps bring on the crisis in which they believe they will be the winners.

Much better, I think, to meet this desperate cry for Botox on the part of a D-list celebrity with the emotion it truly deserves. Good, healthy scorn. Along those lines, my favorite reaction to Griffin was that of provocateur Gavin Macinnes:

The devil can bear many things. He can’t abide being mocked. So said St. Thomas More. (For more from the author of “Does Kathy Griffin Want to Join ISIS?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Merkel: Germany Won’t Step up Fight Against ISIS Even If NATO Does

German Chancellor Angela Merkel does not plan on increasing the country’s commitment to the fight against the Islamic State even if NATO increases its commitment to the fight, she declared Thursday.

Merkel appeared with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg who has indicated he is amenable to President Donald Trump’s insistence that the alliance increase its commitment to the U.S. led anti-ISIS effort.

Trump pushed Stoltenberg to “adapt to the challenges of the future” during his April 12 visit. “This includes upgrading NATO to focus on today’s most pressing security and all of its challenges, including migration and terrorism,” he continued.

NATO is reportedly considering establishing an office solely dedicated to counter-terrorism. NATO officials, however, are reluctant to commit to the post without agreement from allies that counter-terrorism should be a priority. They are also seeking extra funding for training initiatives.

“I want to state very clearly, that even if such a decision is made, it will not mean that any military activity that Germany currently carries out, for instance, AWACS surveillance will be expanded or something like that,” Merkel emphatically declared. Germany only contributed approximately 150 troops to the anti-ISIS mission to train, advise, and assist forces according to an August 2016 Congressional Research Service report. (Read more from “Merkel: Germany Won’t Step up Fight Against ISIS Even If NATO Does” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Man Who Was Beheaded the Day He Became a Christian

Most of us know the story of the 21 Coptic Christians from Egypt who held fast to their faith and were beheaded by ISIS in February, 2015. But did you know that only 20 of them were actually Copts from Egypt? Did you know that one of the martyrs was from Chad, and he had not been a Christian prior to the day of his beheading?

This story was previously reported. But I had not heard it before this week, when I attended the World Summit in Defense of Persecuted Christians hosted by the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. A Coptic leader shared this remarkable story. It’s yet another tribute to the faith of these martyred Copts.

“Their God is My God”

All 21 men had been working in Libya when they were kidnapped by ISIS. But as can be seen in pictures where they are lined up on the beach to be killed, one of them had darker skin and different facial features. This was the man from Chad.

The Coptic Christians were given a choice to deny Jesus or die. They refused to deny Him, knowing it would cost them their heads.

When the terrorists ordered the man from Chad to deny Jesus or die, he answered, “Their God is my God,” thereby sealing his fate.

That’s how moved he was by the faith of these Christians. Their refusal to deny their Savior, even at the point of death — literally, at the point of a knife to their throats — moved him to make a profession of faith, one that would cost him his head as well. Can we grasp the intensity of this story?

The man had not been a believer. All he had to say was, “I don’t believe in Jesus” or, “Jesus is not the Son of God,” and he could walk away a free man. He would be with his family again. He would not die a brutal death. He would live to see another day.

How many Christians would be sorely tempted under such circumstances? How many would waver and, for that moment, deny their Lord, just to avoid beheading? Yet this man, who had not been a follower of Jesus before then, was so moved by the dedication of these Christians that he became a believer on the spot.

“Go ahead and behead me,” he was saying. “Your god is not my God. Their God is my God.”

Power of the Gospel

That is the power of the gospel, and that is how we overcome Satan, by not loving our lives to the point of death (Revelation 12:11).

That is why this story needs to be told and retold until the faith of those martyrs becomes our faith, until people look at our lives and say, “Your God is my God, whatever may come my way.”

And here’s something striking. As I have listened this week to the stories of persecuted Christians, even hearing from family members of martyrs, I have not heard a word of self-pity. Not a word.

I have heard words of courage and dedication. I have heard words of great love for Jesus. I have heard requests for prayer and help. But I have not heard any self-pity.

The daughter of an Iranian pastor martyred 20 years ago spoke of her own life experience and of her father’s refusal to back down. Now, 20 years after her father was buried in an unmarked grave, she could speak of multiplied hundreds of thousands of Iranian Muslims coming to faith in Jesus. Her father’s blood was not shed in vain.

That is how a seed planted in the ground first dies and then produces much fruit (John 12:24-25).

A Syrian Christian leader shared how a radical Islamic group offered to arm them to fight against another radical Islamic faction. He replied, “We already have two arms, love and forgiveness. We don’t want to become another militia.”

That is how we overcome evil with good (Romans 12:21). Some Christians even said to ISIS, “Thank you for helping to unite us!”

We Are More Than Conquerors Through Christ

Yet it would be wrong to think of these suffering believers as super saints, which is another lesson for us all.

Most of them are just ordinary Christians, not preachers or pastors, and certainly not big-name evangelists. They are mothers and fathers, young people and old people, laborers and housewives, educated and uneducated. Yet they have remained faithful under hellish pressure, enduring unspeaking suffering.

Yet rather than curse God, they bless Him, and rather than retaliate against their enemies with hatred and vengeance, they offer forgiveness and love.

Earlier this year, a couple told me about their trip to Ethiopia where they met with family members of the Ethiopian Christians beheaded by ISIS. They spoke with the widow of one of the martyrs who was pregnant when he was killed, making his death even more painful.

But when they talked with this young woman, rather than bemoan her terrible loss, she said to them, “How is it that I had the privilege of being married to a martyr for Jesus?” She was an uneducated woman with no social status, and she was humbled beyond words that she was chosen to be the wife of a martyr.

This is why radical Islam will ultimately fall before the name of Jesus and why every other force that seeks to wipe out the Church will fail in the end. It’s also why we should stop feeling sorry for ourselves when things get a little rough. Are we not also more than conquerors through Him who loved us? (See Romans 8:37) (For more from the author of “The Man Who Was Beheaded the Day He Became a Christian” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Authorities Abandon Huge Refugee Camp After ISIS Cells Emerged

A gigantic refugee camp in Jordan has become an “imminent threat” after Islamic State cells started to emerge.

Some 80,000 people are trapped inside the Al Rukban refugee camp by the Syrian border after Jordanian military cut off humanitarian assistance last summer. ISIS militants at the camp “have whole weapons systems … small arms, RPGs, anti-aircraft,” Brig. Gen. Sami Kafawin of the Jordanian army told NBC News in an article published Monday.

“They consider the camp a safe haven. We consider it an imminent threat,” Kafawin told NBC News.

Authorities estimate as many as 4,000 residents, about 5 percent of the camp’s population, may be militants. The area has been struck by several attacks and almost daily gun battles after the government lost control, according to Kafawin.

The military abandoned the camp after seven border guards were killed and another 13 were wounded in an ISIS-claimed car bombing last June. (Read more from “Authorities Abandon Huge Refugee Camp After ISIS Cells Emerged” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

New Strategy Needed to Confront Islamist Threats in War of Ideas

Coming into office, President Donald Trump declared defeating and destroying ISIS to be his foreign policy top priority.

In contrast with the Obama administration, he had no hesitation defining precisely the root of the threat: Islamist terrorism—not vaguely phrased “violent extremism,” “workplace violence,” or “manmade contingencies.”

This definition of the threat also needs to come with a far more concise strategy to combat it. The shorthand for the Obama strategy was “CVE,” or “Countering Violent Extremism.”

Like the evasive title, this program failed. The United States continues to face terror attacks from radicalized individuals, such as last year’s Orlando nightclub massacre.

In a recent article for The National Interest, “Top 10 Ways to Make the War on the ‘War of Ideas,’” The Heritage Foundation’s James Carafano writes that “the new team in Washington needs to right-size the effort, making it complimentary with effective counterterrorism measures and U.S. strategy overseas.”

Carafano’s 10 points are:

1. Helping Americans understand the changing nature of the war. This could potentially occur through the creation of a 9/11-style commission to define the threat for this new era.

2. Do not allow efforts to be captured by ulterior motives. This happens when the perpetrators of violence are excused as victims, and therefore not to blame.

3. Focus on Islamist threats. The Islamist threat is a very specific and anti-democratic threat that cannot be countered with a generic counterterrorism approach.

4. Limit domestic programs and keep them modest in character. Overly broad programs to counter radicalization have failed in the past. For instance, one FBI anti-terror program in 2012 identified the real terror threat as right-wing terrorism, not Islamism.

5. Focus domestic programs on counterterrorism. Identify and hone in on individuals that pose potential threats, and prevent those individuals from successfully striking. Most domestic terrorists have been on law enforcement’s radar screen prior to attacking.

6. Make domestic programs bottom-up. Equip local communities and law enforcement to confront terrorism, instead of hoping that the federal government can handle the terror threat all by itself.

7. Emphasize support to the field in overseas programs. Again, local officials and political leaders will be far better equipped than central authorities to deal with radicalization on the ground in trouble spots.

8. End handouts that don’t deliver. No more government-funded conferences and meetings for ineffective NGOs, such as George Soros’ Open Society Foundations.

9. Avoid obsessing over social media. Social media is not itself the root cause of terror attacks. Social media is a contributing factor in radicalization that is most effective where there is already a local network to carry out attacks.

10. Drop the label. The Obama administration’s “Countering Violent Extremism” label is too vague. Islamist extremism represents a well-defined threat that we need to fight in the name of all that human decency and liberal democracy stand for.

An 11th point that should be added is the importance of information and communication in defeating the enemy.

For that, the United States government has powerful tools—in particular, the civilian entities of U.S. International Broadcasting under the Broadcasting Board of Governors.

These broadcasters are legitimate and important tools of U.S. foreign policy, and have been ever since they were created in World War II.

The U.S. government has devoted millions of dollars over the last 15 years toward expanding these broadcast services to the Middle East and Afghanistan, with varying degrees of success.

Networks that came from these efforts include the Middle East Broadcasting Network (which consists of Radio Sawa and Al Hurra Television), Voice of America’s Persian News Network, Radio Free Afghanistan, and Radio Farda (for Iran) produced by Radio Liberty in Munich.

The Trump team must now create a comprehensive broadcasting strategy to reach and inform audiences who are trapped behind enemy lines, often by autocratic Islamist regimes. This should become part of a clear, focused, and revitalized counterterrorism strategy. (For more from the author of “New Strategy Needed to Confront Islamist Threats in War of Ideas” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

This Republican Senator Pushes Congress for ISIS War Authorization

For political and practical reasons, lawmakers across the partisan divide have permitted President Barack Obama, and now, President Donald Trump, to carry out a bombing campaign against the ISIS without specific congressional approval.

More than 40 times in U.S. history, Congress has authorized the use of military force in the form of what’s known as an Authorization for Use of Military Force, or AUMF, which gives the basic legal authority for American military power against an enemy.

As Trump carries on where Obama left off, and promises to accelerate the fight against the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, in Iraq and Syria, some lawmakers who have long called for explicit congressional approval for this military campaign—but failed to inspire Congress to even take a vote—are making a strong push to revisit the issue.

“I believe it is long past time for Congress to pass and consider an AUMF for the fight against ISIS,” said Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., in a speech at The Heritage Foundation on Monday. “The Founders, in my view, intended—and the Constitution demands—that Congress play a decisive role in the decision go to war, not acting as a rubber stamp or passive observer. This failure by Congress to fulfill its constitutional authorities isn’t good for our country.”

Trump, like Obama before him, is operating the fight against ISIS under an existing 2001 AUMF permitting the targeting of groups connected to the 9/11 attacks and the 2012 AUMF authorizing the Iraq War.

Obama had encouraged Congress to authorize military force against ISIS, and even authored his own AUMF explicitly targeting ISIS for lawmakers to review.

Democrats and Republicans found different reasons to oppose Obama’s AUMF, which included limitations on the length of time the U.S. could fight ISIS—the measure would have expired in three years—and on the use of troops (“long-term, large-scale ground operations” were not permitted).

Many Republicans viewed this proposal as overly restrictive, and Democrats, meanwhile, saw it as not limiting enough.

Stephen Preston, the general counsel for the Department of Defense in the second term of the Obama administration, says the former president had the authority to prosecute the military campaign against ISIS using the old 2001 and 2012 AUMFs.

But Preston says he, on behalf of Obama, continued to push for a new ISIS-specific AUMF as a way for Congress to show the world that America is united in the fight against terrorism.

“I firmly thought then and now that it’s imperative for Congress to act to carry out its constitutional role to take this country to war,” said Preston, who also spoke at The Heritage Foundation event. “I feel this way not because [a new AUMF] is necessary to be lawful, but because it’s important in our democracy and government of shared powers for Congress to play its role. It’s important to show the men and women in uniform, and the American people, that the government is united in its support for the fight, and also to show our partners and our adversaries that this country and our government is united in the fight.”

In a sign that Congress may be ready to take a more active role, a new spending agreement to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year contains a clause providing an additional $2.5 billion in military spending if Trump delivers a plan on how to defeat ISIS.

Young, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has introduced a proposed AUMF that would also mandate the Trump administration to submit a “comprehensive strategy” to beat ISIS.

His AUMF would approve the use “of all necessary and appropriate force” against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, ISIS, associated forces, and “successor organizations.”

Young said he believes that Trump would be more likely than Obama to support a broader, more open-ended AUMF such as this.

Yet he recognizes potential opponents may seek stronger limitations—such as a sunset provision limiting the duration of military force—at a moment when Americans are weary of war.

“I struggled with this,” said Young, who served in the Navy and Marines. “The downside of a sunset [provision] is you allow the enemy to figure out when you will disengage. When America goes to war, it ought to win, so it’s important to give the commander in chief discretion in that area. On the other side, we need to avoid perpetual wars, and I believe we can avoid that by ensuring we have a robust strategy with sufficient congressional oversight.”

Charlie Savage, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist with The New York Times who has written extensively about the government’s power to prosecute war, shares Young’s optimism that a Republican-controlled Congress may be likelier to pursue an ISIS-specific AUMF under Trump.

But Savage, speaking at The Heritage Foundation event, argued that Congress has already harmed its reputation, and weakened its own powers, by not yet having authorized the ISIS fight.

“It seems like the conditions are there to clean this up, just because I don’t see where the opposition to [an ISIS AUMF] is organized in the sense that Obama won’t sign the bill,” Savage said. “Trump will sign the bill.”

“As time continues to pass, this is the opposite of urgency,” Savage added. “The damage is sort of done. At this point, it may be that the scab and the scar tissue has already formed. I am not quite sure what damage is being fixed as much today if this ever were to happen.” (For more from the author of “This Republican Senator Pushes Congress for ISIS War Authorization” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Let Slip the Hogs of War — Wild Pigs Thwart ISIS Ambush, Kill 3 Militants

Three Islamic State fighters were mauled to death by a pack of wild boar, reports U.K.’s The Times. Another 5 militants were also injured in the attack.

The men were said to be taking cover in a field as they set up an ambush for local tribesmen, local leaders said.

“It is likely their movement disturbed a herd of wild pigs, which inhabit the area as well as the nearby cornfields,” Sheikh Anwar al-Assi, a chief of the local Ubaid tribe and supervisor of anti-ISIS forces, told the Times. “The area is dense with reeds, which are good for hiding in.” (Read more from “Let Slip the Hogs of War — Wild Pigs Thwart ISIS Ambush, Kill 3 Militants” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

ISIS Starves Civilians to Force Them Into Fighting for the Caliphate

The Islamic State is withholding food and water from citizens in Mosul in an effort to force them into joining the terrorist organization, according to an Iraqi non-profit.

The beleaguered terrorist organization has suffered personnel and territory losses since the U.S.-backed Iraqi Security Forces began operations to retake Mosul in October. Combat operations in Mosul have led to intense, street-to-street fighting in the city’s western area. ISIS is now forcibly conscripting the thousands of locals who remain by withholding food and water, according to a report by the Iraqi Observatory for Human Rights.

“An infant and its sister [have] died last week in Uruba neighborhood due to lack of food,” the report stated. “Now their mother is facing the same fate as she is in a very bad health condition.”

Some local civilians have given into ISIS to survive.

A single hospital in Mosul has seen hundreds of cases of malnourished and dehydrated people, mostly children, a representative told the Observatory. (Read more from “ISIS Starves Civilians to Force Them Into Fighting for the Caliphate” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.