Posts

“We Know Their Names”: Epstein Survivors Vow to Make Their Own List

On September 3, 2025, survivors of Jeffrey Epstein held an emotional two‑hour news conference just outside the U.S. Capitol, calling for transparency, justice, and resolute action in the aftermath of their years of abuse. Many attendees spoke publicly for the first time, delivering deeply personal testimonies that revealed the harrowing world behind Epstein’s exploitation—and what they hope comes next.

Survivors described being duped as teenage masseuses into predatory environments. One recounted the chilling reality of being coached into the exploitative roles, while Haley Robson, appearing in media coverage earlier, revealed she was coerced into recruiting other teenage girls. Robson said she was paid per recruit, saying, “I was told it would be possibly in your bra and underwear, but it would just be a massage.”

Another survivor, Marina Lacerda—long identified as “minor victim one”—spoke about being lured under the guise of opportunity, only to be trapped in abuse that derailed her education and childhood.

For years, investigators have asserted that no formal “client list” of powerful individuals associated with Epstein exists. Yet survivors are now proactively taking matters into their own hands. At the press conference, Lisa Phillips—who runs a podcast for Epstein survivors—announced:

“We have been discussing creating our own list. We know the names… it will be done by survivors, for survivors. Stay tuned.”

Attorney Brad Edwards clarified that no official list was found in Epstein’s records, and emphasized that while survivors know who was in “his world,” any naming would come with serious legal risks. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene backed up survivors’ rights to hold their collaborators accountable; she offered to publicly read their list in Congress—protected by the Speech or Debate Clause, if given permission

Meanwhile, at a simultaneous White House event, President Trump dismissed the renewed focus on Epstein and the push for document transparency as a “Democrat hoax that never ends,” urging the public to shift attention to the “greatness of our country.”

Survivors were joined by bipartisan lawmakers—Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA)—to press for the release of all documents related to the Epstein and Maxwell case. They criticized the Justice Department’s recent release of over 30,000 pages as heavily redacted and largely redundant, with many key files still withheld.

Rep. Khanna framed the fight as fundamental to restoring trust: “A nation that allows rich and powerful men to traffic and abuse young girls without consequence… has lost its moral and spiritual core.”

Victims and families—including those of Virginia Giuffre, who died earlier this year—criticized Trump’s “hoax” characterization. Giuffre’s family called out the administration, insisting that the survivors’ demand for justice will not fade.

Survivors have clearly declared their intent: justice, truth, and closure. Whether through full governmental transparency or survivor‑led accountability, their resolve endures. The release—or potential disclosure—of the “client list” could reignite legal and political ramifications.

White House Warns GOP: Backing Epstein File Release Is ‘Hostile Act’ Against Trump

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said she got “a lot” of pushback from the White House over supporting a discharge petition aiming to force the administration to release all of the documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

“Oh, I got a lot of pushback. I got phone call after phone call last night. They didn’t want me to sign the discharge petition. They want to focus on the Oversight [Committee] investigation. They hate Thomas Massie more than they can hate any Democrat, which makes no sense to me. And they don’t want to work with Democrats at all,” Greene, an ally of President Trump, said during her Wednesday appearance on Real America’s Voice “Bolling!” . . .

Greene said Wednesday, “It’s not a hoax, because Jeffrey Epstein is a convicted pedophile. That takes away the whole hoax things. It’s not a hoax. It’s not a lie.” . . .

House GOP leadership is urging members not to sign on to the petition, which currently has the support of four Republican lawmakers, and to back the investigation done by the Oversight Committee. The panel released a large batch of files it received from the Justice Department after issuing a subpoena for materials related to Epstein. Democrats on the panel said most of the files have already been made public.

“Helping Thomas Massie and Liberal Democrats with their attention-seeking, while the DOJ is fully supporting a more comprehensive file release effort from the Oversight Committee, would be viewed as a very hostile act to the administration,” a White House official told multiple news outlets this week. (Read more from “White House Warns GOP: Backing Epstein File Release Is ‘Hostile Act’ Against Trump” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Trump Ties to Epstein Resurface: Survivor Calls Him Epstein’s “Biggest Brag” as GOP Rep Caught Saying He’s in the Files

Pressure continues to mount on Congress and the White House to release the full contents of the Jeffrey Epstein case files, as survivors, lawmakers, and even members of Donald Trump’s own party demand transparency about who was involved in the disgraced financier’s network.

At an emotional press conference on Capitol Hill, survivors of Epstein’s abuse — joined by family members of other victims and a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers — urged immediate passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which would compel the Department of Justice to make all Epstein-related records public.

One of the most striking moments came from Chauntae Davies, an Epstein survivor, who spoke directly about the late financier’s ties to prominent political figures — specifically naming President Donald Trump.

“Epstein had a free pass. He bragged about his powerful friends, including our current president, Donald Trump,” Davies said. “It was his biggest brag, actually.”

Davies went on to describe a framed photo of Epstein with Trump that reportedly sat on Epstein’s desk during her first visit to his Palm Beach estate. She added that both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell often boasted about their connections to influential men.

While Democrats are expected to unanimously support the transparency bill — introduced by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) — at least two more Republican signatures are still needed to force a vote through a discharge petition. So far, four Republicans, including Massie and Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Nancy Mace, and Lauren Boebert, have signed on.

But resistance from the White House and the Department of Justice has raised alarms. Despite prior commitments to transparency, the Biden-appointed DOJ has reportedly slow-walked the release of key documents, citing legal hurdles, and recently stated that no further information would be released — contradicting past statements by Attorney General Pam Bondi, who previously claimed the so-called “client list” was “on my desk.”

Survivors and lawmakers say this stonewalling is unacceptable.

“The American people deserve to know the full extent of Epstein’s network,” Massie said. “Sunlight is the best disinfectant — and we should not be shielding abusers or their enablers, no matter how powerful.”

The push for transparency has been complicated by the frequent invocation of Trump’s name — both by survivors and members of Congress. At a recent Muscogee County GOP meeting in Georgia, Rep. Mike Collins was caught on a hot mic suggesting that Trump may indeed appear in the files.

“He’s in there,” Collins said, later clarifying that he believes Trump was referenced because he had previously cooperated with the FBI and had banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago.

Collins, who is also a candidate for the U.S. Senate, doubled down on his support for full disclosure:

“We need to release it. I have no problem releasing it.”

News Conference With Epstein’s Victims Will Be ‘Explosive,’ Lawmaker Predicts

An upcoming news conference with victims of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein could be “explosive,” one of the congressmen pushing for full release of the files on Epstein predicts.

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-California, said the victims’ accounts will force lawmakers to vote on a bill requiring the Justice Department to release its files.

Khanna and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky – who are co-leading the effort − need 218 signatures to make that happen.

With all 212 Democrats backing the effort, only six Republicans need to sign on, Khanna said on NBC’s “Meet the Press with Kristen Welker.”

“What will be explosive is the September 3rd press conference that both of us are having with 10 Epstein victims, many who have never spoken out before,” Khanna said in remarks that aired Aug. 31. (Read more from “News Conference With Epstein’s Victims Will Be ‘Explosive,’ Lawmaker Predicts” HERE)

Epstein’s Secret “Birthday Book” Set to Expose Trump Note

The estate of Jeffrey Epstein has agreed to turn over a 2003 “birthday book” containing messages from high-profile individuals—including a reportedly explicit note from Donald Trump—as part of the House Oversight Committee’s expanding investigation, Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) confirmed Friday on MSNBC.

A subpoena issued by the committee’s Republican chairman, Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), tasks Epstein’s estate with delivering all entries from the leather-bound album assembled by Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein’s 50th birthday, as well as any associated documents such as client lists, financial records, and his will—all by September 8.

“The estate is actually going to now get us that book and a bunch of other documents that they have that’s actually not been reported yet,” Garcia said. “We’re gonna get those documents, as we understand it now, on Sept. 8. And so that will continue our investigation.”

The committee also seeks additional information from the Department of Justice after an unsigned memo indicated that no “client list” exists. Investigators view the birthday book as potentially critical evidence in uncovering Epstein’s network and how the case was managed by federal authorities.

The “birthday book” was first publicized in July 2025 when The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump’s message, reportedly illustrated and framed by the outline of a naked woman, closed with the line: “Happy Birthday—and may every day be another wonderful secret.” Trump has categorically denied authoring the note and has filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Journal and its parent company

Ghislaine Maxwell confirmed in DOJ interview transcripts that she assembled the book but could not recall who contributed to it.

The probe has intensified in recent months following an unsigned joint memo by the Justice Department and FBI announcing they would not release additional Epstein files. The decision triggered anger among Trump’s supporters and even criticism from within his own administration. On the campaign trail, Trump accused the government of concealing aspects of the Epstein case and promised transparency, though his critics argue little has been delivered.

Meanwhile, the scandal continues to entangle high-profile figures abroad. Emails reveal that Britain’s Prince Andrew stayed in contact with Epstein years longer than he previously admitted, even after Virginia Giuffre publicly accused both men of sex trafficking in 2015. In one email exchange from late 2015, Epstein told his longtime associate, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, that the Duke of York was the source of information about a potential business venture in China.

The correspondence casts further doubt on Andrew’s claim in his infamous BBC Newsnight interview that he last saw Epstein in December 2010. Records now suggest he maintained ties with Epstein well into 2015, including discussions of business opportunities and personal meetings.

Epstein and Barak had jointly invested millions in a security start-up, Reporty Homeland Security, and were exploring new ventures in Asia. In one striking email, Epstein wrote of “Weathy [sic] Chines [sic] looking for to start personel [sic] protection co in Beijing,” adding ominously that “kidnapping has begun.” Barak pressed back, asking Epstein where he obtained the information.

The revelations underscore the global breadth of Epstein’s influence and the expanding scope of the congressional inquiry. With the “birthday book” and new records set to be delivered by September 8, lawmakers say they are determined to uncover the full extent of Epstein’s network, and to ensure that the voices of survivors remain central to the investigation.

Ghislaine Maxwell Was Honored at Clinton Global Initiative Event Years After Sex Abuse Allegations Surfaced, Report Reveals

Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associate and convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell was celebrated at a prestigious Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) conference in September 2013—more than five years after allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation had first emerged against her, according to a new report from CNN.

Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence after her 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges, was publicly recognized at the 2013 CGI annual meeting as a “Commitment to Action” leader for her ocean conservation nonprofit, the TerraMar Project. Attendees told CNN that being acknowledged in this way was a “rare, prestigious” honor.

Allegations linking Maxwell to Epstein’s recruitment of underage girls had circulated since at least 2009. That same year, she was even served with a subpoena in lawsuits filed by 24 accusers as she exited a CGI event, according to Page Six. By 2011, Clinton staffers had reportedly barred her from official functions after extensive media scrutiny.

Despite that ban, CNN reports Maxwell was among a small group granted complimentary tickets to the 2013 conference—a perk so uncommon that one source said it likely required personal approval from either Bill or Hillary Clinton.

A Clinton spokesperson denied that the former president personally intervened on Maxwell’s behalf, stressing that hundreds of complimentary passes were distributed at the staff level that year.

“This is about someone working on ocean conservation attending a charitable conference 12 years ago, along with thousands of other people, and nothing more,” the spokesperson told CNN. “As we have consistently said, the Clintons know nothing about Jeffrey Epstein’s terrible crimes.”

The TerraMar Project shut down in 2019 following Epstein’s arrest on federal trafficking charges. Maxwell’s attorneys later cited her nonprofit work—and even claimed she had helped “launch” CGI—in an unsuccessful bid for leniency at her sentencing.

Maxwell’s ties to the Clintons, however, extend far beyond the 2013 CGI appearance. She and Epstein were photographed visiting the White House during Bill Clinton’s presidency in the 1990s, and flight logs show Clinton took at least 16 trips on Epstein’s private jet to international destinations where Maxwell was often present. Maxwell also maintained a personal friendship with Chelsea Clinton, vacationing with her in 2009 and attending her 2010 wedding.

In 2019, a Clinton family spokesperson told Vanity Fair that Chelsea and Maxwell had become “friendly” through a mutual friend, but insisted Chelsea had no knowledge of the accusations until years later.

The renewed scrutiny over Maxwell’s presence at CGI comes as the House Oversight Committee expands its probe into Epstein’s network of elite associates. Earlier this month, both Bill and Hillary Clinton were subpoenaed and are scheduled to testify under oath in October.

Judge Rejects Trump DOJ Bid to Unseal Epstein Grand Jury Transcript, Calls It a ‘Diversion’

A federal judge has rejected an effort by the Trump administration’s Department of Justice to unseal grand jury testimony related to Jeffrey Epstein, describing the request as a “diversion” from broader records in the government’s possession.

Judge Richard Berman, a Clinton appointee, issued a 14-page ruling on Wednesday denying the DOJ’s petition, which had been filed in July 2025 at the direction of President Donald Trump. The judge wrote that the transcript in question was “merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged conduct,” adding that the government itself should be responsible for making a more comprehensive disclosure of records tied to the Epstein case.

“The Government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein files,” Berman noted. “By comparison, the instant grand jury motion appears to be a ‘diversion’ from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government’s possession.”

The ruling follows two earlier rejections of attempts to unseal similar transcripts in both Epstein’s Florida proceedings and the Ghislaine Maxwell case.

Attorneys representing several Epstein victims raised objections to the DOJ’s approach, questioning whether proper notice and safeguards were provided. In an August 5 letter to Judge Berman, victims’ lawyers wrote that their clients felt “deep anxiety” about the adequacy of redactions. The attorneys criticized the government for failing to notify victims before moving to unseal the grand jury materials, a step they argued could compromise privacy and safety.

Berman echoed those concerns, noting that maintaining confidentiality in certain aspects of the case remains crucial to protecting individuals involved.

Meanwhile, congressional scrutiny of the Epstein files has intensified. House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer announced on August 5 that the DOJ would begin providing Epstein-related records to his committee by the end of that week, though the process of reviewing and redacting sensitive information would take time.

“There are many records in DOJ’s custody, and it will take the Department time to produce all the records and ensure the identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted,” Comer said in a statement, adding that he welcomed efforts by the Trump administration to promote transparency.

Why Did Trump Push for the Transcript?

The unusual element in this case remains the Trump administration’s decision to prioritize unsealing a single grand jury transcript rather than pursuing a broader release of Epstein-related files. Critics, including Judge Berman, have suggested the request distracted from a more comprehensive accounting of the government’s records.

The timing of the move also drew attention. Just days before the filing, a DOJ memo stating Epstein had no “client list” and died by suicide prompted frustration among Trump’s political base, who demanded fuller disclosure. Whether the push to unseal the transcript was motivated by those political pressures, or by a broader policy commitment to transparency, remains unclear.

Hunter Biden Refuses to Apologize After Melania Trump’s Billion-Dollar Lawsuit Threat

Hunter Biden is refusing to back down after first lady Melania Trump threatened him with a billion-dollar lawsuit over his comments linking her to deceased financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Appearing Thursday on Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan, Biden made clear he had no intention of retracting or apologizing for statements he previously made suggesting Epstein “introduced” Melania to Donald Trump.

“An apology from me is not going to happen,” Biden said bluntly on the program. “F*ck that.”

The first lady’s attorney, Alejandro Brito, sent Biden a letter on August 6 warning of legal action “for over $1 billion in damages” if the remarks were not deleted and a formal apology issued. Fox News reported that Biden was given the option of withdrawing his claims, but instead he doubled down.

Biden argued that his statements were based on reporting from journalists and authors, including Michael Wolff. He dismissed the letter from Trump’s legal team as “a distraction” from the children Epstein abused.

“I also think they’re bullies,” Biden said. “And they think that a billion dollars is going to scare me … If they want to sit down for a deposition and clarify the nature of the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein, if the president and the first lady want to do that, and all of the known associates around them at the time … I’m more than happy to provide them the platform.”

Biden’s combative response stands in sharp contrast to others who have received similar legal warnings from the first lady’s attorney. Democratic strategist James Carville said on an August 7 episode of his Politics War Room podcast that he had deleted a video referencing alleged Epstein ties after receiving a letter from Brito, in addition to issuing a retraction and apology.

The Daily Beast likewise issued a retraction and correction on July 30, walking back a story that had claimed the first lady was “very involved” with Epstein. An editor’s note cited Brito’s letter challenging the article’s headline and framing.

For now, Biden has made it clear he has no plans to follow suit.

Melania Trump Threatens $1B Lawsuit Against Hunter Biden Over Epstein Claim

First Lady Melania Trump has threatened legal action against Hunter Biden, demanding he retract comments linking her introduction to former President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein.

In an Aug. 6 demand letter obtained by Fox News, Melania’s attorney, Alejandro Brito, accused Biden of making “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory” statements during a recent appearance on the YouTube program Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan. Brito said the remarks caused “overwhelming financial and reputational harm” and warned that failure to retract them could lead to a lawsuit seeking more than $1 billion in damages.

According to Brito, Biden claimed in the interview that Epstein introduced Melania to Donald Trump, citing allegations from author Michael Wolff. The attorney described Wolff as a “serial fabulist” and asserted the claim was untrue. Biden also commented on “connections” between figures in Epstein’s network, which Brito characterized as baseless.

The letter was sent to both Biden and his attorney, Abbe Lowell, and calls for an immediate public retraction.

Photo credit: Flickr

Jeffrey Epstein IDF Sweatshirt Photo Sparks Mossad Connection Theories; Former Butler Speaks Out

A newly surfaced photograph of Jeffrey Epstein wearing an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) sweatshirt is reigniting speculation about the disgraced financier’s alleged ties to Israeli intelligence. The image—taken just months before his arrest in 2019—shows Epstein smiling aboard his private jet, a relaxed pose that sharply contrasts with the serious questions it raises. For years, rumors have swirled that Epstein may have worked with Mossad, Israel’s intelligence agency, a claim he reportedly laughed off.

The image, shared by Epstein’s longtime Paris butler Valdson Vieira Cotrin, was reportedly taken aboard Epstein’s private jet in January 2019. In the picture, Epstein appears relaxed, smiling, and noticeably puffy-faced. Cotrin, who worked for Epstein for 18 years as butler, chauffeur, and cook, claims it may be one of the last photographs of him before his arrest on July 6, 2019.

Cotrin, speaking to The Telegraph, insisted he did not believe Epstein died by suicide, stating his former employer “loved life too much” and was confident about securing bail before his death in August 2019. The butler also expressed fear for his own safety and suggested foul play in the April 2024 death of Virginia Giuffre, who had accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault. Authorities ruled Giuffre’s death a suicide.

In the same interview, Cotrin claimed that Epstein told him in 2016 he had been offered a position in Donald Trump’s first administration but declined. There is no evidence supporting the claim, and Trump has said he severed ties with Epstein in 2004 after a business dispute.

Cotrin remains in possession of multiple photographs with Epstein’s associates, including a shot of himself with former President Bill Clinton aboard Epstein’s notorious “Lolita Express,” the private plane prosecutors say was used to traffic underage girls.

The renewed attention to the IDF sweatshirt photo comes as pressure mounts on the Trump administration to make the Epstein files public.