Posts

Joe Miller To Give Keynote Address at Nevada GOP Unity Dinner

joe_miller (1)Joe Miller will be the keynote speaker at this year’s annual Nevada Republican Party’s Unity Dinner in Las Vegas. The event will take place on Saturday, September 28th following the GOP’s Fall State Committee meeting.

Miller stated, “I am honored to be asked to speak at this year’s Nevada GOP Unity Dinner.” He added, “One common, though not unchangeable trait, Nevada and Alaska share is that the majority of each state’s land is currently held by the federal government.”

An astounding 69.1 percent of Alaska’s land falls under federal ownership, second only to Nevada at 84.5 percent. Miller noted, “For some years now, both as a matter of justice and for the purpose of creating economic growth and job creation, I have advocated the need to return ownership of much of the land to the states and the people where it belongs. The states and the people formed the federal government and not the other way around.”

Miller plans to address this vital issue, as well as what actions he feels are needed to return our constitutional republic to its strong moorings and revive the America dream for ourselves and future generations.

Nevada National Committeeman James Smack said of the event, “It is an honor and a pleasure to host Joe Miller and his wife Kathleen for our Nevada Republican Party Unity Dinner in Las Vegas on September 28th.  Mr. Miller represents the principles that Nevada Republicans expect from their candidates, highlighted by smaller government, lower taxes and personal responsibility.  I look forward to hearing his message and encourage my fellow Republicans to join me in welcoming Joe Miller to the Silver State!” James Smack, Republican National Committeeman for Nevada.

More information and tickets for the event are available HERE.

Joe Miller Moves Forward With Senate Bid, Appears on Cavuto (+video)

Tea party favorite Joe Miller has filed Federal Election Commission papers to challenge incumbent Sen. Mark Begich, one of several sitting Democrats seen as vulnerable by the GOP.

“Support from the grass roots has been overwhelmingly positive, and we are moving forward within those guidelines organizing, fundraising, and coordinating with our volunteer base,” Mr. Miller said in a statement when Politico.com broke the news Tuesday.

Miller is best known for challenging incumbent Republican US Sen. Lisa Murkowski in 2010. With the backing of national tea party groups and Sarah Palin, he beat Senator Murkowski in the GOP primary by 2,006 votes out of 109,750 cast.

But Murkowski, a moderate Republican, came back to wage a write-in campaign backed by native corporations, political action committees, and some unions, dashing Miller’s hopes and holding onto her seat – the first time in more than 50 years that a US Senate candidate had won a write-in campaign.

Miller did not go down without a fight, however, challenging the election results up the Alaska state court system until a federal judge finally dismissed Miller’s suit and Murkowski was certified as the winner two months later.

Read more from this story HERE.

Miller Responds to Press on Senate Filing

Fairbanks, AK – Joe Miller today responded to press inquiries about his filing to run for US Senate, the complexities of FEC law, and the status of his candidacy.

“On May 2nd, 2013, we filed paperwork with the Secretary of the Senate expressing an intent to run for US Senate in 2014,” Miller said. “The complexities of the law require filing after expenditures exceed $5,000, or when certain fund-raising or campaign activities are commenced. Support from the grassroots has been overwhelmingly positive, and we are moving forward within those guidelines organizing, fund-raising and coordinating with our volunteer base.”

Though an official announcement has not been made to date, the Citizens for Joe Miller committee has engaged in a thorough deliberative process and will notify our supporters and the press at such time as we have an official announcement to make.

Judge Shafts Joe Miller in FNSB Case

Photo Credit: KTUUIn yet another dubious move by the Alaska Court System, Judge Stephanie Joannides awarded the news blog Alaska Dispatch an inordinate sum totaling almost 100K in legal fees from the Miller v. FNSB court case. Joe Miller was ordered to pay 85K, this despite the fact that the majority of the fees were billed either before Miller intervened in the case or after they were a relevant party to the case.

The Alaska Dispatch remained party to the case long after the Anchorage Daily News and Fairbanks Daily News-Miner reasonably withdrew, and had agreed not to petition the court for legal fees.

To any remotely objective observer, the Dispatch had no legitimate reason to remain party to the case outside of the source material they may have been able to gain through first-hand observation of the Borough depositions, a raw profit motive, or perhaps prurient interest.

In fact, Dispatch attorneys even admitted that they had no reason to be in the case, given that Mr. Miller had filed no action against them. Yet they still sought fees long after the case was decided in their favor, and from actions they had unilaterally undertaken, dating all the way back to Sept. 2010, weeks before Miller intervened in the case.

How is Miller responsible for expenses accrued by the Dispatch’s lawsuit against the Borough before he chose to intervene? Or for the debts accumulated long after they ceased to be a relevant party to the case?

Following is the breakdown of the fee schedule stated in Mr. Miller’s appeal:

“According to Alaska Dispatch’s counsel, he billed 123.1 hours of attorney’s fees from September 9, 2010 through October 19, 2010, when Mr. Miller intervened in this lawsuit; 34.6 hours from October 20, 2010 through October 26, 2010, when Alaska Dispatch obtained its relief; and 291 hours after October 27, 2010, while the cross-claims and third-party claim between Mr. Miller and FNSB/Whitaker were being litigated.”

Equally troubling is how Judge Joannides was assigned to the case in the first place, and subsequent revelations that she had a financial relationship with a Dispatch employee.

Under normal circumstances a judge would be assigned through a random selection process. However, in the FNSB case, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court intervened and hand-picked Judge Joannides. This is a very rare move, perhaps unprecedented outside of this particular case.

Moreover, Judge Joannides had rented her basement apartment to an Alaska Dispatch employee, but claimed that the fact was irrelevant to the case. This begs the question of whether it was a random coincidence. Does the Judge have further relationships with other folks at the Dispatch?

_____________________________________

Tom is author of the blog ‘It’s a Kwazy Life: Analyzing the Sanity in Politics That Control Our Lives’ and is also a Construction worker in Anchorage Alaska. This story first appeared at his blog HERE.

Alaska Conservatives Respond After IRS Commissioner Ousted (+video)

The head of the Internal Revenue Service was ousted amidst controversy that the agency had targeted certain political groups. According to the U.S. Treasury, the IRS delayed processing applications for groups tea party-affiliated groups. Those groups are already very critical of the federal government. Those CBS 11 talked to say firing the head of the agency does little to ease their fears about federal bias.

Since 2010, the Treasury Inspector General said, the IRS has not been fair in processing applications from certain groups seeking tax-exempt status. President Barack Obama addressed Americans in a press conference where he called the scandal an “outrage.”

He announced the resignation of acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller, but former Alaska tea party candidate Joe Miller said that’s not enough. “The people that made that decision, they need to be prosecuted. The house needs to be cleaned. The IRS [needs] to make sure this doesn’t happen again.”

Mark Fish is one of the founding members of Alaska’s tea party movement. He said government scrutiny is exactly why his tea party group in Alaska opted not to file tor tax exempt status. “You know, with current events, it looks like some of those fears have been founded.”

Read more from this story HERE.

Justice Department Subpoenas of AP Phone Records Unites Left, Right in Opposition to ‘Big Brother’

Photo Credit: J. Scott ApplewhiteThe revelation that the U.S. government used secret subpoenas to pry into Associated Press reporters’ phone records triggered two contradictory reactions in the political world.

“What the subpoenas did was remind the left that the right has reasons to fear big government and remind the right and left of the objectives they share politically,” said Joe Miller, the Alaska conservative who was the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate last year.

For conservatives, the phone-records story fortified their fear that, despite the best of intentions, government by its nature will tend to erode the freedom of the individual — and almost always in the name of protecting the collective good.

That conservative fear is one that liberals tend to regard as verging on paranoia.

Yet this latest Justice Department action — an action that for many on the right confirms long-held concerns about big government — is also, paradoxically, bringing conservatives and liberals together. Both ideologies, after all, share an interest in defending the freedom of the individual.

Read more from this story HERE.

Deja Roo: Establishment Republicans Contravene Rules, Subvert GOP Elections . . . Again!

Photo Credit: DonkeyHotey

As though the Establishment’s political lynching of Chair-Elect Russ Millette wasn’t enough, the verdict is now in on round two of the proceedings from the Kangaroo Court assembled by the State Executive Committee. After hearing the latest verdict, it is abundantly clear that party “leadership” is sending an unequivocal message to grassroots conservatives: your vote doesn’t matter.

It might be dismissed as an anomaly, an exigent circumstance, or perhaps an isolated lapse in judgment if we hadn’t seen this flick before. But the bad reruns just keep coming, ad nauseam.

After the State Convention in April, I sat down for lunch with ARP Rules Chair Frank McQueary to talk party politics and see if we could patch things up. When asked what could be done to bring the party together, his answer was “nothing.” Period.

Mr. McQueary then went on to give me a history of grievances stretching back to my childhood. He told of the villainous Christian fundamentalists from the “Moral Majority” of the 1980’s, the troublesome “Christian Coalition” of the 1990’s, and so on. It all left me scratching my head, wondering what all that had to do with me or my conservative friends in 2012.

Apparently they had committed the same almighty calumny that the Palinistas, Millerites, and Paulers had. They had the unmitigated gall to go out, organize, and win an election. Clearly unacceptable!

Notwithstanding the protests of my Establishment friends, this whole sordid affair had nothing to do with Russ Millette or Debbie Brown. Just like the last episode had nothing to do with Joe Miller. Or the one before with Sarah Palin . . . or the Christian Coalition of the 90’s . . . or the Moral Majority of the 80’s . . .

It had everything to do with ruling class entitlement, corruption, and a group of despotic power mongers who leverage political power for personal aggrandizement, and shake down State and Federal Treasuries for the enrichment of their friends and family. Can we say crony capitalist?

They are the folks who for a generation propped up Ted Stevens, the Murkowskis, and Don Young while they colluded with lawyers, lobbyists, corporatists, and other corrupt politicians in Washington to create a network that would bring the gravy train to Alaska and keep it flowing. Our delegation and their “partners in crime” are known inside the beltway as “the Alaska Mafia.” No joke.

Sadly, the ARP’s role in enabling big government and crony capitalism has made it a willing accomplice in the bankrupting of America. The struggle you see going on now is for the heart and soul of the Republican Party in the Last Frontier. Nothing more. Nothing less.

The Establishment is arguing again that the results of the Convention were somehow illegitimate, and don’t represent the Alaska Republican Party. Where have we heard that before?

Seems I recall hearing a lot of moaning from the Establishment that Sarah Palin wasn’t “one of us.” Ironically, she was too bipartisan.

And given my central role in Joe Miller’s campaign, I know the narrative well that was being peddled in the days following Joe’s stunning primary victory in the 2010 US Senate race.

Yep. Same story. The primary election didn’t reflect Alaska because it represented only a fraction of the electorate (it’s called the party system), everybody who wanted to vote for Lisa couldn’t (read Democrats) because of the closed Republican primary, and of course Joe Miller had somehow won illegitimately because he “mischaracterized” Murkowski’s record.

I know I’m a little late with the Truth Squad, but the fact is that Joe Miller defeated Lisa Murkowski in the largest turnout for a Republican Primary in the history of Alaska, garnering more than 10,000 more votes than Murkowski received in her 2004 primary victory which she won by more than 20 points.

Then-Representative Lisa Murkowski had voted for the closed primary system while serving in the Alaska Legislature. And the Senator went on to embrace almost every one of Joe’s supposed “mischaracterizations” of her record in the general election, vindicating his statements as truth. Ironically, she won her write-in bid with the help of more than 36,000 Democrats. That would be more votes than the write-in senator received from Republicans.

Murkowski also claimed that she re-entered the race due to an outpouring of public support that grew over time to create a popular mandate. But according to an interview conducted with The Daily Beast on primary election night, knowing things were not looking good for her, she was already entertaining the idea of a third-party run before the primary results were even tallied.

Joe Miller was subsequently villified and treated as a pariah by Establishment Republicans who supported Murkowski’s relentless multi-million-dollar fear-and-smear campaign, proving that all it takes to destroy the character of a good man is a few million dollars and a lot of malice.

The same canards were trotted out after Russ Millette won the chairmanship with 54% of the vote from elected delegates representing all forty political districts of the state. Was it a small number of the 137,000 Republicans in the State of Alaska? Yes, it’s called representative government. But it was a decisive victory from what was reportedly the largest Republican Convention ever assembled in the Alaska.

Not only are the architects of “Republican” mayhem living a lie through their post-convention coup, they are engaging in hypocrisy of the lowest kind. For over the molehill of specious charges leveled at both the Chair and Vice-Chair duly elected by the delegates of the 2012 Republican State Convention, looms a mountain of evidence to prove beyond doubt that many of the folks on the SEC have in fact broken party rules for which there has been no discipline imposed.

I offer two indisputable examples that are a matter of public record: United States Senator Lisa Murkowski, and long-time party boss Randy Ruedrich.

As we all witnessed in 2010, Lisa Murkowski, a sitting member of the State Central Committee, waged a multi-million-dollar smear campaign on the public airwaves against the party nominee. It was mean-spirited. It was malicious. And it was a clear violation of party rules.

What was the Party’s official response? To congratulate the perpetrator, and openly attack the Republican nominee. And that is where Ruedrich comes in.

As though it wasn’t enough to publicly embrace the villainous Murkowski, and seek to publicly humiliate the Republican nominee, Ruedrich joined the Murkowski intervention in post-election legal proceedings by signing a sworn affidavit submitted to the Court, all before the election was certified. This too was clearly a violation of party rules for which the State Central Committee could have removed Ruedrich from office.

So what did the Central Committee do about these clear rules violations? Absolutely nothing.

In fact, after the duly elected delegates of the 2012 State Convention passed a resolution out of committee censuring Murkowski for her destructive behavior, Ruedrich broke the rules again to shut down the convention prematurely, averting a floor vote on the censure. The Chairman subsequently thwarted the reconvene of the convention required under the rules, even taking to the press to tell folks not to attend so as to avoid a quorum.

But it didn’t end there. When the State Central Committee finally got around to acting on the censure resolution, they refused to even vote, instead opting to table it. So not only were they unwilling to exercise discipline by removing the bad actors, they were not even willing to denounce what they had done.

But then again, why would this behavior be surprising coming from the likes of folks who I personally witnessed throw tantrums at the State Convention. One vowed to “burn down the Central Committee.” Another personally told me he couldn’t wait until his term was up as a state-wide officer so he could attack the party openly. Both of these members voted to remove the duly elected leaders of our party.

The subversive behavior of ARP “Leadership” deserves censure from every Alaskan of good will. It is dishonest. It is hypocritical. It is an affront to good faith and fair dealing.

Sorry folks, the verdict of the State Executive Committee’s Kangaroo Court just won’t pass the red face test. And while the corrupt Republican Establishment continues to wage war on the citizens they expect to vote for them, Mark Begich laughs. Let’s hope he’s not laughing all the way back to Washington for a second term.

Alaska’s RINO’s Fail to Remove Liberty-Minded Chair-Elect; Kangaroo Court to Reconvene February 1

Alaska’s Republican Party (ARP) leadership failed in its attempt last night to remove Chair-elect Russ Millette, a constitutional conservative, as well as vice-chair elect Debbie Brown, from the ARP.

Their efforts fell flat after a motion by Fairbanksan Ralph Seekins to allow Russ Millette a continuance so that he would have time to prepare a defense to the charges raised by leftist ARP Rules Chair and Ruedrich confidant, Frank McQueary.

The charges against Debbie Brown were raised by chairman Ruedrich himself, alleging financial improprieties. The fact that the charges were raised by a chairman who apparently not only transferred tens of thousands of ARP dollars to the Murkowski-supporting Juneau Capitol Hill club without proper authorization just a few weeks ago, but who also seems responsible for a significant FEC fine for financial improprieties related to VECO has many within the party scratching their heads.

It also is shocking that this same chairman was reportedly entrusted with hundreds of thousands of dollars for Joe Miller’s direct mail campaign in 2010 but who has refused to disclose the database evidencing that he actually spent the money for Joe Miller instead of Lisa Murkowski, as suspected by some party members.

To make matters worse, the inquisitors had the gall to confront Millette on who he supported for president in 2012 – despite the fact that the very people asking the questions failed to support Republican-nominee Joe Miller in the 2010 US Senate race. The fact that none of the Alaska press in attendance reported on this extreme hypocrisy reflects that little has changed since their efforts in 2010 to sink the anti-establishment candidate with false stories.

Russ Millette commented after the kangaroo court that McQueary had “brought up charges that he’d never seen before.” He stated that the “whole thing, the charges, were totally bogus.” Millette also noted that “most of the minds [on the ARP executive committee] seemed made up.”

Millette was amazed at the effort to remove him, suggesting that the effort by party-insiders to keep RINO’s in charge of the party would devastate its cohesion. If he were allowed to take office, Millette claimed that he would “unite [and] bring the party together.”

During the hearing last night, he was supported by a number of conservatives who waved signs outside of the ARP headquarters in Anchorage:

Stay tuned for the continuance of Ruedrich’s efforts to unseat his successor on February 1.

LA Times Interviews Alaska Militia Leader About Informant Fulton and FBI

The Los Angeles Times is continuing its coverage of the FBI’s involvement in Alaska politics via its leftwing informant, Bill Fulton.

In its article last night, the Times interviews an Alaskan militia leader, Norm Olson, who claims that Fulton “was used by the FBI to wreck Joe Miller’s bid” for the US Senate.

But most of Olson’s vitriol seems directed at Fulton’s efforts to infiltrate Alaska’s Citizens Militia, based out of Kenai, Alaska. Olson lambasted Fulton for trying to play “the big man in Anchorage, boasting about this and bragging about that, how he was ex-military intelligence.” He told the Times that the Obama supporter had “tried to target his militia as well, supplying him with a ‘barn full’ of military gear,” suggesting the type of entrapment others close to Fulton have previously complained of.

But Olson, the streetwise founder of the Michigan Militia prior to his move to Alaska several years ago, was “wary of Greeks bearing gifts.” Claiming he knows a little bit about the FBI, Olson explained that, “anybody comes up to me with fancy toys or gift items, I’m always a little bit wary of what’s going on. I tell people, if you really want to give me something, give me cash, and make it anonymous.”

One member of the Kenai’s Alaska’s Citizen Militia forum suggested that the FBI might have Fulton killed and then try to pin it on the Alaska militias: “If he does get whacked it will be used to label Alaska militia men and women as dangerous terrorists. I would not put it past the FBI to grease him themselves in order to set up a false flag against the patriot movement up here.”

Olson seemed to agree stating, “They’ll paint the [Alaska] militia much like the mafia: you can [get] out, leave feet first. They can use his ‘passing’ as a message to anyone who affiliates with the militia that they are the savages that the central government paints us out to be.”

He concluded that the FBI would use Fulton’s death as a way to eliminate “any hope for a political comeback” for Joe Miller, stating that “Joe’s support for the militia, the Constitution, state Sovereignty and the Rule of Law is well known. Placing him in a controversy about the suspicious nature of Bill Fulton’s death would absolutely disable Joe.”

Fulton, who is in hiding Outside, apparently has gotten the message: “I don’t think the militia guys in Alaska are so happy about me right now,” he told the Times.

Read more from the Los Angeles Times article HERE.

LA Times: Why Did the FBI Have an Informant in Joe Miller Campaign?

fultonThe Los Angeles Times reported today that, “Now that the mole who helped bring down the leadership of the Alaska Peacemaker Militia has talked publicly, the big question on some minds in Alaska is: Why was federal FBI informant William Fulton involved in political campaigns?”

The LA Times interviewed not only Fulton, but also Joe Miller and 2010 Lieutenant Governor Candidate Eddie Burke who hired Fulton as his campaign manager. Fulton’s FBI handler also commented for the article.


During Joe Miller’s interview, he was asked about the impact of the handcuffing and what he thought about an FBI informant working in Alaska politics:

The widely reported arrest of a journalist at a town hall meeting “absolutely” was detrimental to his campaign, Miller said Monday in an interview with The Times.

“I’m a strong supporter of the 1st Amendment, and I had close friends that had been supporters of my campaign question, ‘Why would Joe Miller handcuff a journalist?’ For crying out loud, I wasn’t even in the building,” Miller said. “It was utilized as a political weapon against us in the state.”

Miller said he is now troubled that Fulton, whose personal politics turn out to be not at all aligned with the far right, was injecting controversy into his campaign and was also working on the campaign of Burke, another right-wing candidate who lost — all during 2010, when he was a paid informant for the FBI.

Miller recalled the well-publicized election of 2008, when longtime U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens lost his bid for reelection after being convicted of failing to report gifts from an oil industry lobbyist at the end of a long investigation waged by the FBI in Anchorage. The charges were dismissed in 2009 on the U.S. Justice Department’s own motion when it was learned that potentially exculpatory evidence had not been turned over to the defense. But by then, Democrat Mark Begich had won Stevens’ seat.

“This is the second U.S. Senate race in Alaska that the FBI has had some involvement in,” Miller said. “I’m certainly not expressing any type of conspiracy theory about the FBI causing any kind of trouble to my campaign, but it’s conceptually troubling to me that you have a paid informant working on multiple campaigns answering to the FBI, being debriefed by the FBI, and I really think it’s incumbent on that agency to come clean about the scope of this individual’s employment and the level of involvement the FBI had in that.”

Read more from this story HERE.