Posts

Report: GOP Spends $9.7 Million to Attack Republicans – But Only $3.7 Million to Attack Democrats

Photo Credit: TeaPartyUpdate.comIf you needed more proof that the Establishment is hell-bent on attacking Tea Party candidate, a report on campaign expenditures confirms it. Or as comedian Bill Engvall says, “Here’s your sign.”

A recent study by the Center For Public Integrity revealed that from January 1 through May 6, Republican PACs and outside groups have spent about $9.7 million attacking Republican candidates in advertisements and other communications, and only around $3.7 million to attack Democrats. Democratic groups have only spent $67,000 attacking other Democrats.

What’s caused this turbocharged increase in campaign spending? Political animosity between the Tea Party and GOP Establishment and a Supreme Court decision. In January 2010, the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling allowed corporations and labor unions to spend unlimited amounts of money on ads and other communication to advocate for the election (or defeat) of a political candidate. Campaign spending was ruled to be a form of speech, protected by the Constitution for both individuals and corporations.

The decision didn’t affect contributions, as it’s still illegal for unions and corporations to make direct contributions to candidates for federal office. However, it’s opened the financial floodgates for SuperPACs and other groups to raise money and make independent expenditures for federal races across the country.

Read more from this story HERE.

White House Now Faults Republicans for Weak Border Security

Photo Credit: AP / Jacquelyn MartinAfter previously saying America’s borders are more secure than ever, the White House on Tuesday seemingly blamed Republicans for apparent holes along the southern boundary, evidenced by the flood of unaccompanied children streaming into the U.S. from Mexico, Central America and elsewhere.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest challenged Republicans, if they are truly concerned about border security, to back the comprehensive immigration reform package that passed the Senate last year and is strongly supported by President Obama.

Read more from this story HERE.

‘We Have a Problem with You, and You Have a Problem Maintaining Your Credibility’: House Republicans Slam IRS Commissioner as They Subpoena a White House Lawyer in ‘Missing Emails’ Case

Photo Credit: APRepublicans dropped a hammer on IRS Commissioner John Koskinen during a testy hearing covering the disappearance of emails tied to the agency’s tea party targeting scandal.

The emails, covering the period January 2009 to April 2011, belonged to embattled former official Lois Lerner and could shed light on whether an expansive scheme to single out conservative groups for special scrutiny was guided by members of Congress or administration officials outside the IRS.

‘The committee requested all of Lois Lerner’s emails over a year ago,’ said House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa. ‘And we subpoenaed the emails in August 2013 and again in February 2014. … You worked to cover up the fact they were missing and only came forward to fess up on a Friday afternoon after you had been caught red-handed.’

‘You personally did not cause the targeting,’ he told Koskinen, referring to the tea party scandal. ‘You personally did not destroy the emails. But by your actions and your deception, you now own this scandal.’

‘We have a problem with you,’ Issa sniped at the front end of a three-hour, 36-minute ordeal, ‘and you have a problem maintaining your credibility.’

Read more from this story HERE.

Republicans Likely to Win Senate Majority; Miller Slated to Win in Alaska

Liberal Senator Mark Begich is running for reelection and, according to pundits, will face Joe Miller in the general. Miller is slated to win that contest, too.

Photo Credit: Win McNamee / Getty ImagesIn Nebraska, Republican senate nominee Ben Sasse leads by 17 percent over Democrat nominee David Domina, according to a Rasmussen Reports poll released yesterday. Sasse, a conservative Republican supported by all the major national TEA party and conservative organizations, won the primary in Nebaska this past Tuesday and appears to be likely to be elected the state’s junior senator in November. Rasmussen Reports have him leading 51 percent to Domina at 34 percent in that senate race.

In the meantime, the senate seat in Kentucky is now in play, as the Real Clear Politics average of polls gives Mitch McConnell only a one point lead over Democrat nominee Alison Lundergan Grimes in the race for the Kentucky senate seat. McConnell first ran in 1984 for this senate seat, and by the end of 2014 he will have served 30 years as senator. McConnell was reelected with just 53 percent of the vote in 2008, and is likely to be more vulnerable in 2014.

If McConnell loses the general election, it would help the Democrats retain a majority of the senate after the 2014 elections despite seat lost in other states. There are 36 seats up for election in 2014. Among the other 64 seats not up for election in 2014, Democrats hold 34 of them while Republicans hold 30. 25 of the seats up for election are considered likely or safe for either party, which includes 16 seats currently held by Republicans and 10 seats currently held by Democrats. With those seats added, Democrats will have 44 seats (including the two independents that caucus with the Democrats) and Republicans will have 46 seats. The remaining 10 seats will decide which party controls the senate after the 2014 elections…

Alaska: Incumbent Senator Mark Begich is running for reelection and 2010 nominee Joe Miller appears to be the likely GOP nominee. Begich should be a strong candidate but a united (rather than divided like four years ago with Lisa Murkowski running as a write-in) GOP behind the eventual Republican nominee would give him a fair shot at defeating Begich. For now, this one leans Republican.

Read more from this story HERE.

Gallup: Republicans Can’t Avoid Abortion in 2014 Elections

The Republican establishment may boast that it beat back some Tea Party challengers in this week’s primaries, but GOP candidates cannot hope to retake the Senate if they ignore the issue of abortion, a new Gallup poll indicates.

One-quarter of Republican voters say a candidate must protect life to earn their vote, the polling company found.

Nearly one-in-five people (19 percent) say they would “only vote for a candidate who shares your views on abortion,” and pro-life voters are one-third more likely to feel that way than pro-abortion voters.

Self-described “pro-choice” voters are much more likely to say they “don’t see abortion as a major issue.”

“The pro-life side has more intensity on the issue,” Gallup reports of its most recent survey. In all, 11 percent of all registered voters said they would only vote for pro-life candidates, and eight percent said they would only vote for candidates who call themselves “pro-choice.”

Read more from this story HERE.

Obama Criticizes Republicans for Focusing on Benghazi, Obamacare

Photo Credit: REUTERS / KEVIN LAMARQUEPresident Barack Obama chastised his Republican opponents on Monday for focusing criticism on the events surrounding the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, and on his signature healthcare law.

“The debate we’re having now is about what, Benghazi? Obamacare? And it becomes this endless loop. It’s not serious. It’s not speaking to the real concerns that people have,” Obama said.

He was speaking to more than 60 people at a fundraising dinner for Democratic candidates for the House of Representatives.

The event took place at a physician’s home in the Washington suburb of Potomac, Maryland, as Obama seeks to persuade Democrats to organize for a voter turnout effort to prevent Republicans from ousting Democrats from control of the Senate and from building on their majority in the House.

Republicans in the House have begun a new investigation of the deaths of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, and three other Americans during a militant attack on September 11, 2012.

Read more from this story HERE.

The Democrats’ Free-Speech Hypocrisy

Photo Credit: The Daily Beast
Last week, the war on the First Amendment entered a new phase when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced his support for S.J. Res. 19, a proposed constitutional amendment designed to “advance the fundamental principle of political equality for all, and to protect the integrity of the legislative and electoral processes.” The intent of the proposed amendment is to empower the Congress and the States to limit all categories of campaign-related spending and contributions and overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United, which held independent political expenditures by businesses and unions alike to be protected by the First Amendment.

In plain English that’s called censorship. It’s also called hypocrisy, as many of the proposed amendment’s supporters—and most of its likely opponents—take a situational stance on the First Amendment.

More often than not, politicians think free speech is a fine thing so long as you agree with them. What do I mean? Well, in 2006 the then-Republican-controlled Senate failed by a single vote to move forward a proposed constitutional amendment that would have given Congress the legal authority to ban flag “desecration.” Fortunately, the Constitution mandates that a proposed amendment obtain the backing of two-thirds of both the House and Senate before it can be sent to the States for ratification, and the flag-burning amendment garnered only 66 of the 67 votes it needed.

But here’s the thing. Back then, many of the same folks who would stifle free speech if it comes in the form of money—but not in kind, as in the form of a favorable New York Times editorial—had no problem saying that it was constitutionally OK to put Old Glory to the test by putting it to the torch. The roster of Senate Democrats suffering from First Amendment schizophrenia includes former constitutional law professor and Senator Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and senior Senate Democrats Barbara Boxer, Tom Harkin, Barbara Mikulski, Patty Murray, Chuck Schumer, and Ron Wyden—who rightly took the position that free speech should not be diluted in the name of some greater good, hurt feelings, or offended sensibilities…

So when Democrats decry money in politics are they really being serious, or are they just posturing? One thing’s for certain, money isn’t leaving politics anytime soon. As long as government is around, and politicians need their palms greased, money will be there as well. Meanwhile, Democrats and Republicans alike will drape themselves in the Constitution and the flag, except when it gets in their way.

Read more from this story HERE.

Senate Republicans Block Energy Bill, Forfeit Keystone Vote

Photo Credit: shannonpatrick17

Photo Credit: shannonpatrick17

U.S. Senate Republicans on Monday blocked an energy-efficiency bill backed by manufacturers and environmentalists, forfeiting a chance to vote on the long-delayed Keystone XL oil pipeline.

On a nearly party-line vote of 55-36, President Barack Obama’s Democrats fell short of the 60 votes needed to advance the bipartisan energy bill supported by the White House.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, had offered a vote on a separate bill to take the final decision on Keystone out of Obama’s hands and give it to Congress if Republicans allowed passage of the energy bill.

But Republicans refused. They complained that Reid barred them from offering amendments to the bill, including one that would have reined in emissions-cutting regulations on coal-fired power plants, a top strategy in Obama’s fight against climate change.

The blocked energy-efficiency bill would cut electricity use by imposing tough building codes and requiring federal data centers to find ways to consolidate and become more efficient.

Read more from this story HERE.

WATCH: Pelosi – Benghazi is a Diversion, ‘Can’t We Talk About Something Else?’

Photo Credit: AP

Photo Credit: AP

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi dismissed the Benghazi-related emails recently released by the White House as nothing new, refusing to acknowledge any wrongdoing by the administration.

“I haven’t seen it, but I will say this again — diversion, subterfuge — Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. Why aren’t we talking about something else?” Pelosi said at Thursday’s press conference responding to a question from Breitbart News. “What I know of what I’ve read in the press about the emails was what was put out there before. I don’t think there was anything new there.”

Read more from this story HERE.

Miller: Republican Establishment Must Make Peace with Conservatives

Launch - Joe Walking to Front with KathleenIn a misguided article published in Politico Magazine last week, Forrest A. Nabors argued that I am poised to play the role of spoiler and deliver Alaska’s U.S. Senate seat to the Democrats this fall by running as an Independent. And predictably, the grand conspiracy is all Sarah Palin’s fault.

The suggestion that I intend to run as an Independent in the general election is no more than a rumor spread by the Weekly Standard’s report on a February Hays poll. In that poll, I was included as an Independent only because at least 10 percent of respondents said they would vote for me if their choice were between an establishment Republican and the Democratic incumbent, Sen. Mark Begich. To be perfectly clear: I have never said I am running for anything other than the Republican nomination.

While it is true that Gov. Palin played a decisive role in my stunning 2010 primary victory over the sitting vice chair of the Senate Republican Conference, her responsibility ends there. The truth is, but for the perfidy of the Republican establishment, the conservative movement in Alaska would have prevailed in 2010. And undoubtedly, the Alaska race in 2014 would be a unified Republican effort.

Sadly, Sen. Lisa Murkowski learned the wrong lessons from 2010. She was the only Senate “Republican” to vote for every piece of President Obama’s 2010 lame duck agenda. In the process, she helped the president up off the mat after a crushing defeat in the 2010 mid-term elections and handed him bipartisan legitimacy for his 2012 election. If that didn’t vindicate my 2010 primary challenge of Murkowski, and Palin’s decision to endorse my candidacy, I don’t know what would.

But that is the past. It’s time for people of good will to end the petty intramural conflicts and focus on the task at hand. Unlike many of my establishment Republican friends, I am not driven by hatred of Democrats. Nor am I motivated by the desire for power. I simply love my country and want to see it prosper.

For me, the 2014 election is about the renewal of America and Alaska’s economic future. It is a test of our resolve as a people. Will we stand up for the Constitution and our way of life? Or will we stand down as the world’s greatest civilization fades into the fog of history? I believe that our children and grandchildren deserve to face the future with the same sense of hope and optimism that we once did, and it is our responsibility to make that a reality. I believe that nothing is inevitable, that the future lies within the realm of our free will, that God still governs in the affairs of men who will exercise virtue and that, as Ronald Reagan once reminded us, “The future doesn’t belong to the faint-hearted; it belongs to the brave.”

That’s why I’ve embraced a bold agenda: return to Constitutional government. As Republicans, we must not abandon the sanctity of human life, as some would have us do. We cannot give up on our nation’s greatest asset, the traditional family. We must defend our religious liberties at all cost, and refuse the false promise of security in exchange for our 2nd Amendment rights. It is imperative that we repeal Obamacare. Half-measures and temporary fixes will not do. There is only one way to ensure freedom, access and affordability: Get government out of the way and let the free market work.

Republicans must also contend for the rule of law, and never reward lawlessness. Amnesty is a non-starter, and our borders must be secured. It is a grave matter of national security. Further, we must abolish the IRS and reform the tax code to make it fair and simple; audit the Federal Reserve; cut, cap and balance the federal budget; and return power to the states.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, our internal polling analysis shows that we are in a strong position to win both the primary and general elections in Alaska. Even public polling has seen my candidacy surge in a head-to-head match-up against Begich by 17 points since early last year.

The resurgent reform movement in Alaska is poised to make a big comeback, and without a doubt folks are more energized than they were four years ago. The number of registered Republicans is up 4.3 percent since 2008, while the number of registered Democrats is down 10.4 percent. In that year, Begich squeezed out a narrow victory with 48 percent of the vote against the GOP incumbent, Sen. Ted Stevens, who had just been convicted of multiple felonies. (Stevens’s convictions were later vacated because of prosecutorial misconduct.) This time around, Begich’s job approval in public polling has been hovering around 40 percent for months.

This is shaping up to be another wave election. It is inconceivable that an incumbent senator with job approval numbers so low heading into the election will be able to ride this wave of public discontent to 50 percent plus one, unless establishment Republicans sabotage another election.

Wherever I go across the state, there is seldom a kind word for the Republican Party. Much like the last two presidential elections, nothing could be more catastrophic to the cause of liberty, or to a Republican majority in the Senate, than to nominate another “me too” Republican.

Both of my opponents are now calling for unity, despite the fact that they refused to back the party nominee in the state’s last Senate election. The truth is, someone who helped tear the party apart simply isn’t qualified to lead a unity movement.

It’s time for the Republican establishment to end the impurity tests. A big-tent Republican majority must include full-orbed conservatives who embrace the party platform. If the Republican Party leadership is serious about governing, it has a choice to make: join the reform movement, or embrace a permanent minority status.