WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, will not quit releasing pertinent information, even after Sweden announced it’s dropping the rape allegations against him. Assange, the biggest enemy of the state, issued a defiant statement after Sweden dropped the charges. He won’t be kowtowing to the political elites, though; in fact, just the opposite.
Julian Assange had previously expressed concern that he could end up being extradited and face the death penalty in the United States because he continues to reveal government “secrets” through his website, WikiLeaks. On Friday afternoon, Assange appeared on a balcony at the Ecuadorian embassy and described the dropped charges as “an important victory.” But he’s not going to stop releasing the information about the government’s wrongdoings, and that has become a thorn in the side of the political elites.
“Today is an important victory for me and the UN human rights system, but by no means erases seven years of detention without charge…while my children grew up. That is not something I can forgive or forget,” Assange told journalists from a balcony at the Ecuadorian embassy where he has lived for the last five years. Marianne Ny, Sweden’s director of public prosecutions, earlier said the investigation was dropped because Sweden had “exhausted the possibilities” for investigating the allegations against Assange. –Newsweek
It is also becoming more clear as to why the Trump administration now loathes Assange as much as the political left does. No one, Assange included, is supposed to release information showing that the government is not the benevolent magical unicorn partisan politics pretends that it is. Adding fuel to the fire of truth in his statement Friday, Assange said he would continue to release even more of US government’s classified information, regardless of the reports last month that said U.S. officials were preparing charges for Assange’s arrest.
The UK has said it will arrest me regardless. Now the U.S. CIA director [Mike] Pompeo and the U.S. attorney general [Jeff Sessions] have said that I and other WikiLeaks staff have no rights and that my arrest and the arrest of other staff is a priority. That is not acceptable … Our publications are proceeding at speed and that speed in relation to [recent high-profile leaks about the CIA] is accelerating.
Basically, Assange is saying that he has no intentions of stopping the flow of information to his website. Instead, he’s going to speed up the rate he releases the damaging information because of governments’ insistence on continuing to threaten him for the crime of publishing their hard-to-swallow truths.
In the meantime, Ecuador is offering Assange asylum. Guillaume Long, Ecuador’s foreign minister, pledged to help Assange Friday. “Given that the European arrest warrant no longer holds, Ecuador will now be intensifying its diplomatic efforts with the UK so Julian Assange gains safe passage [to] Ecuador,” said Long.
Julian Assange, and other whistleblowers, such as Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, are the only chance we have at regaining a little bit of the truth the governments of the world insist on hiding from us. Some of the information is hard to hear, but wouldn’t you rather know the truth about the government, or do you prefer to be coddled with the lies the political elite think you’re too stupid to understand?
The insistence that Assange is bad and Manning is a traitor resonate only in the minds of those so entrenched in their worship of the government that there is nothing the ruling elites could do to them to warrant a change of heart. The fact remains, that Assange is releasing relevant information proving that the government is the largest corporate gang of criminal masterminds on Earth. And, unfortunately, that truth is just too hard to hear for most voters. (For more from the author of “After Sweden Drops Charges, What’s Next for Julian Assange?” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/1280px-Julian_Assange_full.jpg9671280Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2017-05-22 00:35:292017-05-22 00:35:29After Sweden Drops Charges, What’s Next for Julian Assange?
By Ewen MacAskill. The US intelligence agencies are facing fresh embarrassment after WikiLeaks published what it described as the biggest ever leak of confidential documents from the CIA detailing the tools it uses to break into phones, communication apps and other electronic devices.
The thousands of leaked documents focus mainly on techniques for hacking and reveal how the CIA cooperated with British intelligence to engineer a way to compromise smart televisions and turn them into improvised surveillance devices.
The leak, named “Vault 7” by WikiLeaks, will once again raise questions about the inability of US spy agencies to protect secret documents in the digital age. It follows disclosures about Afghanistan and Iraq by army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning in 2010 and about the National Security Agency and Britain’s GCHQ by Edward Snowden in 2013.
The new documents appear to be from the CIA’s 200-strong Center for Cyber Intelligence and show in detail how the agency’s digital specialists engage in hacking. Monday’s leak of about 9,000 secret files, which WikiLeaks said was only the first tranche of documents it had obtained, were all relatively recent, running from 2013 to 2016. (Read more from “WikiLeaks Publishes ‘Biggest Ever Leak of Secret CIA Documents'” HERE)
___________________________________________
WikiLeaks Publishes Information Reigniting Questions Whether CIA Was Involved in US Journalist Hastings’ Death
WikiLeaks’ release on Tuesday of a massive trove of secret CIA documents has reignited conspiracy theories which have swirled since 2013, with revelations the spy agency was attempting to remotely hack vehicles.
“As of October 2014 the CIA was also looking at infecting the vehicle control systems used by modern cars and trucks,” WikiLeaks writes. “The purpose of such control is not specified, but it would permit the CIA to engage in nearly undetectable assassinations.”
Hastings, an acclaimed war correspondent and vocal critic of government mass surveillance, died in the early hours of Tuesday, June 18, 2013, when his Mercedes C250 Coupe apparently lost control and burst into flames before slamming into a palm tree. . .
[F]ormer US National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism Richard Clarke told The Huffington Post the crash was “consistent with a car cyber attack”. . .
WikiLeaks itself appeared to suggest Hastings’ death was the result of foul play. Hours after crash, WikiLeaks tweeted: “Michael Hastings contacted WikiLeaks lawyer Jennifer Robinson just a few hours before he died, saying that the FBI was investigating him.” (Read more from Wikileaks Publishes Information Linking CIA to Hastings’ Death HERE)
Editor’s note: To learn more about the troubling facts surrounding Hastings death, please click HERE.
___________________________________________
FBI Prepares for New Hunt for WikiLeaks’ Source
By Devlin Barrett. The FBI has begun preparing for a major mole hunt to determine how anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks got an alleged arsenal of hacking tools the CIA has used to spy on espionage targets, according to people familiar with the matter.
The leak rattled government and technology industry officials, who spent Tuesday scrambling to determine the accuracy and scope of the thousands of documents released by the group. They were also trying to assess the damage the revelations may cause, and what damage may come from future releases promised by WikiLeaks, these people said . . .
In the wake of revelations from Army private Chelsea Manning and former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, officials sought to tighten security procedures, and federal agents came under greater pressure to find and prevent secrets from spilling out of the government. (Read more from “FBI Prepares for New Hunt for WikiLeaks’ Source” HERE)
___________________________________________
WikiLeaks Says It Releases Files on CIA Cyber Spying Tools
By Reuters. Anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks on Tuesday published what it said were thousands of pages of internal CIA discussions about hacking techniques used over several years, renewing concerns about the security of consumer electronics and embarrassing yet another U.S. intelligence agency.
The discussion transcripts showed that CIA hackers could get into Apple Inc iPhones, Google Inc Android devices and other gadgets in order to capture text and voice messages before they were encrypted with sophisticated software.
Cyber security experts disagreed about the extent of the fallout from the data dump, but said a lot would depend on whether WikiLeaks followed through on a threat to publish the actual hacking tools that could do damage.
Reuters could not immediately verify the contents of the published documents, but several contractors and private cyber security experts said the materials, dated between 2013 and 2016, appeared to be legitimate. (Read more from “WikiLeaks Says It Releases Files on CIA Cyber Spying Tools” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/6254372476_1bee0dec44_b.jpg7681024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2017-03-07 22:11:082017-03-11 23:29:13WikiLeaks Publishes ‘Biggest Ever Leak of Secret CIA Documents’, Reignites Questions Whether CIA Assassinated Michael Hastings
WikiLeaks on Tuesday published thousands of documents purportedly taken from the Central Intelligence Agency’s Center for Cyber Intelligence, a dramatic release that appears to expose intimate details of America’s cyberespionage toolkit.
It was not immediately clear how WikiLeaks obtained the information, which included more than 8,700 documents and files. The CIA tools, if authentic, could undermine the confidence that consumers have in the safety and security of their computers, mobile devices and even smart TVs.
WikiLeaks said the material came from “an isolated, high-security network situated inside the CIA’s Center for Cyber Intelligence in Langley, Virginia.” It didn’t say how the files were removed, such as possibly by a rogue employee, by hacking a federal contractor working for the CIA or breaking into a staging server where such hacking tools might be temporarily stored. (Read more from “WikiLeaks Publishes CIA Trove Alleging Wide Scale Hacking” HERE)
If there is one thing that has been laid completely bare for the world to see, it is the fact that the mainstream media and the Democratic Party are in lock step and collude on coverage. Any claim to objectivity the media have has gone completely out the window. The latest evidence was released last night by WikiLeaks. In the second DNC email dump of the campaign, it was shown that CNN was asking the DNC for questions to ask at least two GOP presidential candidates during interviews. The DNC of course was all too happy to join in.
In an email on April 28, 2016, the DNC research director Lauren Dillon asked her staff to compile questions for CNN to ask Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas (A, 90%). In the email, Dillon makes it clear that CNN was asking for help. The email stated, “CNN is looking for questions.”
Phil Kerpen uncovered the email with questions that was sent back to Dillon and presumably forwarded to CNN.
Questions for Cruz included one on North Carolina’s HB2 Bathroom bill and whether Cruz only came to D.C. to run for president.
The questions of Cruz weren’t the only ones that were requested for CNN. Earlier in the week, the DNC was compiling questions for Wolf Blitzer to ask Donald Trump. The questions were for an interview with Wolf Blitzer that was later cancelled.
Earlier emails released by WikiLeaks from John Podesta’s Gmail account showed that Donna Brazile was given CNN debate questions ahead of time, which she shared with the Clinton campaign. This happened on at least two occasions and caused CNN to terminate its relationship with Brazile.
Conservatives have long called CNN the “Clinton News Network.” The revelations of internal communications at the DNC and from Podesta’s emails show that they have every reason to give the network that moniker.
It isn’t only CNN. WikiLeaks has shown that CNBC’s John Harwood asked Podesta on September 21, 2015, “What should I ask Jeb …” The Daily Caller explains how the Bush interview then went down.
On Sept. 25, Harwood sat down for a 10 question interview with Bush.
It’s not yet known if Podesta responded to Harwood’s question.
In other leaked emails Harwood praised Hillary Clinton and Podesta. Harwood also referred to President Barack Obama as “the black guy.”
WikiLeaks has also exposed that Politico’s Glenn Thrush sent stories to Podesta for sign off. The Boston Globe worked with the Clinton campaign for an op-ed placement to best serve the needs of the campaign. That episode has led to a Massachusetts political activist Steve Aylward to file an FEC complaint against The Globe.
No matter who wins the election tomorrow, it is now clear that the media are a propaganda arm of the Democratic National Committee — something conservatives have suspected for a while but is now confirmed by internal communications.
CNN, ABC, CNBC, Politico, and others need to come clean about their true relationships with the Democratic Party and its politicians. If they don’t, the American people will continue to lose trust in them. (For more from the author of “Wikileaks: Of Course CNN and the DNC Were Colluding on Questions for Republicans” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/CNN-YouTube_Republican_Debate-1.jpg531800Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-11-07 23:15:292016-11-07 23:15:29Wikileaks: Of Course CNN and the DNC Were Colluding on Questions for Republicans
Today’s 25th installment of the WikiLeaks emails contained a blockbuster. The assistant attorney general for congressional relations, Peter Kadzik, used his Gmail account to inform John Podesta of next steps in the DOJ Clinton email investigation. Kadzik is now reportedly heading up the “review” of documents and emails seized from Anthony Weiner’s computer.
Here’s what the May 19, 2015 email from Kadzik said:
There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails. Another filing in the FOIA case went in last night or will go in this am that indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department posts the emails.
There you have it. An assistant attorney general gave the campaign chair of a presidential candidate under investigation by the FBI a heads up on next steps related to that investigation.
On top of that, Kadzik is the one who sent a letter to Democratic congressmen saying that the Department of Justice was adding additional resources to the Weiner computer investigation.
Who is Kadzik? We have learned in WikiLeaks emails that he is a very good friend of Clinton campaign chair Podesta. Here’s how the Daily Caller reported their relationship last month.
The day after Hillary Clinton testified in front of the House Select Committee on Benghazi last October, John Podesta, the Democrat’s campaign chairman, met for dinner with a small group of well-connected friends, including Peter Kadzik, a top official at the Justice Department.
The dinner arrangement, revealed in hacked Podesta emails released by WikiLeaks, is just the latest example of an apparent conflict of interest between the Clinton campaign and the federal agency charged with investigating the former secretary of state’s email practices.
According to the Washington Free Beacon, Kadzik has previously donated to several Clinton initiatives, including Hillary’s 2008 campaign.
Up until now, Wikileaks emails between Podesta and Kadzik only showed a friendship. And the fact that Podesta claims Kadzik, “kept me out of jail.” Today’s dump by Wikileaks shows that Kadzik was, in fact, providing the Clinton inner circle with information regarding the email investigation.
Not only was Kadzik providing this information, but he did it through his personal, not governmental email address —likely to hide it from the National Archives.
Kadzik should immediately be taken out of his role in this investigation. The American people deserve an impartial Department of Justice. (For more from the author of “Did Wikileaks Just Uncover Hillary’s Mole Within the DOJ?” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/24634300275_e4885e0963_b-4.jpg6831024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-11-03 04:20:062016-11-06 01:29:23Did Wikileaks Just Uncover Hillary’s Mole Within the DOJ?
New Wikileaks revelations from John Podesta’s emails seem to confirm, at least in part, the veracity of Project Veritas’ findings during an undercover sting investigation that resulted in the firing of two Democratic operatives.
Earlier this week, Project Veritas Action President James O’Keefe released a two-part video series featuring Democratic operatives explaining their efforts to incite violence at Donald Trump rallies and commit voter fraud.
In the organization’s first video, paid activist Zulema Rodriguez describes a particularly notable 1 p.m. phone call with the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Rodriguez claims to be one of the rioters present during the violent confrontations in Chicago in March that led to the cancellation of a Trump rally. As the Project Veritas video reveals, some of the agitators were paid to do so by Democratic operatives, and their operations were coordinated on said phone call.
While working at Democracy Partners, a consulting group, party operative Robert Creamer also makes reference to this phone call in the video, describing how the Clinton campaign discusses “the focuses that need to be undertaken each day” with their activists.
Now what seems like reference to this very same conference call can be found in one of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s leaked emails:
“Reminder — Trump Rapid Response/Bracketing Call — Today – Tues – May17 – 1PM Eastern … Including updates on plans for Trump appearance at NRA Convention Friday…. and New Jersey on Thursday,” an email from Creamer to individuals working for the Clinton campaign reads (emphasis mine).
If indeed this is the same call that Creamer and Rodriguez make reference to in Project Veritas’ video, then it is clear that the DNC has been implicated in illegal activities and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign is well due for an investigation.
Senator Ted Cruz, R-Texas (A, 97%) is wasting no time.
Voter fraud operative: 45 meetings w/ Obama–this merits a serious criminal investigation (not a James Comey "friends and family" cover-up). https://t.co/o1CFnt0KRr
As RedState noted, Creamer — a convicted felon and husband of Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill. (F, 22%) — has personally visited President Barack Obama at least 45 times.
All the circumstantial evidence is undeniably damning. An individual linked to allegations of voter fraud and voter intimidation meeting with the president of the United States demands strict and immediate scrutiny by law enforcement — perhaps even the appointment of a special prosecutor, to ensure the integrity of the entire process. (For more from the author of “Wikileaks Confirms Damning Veritas Videos. Ted Cruz Demands Criminal Investigation” please click HERE)
Recently, WikiLeaks has released over 17,000 emails from Clinton Campaign Chairman and Obama advisor John Podesta’s email account. Like most email accounts, a lot of what has been released is SPAM. Yes, the Clinton campaign manager gets an annoying amount of political fundraising emails, just like you. However, hidden beneath the sheer volume of the emails are several that depict what many Americans have suspected all along: The Clinton campaign is corrupt. Be it collusion with the media on carefully crafting stories, hiding her real position in secret, or trying to smear other candidates, these emails break the façade of the Clinton campaign.
1. Hillary wants open borders
Hillary’s staff went through her paid speeches to highlight potential problems if they were ever released. In one of her speeches to Banco Itau — a Brazilian bank — she spoke of her dream for a European Union-style open market complete with open borders for the Western Hemisphere.
Hillary Clinton Said Her Dream Is A Hemispheric Common Market, With Open Trade And Open Markets. *“My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.” [05162013 Remarks to Banco Itau.doc, p. 28]
2. Podesta agreed the Iran deal was Neville Chamberlain-esque
On July 15, 2015 BuzzFeed’s Andrew Kaczynski reported that Illinois senator Mark Kirk said, “This agreement condemns the next generation to cleaning up a nuclear > war in the Persian Gulf… This is the greatest appeasement since Chamberlain > gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler.”
The statement was emailed to John Podesta to which he replied simply, “Yup.”
This flies smack in the face of what Clinton has been saying on the campaign trail and in debates. When Donald Trump says the deal was bad, Clinton responds that it got rid of Iran’s nuclear program without firing a shot. Her senior staff seems to know how bad it really is.
3. Sanders was enticed to support Hillary
The Libertarian Republic showed, through WikiLeaks emails, that the Sanders campaign was manipulated to support Hillary Clinton.
In other words, Budowsky suggested the HRC campaign and the DNC ingratiate Bernie and his supporters by speaking and writing positively about him until the right time… Then get him to back Clinton officially so the game can go according to plan. Or at least, that is what is being alleged by those who have read the email.
Libertarian Party chair Nicholas Sarwark called it a “double-cross” on his official Twitter upon reading it …
4. Team Hillary created false Trump job postings on Craigslist
Team Hillary took time out of its busy schedule to troll Donald Trump on Craisglist. They posted fake job openings. Here’s one.
The boss has very strict standards for female employees…
Job requirements:
No gaining weight on the job
Must be open to public humiliation
A willingness to evaluate other women’s hotness
Proficient in lying about age if the boss thinks you’re too old
Working mothers not preferred (the boss finds pumping breast milk disgusting, and worries they’re too focused on their children).
Like it or not, [the boss] may greet you with a kiss on the lips or grope you under the meeting table.
5. Team Hillary believed Obama committed voter fraud in Colorado
This is one of the most amazing. Yesterday, Barack Obama got on stage and chided Trump for saying the election was rigged because of voter fraud. This is despite knowing, due to an earlier WikiLeaks dump, that the Hillary campaign thought he rigged the Colorado primary process in 2008. Here’s what Podesta wrote via email:
High importance. I met with Jim and Mike in Denver. They are both old friends of the Clintons and have lots of experience. Mike hosted our Boulder Road Show event. They are reliving the 08 caucuses where they believe the Obama forces flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters. They want to organize lawyers for caucus protection, election protection and to raise hard $. They are not just Colorado focused and have good contacts in the region
Mike is likely to talk to WJC about this in the near future. Marlon and Brynne, can you respond to the org chart request and give them some points of contact. Marc can you reach out to them on the lawyer election protection issues. Thanks.
6. Clinton staffer’s wished the San Bernardino jihadis were white
In December of 2015, Sayed Farouk and his wife committed an act of jihad in San Bernardino, California. John Podesta lamented that the name sounded too foreign and — gasp! — even Islamic. Here’s what Podesta wrote.
Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.
That’s right, as Crowder says in the video, conservatives joke about that being the response of liberals. But it ACTUALLY IS!
7. & 8. Media collusion
Crowder wraps together two points into one. The Clinton campaign brags about colluding with the media. Especially with Ezra Klein at Vox. The Clinton campaign sees Klein as the person it can count on to tell its side of the truth. When pressed about who the campaign could use to hold a “journalist accountable,” top Clinton staffer Jennifer Palmieri wrote:
I think that person, the degree to which they exist, is Ezra Klein. And we can do it with him today.
True to form, Klein’s Vox has been a large pushback against the WikiLeaks email dumps.
9. Clinton knowingly deleted email
Her staff was perplexed at Clinton’s use of private email and that she deleted emails she should have kept. Here’s that exchange:
Ok, one thing to use personal email, but why the “twisted truth” on why – with the two problematic areas being (a) emails to bill (when they were to bill’s staff) and (b) i only used one device — [Blackberry], when 2 weeks earlier, it was an iphone, BB and ipad. As Ann and I discussed, hopefully that’s a timing issue and whilst in state, she only used one. 🙂
I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren’t satisfied with answers to date. While we all know pf the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in.
It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I’ve either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.
10. Obama and Clinton communicated via her private server and colluded to hide that fact
Andrew McCarthy at National Review has an in depth rundown of the fact that Clinton and Obama emailed each other using her private server. A fact that her team tried to hide.
We now know that Podesta was very concerned about the Obama-Clinton e-mails and turned to Mills for advice. His succinct e-mail to Mills is dated March 4, 2015 (at 8:41 p.m.), and he entitled it “Special Category.” He stated:
Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That’s the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I [sic] seems like they will.
Plainly, Podesta was suggesting to Mills that the Obama-Clinton e-mails were in a “special category” — i.e., distinct from the tens of thousands of other Clinton e-mails — because they involved the president. Only the president has power to invoke executive privilege, and Podesta believed such invocation would legitimately cover a communication between Obama and his secretary of state, since such consultations are “the heart of” the privilege recognized by the Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon. (I think he was wrong about that, but that’s a matter for another day.)
There are certainly more damning WikiLeaks revelations. These are 10 that as Crowder says, “You should know about.” Today is the final presidential debate, and WikiLeaks has released the 12th installment this morning. As today is the last day for Trump to bring anything up at the debate, there should be something very interesting in today’s leak. (For more from the author of “10 Outrageous Clintonian Things Exposed by Wikileaks” please click HERE)
During an appearance on CNN this morning, Congressman Chris Collins’ satellite feed was cut as soon as he began talking about Wikileaks.
Host Chris Cuomo asked Collins what he thought Trump could do in tonight’s debate to prove he was fit for office. However, the Congressman went off script.
“Two thirds of the public know that Hillary Clinton’s a liar, she can’t be trusted and now the two faces of Hillary are coming out – the fact through Wikileaks she says one thing and….”
The feed is then immediately cut.
Cuomo continued the discussion with pro-Hillary Congressman Hakeem Jeffries for a full two and a half minutes before Collins returned. Cuomo was sure to ask Collins a question that would steer him away from the subject of Wikileaks. Collins was only then allowed to speak for a brief time before the segment ended. (Read more from “CNN Cuts Feed When WikiLeaks Mentioned” HERE)
No updates had been provided by the controversial group’s Twitter account at the time of this writing, and Russia-owned publication RT noted that Wikileaks’ claim is “unverified.” Wikileaks has been releasing e-mails damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for months, though the releases have been increasing in recent weeks. The latest e-mails show, among many other things, that Clinton’s senior advisers wanted to undermine and subvert the U.S. Catholic Church, that Clinton thought Wall Street received too much blame after the 2008 financial crash and that the Democratic nominee holds different positions privately than those she claims to voters.
Clinton’s campaign has also been show colluding with various high-ranking public officials at the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. State Department in regards to her own email scandal.
A release by Wikileaks over the summer led to the resignation of former Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL), after it was shown that she had colluded with the Clinton campaign against the insurgent candidacy of Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT). Wasserman-Schultz’s replacement, former CNN commentator Donna Brazile, was caught in a more recent release allegedly providing a question to Clinton in advance of a debate against Sanders. Brazile has denied the accusation.
Assange has been living at the Ecuadorian embassy for four years to avoid extradition on a rape charge in Sweden that he claims is false and is an effort by the U.S. to extradite him on charges related to his years of leaking government documents and emails.
Clinton surrogates have for the most part ignored the most recent e-mail controversy, claiming the leaks’ validity is questionable because Wikileaks may be working with the Russian government to interfere with the U.S. presidential election. (For more from the author of “Wikileaks’ Assange Loses Internet in Midst of Podesta Email Dump, Blames a ‘State Party'” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/Julian_Assange_20091117_Copenhagen_1.jpg10241536Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-10-18 00:49:392016-10-18 00:49:39Wikileaks’ Assange Loses Internet in Midst of Podesta Email Dump, Blames a ‘State Party’
The controversial Wikileaks founder is so fearful that someone will try to take his life that he no longer uses the property’s balcony, despite having had no fresh air or sunlight for THREE YEARS.
The Australian faces extradition to Sweden on sexual assault charges – which he denies – and has been living at the central London diplomatic residence since 2012, at a cost of £12million to UK taxpayers.
The reclusive figure fears he will ultimately be sent to the US where he could face the death penalty.
In an interview with The Times magazine, Mr Assange claimed it had become too dangerous to even poke his head out the embassy’s balcony doors . . .
He does worry that if he is ever free he could be kidnapped or even targeted by a CIA drone. (Read more from “Wikileaks Founder Claims He’ll Be Killed by CIA Drone If He Leaves Embassy” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-30 21:32:432015-08-30 21:32:43Wikileaks Founder Claims He’ll Be Killed by CIA Drone If He Leaves Embassy
