Dr. James Dobson Just Endorsed This Candidate for President – 2 Big Reasons Why [+video]
Another presidential endorsement has come in, this time from a leading Christian figurehead, Dr. James Dobson. Dr. Dobson is an evangelical radio talk show host and psychologist who has been active in the political arena for over thirty years. On Wednesday, Dobson reiterated his December endorsement for Senator Cruz of the Republican party.
Dr. Dobson is the president of Family Talk, a nonprofit program which focuses on the “preservation of family”, as well as the former president of Focus on the Family. He has also authored over 30 books on the topic, advised three President’s, worked as an associate clinical professor at the University of Southern California, and earned his Ph.D. in child development, as well as numerous honorary doctoral degrees.
Dr. Dobson is viewed by some as an “expert” in family affairs. He dispenses mainly biblical advice focused on Christian marriages through his Family Talk radio program.
In a recent video, Dobson explains why Senator Cruz has his endorsement. “For us, the sanctity of human life and traditional marriage are non-negotiable. Ted has been relentless in defending the institution of marriage.” Furthermore adding, “after Donald Trump and Marco Rubio announced that they would accept the Supreme Court’s ruling on gay marriage we knew we could not support them. Our decision was confirmed when they opposed Senator Cruz’s efforts to defund Planned Parenthood.” (Read more from “Dr. James Dobson Just Endorsed This Candidate for President – 2 Big Reasons Why” HERE)
Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.
He would have a better chance runing under a party.
If conservative Christian values and principles matter to you, Ted Cruz is the only choice.
CRUZ 2016!!!
I’m still concerned about his birth to a foreign father in a foreign land. If Mr. Cruz should gain the nomination (my State’s primary is too late to make any difference), I’ll have to read the underlying decisions of the Supreme Court.
His birth aside, Mr. Cruz’s (or his campaign’s) lies about Dr. Carson (and perhaps other candidates) trouble me greatly. I’d like to read or hear truthful explanations and, if needed, honest apologies.
All THAT aside, the man is appealling in his intelligence, apparent beliefs, and potential electibility (I can’t believe that the country as a whole would elect Bernie Sanders — but, then, I’ve felt the same way about Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton, too, so I mightn’t have the clearest perception of the transformed character of our homeland!).
No, he is NOT! Conservative and Christian values include following the rule of LAW, not supporting a person who is running in violation of both the Constitution itself, AND the oath he took to uphold it against ALL enemies! This is not the behavior of a follower of Yeshua, but of a follower of Satan.
If he were doing that, you might have an argument. But he isn’t. So instead you just sound unhinged. But hey, you keep riding that dead horse. i’m moving on.
He IS doing that, and makes it all the more heinous is that HE knows he is!
Can you cite where the constitution defines “natural born”? Obviously not because it is only referenced as a requirement for being president. If NBC were defined by law what you believe, the legal scholars and Ivy League law professors would not say Cruz (and therefore Obama) is ‘natural born’. So, until a court decides against Cruz and Obama, he is good to go – no matter how loud or how much to repeat the same stuff.
I AM a natural born American citizen, the child of 2 American citizen parents, and born on US soil; so I can well enough “judge” there! The Founders didn’t put the definition of natural born in the Constitution, mistakenly believing that future Americans would also be educated and KNOW what that definition was; from the same sources from which they took it! However, you can find it in the Law of Nations by Emerich Vattel, which was the reference they used, and in many of their ancillary writings, as well as their reasons for including it as a requirement for the office.
Oh, and that scripture is taken out of context as usual. DO learn what it actually means!
If people would get behind Carson, he could win. Don’t understand why people want a person who is not Natural Born, to be US President. Cruz has gays backing his campaign, and he sought their approval, so there is really no clear candidate, except Carson.
Nor do I! Is Dobson willing to chuck the whole Constitution , by endorsing this fraud?
::f131Work At Home….Special Report….Earn 18k+ per monthfew days ago new McLaren. F1 bought after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a days ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn. More right Here::f131➤➤➤➤➤ https://www.easytechjob.com.nu .❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:::::::f131…
What a bunch of hogwash. Carson supporters continue to produce lie after lie about Cruz without one shred of evidence the whole time Carson rides above it all without ever telling his supporters to stop with the lie. I used to be a Carson supporter but now would not vote for him if he were the last one standing. Wake up people, this is a flat out lie and they are hoping people are stupid enough to accept it with no evidence at all, just like the Trump supporters are.
Hey, didn’t “Hope and Change” work for the current narcissist in change – not just once?
Legal scholars and Ivy League Law professors disagree with your NBC claim. And if you think SCOTUS will decide otherwise, think again (who is still in office)!
Dr. Dobson endorsed Joe Miller also (if I remember correctly). Cruz is NOT a natural born citizen as U.S. Constitution requires. So why is he violating the constitution??? Dr. Ben Carson is the best choice if you do not support Donald Trump. I am voting for Trump. Peace,
.How can the constitution be violated when the term “natural born” is not defined within the constitution. Can you cite where the constitution defines “natural born”? Obviously not because it is only referenced as a requirement for being president. If NBC were defined by law the way you believe, the legal scholars and Ivy League law professors would not say Cruz (and therefore Obama) is ‘natural born’. So, until a court decides against Cruz and Obama, he is good to go – no matter how loud or how much to repeat the same stuff.
One extremely consequential reason NOT to endorse Ted Cruz: If elected, at his inauguration, he’ll place his hand on a Bible and then proceed to swear allegiance to the biblically seditious Constitution:
“…Nearly all of the presidents have taken their oath of office by
placing their hands upon a Bible. But this empty tradition is nowhere
required in the Constitution. Even if this custom were spiritually
significant for some of the presidents, it was a meaningless ritual for
the majority of them. How could swearing upon a Christian Bible be
meaningful to these men when Christianity itself means nothing to them?
“Swearing upon the Bible is an empty gesture for an even more important reason. If ever there were an unequal yoking, it is when public officials place their hands on the Bible and swear to uphold the laws of WE THE PEOPLE. This no more Christianizes the oath than Aaron’s naming the golden calf “Yahweh” sanctified his idolatry. The Bible offers no precedent for swearing to uphold any other law than Yahweh’s. Swearing in Yahweh’s name, or swearing on the Bible, means nothing to Him if you simultaneously swear to keep the laws of
another god. This is treason and sedition against the God of gods and King of kings.
‘Be ye therefore very courageous to keep and to do all [commandments, statutes, and judgments] that is written in the book of the law of Moses, that ye turn not aside therefrom to the right hand or to the left; that ye come not among these nations … neither make mention of the name of their gods, nor because to swear by them, neither serve them, nor bow yourselves unto them: But cleave unto YHWH your God….’ (Joshua 23:6-8)….”
For more, google online Chapter 5 “Article 2: Executive Usurpation of “Bible Law vs, the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective.”
Then, find out how much you REALLY know about the Constitution as
compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the right-hand sidebar and receive a complimentary copy of a book that EXAMINES the Constitution by the Bible.
Why did this guy think that he needed to endorse Cruz a second time? Did he not think that one was good enough? Or did nobody hear him the first time?
So sad to hear it!