By Nick Gass. Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) told POLITICO on Wednesday that he will support Trump for the Republican nomination, making him one of the first members of Congress to express public support for the Manhattan businessman who is the prohibitive front-runner after his victory in Tuesday’s Nevada caucuses.
Also on Wednesday, Rep. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.) told The Buffalo News that he is backing Trump, saying he has the “guts and fortitude” to get jobs back from China and to take on foreign threats such as the Islamic State and North Korea.
In an interview on Wednesday, Hunter told POLITICO that Trump has the strength needed for the job. “We don’t need a policy wonk as president. We need a leader as president,” Hunter said, adding that he has told his colleagues much of the same thing. “I’m in, and I’ve been in,” he said in a telephone interview. (Read more from “Trump Just Landed Some Huge Endorsements” HERE)
__________________________________
Mega-Donors Shy Away From Fight With Trump
By Kenneth P. Vogel and Isaac Arnsdorf. As Donald Trump picks up momentum, the chances of a well-funded assault to block him from the Republican presidential nomination are dramatically dwindling, according to interviews with about a dozen donors and operatives who are appalled by the billionaire real estate showman’s campaign.
The party’s elite donor class has mostly closed its checkbooks to groups dedicated to stopping Trump, while the outfits that have built massive reserves are increasingly deciding to forgo anti-Trump campaigns, despite widespread fears that he is making a mockery of conservatism and could undermine Republicans up and down the ballot.
The deepest-pocketed operation on the right, the network helmed by the billionaires Charles and David Koch, had seriously debated launching an aggressive assault on Trump, but sources familiar with the network’s planning tell POLITICO that’s now highly unlikely. And the Karl Rove-conceived Crossroads outfits also are sitting out the party’s bitter primary, instead spending their cash attacking Democrats. (Read more from “Mega-Donors Shy Away From Fight With Trump” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/hqdefault-44.jpg360480Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-24 20:37:192016-04-11 10:52:17Trump Just Landed Some Huge Endorsements
President Obama “can try” to go around Congress in his attempt to close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay Cuba, House Speaker Paul Ryan told news conference on Wednesday. “He has no authority to do so,” Ryan added.
Ryan reminded reporters that Congress voted overwhelmingly for the National Defense Authorization Act, which contains a provision saying the president may not move Guantanamo inmates to U.S. soil.
“We are making legal preparations if the president tries to break the law,” Ryan said. “And what boggles my mind, is that the president is contemplating directing the military to knowingly break the law.
“Our law is really clear, and by the way, Democrats wrote this law when they were in the majority, when they ran Congress, which is, these detainees cannnot come to American soil.
“So if the president proceeds with knowingly breaking the law and asking the military to break the law, he will be met with fierce bipartisan oppostion here in Congress, and we’re taking all legal preparations necessary to meet with that resistance. (Read more from “Speaker Ryan: ‘We Are Making Legal Preparations If the President Tries to Break the Law'” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/8566890023_5a6e7404d5_o.jpg31684752Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-24 20:36:442016-04-11 10:52:17Speaker Ryan: ‘We Are Making Legal Preparations If the President Tries to Break the Law’ [+video]
There is one overarching message from this campaign season: Republican voters are sick of being betrayed. They are sick of the fact, as reflected by the Conservative Review scorecard, that only a handful of Republican members fulfill their campaign rhetoric and actually fight for us on the important issues upon assumption of office.
As someone who has fought every major legislative battle since Republicans took over the House in 2010, I can tell you these political foxholes are pretty lonely. We tend to know everyone who was down for the struggle when it mattered. Nowhere was this foxhole lonelier than during the pitched battle against Obama’s war on American sovereignty.
As a veteran activist of the 2006-2007 amnesty fight—the fight that inspired me to dedicate my career to politics professionally—I was alarmed that in 2013, when Rubio and the boys were promoting Obama’s amnesty bill, there was no staunch opposition to be seen or heard from. We lost much of our coalition from the previous decade and so many people had been bought out by the open borders cartel. Even talk radio, outside of a few perceptive ones like Mark Levin, was slow to understand what was happening. We were pulling our hair out waiting for the reinforcements to arrive and help us expose the danger of this bill. It was around this time of the year when the Gang of Eight was forging the deal and nobody in the Senate other than Sessions, Cruz, and Vitter could be found fighting it.
This begs the question: Where the hell was Donald Trump’s aggressive voice and impervious persona when we needed him on this fight or any other political battle? We are not talking about ancient history here; this was three years ago. If his passionate words about our sovereignty are to be taken at face value, it’s hard to explain his silence at the time. In fact, a few months later, after the bill had passed the Senate and gained full momentum, Trump was actually pimping the Dream Act and mimicking Rubio’s talking points. As this Buzzfeed article notes:
‘You know, the truth is I have a lot of illegals working for me in Miami,’ he told them, using the term for undocumented immigrants those in the meeting found offensive. ‘You know in Miami, my golf course is tended by all these Hispanics — if it wasn’t for them my lawn wouldn’t be the lawn it is; it’s the best lawn,’ Pacheco recalled Trump saying.
Trump said he knew the work of undocumented people is what makes his golf courses and hotels great.
‘At the end of the day, what we’re looking at is a value proposition for America,’ Tijerino said to Trump at the end of the meeting, referring to immigration legislation.
‘You’ve convinced me,’ Trump said to the delight of the activists in the room. [Buzzfeed: 8/26/2015]
But it gets worse.
You want to know what was a really lonely foxhole? When Obama began illegally implementing his executive amnesty with the Morton Memos in June 2011 and the original DACA amnesty in the summer of 2012. By the time Obama went for the second round (DAPA) in November 2014, our hard work fighting the Gang of Eight had paid off and a critical mass of people were wondering if we still lived in a democratic republic or a monarchy. But it wasn’t always like that. At the time, I wrote a column noting how we were in a constitutional crisis and Obama must be stopped. Yet, Obama was able to expand upon the amnesty in the summer of 2012 – in middle of the presidential election! – and nobody within the party’s establishment wanted to even discuss it, much less make it the central issue of the campaign. In fact, it was at that point that Marco Rubio punctuated Obama’s administrative Dream Act by introducing his own version codifying it into law.
During the summer of 2012 and the general election, Mitch McConnell refused to even discuss the issue and demurred to Mitt Romney because, “he is the leader of our party.” The thing is that Romney refused to make executive amnesty a campaign issue. He declined to even promise to overturn the illegal edict. He was completely mum when the Supreme Court, led by Kennedy and Roberts, sided with Obama in an egregious decision forcing Arizona to follow Obama’s illegal amnesty instead of congressional statutes.
In one of the most consequential and tragic mistakes ever made by the Republican Party, they diffidently joined with Obama and refused to fight him on amnesty. Yet, when Romney lost the election, they had the temerity to blame his loss on Romney’s phony lurch to the right on the issue during the primary. It was this sentiment that led to the two-year push for the Gang of Eight that destroyed our political capital and allowed Obama to irrevocably flood America with illegal aliens from Central America.
Yet, not only was Donald Trump’s belligerent voice absent in this fight, but he also echoed the very obnoxious sentiments promulgated by the worst elements of the GOP establishment. He blamed Mitt Romney for being too conservative on immigration:
‘Republicans didn’t have anything going for them with respect to Latinos and with respect to Asians,’ the billionaire developer says.
‘The Democrats didn’t have a policy for dealing with illegal immigrants, but what they did have going for them is they weren’t mean-spirited about it,’ Trump says. ‘They didn’t know what the policy was, but what they were is they were kind.’
Romney’s solution of ‘self deportation’ for illegal aliens made no sense and suggested that Republicans do not care about Hispanics in general, Trump says.
‘He had a crazy policy of self deportation which was maniacal,’ Trump says. ‘It sounded as bad as it was, and he lost all of the Latino vote,’ Trump notes. ‘He lost the Asian vote. He lost everybody who is inspired to come into this country.’ [Interview with Ronald Kessler of Newsmax: 11/26/2012]
Isn’t it amazing how politically correct and establishmentarian Trump is when there is no personal political gain at stake?
The tragic irony of the present is that, despite Trump’s unprecedented jingoism, he is following Romney’s 2012 campaign playbook. He is suddenly running to the right on the issue in order to win the primary when, much like Romney, he was never fighting for us before he had a personal political stake in doing so. We know how that story ended. Sadly, when he inevitably loses or [if he wins] lurches back to the left, conservatives would be blamed for it – the same way he blamed Romney for being too conservative!
Last night, Trump appeared with Sean Hannity and defended his foxhole conversions on numerous issues. He said he has “evolved on many issues” just like Ronald Reagan. The problem with this comparison is that Reagan was serving as a robust voice for conservatives on the major issues of the time for decades before running for president. He was fighting communism as president of GE during the ‘50s. Sixteen years before running for president in 1980, Reagan delivered the landmark “Time for Choosing” speech at the Goldwater nominating convention. In sharp contrast, 16 years before running for president in 2016, Trump was on Meet the Press promoting every licentious liberal view under the sun, including partial birth abortion.
Moreover, when Reagan was a Democrat during the ‘30s, it wasn’t exactly like the Democratic Party of today. This ain’t your grandfather’s Democrat Party. And Reagan certainly wasn’t promoting the very talking points of Gerald Ford and the party establishment he sought to defeat just a few years prior to running.
What is so disappointing for most of us who have bled for the cause is that this is about America’s future more than any cult of personality. Trump likes to brag how he is the man who single-handedly shifted the focus to immigration. Imagine if he would have “seen the light” and “evolved” just a few years earlier when we actually could have nipped the irreversible damage in the bud?
We’ve had a number of Republicans stab us in the back, even after fighting for our causes during the early years of their careers. We’ve never had someone fight for us who had never demonstrated a desire to fight for our issues until it came time to win an election. If we are so gullible as to accept a charlatan after being betrayed by these very same establishment liars for so many years, we deserve the governance we get. It’s time for conservatives to overcome the excitement of fighting words, and remember the essential importance of fighting deeds. (For more from the author of “Where the Hell Was Trump When We Needed Him?” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/Trump-Power-fist-1.jpg9001600Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-24 20:29:562016-04-11 10:52:17Where the Hell Was Trump When We Needed Him?
Abortion access in the U.S. has been vanishing at the fastest annual pace on record, propelled by Republican state lawmakers’ push to legislate the industry out of existence. Since 2011, at least 162 abortion providers have shut or stopped offering the procedure, while just 21 opened.
At no time since before 1973, when the U.S. Supreme Court legalized abortion, has a woman’s ability to terminate a pregnancy been more dependent on her zip code or financial resources to travel. The drop-off in providers—more than one every two weeks—occurred in 35 states, in both small towns and big cities that are home to more than 30 million women of reproductive age.
No region was exempt, though some states lost more than others. Texas, which in 2013 passed sweeping clinic regulations that are under scrutiny by the Supreme Court, saw the most: at least 30. It was followed by Iowa, with 14, and Michigan, with 13. California’s loss of a dozen providers shows how availability declined, even in states led by Democrats, who tend to be friendly to abortion rights . . .
Typically defined by medical researchers as facilities that perform 400 or more abortions per year, the ranks peaked in the late 1980s at 705, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a New York-based reproductive-health research organization. By 2011, the most recent year for which Guttmacher has data, that number had fallen to 553. (Read more from “Abortion Clinics Are Closing at a Record Pace” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/Save_the_unborn_child_sign_in_New_Zealand.jpg466479kathleenhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngkathleen2016-02-24 20:29:352016-04-11 10:52:17Abortion Clinics Are Closing at a Record Pace
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu showed his support on the Knesset’s first designated LGBT Rights Day on Tuesday.
Netanyahu rarely appears in the legislature on Tuesdays, a day on which it usually does not hold important votes, but he arrived specially to participate in LGBT Rights Day, during which discussions of the topic were held in the plenum and committees.
The prime minister briefly addressed the plenum: “I know that there were important and lengthy discussions today, and I came here in the middle of my schedule, which was no less busy, to say one sentence to the members of the LGBT community: ‘Every man was created in the image of God.’ That is the idea brought by our nation to mankind thousands of years ago, and it is the principle that must guide our national lives today.” (Read more from “Netanyahu Quotes Bible, Voices Strong Support for Gay Rights” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/Flickr_-_Benjamin_Netanyahu_with_Greek_PM_-_03.jpg10111116Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-24 20:29:122016-04-11 10:52:17Netanyahu Quotes Bible, Voices Strong Support for Gay Rights
China warned the United States on Wednesday not to adopt punitive currency policies that could disrupt U.S.-China relations after Donald Trump’s win in the Nevada caucus.
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told reporters in Beijing that “we are following with interest the U.S. presidential election.”
Hua was asked about China’s response to a possible Trump presidency and his announced plan to punish China for currency manipulation with a tax on Chinese goods.
“Since it belongs to the domestic affair of the U.S., I am not going to make comments on specific remarks by the relevant candidate,” she said.
“But I want to stress that China and the U.S., as world’s largest developing and developed countries, shoulder major responsibilities in safeguarding world peace, stability and security and driving world development,” the spokeswoman added. (Read more from “China Warns U.S. After Trump Wins Nevada Caucus” HERE)
Here are the key provisions that have drawn the most attention:
1) First, SB 89 requires local school boards to adopt policies that recognize a parent’s inherent authority to withdraw their children from tests or assessments that they find objectionable; and to allow parents to withdraw their child from any activity, class or program that instructs on human reproduction or sexual matters, or which inquires into personal or private family affairs of the student that are not a matter of public record.
2) Second, if a school plans to offer instruction dealing with human reproduction or sexual matters (i.e., sex education courses), then the parent must be provided at least two weeks notice, and the signed consent of the parent is required before the student may participate in such instruction.
3) Third, SB 89 states that an “abortion services provider” may not offer course materials or teach sex education programs in the public schools.
Planned Parenthood is lobbying furiously against the bill, arguing that SB 89 is designed to “target” them specifically, and further arguing that it will prevent students from receiving sex education. In reality, the bill’s language speaks for itself: entities that are making money by performing abortions ought not to be given a free, taxpayer-funded venue for promoting their services in front of impressionable young people. That applies not only to Planned Parenthood, but also to other abortion facilities and their employees. As Senator Dunleavy put it, “We’re not outlawing abortion service providers; we’re saying, ‘Take it out of the school.’”
For most of us, that’s just common sense. But Planned Parenthood, which makes more money from doing abortions than any other entity in the world, apparently has a sense of entitlement. Planned Parenthood thinks they’re entitled to be teaching your child about sex, and peddling their “services” to your child, in the public school that you pay for. Here’s reality: there are dozens of options that schools have for teaching about human sexuality that don’t involve giving free advertising to America’s No. 1 abortion business. There is nothing in SB 89 that disallows schools from offering sex education programs – provided they have the permission of parents to do so.
But Planned Parenthood isn’t the only entity opposing this bill. The public school bureaucracy is also launching salvos against SB 89. They claim it would just be way too burdensome to obtain the parent’s written consent before students can participate in a sex education class. This is nonsense. Schools obtain parental consent for all sorts of things – most notably field trips. As just one example, click here to see the parental consent form that Alaska’s largest school district requires before students can go on a field trip.
Guess how many times this form is filled out every year and collected by school staff? Well, the Anchorage School District website says that, “The Transportation Department dispatches approximately 6,000 field and activity trips annually.” You do the math – how many students on average attend each field trip, and then multiply that by thousands. The notion that this couldn’t easily be done for the infrequent sex education class is ludicrous. Let’s translate what the public school bureaucracy is really saying: “We don’t want to lift a finger to help protect the rights of the parents – the same parents who happen to pay our salaries.” If you’re not infuriated by that attitude, you should be.
Click HERE to see what Planned Parenthood is already teaching your kids. Caution – It’s a graphic but eye opening look at what the largest abortion provider in America is doing in public schools today.
My friends, it’s time to saddle up and defend Senate Bill 89. Senator Dunleavy has shown tremendous leadership in advancing this idea, but now the progressive left has simply come unhinged. Don’t let them get away with their “Indiana-style tactics” for demonizing a perfectly reasonable, perfectly common sense bill.
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/Classroom_in_Inspiration_Building.jpg12001805Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-24 20:28:352016-04-11 10:52:18Left-Wing Activists Wage War on Parental Rights
By Samia Nakhoul. Iran’s top leader warned voters on Wednesday the West was plotting to influence elections pitting centrists close to President Hassan Rouhani against conservative hardliners in a contest that could shape the Islamic Republic for years to come.
In remarks reflecting an abiding mistrust of Rouhani’s rapprochement with the West, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said he was confident Iranians would vote in favor of keeping Iran’s anti-Western stance on Friday in the first elections since last year’s nuclear accord with world powers.
Rouhani’s allies, who hope the deal will hasten Iran’s opening up to the world after years of sanctions, have come under increasing pressure in the election campaign from hardliners who accuse them of links to Western powers including the United States and Britain.
Those accusations seek to tap into Iranians’ wariness of Western motives and memories of a 1953 coup against nationalist prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh that was orchestrated by the United States and Britain and strengthened the Shah’s rule. (Read more from “Ahead of Election, Iran’s Leader Warns of Western ‘Plot'” HERE)
___________________________________
Iran Arrests Elderly Father of Jailed U.S. Citizen
By Yeganeh Torbati. Iranian authorities this week arrested the elderly father of an American jailed in Iran since October, the man’s family said on Wednesday.
Siamak Namazi, a dual U.S.-Iranian citizen, was detained by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in October while in Iran visiting family. Officials have yet to announce charges against him.
Baquer Namazi, Siamak’s father, was arrested late on Monday in Tehran, his wife Effie Namazi said in a Facebook post on Wednesday. The 80-year-old Namazi, also a dual Iranian-American citizen, was taken to Evin Prison, where his son is also being held, she said.
Asked at a Senate hearing about the elder Namazi’s arrest, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said: “I am very familiar with this and I am engaged on it specifically, but I am not permitted due to privacy reasons to go into details here.” (Read more from ” Iran Arrests Elderly Father of Jailed U.S. Citizen” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/hqdefault-43.jpg360480Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-24 20:28:202016-04-11 10:52:18Ahead of Election, Iran’s Leader Warns of Western ‘Plot’
A set of newborn triplets are now being tended to in a California hospital, unaware of their place at the center of a complex legal battle that could have huge implications for surrogacy and parental rights.
The babies were delivered several weeks premature Monday night, according to a lawyer for Melissa Cook, the 47-year-old surrogate mother from Woodland Hills who refused the biological father’s demands that she have an abortion. That man, a deaf, 50-year-old postal worker from Georgia identified in court papers as “C.M.,” paid Cook to carry anonymously donated eggs he fertilized in the hopes of having children. But Cook, who describes herself as pro-life, refused to have an abortion, and is seeking parental rights.
“I’m healthy, I’m 28 weeks pregnant, the babies are doing great, the three little boys I have inside me,” Cook told Fox News outside court earlier this month before they were born.
In California, a gestational surrogate – a woman who carries a donor’s eggs – has no parental rights, but Cook is challenging the state’s surrogacy law in federal court, claiming it is unconstitutional.
“It’s an attempt to reduce women to an object, or a breeding animal,” charges Cook’s lawyer, Harold Cassidy, a nationally prominent pro-life and anti-surrogacy lawyer who is calling for a moratorium on surrogacy. (Read more from “California Triplets at Center of Thorny Surrogacy Case, Pro-Life Debate” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/2892182827_8b5f6e626c_o.jpg20003008kathleenhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngkathleen2016-02-24 20:27:552016-04-11 10:52:18California Triplets at Center of Thorny Surrogacy Case, Pro-Life Debate
An unnamed staff member for GOP candidate Sen. Ted Cruz told CNN Monday that, in his assessment, the campaign is “done.”
“The Cruz campaign has to focus on getting basic campaign techniques right,” an unnamed “Republican operative” working for the Cruz campaign told the news outlet. “I don’t think Cruz can win the nomination at this point. I think his campaign is done.”
The staffer’s pronouncement comes in the wake Cruz’s disappointing third-place finish in South Carolina, “where evangelical or born-again Christians made up 74 percent of the GOP electorate. Making things worse for Cruz, Trump captured all 50 delegates up for grabs. If Cruz can’t win one delegate with demographics like that, the fears are Super Tuesday won’t be much better without a change in tactics,” CNN reported.
The assessment also comes after Cruz announced Monday he had fired campaign spokesman Rick Tyler. Tyler pushed a false story on social media that GOP rival Sen. Marco Rubio made derogatory statements about the Bible, when the opposite was actually true.
As reported by Western Journalism, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., became very angry with the Cruz campaign and its allies for engaging in “outright lies” and “underhanded tactics” in the days leading up to Saturday’s South Carolina primary. The former federal prosecutor, who has endorsed Rubio, said there has been a “systematic effort by Sen. Cruz and his allies to spread false information.”
(Read more from “Cruz Staffer Goes Rogue, Makes SHOCKING Statement About Campaign No One Expected” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/20832825818_9dec96cab5_b.jpg6831024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-02-23 23:15:162016-04-11 10:52:18Cruz Staffer Goes Rogue, Makes SHOCKING Statement About Campaign No One Expected