Kansas City, Kansas, Police Captain Shot Dead

A police captain was shot and killed Tuesday while responding to a drive-by shooting in Kansas City, Kansas, prompting members of law enforcement to lament that another one of their own had died violently.

Capt. Robert Melton was pronounced dead at a hospital as a manhunt for shooters continued, Mayor Mark Holland said in a statement.

Tuesday’s fatal shooting comes just on the heels of three police officers being fatally shot in Baton Rouge, La., last Sunday, and five police officers in Dallas being shot fatally July 7.

“This is a very tense and volatile time in our community and our nation,” Holland said in a statement. “It is important that we not jump to conclusions or speculate about this situation. Our police and city officials will share information as it becomes available. As we wait for that information, let us focus our thoughts and prayers on Capt. Melton’s family, our police department, and on the community.”

The public initially became aware of the incident via social media. (Read more from “Kansas City, Kansas, Police Captain Shot Dead” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Attacks Trump in Cleveland

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz took her disdain for the Republican Party and its presumptive presidential nominee right to the source Monday, criticizing both during interviews from inside the arena at the GOP convention in Cleveland.

Declaring that Donald Trump should go “nowhere near the White House,” Wasserman Schultz told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that Trump is “the most divisive, bigoted, unprepared, unqualified major-party candidate that has ever run.”

Going further, the DNC chairwoman promised that “that’s the contrast that we’re going to draw. Whatever is said on this stage tonight and through this week, Donald Trump can’t run away from his horrific personal and business record.”

The Democrats are conducting interviews and meetings in Cleveland this week in an effort to counteract any momentum Trump may gain from officially winning the GOP nomination.

In a related interview with NBC’s Andrea Mitchell, Wasserman Schultz echoed her Democratic talking points, calling Trump “divisive,” “dangerous,” “unqualified” and “unprepared.” She told Mitchell that “bluster is no substitute for expertise” and mocked Trump’s calls for war against ISIS.

But Mitchell reminded Wasserman Schultz that despite her claim that Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton is “the most admired and respected woman in the entire world,” Clinton’s unpopularity is only bested by Trump. “The negatives in Hillary Clinton — 67 percent don’t trust her,” Mitchell said.

Mitchell also asked Wasserman Schultz how her team would counteract the beliefs some Americans have that the nation needs a “strong man” in the White House. The DNC chairwoman brushed aside the notion Clinton isn’t strong enough to lead the country, countering, “Americans are looking for a president who will keep us safe. … Hillary Clinton will lead us forward and continue the progress we’ve made.”

In addition to having Wasserman Schultz and others on site in Cleveland, a leaked document revealed the Democrats also have planned to disrupt the GOP convention with staged strikes of fast food workers, protests, leaflets and propaganda. (For more from the author of “Debbie Wasserman Schultz Attacks Trump in Cleveland” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

POOR, INNOCENT, NAIVE SHEPARD SMITH: Completely Clueless as to Why Cops Are Being Slaughtered

In the wake of another horrific ambush of police officers earlier today in Baton Rouge, Fox News anchor Shepard Smith was actually arguing with the Governor of Louisiana a few minutes ago.

He was saying, in essence, that no one has a clue as to how to stop this madness.

I beg to differ, Shmuckard, I mean, Shepard. How about electing a President who actually treats people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin? Who waits until facts emerge before opining on law enforcement issues?

The President of the Cleveland Police Union put it bluntly today, stating that “President Obama has blood on his hands.”

Detective Steve Loomis, President of the Cleveland Police Union, was interviewed on Sunday on Fox News. He described the situation that began with Alton Sterling. The president of the United States validated the nonsense and false narrative that the Black Lives Matter and the media spewed with his divisiveness, he said.

The detective called for someone to put an end to this.

It’s “insane” that a governor of Minnesota and a president of the United States made the statements they made one day after the police-involved shootings, the union chief said. They absolutely and directly triggered these senseless murders of law enforcement officers throughout this country. “It’s reprehensible”, he added.

They have politicized the false narrative and the president has “blood on his hands” and it “will not be washed off”, Officer Loomis said.

Officer Loomis wants to know how police officers became the bad guys. We have celebrities and athletes spewing venom at them.

A false narrative has been handed down from the White House all the way down the offices of government to inflame racial tension.

From the New Black Panther voter intimidation case, to “the police acted stupidly”, to calling America “a nation of cowards”, this president and his administration have done their very best to sow racial division, discord, and civil unrest.

All is proceeding as they have planned. (For more from the author of “POOR, INNOCENT, NAIVE SHEPARD SMITH: Completely Clueless as to Why Cops Are Being Slaughtered” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Ailes Bails — Exits Fox News in Wake of Sexual Harassment Allegations

Fox News titan Roger Ailes will be leaving the network he helped build in the wake of sexual harassment allegations, his lawyer confirmed Tuesday to The New York Times. His lawyer, feminist hero Susan Estrich, said that he may keep a position with Fox Network as a consultant. The Times described his being forced out as “a humbling and startlingly swift fall from power.”

Ailes’ troubles began when long-time Fox star Gretchen Carlson sued him, claiming that she was fired after she refused his advances. Ailes denied it, calling it “a retaliatory suit for the network’s decision not to renew her contract.” Other women at the network came forward with similar stories. It was not the first time Ailes had been accused of sexual harrassment, his biographer Gabriel Sherman said. “Taken together, these stories portray Ailes as a boss who spoke openly of expecting women to perform sexual favors in exchange for job opportunities.”

“Ailes is known for having a bawdy, politically incorrect sense of humor,” CNN Money reported when she began the suit. “But Carlson’s lawsuit alleges that he went much further with her. It alleges that Ailes repeatedly ‘injected sexual and/or sexist comments’ into conversations; made ‘sexual advances by various means’; and said to her last September, ‘I think you and I should have had a sexual relationship a long time ago and then you’d be good and better and I’d be good and better.’”

At that time, the Murdochs said in an official statement, “While we have full confidence in Mr. Ailes and Mr. Doocy [a Fox News host Carlson also accused], who have served the company brilliantly for over two decades, we have commenced an internal review of the matter.”

Reports that Ailes was going to be shown the door surfaced Monday in New York Magazine. The magazine reported that owners Rupert Murdoch and his two sons had agreed to force out Ailes and were waiting till after the Republican convention. It also reported that the law firm investigating the charges is “looking into the appropriateness of Ailes’s pressuring employees to speak out on his behalf, against his accusers,” including a Business Insider article by Fox senior vice-president Neil Cavuto.

Megyn Kelly Too

And today, another bombshell: The Kelly File host Megyn Kelly testified that she, too, had been harassed, says New York Magazine writer Gabriel Sherman. He quotes two sources briefed on Fox News’ parent company 21st Century Fox’s outside investigation of Ailes’ alleged behavior as saying that “Kelly told investigators that Ailes made unwanted sexual advances towards her about ten years ago when she was a young correspondent at Fox.” She reportedly described the harassment in detail.

Kelly’s involvement raised the stakes for Ailes and will have increased the pressure on the Murdochs to let him go. She’s become a media superstar after her debate battles with Donald Trump, the brightest presence in their prime time lineup, and the clock is ticking on her contract. Rumors are reportedly circulating that Bill O’Reilly is thinking of retiring, making Fox News even more desperate to hold onto Kelly. She is, they say, “the future of the network.”

Kelly’s silence in the wake of Gretchen Carlson’s sexual harassment lawsuit against Ailes had already drawn plenty of discussion. Now that she’s become something of a feminist icon in the wake of her battles with Trump, why didn’t she speak up in Carlson’s defense? On the other hand, Ailes has certainly helped make her a media superstar, why didn’t she join other Fox News personalities in rushing to his defense?

On Tuesday, Breitbart claimed that an inside source said, “Everyone here hates Gretchen and Megyn” and that “hosts from Fox and Friends and throughout the primetime lineup from the co-hosts of The Five to Special Report’s Bret Baier to Greta Van Susteren to Bill O’Reilly, Shepard Smith and Sean Hannity are planning to band together and potentially execute contract clauses that allow them to leave if Ailes is driven out.”

As for the report that the decision has already been made to give Ailes the boot: “This matter is not yet resolved and the review is not concluded,” the Murdochs’ official statement said. (For more from the author of “Ailes Bails — Exits Fox News in Wake of Sexual Harassment Allegations” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

McConnell Spoke, America Stopped Watching the Convention

Tonight, to a mixed chorus of boos and cheers, Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. (F, 42%) addressed the Republican convention. There was a part of me that was hoping to hear something prophetic; an admission of fault or failure from the GOP; an admission that the Republican Party that McConnell promised to defend had lost its way.

Perhaps predictably, McConnell spoke about none of those things. In fact, the first thing he mentioned upon taking the stage was… his own election.

The rest of McConnell’s message was nothing more than a staff written speech full of the typical talking points. It was full of grandiose “achievements”, empty promises, and rhetoric that even McConnell may struggle to believe. Ironically, he described Hillary Clinton as someone who will “say anything, do anything, and be anything” to achieve her own ends. Look in the mirror much, Mitch?

Perhaps McConnell’s speech confirms why we have lost trust in the Republican Party. As we’ve watched this convention unfold, we have the opportunity to measure his speech, as offered from the cautions of a teleprompter, versus those of Senators who stand for the people; Senators like Mike Lee, with emotion and passion, stood on the convention floor bellowing to be heard by the conveniently deaf politburo of the Republican Party.

Yet, McConnell presents narrative that is simply unbelievable. He extolls his achievements as the Republican leader over a Republican Senate that has literally accomplished nothing. He claims that his Senate is more effective than that run by Reid – but even in that humble-brag, he cannot be taken seriously.

Say what you will about Harry Reid, but he was effective for President Obama. Reid handed Obama victory after victory. He broke the longstanding rules of the Senate to satisfy his progressives, and that crushed Republicans; he helped President Obama pass Obamacare; he reversed spending cuts and helped raise taxes on the rich.

Seriously, take a moment to ask yourself what McConnell has truly achieved for conservatives?

McConnell promised conservatives a repeal of Obamacare. Instead, he protected it.

McConnell promised conservatives he would reduce the size of government. Instead, he expanded it with a $305 billion new highway bill; then he eliminated $2 trillion in austerity measures originally implemented by conservatives in Congress.

McConnell promised conservatives that a new majority would never sign off on a Homeland Security funding bill without outlawing Obama’s executive amnesty program. Instead, he immediately surrendered to Obama’s demands.

McConnell used the Senate to pass $630 billion in tax breaks for his lobbyist buddies; he used the rules of the senate to sink conservative policy while helping liberals advance their own agenda through amendments to legislation.

McConnell doesn’t represent the Republican Party, and he certainly doesn’t share the anti-establishment characteristics of the presumptive nominees in Trump/Pence. Instead, McConnell is a political hack that has made a career out of politics and the cronyism it has afforded him.

In his own book, he boasts of becoming a career politician; enthused at the mere idea of a lifetime in the seats of power. He stands before conservatives professing to be one of us, yet repeatedly writes, in his own memoir, how much he despises the Tea Party or anti-establishment members for fighting for small government; and instead, whines that they should simply accept that “in the Senate, we don’t get everything we want.”

Before you tonight was not a Senator, nor a majority leader, but a mascot that represents a party that has lost our trust; a party that chose a candidate that, frankly, it nominated in spite of McConnell and the establishment he seeks to protect. McConnell doesn’t represent us – and he shouldn’t represent the Republican Party. (For more from the author of “McConnell Spoke, America Stopped Watching the Convention” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

What Happened to Trump’s Anti-Muslim Rhetoric?

Donald Trump largely built his candidacy on three things:

1. Unprecedented free, unfettered media coverage. Far greater than all his primary competitors combined, in fact.

2. His own bravado, which was manna from heaven for a populace starving for anything other than the consultant-driven drivel typically served up.

3. Cynical manipulation of racial/religious identity politics.

It is that third item that it’s time to revisit in light of day two of the GOP convention, which closed with a Muslim prayer. See, much of Trump’s base really believed all that anti-Muslim rhetoric. In fact, his so-called “Muslim ban” was his most popular policy initiative according to all the exit polls nationwide.

But if there was ever any further confirmation needed this was all for show, and a con all along, tonight’s closing prayer was it. Not because it displayed religious pluralism. I don’t believe in Allah, which is why I’m not a Muslim. But I understand not everyone in America believes as I do.

Rather, because the pluralism on parade tonight is a complete and total repudiation of the canard Trump sold his base for months. As he cynically capitalized on liberal stereotypes of Republicans, because he’s a New York City liberal, too.

So all of you who overlooked the fact Trump is not and never has been with us on the issues, simply because you believed he shared your nationalist frustrations, you are now part of a select group of people. Those swindled by Donald Trump.

Now who’s the cuck? (For more from the author of “What Happened to Trump’s Anti-Muslim Rhetoric?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

A Day in the Life of a Delegate to the RNC

It’s just after 3 p.m. on the afternoon of the first day of the Republican National Convention, and Art Wittich is leaning up against a red pole on the outskirts of the convention floor, observing the events taking place before him.

Directly to his right, CNN anchors and guests gather around an anchor desk, preparing for a segment. Directly to his left, delegates, members of the media, and Republican National Committee staff move on and off the convention floor.

In front of him, delegates from Texas—all dressed in matching cream-colored cowboy hats and red, white, and blue button-down shirts—danced to a jazz band playing “How Sweet It Is To Be Loved By You” for the 2,472 delegates gathered for the week.

Standing there, watching as thousands moved around him, Wittich had his hands clasped in front of him. In them, he held two booklets: one outlining the order of business for the 2016 Republican Convention, and another listing the rules of the convention.

The Daily Signal is the multimedia news organization of The Heritage Foundation. We’ll respect your inbox and keep you informed.

The second booklet—the rules of the convention—would prove to be the subject of controversy that would unfold before Wittich’s eyes.

Where the Action Is

Wittich is a first-time delegate to the Republican National Convention. The convention, which kicked off Monday and will run through Thursday, is the first one Wittich has attended.

For some of the more than 2,400 delegates, serving their state at the convention means taking a week off from work and footing the bill themselves to make the trip to Cleveland. Though some state parties helped pay the way for their delegates, others—like one young delegate from Rhode Island—took to crowdfunding websites like GoFundMe to raise money.

Wittich and his wife arrived Wednesday and came strictly on a volunteer basis, meaning they took off from work and paid their own way. For Wittich, though, it was worth it to serve.

“It’s an honor and a privilege to be part of the nominating process,” Wittich told The Daily Signal. “But the RNC has to change and improve and reform so that we give voice but also meaning to grassroots involvement.”

Though the convention in Cleveland is a first for Wittich, he’s no stranger to the political process.

A former state senator and representative in the Montana Legislature, Wittich was defeated in the Republican primary earlier this year.

He lost after a jury found him guilty of violating Montana campaign finance laws for taking illegal campaign contributions during his 2010 run for the state Senate.

But the investigation into Wittich, launched by Montana Commissioner of Political Practices Jonathan Motl, hasn’t been without controversy. It’s been called a “speech mugging” by The Wall Street Journal.

Wittich served as the majority leader in the state Senate and led the charge against Medicaid expansion in the state House. After losing his primary last month, he turned his attention to the Republican National Committee.

“I like to be where the action is,” he said. “When I was in the state Senate, that was leadership. In the state House, that was trying to kill Medicaid when I become House Human Services [Committee] chair. The RNC is the only organization big enough to stop socialism.”

“It’s as simple as that. There is no other organization that can effectively combat it,” he continued.

Wittich will not only serve as a delegate to the convention, but the 23 members of Montana’s delegation further selected him and a female delegate to serve on the rules committee.

He was also elected to serve as a RNC committeeman, a four-year term that starts the day after the convention ends.

Wittich arrived in Cleveland last week, when the rules committee met to vote on the rules for the convention.

The panel gathered for 16 hours on Thursday, Wittich said, and saw intense debate over an attempt to unbind delegates from voting for the candidate who won their state and instead allow them to vote their conscience.

Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, who is at the convention as a delegate also on the rules committee, was one of the loudest voices behind the effort.

Wittich doesn’t consider himself to be a disrupter, but he said he was moved and impressed by three speeches Lee gave last week during the committee meeting.

The committee met again on the fourth floor of the Quicken Loans Arena on Monday and cast one vote—to pass the rules debated the prior week.

Though rules committee Chairwoman Enid Mickelsen, a delegate from Utah, said there had been ample time for debate and discussion on those rules, Wittich disagreed.

“People weren’t even allowed to speak,” he said. “[The RNC] eliminated dissent and rejected reforms by the states to make the RNC more grassroots.”

Wittich said the rules committee leaders pushed through a series of procedural motions last week, effectively shutting down debate.

“When you know that there are people who are frustrated with the process, you can take one of two approaches. One is you can hear them out and have the debate, and the other approach is just to try to push it through with procedural motions in a long day,” he said, continuing:

The RNC has to reform and has to evolve. I think it’s going to get there, I really do. I’ve talked to a number of new RNC members who want that to happen. I’m optimistic that the institution will start evolving.

The First Day

Wittich, his wife, a guest to the convention, and his fellow Montanans stayed in a hotel outside of Cleveland, in Westlake, Ohio.

At 11 a.m. on Monday morning, the Montana delegation boarded buses bound for the Quicken Loans Arena for the start of the 2016 convention.

When looking out at the floor from the convention stage, the Montana delegates were seated in the back, left corner, next to delegations from Texas and Colorado.

Montana delegates and guests who traveled to Cleveland donned denim vests with their state name sprawled across their backs in red and white lettering. Stickers proclaiming “Unlock Our Lands”—a call for the federal government to give land back to the people living out West—were plentiful, and Montana’s delegates were quick to hand them out.

Wittich, though, bucked his state’s attire, at least for the convention’s opening day.

On Monday, he said his lineup of meetings and events called for a tan sport coat and navy slacks. His “Montana,” he called it, will come out as the week goes on, when he trades in his business attire for denim and cowboy boots.

When Wittich arrived at the arena around 12:30 p.m., he quickly made his way to his seat on the convention floor.

The convention kicked off at 1 p.m. that afternoon with a short speech from Chairman Reince Priebus calling the convention to order. Then, the delegates broke out to meet with their respective committees.

Wittich joined a throng of fellow delegates on the rules committee and members of the media who gathered to pass the rules for the convention.

The Montana delegate said that the committee had previously been divided into four factions: pro-Trump, anti-Trump, pro-RNC, and RNC reformers. Eventually, though, the groups were whittled down to two: pro-Trump and anti-Trump.

Wittich, himself, advocated for reforms that would lessen the power of the committee’s chairman and give more power to the grassroots. He also introduced a measure to explicitly bind the delegates, which Wittich said was an effort to codify what so many committee members were pushing in the first place.

Ultimately, the rules committee passed a package similar to those passed during the 2012 convention, with minimal changes.

It was when Wittich and the delegates arrived back on the convention floor, though, that the chaos started.

Giving a Voice to the Grassroots

It was just after 3 p.m. when Wittich returned to his seat on the convention floor.

First, the delegates voted to pass a report from the credentials committee, one of three that met Monday.

It was when Rep. Steve Womack, R-Ark., chair of vote procedures, arrived on stage to call for a vote on the rules package passed by the 112-member committee that there was uproar among a group of delegates opposed to New York businessman Donald Trump.

Anti-Trump delegates called for a roll call vote from all 2,472 delegates on the rules package after gathering the signatures needed to do so.

But after chants of “Roll call vote” and “U-S-A” broke out in the arena, efforts to force the roll call vote failed.

The discord centering on the convention rules caught many onlookers by surprise, as delegates typically pass the package with little fanfare.

Wittich, though, said it highlights the disunity not only among convention goers, but also in the country.

“The party is split and the country is split, so it makes sense for the convention to reflect that a little bit,” he said. “I didn’t expect this particular thing, but it just shows the level of frustration inside the party.”

For his part, Wittich didn’t partake in the debate on the convention floor, but he did admit the RNC has some soul-searching to do.

“[The RNC is] not listening to the people,” he said. “It’s a top-down organization. It’s really about speech. It’s association. It’s having authority and varying viewpoints and not being afraid to discuss and debate and change.”

‘An Honor and a Privilege’

After the delegates passed the rules package by voice vote, they proceeded to pass the party’s platform with no controversy.

The convention then stood in recess until 8 p.m. Monday night, when delegates and attendees gathered to hear from a lineup of speakers including actor Scott Baio; Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.; and Melania Trump, with speeches centered around the theme “Make America Safe Again.”

During the hours-long break, Wittich and his wife headed to a reception hosted by the Republican National Lawyers Association and returned to the arena later on for the evening’s events.

Though Wittich admitted his first convention as a delegate wasn’t what he expected, he said he doesn’t regret serving as a delegate and attempting to challenge the status quo within the party committee.

“Right now I’m pleased to have spent time on the rules committee. If you’re going to be on the RNC, you might as well be on the rules committee,” he said. “The RNC is a very important institution for protecting enhancing the country as far as conservative principles.” (For more from the author of “A Day in the Life of a Delegate to the RNC” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Gun Seller: Secretive Justice Department Program Forcing Banks to Gather Illegal Information About Firearms Sales

A firearms dealer in North Carolina said his bank asked him to reveal “ridiculous and somewhat illegal” information about his business and its customers after the June 12 terrorist attack in Orlando, Florida, and he believes a secretive Justice Department program is to blame.

Luke Lichterman, owner of Hunting and Defense in Tryon, North Carolina, said his bank told him he couldn’t use its services without completing an “addendum” supplying details about his business.

“It all comes back to the Obama administration and Operation Choke Point, the ‘undesirable businesses’ thing,” Lichterman told The Daily Signal. “Something like that from the government has ripples that keep radiating. It’s not something that you can turn on and turn off.”

Lichterman believes that the timing of the request from his bank was no accident, given that gun control once again became a hot issue after the attack on a gay nightclub in Orlando.

The Justice Department launched Operation Choke Point in 2013 to fight fraud. The agency made it more difficult for “high risk” industries to gain access to the banking system, as a way to drive fraudulent industries out of business.

However, critics argue the Obama administration also used Operation Choke Point to intentionally make business more difficult for firearms sellers by categorizing them alongside illegal and fraudulent industries.

In February, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill to end Operation Choke Point. In April, Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Mike Lee, R-Utah, introduced a similar measure in the Senate, where it has since stalled.

In the meantime, small business owners from across the country such as the 75-year-old Lichterman continue to complain about the lasting effects of Operation Choke Point.

The Bank’s Original Problem

As The Daily Signal previously reported, Lichterman and his wife had maintained personal accounts at HomeTrust Bank in Asheville, North Carolina, since 2012. But this spring, when Lichterman approached the bank for access to an automated clearinghouse payment service for Hunting and Defense, which operates under the legal name Muttburger Marketing LLC, the bank refused his request.

An automated clearinghouse payment service makes it easier—and cheaper—for business owners to transfer and send money online, allowing them to complete transactions electronically. Without it, Lichterman would be forced to front processing fees at 4.5 percent of every transaction that would eat away at his already slim profits.

In early June, after Lichterman fought back and went public with his story—accusing the bank of participating in Operation Choke Point tactics by discriminating against him because he sells guns—HomeTrust Bank reversed its policy and offered Lichterman an account.

But on June 14, two days after an Islamist-inspired terrorist shot and killed 49 people and wounded 53 others in an attack at an Orlando nightclub, the bank again reversed its policy and told Lichterman he couldn’t use their services without completing an “addendum” demanding more information about his business.

The Daily Signal sought comment about this request from HomeTrust Bank via phone and email, but it did not respond.

The New Demands

Among other demands, the addendum, which Lichterman provided to The Daily Signal, asks Lichterman to “submit a complete list of all firearms and ammunitions vendors and customers” that he conducts business with. In part, it reads:

After the first/initial submission subsequent lists are to include all relevant parties since the date of last report. Each list is to specify personal and business names and associated FFL [federal firearms license] numbers and should indicate whether the individual/entity is new or repeat. The list must identify all firearms and ammunitions transaction entities regardless of whether HomeTrust Treasury Management ACH [automated clearinghouse] origination services are used for the transaction.

The list is due no later than the fifth day of the first month in each quarter.

The new agreement also requires:

A “complete list of all firearms and ammunitions vendors and customers” that Lichterman did business with.

A “detailed written document explaining how the business is operated, including procedures in place to screen customers” to ensure compliance with federal regulations, rules, and laws.

A current copy of the applicable federal firearms license(s).

The end of the agreement enables HomeTrust Bank to request more information:

“[HomeTrust Bank] may request additional information (such as, but not limited to, personal or business financial statements, tax returns, etc.) for the purpose of evaluating your request to obtain or maintain [accounts].”

The Daily Signal publishes the agreement in full at the end of this report.

Christopher Zealand, senior research lawyer for the National Rifle Association’s lobbying arm, described the agreement as highly unusual.

“It’s one thing for a bank to require evidence that a business is operating legally (for example, by requesting copies of relevant licenses, etc.),” Zealand said in an email to The Daily Signal. “It’s quite another for the bank to insist that a federally licensed firearms dealer divulge identifying information about every customer who purchases, or has purchased, a firearm or ammunition.”

The implications, he said, are even more concerning:

Not only is [the information request] logistically problematic, it is an egregious violation of privacy. And to the degree federal banking regulators would have access to these lists, it could also create a workaround to existing laws meant to prevent federal registries of firearm owners.

The Reason

It is unclear whether the demands originate from HomeTrust Bank employees, or the bank’s federal regulators.

HomeTrust Bank is regulated by the Federal Reserve, which would not comment on Lichterman’s specific case or answer broader questions about the requirements and guidelines the agency sets for gun sellers to ensure safe transactions.

Dillon McConnell, a public affairs specialist at the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which regulates the firearms industry, wrote in an email to The Daily Signal that the bank’s addendum for Lichterman appears to originate from a “private institution.”

McConnell added that while the the Federal Privacy Act prohibits his agency from releasing information about federally licensed firearms dealers, gun sellers are not prohibited from disclosing such information. Aside from applicable state and local laws, private institutions are free to request the information.

If the demands originate with HomeTrust Bank, however, it isn’t clear why the bank requires such information from a customer.

Lichterman said he believes the answer is Operation Choke Point, and the program’s continued effects:

[Under] Operation Choke Point, Obama didn’t write a memo and send it to the bank and say ‘Hey, shut this guy off because he might sell a gun that someday might be used by somebody,’ completely ignoring the fact that it might be used to defend against one of these guys. The thing is, they keep going after the wrong target. In airports, they’re looking for the bomb, they’re not looking for the bombers. They go after the gun, they don’t go after the gunman. If they want to get guns off the street, first get the criminals off the street. They can attack the guys by attacking the people who do business in guns.

Zealand, the lawyer with the NRA, said he agrees.

“The fallout of Operation Choke Point continues,” he said. (For more from the author of “Gun Seller Says His Bank Demands ‘Ridiculous’ Information. He Blames Operation Choke Point.” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Melania Trump’s Cleveland RNC Speech Draws Praise, Controversy

By Ali Vitali. In a rare public-speaking appearance, Melania Trump made the case for her husband on the first night of his convention.

Her speech displayed Trump’s softer side, oft shielded and secret from the press that constantly follow him. And while her words did little to add to the image of the brash billionaire poised to officially become the Republican standard bearer, Monday’s speech painted a more vivid picture of the woman who stands by the that billionaire’s side.

Calling Trump determined and speaking about his perseverance in business, Melania’s vision of her husband added no new characteristics to the man who has dominated the 2016 presidential election with his off the cuff campaign style and say-anything reputation . . .

Where Trump still has the occasional barb for his former rivals, Melania shared praise for them — saying Monday “they deserve respect and gratitude from all of us.”

While Trump still grapples publicly with the finer tenets of his controversial Muslim ban, Melania’s speech was a rhetorical outreach to all religions and races on behalf of her husband. (Read more from “Melania Trump’s Cleveland RNC Speech Draws Praise, Controversy” HERE)

___________________________________

Some of Melania Trump’s Speech at GOP Convention Similar to Michelle Obama Remarks

By Fox News. Melania Trump’s speech Monday to the Republican National Convention on Monday has come under fire as it appears that two of the passages are strikingly similar to the speech first lady Michelle Obama gave in 2008 at the Democratic National Convention.

The passages in question focus on lessons that Melania Trump, the wife of presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, said she learned from her parents and the relevance of their lessons in her experience as a mother.

The remarks came toward the beginning of her speech, which was otherwise distinct from the address that Michelle Obama gave when her husband, then-Sen. Barack Obama, was being nominated for president.

“From a young age, my parents impressed on me the values that you work hard for what you want in life, that your word is your bond and you do what you say and keep your promise, that you treat people with respect. They taught and showed me values and morals in their daily life,” Melania Trump said in her speech in Cleveland.

In Michelle Obama’s 2008 speech in Denver, she said: “And Barack and I were raised with so many of the same values: like, you work hard for what you want in life, that your word is your bond, that you do what you say you’re going to do, that you treat people with dignity and respect, even if you don’t know them and even if you don’t agree with them.” (Read more from “Some of Melania Trump’s Speech at GOP Convention Similar to Michelle Obama Remarks” HERE)

___________________________________

CNN: Melania Trump’s speech plagiarizes parts of Michelle Obama’s

At least one passage in Melania Trump’s speech Monday night at the Republican National Convention plagiarized from Michelle Obama’s address to the Democratic National Convention in 2008.

Side-by-side comparisons of the transcripts show the text in Trump’s address following, nearly to the word, the first lady’s own from the first night of the Democratic convention in Denver nearly eight years ago.

The controversy quickly overshadowed the speech, which was to have been her introduction to voters. It focused on her immigration to the US and her love for her husband. (Read more about Mrs. Trump’s Cleveland RNC Speech HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Giuliani Confirms Trump Plans to Keep Iran Deal

Rather than choke off a dangerous and lawless jihadist regime as they should, Americans are going to be stuck negotiating with terrorists for at least four more years, according to a Trump surrogate’s speech in Cleveland Monday night.

Following a rant about jihadist terrorism during a convention night themed “Make America Safe Again,” former New York mayor and Trump supporter Rudy Giuliani delved into the future of the Iran Nuclear Deal in a hypothetical Trump administration.

“To defeat Islamic extremist terrorism we must put them on defense,” said Giuliani during his rambling, largely-unhinged convention speech. “This includes undoing one of the worst deals America ever made – Obama’s Nuclear Agreement with Iran that will eventually let them become a nuclear power and put billions of dollars back into a country that the world’s biggest state sponsor of terrorism.”

“We must commit ourselves to unconditional victory against” jihadists, said Giuliani.

Sounds great, so I guess that means we’re scrapping it finally? Well, no.

Giuliani went on to promise that “Donald Trump will make sure that any agreement with Iran meets the original goals of the U.N. and our allies, and that is a non-nuclear Iran.”

The prospect of convincing the Mullahs to beat their heavy water reactors into plowshares by employing “The Art of the Deal,” may seem appealing, but let’s look at this open-eyed.

At least the speech, paired with similar promises from the campaign, at least provides some clarity to the confusion sown by months of inconsistent rhetoric from team Trump regarding deal. While the candidate has always been against the deal in some form or fashion, his approach to handling the international security disaster has vacillated from renegotiation to scrapping back and finally back to renegotiation.

Initially, in September, Trump said he would simply renegotiate the deal, which was ushered through the Senate by Republican leadership last summer.

“If we have to wait until the next president is sworn in to revisit this nuclear weapons agreement, then the next president better be someone who knows how to negotiate,” he said in an op-ed at USA Today. “When I am elected president, I will renegotiate with Iran — right after I enable the immediate release of our American prisoners and ask Congress to impose new sanctions that stop Iran from having the ability to sponsor terrorism around the world.”

By the time the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) conference rolled around in March, there was a brief and shining season where Trump told the crowd that his “number one priority” was to “dismantle the disastrous deal with Iran,” saying that it was “catastrophic for Israel—for America, for the whole Middle East.”

However, as of a couple of weeks ago, it seems that Trump is back to keeping the deal.

In an interview with the Daily Caller News Foundation, top Trump foreign policy adviser Walid Phares said that Trump is likely going to keep the deal in some form, saying “he’s not going to get rid of an agreement that has the institutional signature of the United States.”

“He’s said, so far that he doesn’t like this deal and that it was poorly negotiated,” Phares continued. “Once elected, he’s going to renegotiate it after talking through it with his advisers.”

“[He] is not going to implement it as is, he is going to revise it after negotiating one on one with Iran or with a series of allies.”

The renegotiation stance was, of course, echoed by Giuliani’s immediate pivot to talking about future deals after saying that the current agreement needs to be scrapped.

The problem with this, Andrew C. McCarthy explains at National Review, is that there should be no deal with the regime in the first place:

The JCPOA debacle is the result of being at the negotiating table in the first place. We gave the store away simply by sitting down, absent any conditions or changes in behavior, with a committed enemy of the United States, the world’s prime state sponsor of terrorism, while it was actively fueling anti-American jihadists, calling for “Death to America,” holding American hostages, threatening the annihilation of Israel, persecuting its own people, and developing nuclear power and ballistic missiles in violation of international law … Iran policy should not be about how to get a better deal. It should not even be about nuclear weapons — not primarily. The U.S. strategy on Iran should aim to suffocate the jihadist regime.

Faced with a Trump/Clinton dichotomy, America is going to be back at the table with Tehran once again IF WE’RE LUCKY. But even if a President Trump works out the most amazing, most unbelievable deal that you wouldn’t even believe, America is just going to continue with the Obama Doctrine tendency of opening doors to totalitarian, anti-American regimes who don’t even deserve the diplomatic time of day.

Given the choice between a liberal internationalist who helped lay the groundworks for the Iran Deal and a presumptive Republican nominee who appears to have finally landed at renegotiating it now that he’s won the primary, it looks like we’re stuck with the Mullahs, folks. (For more from the author of “Giuliani Confirms Trump Plans to Keep Iran Deal” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.