The Disgusting Socks Kaepernick Wore to Practice Completely Cross a Line

/0 Comments/in , /by

The San Francisco 49ers quarterback has created waves this week by refusing to stand for the national anthem at a preseason game, because he “won’t show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color.”

But, as Independent Journal Review noted, Colin Kaepernick doesn’t just disdain the U.S. He also apparently disdains police officers.

Today, Sports Rant Radio tweeted a photo of Kaepernick sporting socks with pigs wearing police hats.

But there’s more. Kaepernick shared his take on the socks on his Instagram account:

“I wore these socks, in the past, because the rogue cops that are allowed to hold positions in police departments, not only put the community in danger, but also put the cops that have the right intentions in danger by creating an environment of tension and mistrust. I have two uncles and friends who are police officers and work to protect and serve ALL people. So before these socks, which were worn before I took my public stance, are used to distract from the real issues, I wanted to address this immediately.”

Really, Kaepernick? Next time you talk about “anti-oppression,” maybe wear a shirt that doesn’t pay homage to one the longest reigning dictators.

The NFL has stated Kaepernick will start in the 49ers’ last pre-season game on Thursday night against the San Diego Chargers. (For more from the author of “The Disgusting Socks Kaepernick Wore to Practice Completely Cross a Line” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Why Is the National Media Ignoring Trump’s Heartfelt Angel Moms Moment?

/0 Comments/in , /by

Wednesday was a big day for Donald Trump’s campaign, marking the Republican presidential candidate’s first meeting with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto. The meeting and its aftermath became the biggest national story of the day, but there was one key angle the media seemed to have left out.

Following his meeting with Peña Nieto, Trump held a rally in Phoenix, Arizona, during which he laid out his ten-step plan of hardline immigration reform. Later in the rally, Trump welcomed on to the stage the group known as Angel Moms, a group of mothers whose children were killed by illegal immigrants.

As the Daily Wire reported, the mothers of Ronald da Silva, Joshua Wilkerson, Steve Woods, Eric Zepeda, Shayley Estees, and Brandon Mendoza all took the stage wearing shirts featuring photos of their murdered children and voiced their support for Trump. They were joined by the parents of Matthew Denice, Rebecca Ann Johnston’s cousin, and Grant Ronnebeck’s father.

Trump ended his speech Wednesday evening with a warning that his candidacy might be the country’s last chance to secure the its borders and prevent future losses like the ones these parents have experienced.

The liberal media was not having it. Thursday morning, many newspapers and online media outlets across the country covered Trump’s Arizona speech but ignored the Angel Moms, instead focusing their attention on Trump’s hardline immigration stance.

“Another Brick in the Wall,” read CNN.com’s homepage headline. “Donald Gets Darker,” warned the ever-Trump-bashing Huffington Post.

We’ve pulled the front pages to give you an idea of what was being reported Thursday morning. See if you can detect a pattern:

ABC

CNN

HuffPo

MSNBC

20160901-Newspapers

Headlines from Newseum

Why is it significant to point out that the media failed to mention Angel Moms in their Trump write-ups? After all, isn’t the policy angle more “newsy” than the personal emotional story of these parents?

That argument may have stood had the media not made such a big deal about the “Mothers of the Movement” appearance at last month’s Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia. CNN, MSNBC, and others jumped on the story about the mothers who lost their children to inner city gun crime or police shootings. The online news source Media Matters even pointed out that Fox News “completely ignored the appearance.”

Why can’t Fox have a heart as pure and unbiased as the rest of the liberal media? Give me a break. (For more from the author of “Why Is the National Media Ignoring Trump’s Heartfelt Angel Moms Moment?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Corrupt Media Wouldn’t Care If Hillary Handed out Suitcase Nukes as Party Favors at Clinton Foundation Events

/0 Comments/in , /by

Where does media bias come from?

Anyone who really wanted to know had that question answered when much of the media took a break from attacking Trump to attack the Associated Press. What does the AP have in common with Trump? Both were hurting Hillary Clinton’s chances to score payoffs from dictators, arms dealers and tycoons with terrorist ties for the next four to eight years.

The Associated Press got in trouble with the rest of the media for digging up dirt on the Clinton Foundation. Instead of just repeating the usual Clinton denials, it actually ran the numbers and noted that more than half the “ordinary folks” who got meetings with her had donated to her Foundation.

Instead of reporting on the AP story, the media went to war on its own. It wasn’t just the usual suspects like Vox and Slate who have a reputation for attacking any actual reporters who stray off the reservation and actually do their jobs. This time all the big boys were on the job.

CNN called in AP’s Kathleen Carroll to barrage her with classic ‘Have you stopped beating your wife’ loaded questions like, “Did you feel the pressure to publish something even though so many critics have said it didn’t amount to much?” A better question might be why CNN didn’t inform viewers that its parent company was a Clinton Foundation donor. But that would be practicing journalism.

Instead CNN offers gems like, “AP’s ‘Big Story’ on Clinton Foundation is big failure”. A high school paper could have come up with a cleverer putdown, but in this brave new world in which media companies donate to front groups for presidential campaigns and then denounce stories exposing their corruption there are no more new ideas, just organized spin sessions.
If you didn’t like the AP headline, try Vox’s “The AP’s big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess.”

Yes, they are all reading from the same script.

The New York Times initially blacklisted the story. Then it came out with a call for Hillary Clinton to cut ties with the Clinton Foundation. That’s like asking Al Capone to cut ties with the mob.

But the Times might have started out by cutting its own ties to the Clinton Foundation.

Carlos Slim, the Mexican-Lebanese billionaire who keeps the lights burning at the New York Times HQ, gave the Clinton Foundation anywhere from 2 to 10 million dollars. Then there’s the six figure sum that Hillary picked up for delivering one of her comatose speeches about something or other in a robotic monotone.

It wouldn’t do for his Manhattan investment property to undermine his Washington D.C. investment property.

The Times tremulously urged Hillary to cut ties with the organization she had used to fuel her political ambitions, worrying that, “If Mrs. Clinton wins, it could prove a target for her political adversaries.”

Could prove? If the New York Times occasionally bothered to report the news, it would have noticed that it already had. But the Times isn’t worried about ethics, legality or national security. Instead it, incredibly, asks Hillary to act to protect her agenda and reputation from her own crimes.

That’s like asking an embezzler to quickly burn his second set of books before the cops catch him.

The New York Times doesn’t give a damn if foreign interests buy the White House. Its only concern is to protect Hillary from Republican attacks. And this overt bias is actually downright moderate.

It’s almost noble compared to the Washington Post, another Clinton Foundation donor, which fired off one attack after another. There was this cheerfully breezy masterpiece which read like North Korean propaganda written by a Portland hipster, “AP chief on patently false Clinton tweet: No regrets!” (For more from the author of “Corrupt Media Wouldn’t Care If Hillary Handed out Suitcase Nukes as Party Favors at Clinton Foundation Events” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

MARK LEVIN: Dammit, Obama Lied and Iran Is on Its Way to Nukes!

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Thursday on the Mark Levin program, Conservative Review’s Editor-in-Chief read a report indicating the Obama administration cut a secret deal with Iran to permit the terrorist-sponsoring regime to violate restrictions put in place by last year’s nuclear deal.

“This is the biggest issue of the day, the biggest issue of the month, the biggest issue of the year!”

Listen:

“These are impeachable offenses. For Obama. For Vice-President Biden. For Secretary of State Kerry. For Susan Rice. For the whole top-level of the administration, the president on down,” Levin said.

“We have just armed up the most aggressive, detestable terrorist-state on the face of the earth! We’ve just sold out to them! They’re on their way [to] building nuclear weapons!”

“This is the fate that Barack Obama has sealed for the American people!”

Mark Levin continued after the break, tearing into the Iran nuclear deal and the feckless politicians who gave it to us.

“They may seek to wash their hands, but their hands are full of uranium! Their hands are full of plutonium!” (For more from the author of “MARK LEVIN: Dammit, Obama Lied and Iran Is on Its Way to Nukes!” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Just When You Think the Clinton Insanity Is Over, There’s More!

/0 Comments/in , , /by

It’s been a rough start to the week for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. On Tuesday, State Department attorneys announced that they had retrieved 30 emails relating to the 2012 Benghazi attacks from Clinton’s private server.

According to the Washington Examiner, a judge requested that the agency review the documents ahead of a release to the conservative legal watchdog group Judicial Watch, which filed the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit that resulted in a year-long FBI probe involving around 15,000 emails — over 2,000 of which were believed to contain classified information.

As the Examiner points out, the new discovery is noteworthy because Clinton had repeatedly insisted to government agencies and to the public that she turned over all work-related communications in the batch of 55,000 pages she submitted to the FBI in late 2014.

During the hearing Tuesday, State Department lawyers told Judge Amit Mehta of U.S. District Court that they had yet to determine how many of the 30 emails had already been disclosed in the 2014 email dump, according to the Examiner.

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton announced in a tweet Tuesday that the State Department requested 30 days to review the new emails before releasing them to the watchdog group.

But wait — there’s more! On Wednesday, the New York Post announced that it has exclusively learned that Clinton continued to send classified information over her private server months after leaving the State Department:

On May 28, 2013, months after stepping down as secretary of state, Clinton sent an email to a group of diplomats and top aides about the “123 Deal” with the United Arab Emirates.

But the email, which was obtained by the Republican National Committee through a Freedom of Information Act request, was heavily redacted upon its release by the State Department because it contains classified information.

The email, sent from [email protected] (the account associated with Clinton’s private server), is marked classified until May 28, 2033. The RNC eventually received a heavily redacted copy through its Freedom of Information Act request, as it includes “information regarding foreign governors” and “foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources.”

Clinton sent the email to Deputy Secretary of State William Burns, diplomat Jeffrey Feltman, policy aide Jake Sullivan, diplomat Kurt Campbell, State Department chief of staff Cheryl Mills, and top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

The “123 Deal,” also called the “123 Agreement,” was a 2009 agreement between the United States and United Arab Emirates that established “a required legal framework for commerce in civilian nuclear energy between the two countries,” according to the UAE Embassy website.

“Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information was so pervasive, it continued after she left government,” RNC research director Raj Shah told the Post. “She clearly can’t be trusted with our nation’s security.”

Darn that Freedom of Information Act! (For more from the author of “Just When You Think the Clinton Insanity Is Over, There’s More!” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Left Is Busily Planting Fake Red-Meat Conservative News Sites

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Almost all of us have been a victim of accidentally spreading fake news at one time. A trusted friend emails you a link to an article that is red meat for the conservative base; it sounds legitimate, and the name of the site even sounds official. You forward the article and post it on Facebook and Twitter — and then the backlash is embarrassing. Multiple people point out you’re wrong, and you feel like an idiot. But how were you to know, especially in this information overload, social media era? It has become normal to quickly skim articles and headlines. And why would you suspect your most trusted, intelligent friends would be sending you false news?

It used to be The Onion was the only satire news site. And the site makes it very clear its news is satire. But within the last year, multiple sites (there is a list compiled here) have sprung up that do not make it clear they are satire, if at all. They brazenly post fake news that isn’t even funny, like The Onion, but sounds like legitimate news.

By posting these outlandish tales, the sites attract many page views, which allows them to make money from advertisers. Even more nefarious, some are run by Democrats in order to make conservatives look like radical extremists. The strategy, an insider told me, is to fool so many conservatives into spreading a ridiculous, fake article that finally a prominent elected official falls for it. Then the left pounces on the official and makes them look foolish and/or an extremist.

As I’ve written previously, putting out heroic stories about Donald Trump that turn out to be false doesn’t help Trump when people discover they are false.

Some of the worst offenders are sites that rip off names from legitimate conservative news sites. World News Daily Report is a typical example. It sounds very similar to the conservative site WorldNetDaily, which recently renamed itself to WND. The disclaimer on the site says nothing about the news being fake; instead, it disingenuously states that the site is not responsible for inaccurate information. The fake site’s “About us FAQ” page pretends to cater to conservative Jews and Christians with a strong defense of Israel. Yet how are fake news articles helping Israel? The site has become so successful that the myth-debunking site Snopes now lists it second on its “Field Guide to Fake News Sites and Hoax Purveyors.”

For some of these sites, the proverbial chickens have come home to roost. The gossip website Gawker was recently sued by celebrity wrestler Hulk Hogan for posting a sex tape of him, which put the company into bankruptcy and forced it to shut down a week ago. There are many ways these sites could be sued out of existence, such as for libel or the unauthorized use of images. Facebook has started removing these articles from users’ news feeds. Perhaps a developer can create an app to add to browsers that will specifically block these sites.

The people who run these sites are nothing more than cruel bullies who should get a taste of their own medicine. It is one thing to identify a story as parody, but to deliberately print false news to trick innocent people in order to make them look bad and destroy their credibility is dishonest, a nuisance and an abuse of the press. If they knowingly put false news about a crime or catastrophe out over TV, they would be prosecuted, due to the dangers of creating substantial public harm such as a mass panic.

Until these sites are curtailed, conservatives must get into the habit of looking up news articles regularly on myth-debunking sites like Snopes (granted, that particular site leans to the left). If The New York Times isn’t breaking some huge story, but a site called Your News Wire is, that is a good indication it may be a fake article. (For more from the author of “The Left Is Busily Planting Fake Red-Meat Conservative News Sites” please click HERE)

Watch a recent interview with the author below:

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Clinton Camp Thinks Trump Fell for Old Trick

/0 Comments/in , /by

Hillary Clinton’s campaign feels confident. So confident that behind closed doors her team is taking some credit for forcing Donald Trump to seemingly defend territory that Republicans almost never lose.

After weeks of Brooklyn telegraphing a competitive race in traditionally red states and making public moves that look like initial investments — boosting staff, holding fundraisers and promising more investments — Trump is now campaigning in Arizona, which has voted Republican in 15 of the past 16 elections, while his running mate goes to Georgia, a state that’s gone red in seven of the past eight cycles.

That’s a deployment of precious resources away from swing states that Trump must win to make the Electoral College math work in his favor.

In private, members of Clinton’s team draw a direct line between their activity in those states and Trump’s worries there. In public, Democrats are starting to cheer the success.

“This would be the equivalent of Hillary having to campaign in Massachusetts or having to campaign in California, except [to raise] money,” said Democratic strategist Chris Lehane, a veteran of Bill Clinton’s campaign and White House teams who remains close to the family’s operation. “Either he has fallen for it hook, line and sinker, or there are substantive concerns given his changes in some of the margins within specific cohorts of voters. Either way, it’s good news.” (Read more from “Clinton Camp Thinks Trump Fell for Old Trick” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Republican Congressman Ed Whitfield Announces Resignation on Short Notice

/0 Comments/in , /by

As the fractured Republican Party works desperately to maintain its majority in both houses of Congress, and build momentum for the November elections, it will be losing one member of the House of Representatives next week.

Rep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., 73, announced Wednesday that he will be resigning on the day Congress returns after a seven week recess.

Whitfield had previously announced he would retire at the end of his term.

Whitfield officially announced his intention to step down in a letter to Republican Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin. The letter did not state a reason for Whitfield’s decision.

“It has been my honor and privilege to have represented the constituents of the First District of Kentucky in the United States Congress for the last almost 22 years,” Whitfield wrote.

“As you know, I did not seek re-election to Congress this year and have now decided to submit my resignation as the Congressman of the First District of Kentucky, effective 6 p.m., Tuesday, September 6, 2016,” the letter added.

Bevin released a statement in response to Whitfield’s resignation.

“Both personally and on behalf of the Commonwealth, I want to thank Congressman Ed Whitfield for his many years of service to our state and our nation,” Bevin said.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., praised Whitfield.

“It has been an honor working alongside him on a variety of issues, including our support for the workers at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant and for the men and women serving our country stationed at Fort Campbell,” McConnell said.

The House Ethics Committee had been investigating the 11-term congressman to determine whether his wife, who is a lobbyist for the Human Society, had improper access to Whitfield.

Last month, the panel rebuked Whitfield, saying he did take sufficient measures to prevent inappropriate linkages between his staff and wife. However, the committee also ruled that Whitefield did not intentionally break ethics rules.

The election to fill the final weeks of Whitfield’s term will come on the same day as the general election contest to replace him, which pits Republican James Comer against Democrat Sam Gaskins.

House Republicans currently have a majority of 247-186 over Democrats. (For more from the author of “Republican Congressman Ed Whitfield Announces Resignation on Short Notice” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Child Welfare Agency Investigating Weiner After Latest Photo Episode

/2 Comments/in , /by

Anthony Weiner’s latest photo escapade has resulted in an investigation into his fitness as a parent.

On Monday, news organizations began publishing a photo of Weiner that he sent to a woman showing the former congressman in bed next to his son.

As reported by Western Journalism, the lewd photo showed “a bulge in his white, Jockey-brand boxer briefs and his son cuddled up to his left, wrapped in a light-green blanket.”

When the pictures hit the papers, calls for an investigation soon followed.

“The photo and story worry me as a senator, a minister, a parent, and a grandfather, because I believe that the disregard for any boundaries of sexual activity with a child present is incredibly inappropriate, and could have a harmful impact on the child,” Democratic New York State Sen. Reuben Diaz said Monday. “I urge the city of New York’s Administration for Children’s Services to investigate this case carefully and thoroughly.”

The child welfare agency has since launched an investigation into how Weiner cares for his son, The New York Post reported, citing “a city government source.”

The Post reported that city staff made a home visit to the apartment building where Weiner lives, in keeping with the agency’s rules and regulations.

Weiner told the Post Wednesday he had not been interviewed by the agency.

However, other sources said an investigation was inevitable.

“From what it looked like, (Weiner) is possibly exposing his child to an imminent risk of harm. This is something ACS looks into for much less situations … ACS is mandated to protect children from cases of suspected abuse and or neglect,” said Mark Feldman, a divorce and custody lawyer in New York City.

“Any time adults draw children into their own sexual activity, they have crossed the line. It is always inappropriate for an adult to connect any child to their sexual activities, however peripheral,” said Tim Hathaway, executive director at Prevent Child Abuse New York.

ACS said it is the agency’s policy not to comment about whether it is conducting an ongoing investigation.

Weiner’s wife, Huma Abedin — who is vice chairwoman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign — announced Monday that she was separating from Weiner after the latest revelation hit the newspapers.

Abedin and Weiner were married in 2010. He resigned from Congress in 2011 amid a scandal over his sexting, the same habit that derailed his 2013 attempt to run for mayor of New York City. (For more from the author of “Child Welfare Agency Investigating Weiner After Latest Photo Episode” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Calls Hillary a Bigot. Rubio: Some of Her Policies ‘Do Harm Minority Communities’

/0 Comments/in , /by

Hours before he won a contested Florida primary, the state’s junior Senator declined to criticize Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump for calling Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton a “bigot.” According to Republican Senator Marco Rubio, Trump is merely turning a long-time Democratic tactic against them, and not without some justification.

“Democrats have been calling republicans a bigot for a long time,” Rubio told CNN reporter Manu Raju. “Some of the policies she stands for do harm minority communities, absolutely.”

“Too far to call her a bigot, though?” asked Raju.

“You have to ask other campaigns about the terms they use,” said Rubio. “I can tell you I don’t want Hillary Clinton to be our president.”

Trump has pivoted his campaign in recent weeks to woo black voters, saying that Clinton is a “bigot” because she doesn’t care about the quality of minority lives in America. “She is a bigot,” he told CNN’s Anderson Cooper. “She is selling them down the tubes because she’s not doing anything for those communities. She talks a good game. But she doesn’t do anything.”

When Cooper asked if Clinton had disdain for blacks, Trump said, “Her policies are bigoted because she knows they’re not going to work.”

Clinton responded in a Thursday speech, twice accusing Trump of “bigotry” and twice accusing him of making a “racial lie.” Many media voices seemed to defend Clinton or downplay the aggression in her speech, even as they reacted strongly to Trump’s accusations.

The Nazi Card

Trump’s attack is one often heard, but usually it’s Democrats calling Republicans bigots. A quick search pulled up some prominent liberal figures accusing various Republicans of bigoted beliefs of various kinds, including the charge that they hold the same positions as Nazis.

In 2001, the first president of the Southern Poverty Law Center and then-NAACP Chairman Julian Bond — now deceased — compared U.S. conservatives to the Taliban. In 2003, he said of Republicans, “Their idea of equal rights is the American flag and Confederate swastika flying side by side.”

Current U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was accused in his Senate hearings of discriminatory beliefs towards non-whites and women, something that led his wife to leave the hearing in tears and Alito to declare, “I am not any kind of a bigot.”

A 2004 Townhall.com column highlighted many examples of prominent Democrats — among them then-Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, himself a former KKK member, as well former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and a federal judge — comparing President George W. Bush or members of his administration to Hitler or to those working for Hitler. This column highlights other examples.

Sometimes the accusations are subtle. Other times, not so much. After a rules debate in the U.S. Senate, one Democratic Senator dialed the rhetoric straight to ten:

“You’re a bunch of dictators, that’s all you are,” Rep. Sam Gibbons (D-Fla.) shouted as he stormed, red-faced, from a meeting room just off the House floor. “I had to fight you guys 50 years ago,” said Gibbons, who fought the Nazis in World War II.

In 2012, the Chairman of the South Carolina Democratic Party compared GOP Governor Nikki Haley — who is of Indian descent — to Adolf Hitler’s girlfriend Eva Braun, this when Haley spoke at a GOP event in Charlotte, North Carolina at the same time as the Democratic National Convention.

There is enough of this sort of thing to compile “A Short History of Liberals Using the Nazi Card” against conservatives.

Fascists and Racists

When they want to be slightly less hamfisted, the American left opts for terms like “fascist” or “racist.” So, for instance, in 2015 a University of Wisconsin sociologist who is now employed by Temple University called her state’s governor, Scott Walker, “and many Wisconsin Legislators” fascists in a tweet. She wasn’t the only one. A Google search for the joint terms “Scott Walker” and “fascist” brings up many options.

Last year, prominent liberal columnist Frank Rich said that Dr. Ben Carson, who is black, appealed to the “racist, bigoted” GOP base when Carson said he might not support a Muslim president. In 2013, Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) compared Tea Party activists to the KKK, which led to criticisms from liberals like MSNBC host Martin Bashir, but also praise from liberal commentators — including one who said Mitt Romney was engaging in racism when he told the NAACP in 2012 that some voters want “free stuff.”

Romney, the 2012 Republican presidential nominee, was also accused of bigotry in a Bloomberg column for allegedly forcing a gay staffer criticized by social conservatives to quit his campaign. His predecessor GOP nominee, Senator John McCain of Arizona, was accused of various forms of racism and bigotry in multiple mediums when he ran for President.

President Barack Obama was not above similar rhetoric, accusing Romney in 2012 of wanting to bring America back to its sexist and racist past. Other prominent liberal voices did the same on TV, online and in print, to the point where many Americans may have simply tuned them out.

Media is “Setting Aside Any Concept of Ethics or Neutrality”

Conservative critics of the media’s treatment of Republicans abound. One of them, Dan Gainor of the Media Research Center, told The Stream that “the left and the media use four major strategies to attack either conservative or right-leaning politicians. They claim they are some combination of crazy, evil, stupid and racist. They depicted Reagan as crazy, senile (stupid) and racist. George H.W. Bush had run the CIA, so he was evil. George W. Bush was described as crazy and stupid.”

“The ist words are the most popular ones with the media now — racist, sexist, nationalist, etc.,” continued Gainor. “These are designed to eliminate any debate. One you have been declared ist, you are merely supposed to recant and be silent.”

Gainor concluded, “Liberals and those in the media are shocked that Trump dare criticize Clinton at all. They overwhelmingly have thrown in for her candidacy, setting aside any concept of ethics or neutrality.” (For more from the author of “Trump Calls Hillary a Bigot. Rubio: Some of Her Policies ‘Do Harm Minority Communities'” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.