Gang Member Released Under First Step Act Wanted for Murder

It’s exactly why proponents of the bipartisan leniency for violent drug traffickers and gang members didn’t want a transparent debate in Congress over the bill. It’s why they stifled all dissent and rammed the biggest change to federal prison sentencing in three decades through the House on a “suspension vote” with no debate or hearings during the last moments in session last year, when all eyes were focused on the pending government shutdown. They didn’t want you to know they’d be releasing people like Joel Francisco of Providence, Rhode Island.

In order to perpetuate the lie that we are somehow unjustly incarcerating too many people for too long and that there is a general over-incarceration problem, particularly in federal prison, phony conservatives joined liberals in selling the First Step Act as nothing more than “prison reform,” never telling the fact that it dramatically cut sentencing for thousands of hardened criminals. They told us it would only affect first time, low-level, non-violent offenders. In reality, federal prosecutors only pursue the worst criminals in a given area, who are often gang leaders fueling widespread violence, and convict them on drug charges. That is why CR is the only legislation scorecard that had the fortitude to score against this travesty of a bill.

In February, when the first wave of prisoners were released, Joel Francisco was among them. Who is Joel Francisco? According to Cmdr. Thomas Verdi, deputy chief of the Providence Police Department, quoted in the Providence Journal, he is a “cold, evil, violent person.”

“Some criminals deserve to spend their lives incarcerated,” Verdi said. “Joel is one.”

Yet like most people in federal prison for drug charges, he was officially “only” convicted as a crack dealer. He was sentenced to life in prison in 2005 because it was his third conviction. That sounds harsh, but he was hit with the maximum sentence because he was a Latin Kings gang leader who was believed to be responsible for a lot of violence in the city. The incarceration of people like him is the single most important factor in driving down the murder rate since the 1990s.

In 2010, Congress passed the Fair Sentencing Act, which raised the quantity of crack cocaine needed to trigger the sentencing guidelines to be more on par with the levels of powder cocaine. Among the many retroactive jailbreak provisions of the First Step Act of 2018 was section 404, which applied the leniencies of the 2010 act to crack dealers already convicted prior to enactment. Francisco was one who was released under the retroactive reduction of sentencing for repeat crack dealers. 2,600 federal inmates are potentially eligible for retroactive reductions under this provision, according to the Marshall Project.

During the debate over the bill, Senator Mike Lee claimed that “nothing” in the bill gives inmates “early release.” Sen. Tom Cotton replied by specifically warning about the crack cocaine provision. As of July, 1,691 inmates were released early just under section 404.

According to the Providence Journal, Francisco was accused of attempting to break into an ex-girlfriend’s home in July, and a knife was found on the scene, but he was not reincarcerated. Now there is an arrest warrant out on him for the stabbing of Troy Pine, 46, who was found dead last Wednesday night in a local bar. Francisco was scheduled to be arraigned for the attempted domestic violence and break-in charges on October 15, but he is now a fugitive.

The sad thing is that none of the foolish pro-criminal politicians in the White House or Congress from either party will be made to answer for Francisco and God knows how many others like him who have been released. As I’ve chronicled almost daily at CR, there is an epidemic of repeat violent offenders going on to commit heinous murders and rapes, yet the media seldom reports how and why they were let out of jail. The same way the “abolish ICE” movement doesn’t want you to know how many heinous crimes are committed by deportable aliens who should have been removed, the “abolish prison” crowd doesn’t want you to know how many murders were committed by repeat drug offenders and other offenders who were released from prison.

If not for the Providence Journal, I would never have known about this case, and undoubtedly, there are countless others who are now back in the criminal underworld, yet their stories will never be told. Sob stories of victims are never told by Kim Kardashian and Ivanka Trump, but only those of cartel traffickers.

During the very short debate over the First Step Act in the Senate, Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and John Kennedy, R-La., proposed a simple amendment that would have required Congress to publish a quarterly report on how many prisoners were released, a history of their rap sheets, and any updates on those who are rearrested for crimes. Real simple, right? After all, if the entire point of the bill, according to “conservative” proponents, was to place convicts in special “anti-recidivism” programs to magically rehabilitate them before being released, don’t they want to see the results and gauge the progress?

In reality, they wanted zero accountability. 17 Republicans and every Democrat joined together to defeat this amendment. The ignorance and groupthink surrounding this cult was so contagious that it passed the Senate 87-12 and the House of Representatives 358-36. Many members I spoke to at the time really thought the bill was about prison reform, aka the quality of the food or the beds in prison, not an early release bill.

But we all knew the truth that, given that the prison population is composed of mainly violent criminals, it was inevitable that a movement dedicated to lowering prison numbers rather than to public safety would lead to the release of people like Francisco. Even as they were promoting the “nonviolent, low-level, first-time offender” lie to the public, a group of phony “conservative” groups sent a letter to senators opposing another amendment from Cotton that would have barred violent offenders from early release. They finally admitted the truth after all these years. They bemoaned the fact that Cotton’s amendment “would make virtually all federal prisoners ineligible for earned time credits, with the exceptions of low-level drug offenders and white-collar criminals.”

It’s nice to know that the president now realizes that he was scammed. Now it’s time for him to demand reforms to the “reforms.” During the campaign against Hillary Clinton in August 2016, Trump warned, “There is no compassion in allowing drug dealers, gang members, and felons to prey on innocent people.” Sadly, even though Hillary wasn’t elected, we got that “compassion” anyway. Now it’s time for an agenda of true compassion rooted in public safety. (For more from the author of “Gang Member Released Under First Step Act Wanted for Murder” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Toy Gun Prompts Lockdown of Three U.S. Campuses

A security alert which resulted in three college campuses in Florida going on lockdown was later revealed to be a false alarm involving a brightly colored toy gun.

An alarm was raised after a student at Florida Atlantic University reported seeing a man with a rifle on campus on the evening of Thursday, October 3. The student said the man walked towards her whilst she was in her car and pointed a gun at her. . .

As a precaution, the campuses at Florida Atlantic University, Broward College and Nova Southeastern University all went into lockdown. The colleges warned students and other people who may be on campus to seek shelter in a secure location on social media. . .

“After clearing the scene at the #Davie college area. A #DaviePolice officer located an individual with this toy gun walking on Stirling Rd,” the force tweeted. “They both matched the description given by the witness. The toy gun was collected and the investigation was turned over to detectives.”

(Read more from “Obviously Toy Gun Prompts Lockdown of Three U.S. Campuses” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

WATCH: Trump Describes Writing Letters to Families of Killed Soldiers in Emotional Speech

President Donald Trump defended his decision to remove American forces from Syria during a press conference Monday, emotionally describing how he has to write letters to the families of fallen soldiers.

“It’s time to come back home. But I can understand the other side of it, but if you go by the other side that means we should never, ever come home. We should never, ever come home and you know, I have to sign letters often to parents of young soldiers that were killed and it’s the hardest thing I have to do in this job,” Trump said.

“I hate it. I hate it. Afghanistan, I signed one the other day. Iraq. Syria. They get blown up by mines. They get taken out by a sniper,” the president said, continuing, “And I have to write letters, and we make each letter different. Each person is different. We make them personal.”

He continued, “But no matter what you do it’s devastating. The parents will never be the same. The families will never be the same. People are killed. Many people are still being killed. It’s going to go on for perhaps a long time. And, we’re willing to do what we have to do but there has to be an end game.” (Read more from “Trump Describes Writing Letters to Families of Killed Soldiers in Emotional Speech” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

WATCH: Salon Goers in Long Island Got Quite the Scare After a Deer Crashed Through the Front Window

So imagine you are just sitting there getting your hair done when all of the sudden a giant deer comes crashing through the front window of a salon.

That is exactly what happened Saturday in Long Island, New York, when surveillance video at the store caught the moment a huge deer run straight into and then crashed through the front glass window, per People magazine in a piece published Monday.

In the clip shared on YouTube, we see the aftermath of what occurs in the salon after the deer comes flying through the window. The animal first hits the ground after scaling a couch where a woman was seated. It then slides to a stop near hairdresser and owner, Jenisse Heredia, and her costumer.

The deer then scrambles to get its feet under it and starts running through the beauty store knocking over everything in its path while the people inside can be overheard screaming. (Read more from “Salon Goers in Long Island Got Quite the Scare After a Deer Crashed Through the Front Window” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

More Evidence Emerges Elizabeth Warren Lied About Being Fired for Pregnancy

New evidence emerged Monday that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has been untruthful in telling voters she was fired from a teaching job because she was “visibly pregnant.” . . .

The Free Beacon’s Collin Anderson reported:

RIVERDALE, N.J.—The Riverdale Board of Education approved a second-year teaching contract for a young Elizabeth Warren, documents show, contradicting the Democratic presidential candidate’s repeated claims that she was asked not to return to teaching after a single year because she was “visibly pregnant.”

Minutes of an April 21, 1971, Riverdale Board of Education meeting obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show that the board voted unanimously on a motion to extend Warren a “2nd year” contract for a two-days-per-week teaching job. That job is similar to the one she held the previous year, her first year of teaching. Minutes from a board meeting held two months later, on June 16, 1971, indicate that Warren’s resignation was “accepted with regret.”

The minutes also confirm a key detail from the 2007 interview: namely, that Warren was hired on an “emergency” basis because she lacked the necessary education qualifications, despite graduating from George Washington University with a degree in speech pathology, and supposedly pursuing a lifelong dream of being a public school teacher. (Read more from “More Evidence Emerges Elizabeth Warren Lied About Being Fired for Pregnancy” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Ecuador Declares State of Emergency as Violent Protests Sweep Major Cities (VIDEO)

President of Ecuador Lenin Moreno declared a 60-day state of emergency on Thursday after transportation workers and leftist groups began rioting against the repeal of a decades-old government gasoline subsidy.

Moreno ended the subsidy, in vigor for 40 years, as part of an economic plan to reduce government spending in exchange for a large loan from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Among other reforms, Moreno also announced this week that he would withdraw from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) so that Ecuador would no longer be beholden to that cartel’s production limits, increasing oil supply and thus driving down the price of gasoline without government spending.

Transportation professionals – drivers of buses, taxis, and trucks – led citywide strikes in the capital Quito, and Guayaquil, the nation’s economic hub, to protest the gasoline price increase, which would adversely impact their businesses. The strikes rapidly turned into chaos as protesters threw Molotov cocktails, burned tires, and blocked major roads. Businesses also reported looting and vandalism.

Moreno published a state of emergency decree on Thursday evening.

“Rights are demanded without hurting that which is fundamental for the progress of the nation: work, education, and freedom of mobility,” he wrote on Twitter. “We guarantee citizens’ security, free movement, and protection of their property”:

(Read more from “Ecuador Declares State of Emergency as Violent Protests Sweep Major Cities” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Supreme Court Rejects NYC’s Attempt to Get Second Amendment Case Thrown out

New York City’s latest effort not to have to go to court over one of its gun laws failed at the Supreme Court on Monday. Justices told the city’s lawyers to wait until December to try again.

The case in question is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. [NYSRPA] v. City of New York, New York, which asks whether New York City’s laws about transporting a licensed, unloaded, and locked firearm to a residence or shooting range outside the five boroughs is consistent with the Second Amendment.

The city has tried to make the case that, because it eased its transport restrictions, that the case is now moot. The Supreme Court, however, didn’t see it that way Monday when it issued an order denying New York’s “suggestion of mootness” and adding, “The
question of mootness will be subject to further consideration at oral argument, and the parties should be prepared to discuss it.” Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for early December.

Back in July, the city filed a document making the case for mootness after it put out a new set of regulations that it said “give petitioners everything they have sought in this lawsuit.”

Lawyers for the petitioners in the case — the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association — responded to that by saying the case should nonetheless go before the court.

New York state law requires licenses for handgun ownership that are issued by local authorities; these are either a “possess on premises” or concealed carry permit. The case began over six years ago in March 2013 and deals with the former. Under New York City’s previous set of regulations, a Federalist Society blog post explains, “a New Yorker whom the City itself has licensed to possess a handgun cannot transport her handgun to a weekend second home (even to exercise the core constitutional purpose of self-defense), to an upstate county to participate in a shooting competition, or even across the bridge to a neighboring city for target practice.” (For more from the author of “Supreme Court Rejects NYC’s Attempt to Get Second Amendment Case Thrown out” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

House Dems Subpoena Pentagon and White House Budget Office

The chairmen of three Democrat-led House committees have sent out a new batch of subpoenas to Trump administration officials as part of the ongoing impeachment investigation against President Donald Trump.

Monday’s subpoenas went out to the Department of Defense’s recently confirmed Secretary Mark Esper as well as White House Office of Management and Budget acting Director Russell Vought and are for documents related to Ukraine military aid. The legal demands were sent by the Democratic chairmen of the House Intelligence, Oversight, and Foreign Affairs Committees — Reps. Adam Schiff, Calif., Elijah Cummings, Md., and Elliot Engel, N.Y., respectively.

“Pursuant to the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry, we are hereby transmitting a subpoena that compels you to produce the documents set forth in the accompanying schedule by October 15, 2019,” the chairmen wrote in letters to Esper and Vought.

The news release from the three top Democrats explains that the documents are necessary to evaluate “the extent to which President Trump jeopardized national security” by withholding foreign aid and asking Ukrainian officials to look into the matter of a since-scuttled investigation of a company that employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter.

The release cites one story from the Washington Post and another from the New York Times that the funds were halted ahead of President Trump’s July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

According to the Times story, Trump “personally ordered his staff to freeze more than $391 million in aid to Ukraine” ahead of the phone call” and “issued his directive to Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, who conveyed it through the budget office to the Pentagon and the State Department, which were told only that the administration was looking at whether the spending was necessary,” according to two administration officials.

“The enclosed subpoena demands documents that are necessary for the Committees to examine this sequence of these events,” the chairmen wrote, “and the reasons behind the White House’s decision to withhold critical military assistance to Ukraine that was appropriated by Congress to counter Russian aggression.”

The subpoena schedule for Vought and Esper includes documents, meetings, and communications going back to Jan. 1, 2019.

In prepared congressional testimony given last week, former U.S. envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker told Hill investigators that he became aware of a hold on financial assistance to the country about a week before the phone call “and immediately tried to weigh in to reverse that position.”

However, he also testified, “As I was confident the position would not stand, I did not discuss the hold with my Ukrainian counterparts until the matter became public in late August.”

“The issue of a hold placed on security assistance to Ukraine also came up during this same time I was connecting [a Zelensky aide] and [Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy] Giuliani,” the former envoy said elsewhere in the statement. “I did not perceive these issues to be linked in any way.” (For more from the author of “House Dems Subpoena Pentagon and White House Budget Office” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

China Bans ‘South Park’ – Show’s Creators Hilariously Troll Them

The Communist Party of China banned the wildly popular TV show “South Park” after the show blasted the communist nation for shaping American culture by forcing American companies to not do anything it deems offensive if they want to be able to sell their products and services in China.

“Now, those very same government censors, in the real world, have lashed back at ‘South Park’ by deleting virtually every clip, episode and online discussion of the show from Chinese streaming services, social media and even fan pages,” The Hollywood Reporter reported. “The draconian response is par for the course for China’s authoritarian government, which has even been known to aggressively censor ‘Winnie the Pooh,’ because some local Internet users had affectionately taken to comparing Chinese president Xi Jinping to the character.”

On Monday, South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone issued a statement trolling the Chinese government:

Like the NBA, we welcome the Chinese censors into our homes and into our hearts. We too love money more than freedom and democracy. Xi doesn’t look like Winnie the Poo at all. Tune into our 300th episode the Wednesday at 10 p.m. Long live the great Communist Party of China. May the autumn’s sorghum harvest be bountiful. We good now China?

. . .The statement from Stone and Parker comes one day after the National Basketball Association (NBA) and the Houston Rockets received intense backlash from across the American political spectrum for apologizing for offending China after Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey tweeted out support for Hong Kong. Morey’s tweeting had sparked an immediate backlash from the Chinese government.

(Read more from “China Bans ‘South Park’ – Show’s Creators Hilariously Troll Them” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Teacher Allegedly Displays Graphic Saying Confederate Flag Means ‘You Intend to Marry Your Sister’ (VIDEO)

A Georgia teacher allegedly showed a Powerpoint image of a Confederate flag to the teacher’s classroom accompanied by a caption reading, “A sticker you put on the back of your pickup truck to announce that you intend to marry your sister. Think of it like a white trash ‘Save the Date’ card.” . . .

The incident allegedly occurred at Hephzibah High School, where the daughter of Melissa Fuller was in the teacher’s class. Melissa Fuller told WRDW, “She found it offensive, so she sent it to me and asked me what I thought.” Fuller posted the story on Facebook. Fuller stated, “A lot of [it] is that it’s not morally correct. It’s unethical. It’s just something you don’t want to discuss today in today’s world and especially inside of a classroom.” She added, “Why was that used? With it being such a rough area, why would you put that out there to start a class discussion that could have turned very ugly?”

Fuller said her daughter had once worn a Confederate flag belt buckle to school, then removed it after she was told it was inappropriate, but still received an in-house suspension. She asked, “If she can’t wear that belt buckle, then why is it appropriate to make an assignment out of it?” . . .

WRDW reported that the district released the following statement: “The Richmond County School System is committed to creating a diverse, equitable learning environment for all students. The language used in the example was unacceptable and has no place in our classrooms.”

(Read more from “Teacher Allegedly Displays Graphic Saying Confederate Flag Means ‘You Intend to Marry Your Sister’” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE