Liberal Media are Fearing Democrats Might Have Blown Up Their Impeachment Circus (VIDEO)

/0 Comments/in , /by

I mean this is just great, but it’s also a tad disturbing. The media is so desperate to boot Trump and they’re making it known that they think Democrats might have blown their chances at doing it successfully. I don’t get why; there was no way 67 senators were going to remove Trump. And now that the formal articles have been released, there’s no way. Abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. What weak sauce nonsense is that? And this is on top of the fact that this impeachment push has trashed Democrats in the polls. Not a single top-tier 2020 Democrat is beating Trump in key swing states. In fact, impeachment was never popular in these states, especially in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. No one is watching this garbage. No one cares.

And this has triggered the liberal media. From hosts saying that this impeachment moment reminds them of how O.J. Simpson allegedly got away with murder to saying that Trump had brought the nation to the edge of destruction, the feeling that the moment to impeach this man has passed them by is palpable.

(Read more from “Liberal Media are Fearing Democrats Might Have Blown Up Their Impeachment Circus” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Democrats Filing Two Articles of Impeachment Against Trump; Here’s What’s in the Long-Awaited Inspector General’s Report on FISA Abuse

/0 Comments/in , /by

By Daily Wire. House Democrats are expected to reveal two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday that will be voted on later this month, thus cementing their attempts to remove him from office.

The two articles of impeachment will focus on “abuse of power” and “obstructing Congress,” The Washington Post reported.

During Democrats’ impeachment hearings last week on the House Judiciary Committee, liberal Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz noted that the idea that a president could be impeached for “abuse of power” was an absurd notion. . .

Noticeably absent from The Post’s report on what Democrats will introduce articles of impeachment on was “bribery,” which is what their entire impeachment effort has centered around as they have claimed that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a July 25 phone call.

CNN reported that Democrats were debating adding a third article of impeachment for “obstruction of justice.” (Read more from “Democrats Filing Two Articles of Impeachment Against Trump” HERE)

________________________________________________

Trump Will Be Impeached, but Will Get Reelected Because of It, Oliver North Says

By Fox News. Retired Lt Col. Oliver North revealed his 2020 predictions on Monday as Democrats move forward with the process to draft articles of impeachment against President Trump.

“Here’s my prediction: Number one, the president is going to be impeached,” North said. “Number two, the Senate will not convict him. Number three, he will be reelected in large part because of what they’re doing today, and what they’re about to do with the articles of impeachment. And, number four — it means the Republicans will recapture the U.S. House of Representatives,” North said.

On Monday, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing for committee lawyers to present evidence in the impeachment case against Trump after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi last week called on lawmakers to proceed with drafting articles of impeachment.

On Fox Nation’s “Deep Dive,” North said Trump’s impeachment was inevitable, though the Republican majority in the Senate would ensure he’d remain in office for the remainder of his term. North also said impeachment will lead fed-up Americans to reelect Trump in 2020.

“They have made a terrible mistake,” he said, warning Democrats that their continued impeachment efforts would have significant ramifications. (Read more from “Trump Will Be Impeached, but Will Get Reelected Because of It, Oliver North Says” HERE)

________________________________________________

IG Report Notes Serious Problems in FISA Warrant Process — but No Evidence of ‘Political Bias’ — in Origins of FBI Trump-Russia Probe

By The Blaze. After months of anticipation, the Department of Justice Inspector General’s office released its report on its investigation into the origin of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016.

In short, the 476-page document report says that Horowitz’s team did not find evidence of political bias in the decision to open investigations into the Trump campaign, but did find some serious problems with how FBI personnel went about obtaining warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, also known as FISA, in the process of conducting the investigation. . .

U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is conducting his own investigation into the origins of the FBI investigation, responded to the release of the report with a statement that took issue with Horowitz’s conclusions.

“Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S,” Durham said. “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

After the report’s release, House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said after the release that “there are many lingering questions” and called on Democratic House leaders to “convene hearings with Inspector General Horowitz as soon as possible.” (Read more from “IG Report Notes Serious Problems in FISA Warrant Process — but No Evidence of ‘Political Bias’ — in Origins of FBI Trump-Russia Probe” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Poll Reveals New 2020 Frontrunner, but this One isn’t Even in the Race

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton would be the leading choice among registered Democrat voters for the White House if she jumped into the crowded primary field, according to a recently released poll.

The latest Harvard-Harris presidential poll shows Clinton at 21 percent support, edging out former Vice President Joe Biden with 20 percent. The survey shows Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) in third place with 12 percent and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) placing fourth at nine percent. Tied for fifth place with fice percent support are South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D) and former Secretary of State John Kerry, who has ruled out a White House bid of his own and recently thrown his support behind Biden.

In a survey with Clinton removed from the roster of candidates to choose from, Biden is Democrat voters’ top pick with 29 percent, with Sanders at 16 percent. Warren placed third at 13 percent, while Buttigieg takes eight percent in fourth. Tied for fifth place is Bloomberg, a late entry to the 2020 field, and Kerry, garnering five percent each.

While Clinton has said that she has no plans to run for president, she conceded to being “deluged” with requests to do so. (Read more from “Poll Reveals New 2020 Frontrunner, but They’re Not Even in the Race” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

U.S. Farmers Back Trump: Federal Aid Has ‘Been a Godsend’ in Trade War

/0 Comments/in , /by

American farmers are backing President Trump in the United States’ trade war with China, calling the president’s billions in federal aid to farmers “a godsend.”

In May, in the midst of trade negotiations with China, Trump announced he would deliver $16 billion in federal aid to American farmers to help them through the battle’s strain on the industry. Democrats have sought to block the aid and 2020 Democrats running for president have blasted the bailout. . .

Other American farmers interviewed were frustrated with U.S.-China trade relations and are hoping for some kind of resolution soon. Illinois farmer Evan Hultine, for instance, said the federal aid from Trump is major, but he believes the trade dispute is dragging on for too long now.

Pennsylvania farmer Bill Boyd said he feels the administration is “backstabbing” the folks who got him elected, but admitted that the Democrats are no better.

“Unless [Democrats] come up with a better alternative, I am going to vote for [Trump] again,” Boyd told CNN. (Read more from “U.S. Farmers Back Trump: Federal Aid Has ‘Been a Godsend’ in Trade War” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump Must Add Saudi Arabia and Other Middle Eastern Countries to ‘Travel Ban’ List

/0 Comments/in , /by

How many more lives need to be lost to Islamic terror before it becomes fashionable to shut off mass migration and visas from the Middle East?

A parallel question is often asked by the Left about gun control after a mass shooting incident, but there is one important distinction: American citizens’ self-defense is an inalienable right; all immigration, including mass migration, student visas, and foreign military training visas, is not.

On Friday, just hours before the commemoration of the 78th anniversary of the Pearl Harbor attack, a naval base in Pensacola was attacked by a Saudi Arabian national. At least 10 other Saudis are also training there. Unlike at Pearl Harbor, however, this attack was committed by an enemy within that we electively brought into the country, and then onto our military bases. Why?

Imagine if the American people were given a voice as to whether we will electively bring in an estimated 850 Saudi pilots to train on our military bases. What if we had been given a choice after 9/11 of whether to double our intake of immigration from the Middle East? What if we had been told that after 15 Saudi nationals flew planes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon, we’d bring roughly 40,000 students from Saudi Arabia into our universities every year? Would the public have supported such a suicidal plan? Fat chance.

What happened to severe vetting?

Ironically, in a statement that will live on in infamy, President Trump said the following about immigration from the Middle East on December 7, 2015, on the 74th anniversary of Pearl Harbor:

Without looking at the various polling data, it is obvious to anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension. Where this hatred comes from and why we will have to determine. Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life.

This appears to have been the case with Saudi Royal Air Force pilot Mohammed Saeed Alshamrani. Even though he was supposed to be among the most vetted of our visa recipients – foreign military trainees – a Twitter account believed to be Alshamrani’s had a short manifesto posted before the attack spewing hatred against America and Israel. This from a man who has been given every opportunity to succeed – by America.

Trump was right in discerning that there is no way to vet such dogma in mass numbers when it is rooted in jihad. No amount of TSA “security” for passengers can stop the suicide of a nation bringing in Sharia-adherent Islamists in large numbers on visas to this country without any way to vet them or deal with the Muslim Brotherhood subversion in their communities on our soil.

Yet here we are, three years into the administration, and it has only suspended visas from five Middle Eastern countries, conspicuously leaving Saudi Arabia off the list. Moreover, the responses both from the president and his defense secretary have been quite tepid so far in pointing the finger at immigration jihad.

Take a look at the following chart of the number of green cards given out to nationals of predominantly Muslim countries in the Middle East and North Africa since 9/11. There are over 2.3 million. And that doesn’t include the hundreds of thousands of foreign students or, of course, the thousands of military exchange students like Mohammed Saeed Alshamrani. The numbers have not dropped dramatically under Trump. Alshamrani came here under the Trump administration in August 2017.

Perhaps these ominous statistics are reflected most dramatically in the recent news that the name Muhammad has just made it into the list of top 10 boy names … in the United States.

If we can’t even vet the most closely scrutinized military trainees coming onto our secured naval bases, do you really have confidence that there aren’t thousands of other green card recipients and general foreign students from these countries who harbor the same views Alshamrani allegedly expressed on social media?

Is it even possible to vet effectively, and why should we be on the hook for this anyway?

According to the AP, Alshamrani held a dinner party with several other Saudi military students several days before the attack. “One of the three students who attended the dinner party hosted by the attacker recorded video outside the classroom building while the shooting was taking place. Two other Saudi students watched from a car, the official said.”

Again, if that many of the most scrutinized military exchange students on naval bases are now under suspicion, what about all those who come in as run-of-the-mill chain migrants as relatives of existing immigrants or as students in civilian universities?

Just in October, a spouse of a Saudi student was sentenced to 12 years in prison after documents uncovered by our forces in Afghanistan showed that he had trained the notorious al Farooq al Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan. Yet a decade after 9/11, he was let into the country on an F-2 student spousal visa and applied for flight lessons in Oklahoma based on the issuance of that visa. Yes, we evidently have still not even prevented Saudis from coming here for flight school! And it was only a fluke operation that wound up catching him.

Over the summer, Abdul-Majeed Marouf Ahmed Alani, an Iraqi immigrant who was a mechanic for American Airlines, was arrested for putting foam glue inside part of a commercial plane’s navigation system. The FBI found violent jihadist videos on his phone. This is a man who held a high-paying job and enjoyed a good life in America for many years. But when jihad comes calling …

This lack of vetting of those coming from volatile Islamic countries has been a systemic problem with A-2 foreign military training visas. Earlier this year, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) found that 40 percent of Afghanis who were brought to Fort Worth to train in flying light combat aircraft went AWOL, so the program had to be discontinued. Yet even after most of the 228 Afghanis were located, scores of them were able to apply for status to remain in the country.

This terrorist attack is a terrible reminder of the perverse national security and homeland security priorities of our government. So much is our desire to referee Islamic civil wars halfway around the world that we will bring scores of individuals from all sides of those conflicts to our own shores – both civilian and military – under the guise of bettering our foreign policy and training foreign militaries in proxy wars. But we forget that foreign policy is ultimately about homeland policy, which is most directly threatened by bad immigration policies. There is no overseas agenda that could possibly be worth endangering our own homeland through counterintuitive immigration and visa policies.

At a bare minimum, the president should call on Congress to suspend the A-2 military training visa program until an audit is conducted. There is a budget deadline next week, and now is the best time to have a budget fight over substance. Democrats like to accuse Trump of being weak on Saudi affairs, so now is his time to not only prove them wrong but call their bluff on immigration. (For more from the author of “Trump Must Add Saudi Arabia and Other Middle Eastern Countries to ‘Travel Ban’ List” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

The Next Democrat President Must Be Impeached

/0 Comments/in , , /by

I am of the opinion that the next Democrat president must be impeached.

That’s the only way to stop this.

If the Republicans control the House, they must impeach the next Democrat President to ensure this sort of thing is never repeated.

The next Democrat President must be impeached? What are grounds? It doesn’t matter.

With Trump, they were talking impeachment when he was a candidate. They were talking impeachment the day he got elected. I told you, this is all sham. It’s a scam. It’s a ruse.

The only way to stop them is to turn the political and impeachment guns on them.

The next Democrat president must be impeached.

The Republican Congress can take a page from Nadler, from Waters, from Engel, from Schiff and all the rest.

They should issue scores and scores of subpoenas. Scores of subpoenas, for financial information, for bank records, for tax information; all kinds of communications with, around and about the president; issue subpoenas for the president’s White House Counsel, Chief of Staff, National Security Adviser, and other people who are closest to the president so he ceases to function.

You want to burden this Democrat president as much as possible. You want to undermine him as much as possible.

And you can wave around the Pelosi doctrine, the Schiff doctrine, the Nadler doctrine, and all the rest of them. Use their rules and take him down.

Do the Republicans have the guts to do so? I doubt it, but they must.

It is the only way to fix the Constitutional order when it comes to impeachment, because the Democrats are creating this precedent.

Now let them eat it.

Joe Biden would be the perfect Democrat president to be impeached.

Start subpoenaing all of his records; all of his phone calls with Ukraine, all of his phone calls with Red China.

You bring Hunter Biden in for 30 hours of secret testimony, like they brought Don Jr. in.

You create a special counsel, the way they created a special counsel against President Trump.

You demand Joe Biden testify in person and, when he refuses, you claim he has something to hide.

Imagine using their tools and their rhetoric against their guy. Or gal, it could be Elizabeth Warren, another liar. She’s another one with interesting finances. Well, we want to get to the bottom of it.

The next Democrat president must be impeached.

And Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff and Nadler and the others; CNN, the Washington Post, the New York Times, ABC and the others; they have all laid the foundation.

And the only way to stop this is to destroy their foundation with their guy or their lady.

Read more at MarkLevinShow.com.

(For more from the author of “The Next Democrat President Must Be Impeached” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Beatings and Sexual Assaults Making a Comeback to New York Subways

/0 Comments/in , /by

Whenever you travel to the Big Apple, just remember not to take the subway. The extra cost of a cab is worth your life, even as state and city officials sacrifice the value of your life to street thugs in order to empty the prisons.

Even before the full enactment of New York’s criminal justice reform, the predictable consequence of undeterred violent crime is already rearing its ugly head. Last Thursday, two female tourists were savagely beaten at a Brooklyn subway stop and robbed while nobody did anything to help. Surveillance video shows two suspects repeatedly beating them on the platform stairs and threatening them with a knife and taser before running off with their belongings. Welcome to New York City; enjoy your stay in America!

In a separate incident on a Manhattan subway platform a few days earlier, surveillance video shows convicted rapist George Shaw, 54, sexually assaulting an unsuspecting 18-year-old female. Shaw was convicted in 1996 of raping and sodomizing four females, including three underage girls. He was released from prison last year, and now he is accused of forcibly grabbing this subway passenger from behind. Frankly, we should be thankful Shaw was behind bars even for 22 years. 1996 was at the height of the incarceration era. Today, even someone convicted of four rapes would likely serve much less time in New York before being paroled.

As I’ve reported before, this is part of a broader trend of returning violence to subways in New York and elsewhere. According to NYPD data, there were 1,185 transit misdemeanor assaults citywide from Jan. 1 to Nov. 17, which reflects a 10.9 percent increase from the same time last year. This is largely due to Mayor Bill DeBlasio’s refusal to enforce public order laws and fare jumping, which often reveal perpetrators of even greater crimes. That’s why the number of sex crimes on NY’s subways has increased for four years in a row. The number of subway “hate crimes” is also up 50 percent this year over last year.

This is all before New York’s new “criminal justice reform” law take effect, and anyone accused of transit assault will be out on bail pending trial. Then again, the girl who was sexually assaulted at the subway should be thankful it was there and not in her home, because this same law will now grant the defense the opportunity to return to the scene of the crime during the trial. For a rape victim in her home, that means returning the suspect to the victim’s bedroom.

The breakdown of public order and the escalation of violence in public transit is happening everywhere criminal justice deform has been tried. In San Francisco, where theft and street vagrancy have essentially become a way of life, crime is skyrocketing. The San Francisco Chronicle reports, “Homicide, rape, assault and robbery have doubled on BART [the Bay Area Rapid Transit system] in the last four years — from 234 incidents in 2015 to 481 incidents last year — after six years of relative stability.”

As California empties its prisons, the streets are the scenes of criminal behavior. The L.A. Times reports that car thefts in some California cities are at “crisis levels,” as prosecutors say their “hands are tied” thanks to new pro-criminal policies in place. Car burglaries spiked in San Francisco by 24 percent from 2016 to 2017 and by 20 percent in San Jose from 2016 to 2018. So if you want to avoid the crime in the subways by using your own car to get around the city, just remember that the one-sided justice system has given the criminals a long reach into your private vehicle as well.

Subway violence has also increased in Seattle and Minneapolis, two bastions of criminal justice “reform.” The number of serious crimes on Minneapolis’ green line is up 34 percent this year. The Twin Cities have become a stronghold for criminal justice “reform” as crime spikes across most categories, with St. Paul on pace for a record year of homicides. Transit crimes are up 6 percent this year in Chicago, despite the deployment of thousands of new cameras. After all, cameras only serve as a deterrent if those caught committing crimes on the footage are actually punished.

Republicans have a golden opportunity to discuss safe communities and neighborhoods and run against Blue America’s culture of pro-criminal laws and the ensuing consequences of violent crime, burglary, theft, and homelessness. Yet instead of making this a top agenda item, top Republicans continue to support the Soros agenda on crime just as rigorously as Democrats. Bill Lee, the Republican governor of Tennessee, has promised to “empty our jails.” He claimed, “We have to be creative and innovative and disruptive and challenge the way we’ve been doing things forever.”

Actually, Governor Lee, there is nothing creative or innovative about implementing the Soros agenda on crime. We are seeing the innovation in San Francisco, New York, Chicago, Seattle, and Minneapolis. Yes, it certainly is disruptive, and perhaps innovative from the criminals’ standpoint. But where does that leave us law-abiding citizens? (For more from the author of “Beatings and Sexual Assaults Making a Comeback to New York Subways” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Revealed: The Secretive Strategy Behind the Transgender Assault on Parental Rights

/0 Comments/in , /by

Last week, a British journalist unearthed a document laying out the transgender movement’s secretive strategy to seize control of governments, undermine parental rights, and target children for dangerous experimental drugs that lead to sterilization and genital mutilation. The document lays out a three-pronged strategy to victimize children when they are far too young to understand the ramifications of any hormone “treatment” or surgery.

As the Spectator’s James Kirkup revealed, transgender activists attack parental rights by getting ahead of the government agenda, tying their issue to more popular movements to create a “veil of protection,” and working in secret to “keep press coverage to a minimum.” In this way, they use their status as a minority to manipulate the government into enacting policies that would be opposed by the majority.

Dentons, which claims to be the world’s biggest law firm, crafted the report, working with Thomson Reuters Foundation and the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Intersex Youth & Student Organization (IGLYO). Both Dentons and the Thomson Reuters Foundation claim the document does not necessarily represent their views, but they helped draft it, nonetheless.

“Only Adults? Good Practices in Legal Gender Recognition for Youth” warns that parental rights can damage children’s self-expression. “It is recognised that the requirement for parental consent or the consent of a legal guardian can be restrictive and problematic for minors,” the document argues.

In this foundational assumption, IGLYO reveals its aim: to circumvent parental consent when it comes to transgender identity. “Restricting” a child’s capacity for self-harm is an essential part of good parenting, and parents should have the right to protect their children from decisions that will damage them for the rest of their lives. No good father will allow his anorexic daughter to get liposuction, and no good mother will allow her son to cut off his arm or leg because he has body integrity disorder or identifies as an amputee. (Read more from “Revealed: The Secretive Strategy Behind the Transgender Assault on Parental Rights” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Epstein Posed with Weinstein and Dressed as Navy SEAL for Prince Andrew’s Daughter’s Birthday Bash

/0 Comments/in , /by

Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was photographed dressed as a Navy SEAL next to disgraced filmmaker Harvey Weinstein during Prince Andrew’s daughter’s 18th birthday soiree.

Epstein, who was found dead in his prison cell this year while awaiting sex trafficking charges, was reportedly close friends with Weinstein, who has been accused by multiple women of sexual abuse and is slated to go on trial in January. Epstein’s then-girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, was also part of the grinning trio and can be seen wearing a gold masquerade mask in the photo released by the Sun.

Andrew, who has spent considerable time with Epstein, was accused of rape by Virginia Roberts Giuffre, and, although he has denied the allegations, he has been relieved of his duties in light of the public backlash. A second woman has also come forward and accused Andrew of having sex with her.

The picture of the three was snapped just about a week before Epstein was arrested for the first time and charged with one count of soliciting prostitution. Epstein was under investigation by authorities while he attended the exclusive party, which included the likes of celebrities such as Demi Moore, Kelly Osbourne, and Sir David Frost. . .

An undisclosed source said that the photo “sums up just why the Epstein affair has been so disastrous for Andrew. He brought these people into the royal fold, to Windsor Castle no less, where they could rub shoulders with the great and good. It is an astounding lack of judgment at the very least.” (Read more from “Epstein Posed with Weinstein and Dressed as Navy SEAL for Prince Andrew’s Daughter’s Birthday Bash” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

New Report Reveals the Afghanistan War Was Always Based on Lies

/0 Comments/in , /by

. . .The war in Afghanistan, now in its 19th year, is about as protracted and bloody as it has ever been. Throughout the entire conflict, hawks have told skeptical voters to sit down, be quiet, and leave it up to the professionals. For years they’ve said victory is supposedly just around the corner and that we’re making progress. And yet all the while, the situation on the ground tells a vastly different story. Still, those of us on the outside have never truly been able to witness the full gravity of Washington’s extravagantly expensive misadventure in Afghanistan — because the national security bureaucracy has a knack of keeping bad information hidden away in a vault.

No longer. After a three-year court battle, the Washington Post was able to get its hands on classified government documents that demonstrate the catastrophic nature of the war. The paper reports that “senior U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan throughout the 18-year campaign, making rosy pronouncements they knew to be false and hiding unmistakable evidence the war had become unwinnable.”

Based on 2,000 pages and 428 interviews with American officials, the documents expose two disturbing key themes: For one, the United States had no clue what it was doing in Afghanistan, and even worse, government officials lied to voters every step of the way.

The picture that emerges is one of three successive administrations stubbornly resistant to confronting the depth of their mistakes, all too proud or scared to admit their failure. As Gen. Douglas Lute, the Afghanistan war czar in the Bush and Obama White Houses, summarized: “If the American people knew the magnitude of this dysfunction … 2,400 lives lost … Who will say this was in vain?”

What Lute worries about has already come to pass. A majority of the public and a majority of veterans don’t believe the war in Afghanistan was worth fighting. It’s not hard to see why the numbers are so high: There have been too many mistakes to count. (Read more from “New Report Reveals the Afghanistan War Was Always Based on Lies” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE