‘Hell Is Not Enough for You’: SCOTUS Decision on Child Sex Changes Sparks Trans Infighting
A transgender influencer started pointing fingers at other members of the community regarding the Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling Wednesday, which upheld Tennessee’s law banning child sex change procedures.
Trans woman Brianna Wu, who formerly ran for election to the U.S. House of Representatives to represent Massachusetts in 2020, said it’s the “legal precedent that will allow red states to ban HRT for adults.”
Wu aimed his criticism at “the narcissists” at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which represented the plaintiff, and more specifically at Chase Strangio, a transgender person who served as the lead attorney representing the plaintiffs of United States v. Skrmetti.
Wu said that Strangio was worse for the trans movement than Republican Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, who has been openly critical of the trans ideology, “because she’s not actively laying the legal framework that hurts actual transsexuals.”
Wu said Strangio was “destroying” transgender rights with her “arrogance in your extreme gender ideology.”
This non-binary, self-ID nonsense is the legal basis for SCOTUS dismantling transsexual rights today.
And the logic makes perfect sense. This isn’t just a medical condition, thanks to the progressive fringe. It’s now a category anyone can self ID into.
Gender ideology is… pic.twitter.com/7BoRgVF7IQ
— Brianna Wu (@BriannaWu) June 18, 2025
(Read more from “‘Hell Is Not Enough for You’: SCOTUS Decision on Child Sex Changes Sparks Trans Infighting” HERE)
Photo credit: Flickr
