Bloomberg Wants to Deny Elderly Patients Cancer Treatment

A resurfaced video of Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg emerged over the week that showed him discussing health care while visiting a Jewish family in 2011 where he said that elderly people should be denied treatment for cancer as a solution for managing hospital’s scarce resources.

Bloomberg, who railed against Obamacare while talking to the Jewish family, said, “All of these costs keep going up, nobody wants to pay any more money and at the rate we’re going, health care is going to bankrupt us.”

“So, not only do we have a problem, it’s going to bankrupt us and we’ve got to sit here and say, ‘which things are we going to do and which things we’re not,’” Bloomberg continued. “Nobody wants to do that.”

“You know, you show up with prostate cancer and you’re 95-years-old, we should say, ‘go and enjoy, have a nice [inaudible], live a long life,’” Bloomberg continued. “There’s no cure and you can’t do anything, if you’re a young person we should do something about it. Society is not willing to do that yet, so [health care] is going to bankrupt us and we’re not looking at prophylactic care, we’re not trying to take care of things, so we don’t get sick.”

Bloomberg later praised the socialized medicine that Europe has, suggesting that it was better than America’s health care system. (Read more from “Bloomberg Wants to Deny Elderly Patients Cancer Treatment” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Homosexual Buttigieg Says He Can’t Understand How Christians Can Support Trump

On Tuesday night, former South Bend, Indiana mayor and Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg said he can’t understand how any Christian would support President Donald Trump, suggesting there is no “compatibility” there.

“Do you think it is impossible to be a Christians and support this president?” CNN’s Erin Burnett, serving as moderator, asked Buttigieg.

“I’m not gonna tell other Christians how to be Christians,” the former mayor responded. “But, I will say, I cannot find any compatibility between the way this president conducts himself and anything I find in scripture.” . . .

President Donald Trump, on the other hand, has continuously supported the pro-life movement, which is highly important to Christians across the nation. For example, Trump was the first president to deliver in-person remarks at the annual pro-life March for Life.

Moreover, as outlined by Russ Vought in a Daily Wire op-ed, Trump as supported the pro-life cause in other ways, like reinstate and expanding the Mexico City Policy and prohibiting Title X grantees from referring patients for elective abortions[.]

(Read more from “Homosexual Buttigieg Says He Can’t Understand How Christians Can Support Trump” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Alabama Lawmaker Proposes Mandatory Vasectomies for Men Turning Fifty

A state representative from Birmingham filed a bill Thursday that would require Alabama men to get a vasectomy once they reach 50 years old or father three children, “whichever comes first.”

The legislation by state Rep. Rolanda Hollis, D-Birmingham, says that a man will have to pay for the vasectomy “at his own expense.”

Hollis said the bill is a response to last year’s abortion bill that passed the legislature and included a near-total ban on abortion.

“The vasectomy bill is to help with the reproductive system, and yes, it is to neutralize the abortion ban bill … it always takes two to tango,” she said. “We can’t put all the responsibility on women. Men need to be responsible also.” . . .

“I do not believe that women should use abortion as a birth control, but I do believe that if a women is raped or if it’s incest or anything like that, then she has the choice to do what she wants to do.” (Read more from “Alabama Lawmaker Proposes Mandatory Vasectomies for Men Turning Fifty” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Infected Americans Return From Coronavirus Cruise

Fourteen Americans tested positive for carrying the new coronavirus just as they began their return to the United States from Yokohama, Japan, where they had been trapped aboard the luxury cruise ship Diamond Princess in a quarantine that began February 3.

As of today, February 17, Japanese health officials have confirmed 454 cases of COVID-19 on the ship, including 99 cases reported since yesterday. The cluster is, by far, the largest of any COVID-19 flare ups outside of China, where the outbreak began and has caused the vast majority of infections and deaths.

The new cases in the returning Americans will nearly double the current number of COVID-19 cases in the US, bringing the total from the current 15 to 29.

Originally, no American cruise ship passengers infected with the new coronavirus were meant to leave Japan. When the US government announced plans on Saturday, February 15, to evacuate the roughly 400 Americans stuck on the cruise liner, it noted that sick passengers would stay in Japan for treatment.

But evacuation plans for over 300 other Americans were thrown into question as they disembarked the ship and made their way on buses to the airport where planes chartered by the US State Department awaited them. En route, US officials received the results of testing done two to three days earlier that determined that 14 of the evacuees were infected with the novel coronavirus. (Read more from “Infected Americans Return From Coronavirus Cruise” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Life Sentence Overturned for Cartel Members Who Killed ICE Agent

Illegal aliens can break into our country with impunity and sue ICE officers if they don’t like conditions in the detention facilities. But if an ICE agent is killed by cartel assassins on a mission in Mexico on behalf of the United States government, suddenly borders seem to be important.

On February 15, 2011, members of Los Zetas cartel ambushed two ICE HSI agents traveling in Mexico. They murdered Jaime Zapata, but his partner, Victor Avila, managed to survive by remaining locked in the armored vehicle with diplomatic plates until police arrived on the scene. Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, the second most important federal court, overturned two murder convictions from 2017 for two of the hit men, Jose Emanuel “Zafado” Garcia Sota and Jesus Ivan “Loco” Quezada Pina. They are still serving up to life in prison for the basic murder charge and for a firearms charge, but this decision, unless overturned by the Supreme Court, will give these two cartel members the possibility of parole down the road.

Victor Avila and the parents of Jaime Zapata have been trying to get justice as well as answers from the U.S. government on the nature of the mission that led them into the trap. Zapata’s parents filed a $25 million wrongful death claim against the government, charging that the weapons used against them by the Zetas were part of the “Fast and Furious” gun-running scandal. But that lawsuit, according to Avila, was dismissed in the Southern District of Texas because the federal government did not cooperate by providing the plaintiffs with the documents they needed.

“These families, indeed the American public, are owed the truth about this tragedy and about the circumstances that led to guns going to Mexico — guns that shot two Americans and which may have killed many others,” wrote Judge Hanen in reluctantly dismissing the lawsuit because plaintiffs could not produce enough documents.

I interviewed Avila on my podcast last June in a two-part series (here and here) where he shared the details of the ambush, his quest for elusive justice, and how he has felt let down by our own government both during and after the attack. There’s also a documentary, “Agent Down on Highway 57,” that delves into the questions about the dubious mission they were tasked with, as well as the cover-up after the attack, which was not widely reported in the media at the time.

At issue in the federal appeals court case is whether 18 U.S.C. §1114, which criminalizes the murder of federal agents, applies outside the country. Two other appeals courts, the Second and Eleventh circuits, have ruled in the past that this section is applicable abroad, but the D.C. court ruled that one must presume “that Congress ordinarily legislates with respect to domestic, not foreign, matters.”

Victor Avila, who himself was gravely wounded during the attack, was devastated. “The Zapata family and I are devastated by the appellate court’s decision,” said Avila in a statement to CR. “Other appellate courts have upheld the extraterritorial occurrence in this statute. Why did the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rule this way knowing this precedent exists? What message is being sent to the terrorist cartels in Mexico and around the world? This threatens the safety of our agents in Mexico and abroad. I will do everything I can to have Congress amend the statute and have the Dept. of Justice appeal this egregious decision.”

In total, there were seven individuals extradited for the murder. The other five weren’t even sentenced to mandatory life sentences to begin with because the Justice Department under Obama accepted a plea bargain. Their sentences ranged between 12 years and 35 years. Avilla tells me that the one with the 12-year sentence, Francisco Carbajal Flores, is slated to be released in August 2021.

“It’s unbelievable, this guy’s entire family was brought here on visas and were housed here for the duration of the trial on taxpayer dime. Yet my family had to pay for arrangements to stay in D.C. during the trial, even though I was almost killed by them while serving as a federal agent.”

This court decision leaves a gaping hole in federal law for seeking justice against those who murder federal agents abroad. Last week, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr urging him to appeal this decision.

“The message this ruling sends is one of open season on federal law enforcement officers who can now be targeted overseas,” warns the federal law enforcement association representing 28,000 agents. “Under this ruling, criminals and terrorists will take liberties that targeting a U.S. federal law enforcement officer, will bear no additional punishment, and if apprehended, may never be charged for their death in a United States Court.”

Nothing, of course, is stopping Congress from acting. Why is there never any sense of urgency in Congress to fix judicial loopholes that let off Zetas hit men or criminal aliens in our own country, such as Jose Zarate, Kate Steinle’s killer? Where is the “criminal justice reform” to close these loopholes? (For more from the author of “Life Sentence Overturned for Cartel Members Who Killed ICE Agent” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Illegal Alien Acquitted of Murder in Kate Steinle Case Ruled Incompetent to Stand Trial on Fed Firearms Charges

With all the talk of a two-tiered justice system this past week stemming from the corruption in the trial against Roger Stone, there is another two-tiered system in use in cities like San Francisco. Can victims of illegal aliens ever obtain justice if the trial occurs in a sanctuary city? That is the question we should be asking after Jose Garcia-Zarate, the man who shot Kate Steinle on a San Francisco pier in 2015, caught yet another break.

For the parents of Kate Steinle, the hits keep coming. First, in December 2017, a San Francisco jury acquitted Zarate of all murder charges, including manslaughter, related to the July 1, 2015, killing of Kate Steinle. She was killed by a bullet shot from the stolen .40-caliber gun held by Zarate. He is an illegal alien from Mexico who was deported five times and was released from San Francisco jail two and a half months before without notification to ICE. He remained in the country despite seven felony convictions.

Then, when the family sued the city of San Francisco and former Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi for negligence, the Ninth Circuit rebuffed the claim last year.

Last August, a state appeals court threw out the only remaining state charges. In 2015, the same jury that acquitted Zarate of manslaughter also convicted him of felony gun charges. The state appeals court overturned those charges. Zarate admitted to holding the gun that killed Steinle but maintains that the gun fired on its own.

“It is undisputed that defendant was holding the gun when it fired. But that fact alone does not establish he possessed the gun for more than a moment. To possess the gun, defendant had to know he was holding it,” wrote judge Sandra Margulies for the three-judge panel ruling that the trial judge erred in his instructions to the jury.

Finally, the federal government came in and charged Zarate on federal firearms violations. In 2017, he was indicted by a grand jury for being both a felon and illegal alien in possession of a firearm, both of which are federal crimes. The .40-caliber SIG Sauer P239 had originally been stolen from a U.S. Bureau of Land Management agent’s car. But on Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria, an Obama appointee, ruled that Zarate is not mentally competent to stand trial. Zarate’s future remains unclear.

This man had enough mental acumen to cross our border five times after being deported. He was also competent to stand trial for seven prior felony convictions. What changed now?

The disquieting reality is that after 2015, Zarate was no longer a regular criminal in the eyes of the public. He became one of the most notorious illegal aliens in America. San Francisco politicians, judges, and jurors will do everything they can to ensure he gets off free.

It’s truly shocking how American victims don’t matter in the debate over our own sovereignty. Illegal aliens can sue our state and federal governments for simply enforcing our sovereignty, despite centuries of case law stating they have no standing in our country. Yet whenever Americans harmed by illegal aliens try to get standing to sue against lawlessness that affects their security and the public welfare, they are denied standing. Criminal smugglers can sue our government, yet Kate Steinle’s parents can’t sue San Francisco for harboring the illegal alien who killed their daughter.

However, there doesn’t seem to be a sense of urgency even from Republicans in Congress to pass a law giving victims of sanctuary cities a private cause of action to sue, as Trump called for in his State of the Union address. Instead, top Republicans are promoting a mass amnesty bill. They are also frantically trying to concoct a “DACA” amnesty bill for when the Supreme Court likely sides with Trump on canceling Obama’s clearly illegal executive amnesty program. When will they finally view American citizens like Kate Steinle as highly as they view “dreamers?” (For more from the author of “Illegal Alien Acquitted of Murder in Kate Steinle Case Ruled Incompetent to Stand Trial on Fed Firearms Charges” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Hero Crossing Guard Struck and Killed While Saving Two Grade School Kids in Kansas (VIDEO)

An 88-year-old crossing guard was struck and killed by a car but he’s being hailed as a hero because he saved the lives of two elementary school boys.

The incident occurred on Tuesday morning near Christ the King Elementary School in Kansas City, Kansas.

“He saved two of our students today,” said principal Cathy Fithian. “I’m confident they would not be here if (he) had not stepped in and we are thankful, we feel very blessed to have had him in our lives for five years. We just pray for his family at this time.” . . .

The school later identified the crossing guard as Bob Nill. A neighbor to the school said he was well liked by the children, and that it was a shock that he died.

(Read more from “Hero Crossing Guard Struck and Killed While Saving Two Grade School Kids in Kansas (VIDEO)” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

AG Barr Might Quit Over President Trump’s Tweets

Attorney General William Barr has reached out to multiple allies of President Donald Trump warning that he might quit over the president’s insistence on tweeting about Department of Justice cases, according to numerous reports. . .

The Washington Post reported Tuesday that Barr “has told people close to President Trump — both inside and outside the White House — that he is considering quitting” over the president’s tweets relating to DOJ investigations. The outlet cited three unnamed administration officials. One source told The Post of Barr, “He has his limits.”

The Associated Press also cited an administration official in reporting that “Barr has told people close to him he’s considering quitting his post after President Donald Trump wouldn’t heed his warning to stop tweeting about Justice Department cases.”

Last week, the attorney general sat down for an interview with ABC News where he expressed his frustration over the president commenting on DOJ cases over social media, saying such messages “make it impossible for me to do my job.”

White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham reacted to the interview a few hours after it aired, issuing a statement saying, “The President wasn’t bothered by the comments at all and he has the right, just like any American citizen, to publicly offer his opinions. President Trump uses social media very effectively to fight for the American people against injustices in our country, including the fake news. The President has full faith and confidence in Attorney General Barr to do his job and uphold the law.” (Read more from “AG Barr Might Quit Over President Trump’s Tweets” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Boy Scouts Files For Bankruptcy Due to Numerous Male-on-Male Sexual Assault Claims

By Mike Baker. The Boy Scouts of America, an iconic presence in the nation’s experience for more than a century, filed for bankruptcy protection early Tuesday, succumbing to financial pressures that included a surge in legal costs over its handling of sexual abuse allegations.

Founded in 1910, the Boy Scouts have long maintained internal files at their headquarters in Texas detailing decades of allegations involving nearly 8,000 “perpetrators,” according to an expert hired by the organization. Lawyers have said in recent months that former scouts have come forward to identify hundreds of other abusers not included in those files.

The bankruptcy filing, in Delaware, is expected to disrupt continuing litigation and establish a deadline for when former scouts can pursue claims. (Read more from Boy Scouts Files For Bankruptcy HERE)
_____________________________________

BSA Faces “THOUSANDS” of Boy Scout Claimants

By Corky Siemaszko. Facing mounting legal costs from defending itself against lawsuits alleging sexual abuse of boys, the venerable nonprofit sought Chapter 11 protection in a court filing early Tuesday. . .

Michael Pfau, whose Seattle-based law firm, Pfau, Cochran, Veretis and Amala, represents close to 300 people who say they were abused as Scouts in 30-plus states, called the filing historic.

“It will be far larger in terms of the numbers of victims and far more complicated than any of the bankruptcies we’ve seen so far involving the Catholic Church,” Pfau said. . .

“You’re looking at thousands of abuse survivors making claims,” he said. “This is much bigger than the bankruptcy filings involving the Catholic Church.” (Read more from Boy Scouts Files For Bankruptcy HERE)
_____________________________________

Boy Scouts Admitted Youth Practicing Homosexuality, Transgenders, and Gay Leaders Creating Massive Membership Issues

By Warren Smith. [T]he Scouts can’t blame James Dale, atheist groups, or the ACLU for its most recent, self-inflicted wounds. A 2013 decision to allow homosexual boys to participate in the program accelerated the membership drop. In 2015, others left or considered leaving after BSA’s leadership took the next step and began allowing gay adult leaders. The BSA began accepting transgender youth in 2017.

This drop in membership contributed to a flood of red ink in the organization’s finances, leading to consideration of bankruptcy . . .

In August, a group called Abused in Scouting filed a lawsuit in Philadelphia on behalf of a former Scout who claims he was abused by a Scout leader. The BSA has long kept a list of “ineligible volunteer files” that could include as many as 7,800 names. Victims’ advocates in lawsuits have pressured the Scouts to release the list, but the BSA has resisted, saying that to release a list of suspected abusers would violate their civil liberties and their rights to due process.

The Philadelphia lawsuit says, “It is apparent that the Boy Scouts defendants continue to hide the true nature of their cover-up and the extent of the pedophilia epidemic within their organization.” (Read more from Boy Scouts Files For Bankruptcy HERE)

Top 15 #Coronavirus Pics You Won’t See in Legacy Media

(For more from the author of “Top 15 #Coronavirus Pics You Won’t See in Legacy Media” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE