The sixth man to walk on the surface of the moon has made the astonishing claim that aliens came to Earth to stop a nuclear war between America and Russia.
Edgar Mitchell, a veteran of the Apollo 14 mission in 1971, told Mirror Online that top-ranking military sources spotted UFOs during weapons tests.
The astronaut has been outspoken about his belief in aliens ever since he landed on the surface of the moon, becoming one of the most prominent figures in the worldwide UFO community.
He told US military insiders had seen strange crafts flying over missile bases and the famous White Sands facility, where the world’s first ever nuclear bomb was detonated in 1945.
Mitchell grew up in New Mexico near both the bomb testing zone and Roswell, where believers think one of the world’s most famous UFO encounters took place. (Read more from “‘Peace-Loving Aliens Tried to Save America From Nuclear War,’ Claims Moon Mission Astronaut” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-17 02:54:192015-08-17 02:54:19‘Peace-Loving Aliens Tried to Save America From Nuclear War,’ Claims Moon Mission Astronaut
Several dozen major corporations are responsible for funding Planned Parenthood with hundreds of millions of dollars. Those donations fund 100% of over one-quarter of Planned Parenthood’s operations, operations that include killing over 300,000 pre-born babies per year.
Horrendously, parts from these babies are then fed into a multibillion dollar American industry that directly profits from the murder of the unborn. Read more about this HERE.
We encourage you to stop purchasing goods and services from any corporation that is helping fund Planned Parenthood. We also encourage you to write a letter or email to, or even call, the corporate office of each of these corporations and explain why you will no longer spend money their way.
For your convenience, we have included a list of the offending corporations HERE – along with their contact information – that are helping to directly fund Planned Parenthood’s operations.
Finally, we have created a form letter HERE that you are free to use in lodging your complaint against Planned Parenthood-supporting companies.
Thank you for your fight for life. And may God Bless your efforts.
Restoring Liberty
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-17 00:03:232015-08-17 00:03:23We Must Stop Corporate Donations to Planned Parenthood
Before sending the below letter, make sure you add the information italicized and in brackets below. If you’re looking for the names and addresses of companies that donate to Planned Parenthood, please click HERE.
We were very disappointed to recently discover that your corporation is involved in helping fund the barbaric practices of Planned Parenthood. Although our hard earned dollars have been spent on ***list products you have previously purchased from the company*** in the past, that ends today.
As you undoubtedly know by now, a number of undercover videos reveal that Planned Parenthood is actively involved in the marketing of dead baby parts derived from the hundreds of thousands of abortions committed within their facilities. The videos even suggest that Planned Parenthood employees are murdering babies in failed abortions and subsequently selling their parts.
Although the funding of any group committing the murder of the unborn is reason enough to boycott your business, sponsoring an organization involved in the grotesque body parts trade is especially horrifying to consumers like us.
Until you cut-off 100% of all direct support (and any indirect support through third party groups) for Planned Parenthood, my family and I promise that we will no longer purchase any of your products and/or services. And we will do everything we can to notify our larger communities about what you are doing.
Please let me know at your earliest convenience as to whether you will cut off ALL funding to Planned Parenthood.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-17 00:02:322015-08-17 00:02:32A Form Letter to Send to Companies Donating to Planned Parenthood
Here are the companies that are donating millions of dollars to Planned Parenthood. Please write them stating that you will not buy their products or services until they stop their funding of this barbaric organization. For your convenience, we have prepared a form letter HERE. And if you need more information on why Planned Parenthood must be shut down, please click HERE.
________________________________________
Adobe Systems Incorporated
345 Park Avenue
San Jose, CA 95110-2704
408-536-6000
408-537-6000 (fax)
American Express
4315 S 2700 W
Salt Lake City, UT 84184-0440
1‑800‑954‑0559
Avon
5389 East Provident Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45246
800-500-2866
Bath & Body Works
7 Limited Parkway East
Reynoldsburg, OH 43068
1-800-756-5005
Ben & Jerry’s
30 Community Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403-6828
802-846-1500
Boeing
100 North Riverside
Chicago, Illinois 60606
312-544-2000
Clorox
1221 Broadway
Oakland, CA 94612
510-271-7000
Converse
1 High St. #6 North
Andover, MA 01845
1-978-983-3300
Deutsche Bank
60 Wall Street
New York, NY, USA
212-250-2500
Dockers
1415 Murfreesboro Road, Suite 600
Nashville, TN 37217
800-636-2574
Energizer
533 Maryville University Drive
St. Louis, MO 63141
800-383-7323
Expedia Headquarters
333 108th Ave. NE
Bellevue, WA 98004
1-425-679-7200
ExxonMobil
5959 Las Colinas Boulevard
Irving, Texas 75039-2298
972-444-1000
Fannie Mae
900 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20016-2892
1-800-732-6643
Groupon
600 W. Chicago Ave.
Chicago, IL 60654
1-312-676-5773
Intuit
2700 Coast Ave.
Mountain View, CA 94043
1-800-4INTUIT
Johnson & Johnson
1 Johnson And Johnson Plaza
New Brunswick, NJ 08933
732-524-0400
La Senza
5405 Eglinton Ave West, #106
Toronto, ON
1-888-527-3692
Levi Strauss
1155 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111 U.S.A
415-501-6000
415-501-7112 (fax)
Liberty Mutual
175 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116
888-398-8924
Macy’s
151 West 34th Street
New York, NY 10001
212-494-3000
March of Dimes
1275 Mamaroneck Avenue
White Plains, NY 10605
914-997-4488
Microsoft
15010 NE 36th Street
Redmond, WA 98052
425-703-6214
Morgan Stanley
1585 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
888-454-3965
Nike
One Bowerman Dr.
Beaverton, OR 97005
503-671-6453
Oracle
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650-506-7000
PepsiCo
700 Anderson Hill Road
Purchase, NY 10577
800-433-2652
Pfizer
235 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
212-733-2323
Progressive Insurance
6300 Wilson Mills Rd.
Mayfield Village, Ohio 44143
800-876-5581
Starbucks
PO Box 6363
Dover, DE 19905-6363
800-782-7282
Susan G. Komen
5005 LBJ Freeway
Suite 250
Dallas, TX 75244
877-465-6636
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-17 00:01:082015-08-17 00:01:08Here are the Companies Donating to Planned Parenthood
Ben Carson Used Aborted Fetal Tissue in Research, No Apologies
By Wills Robinson. Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson has defended using aborted fetuses for medical research – even though he has slammed Planned Parenthood for a similar practice.
The neurosurgeon conducted research in 1992 using two fetuses aborted in the ninth and 17th week of gestation, but insists it does contradict his pro-life stance.
He has also claimed it does not go against his call to take away funding from the embattled organisation, which has been under intense scrutiny since undercover videos of staff members discussing the use of fetuses in scientific research surfaced.
He continued by saying: ‘There is absolutely no contradiction between the research I worked on in 1992 and my pro-life views.
‘The issue of fetal tissue has everything to do with how the tissue is acquired. My primary responsibility in that research was operating on people to obtain diseased tissue for comparison to banked tissue samples. (Read more from “Pro-Life Fraud? Ben Carson Used Aborted Fetal Tissue in Research, No Apologies; Also Opposes Religious Exemptions for Vaccinations Containing Aborted Fetal Cells” HERE)
Ben Carson: No ‘Philosophical’ or ‘Religious’ Exemptions for Vaccinations, Even Those Derived from Aborted Fetal Cell Lines
By Breitbart News. Dr. Ben Carson, a likely 2016 GOP presidential contenders, believes there should be no “philosophical” or “religious” exemptions for vaccinations.
“Although I strongly believe in individual rights and the rights of parents to raise their children as they see fit, I also recognize that public health and public safety are extremely important in our society,” Carson told The Hill. “Certain communicable diseases have been largely eradicated by immunization policies in this country and we should not allow those diseases to return by foregoing safe immunization programs, for philosophical, religious or other reasons when we have the means to eradicate them.”
The retired neurosurgeon’s comments came hours after New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and Sen. Rand Paul, both of whom are likely 2016 presidential candidates and potential rivals, stirred up controversy with their takes on vaccinations after the Disneyland measles outbreak.
On Monday, Christie called for a need for “balance” regarding vaccination before his office immediately clarified Christie’s comments, saying there is “no question” that kids should be vaccinated against a disease like measles.
Paul said he could not understand why his belief that most vaccinations should be “voluntary” is in any way “controversial.” (Read more from this story HERE)
Ben Carson Defends Use of Fetal Tissue for Research
By David Weigel. Ben Carson defended the use of fetal tissue for medical research Thursday, after a blog published excerpts of a 1992 paper describing work the neurosurgeon-turned-presidential candidate carried out using aborted fetuses. In an interview with The Washington Post, Carson called the revelation “desperate,” and ignorant of the way medical research was carried out.
“You have to look at the intent,” Carson said before beginning a campaign swing through New Hampshire. “To willfully ignore evidence that you have for some ideological reason is wrong. If you’re killing babies and taking the tissue, that’s a very different thing than taking a dead specimen and keeping a record of it.”
Carson, who has risen in primary polls since last week’s debate, is among the Republicans who’ve condemned Planned Parenthood after undercover videos revealed executives in the organization coldly discussing the extraction and distribution of tissue from aborted fetuses. In a July interview on Fox News, after the first videos broke, Carson said that there was “nothing that can’t be done without fetal tissue” and that babies aborted at 17 weeks were clearly human beings.
That inspired Jen Gunter to excavate a 1992 paper, co-authored by Carson, in which doctors described how they applied “human choroid plexus ependyma and nasal mucosa from two fetuses aborted in the ninth and 17th week of gestation.” That, wrote Gunter, was quite the contrast from Carson’s 2015 denunciation of fetal tissue research.
“Could he think his own research was useless?” Gunter asked. “If it was non-contributory to the field why was it published? Maybe he forgot that he’d done the research on fetal tissue?” (Read more from this story HERE)
____________________________________________________________
Dr. Carson Referred Women to Abortionists
Republicans most trust Dr. Ben Carson and Mike Huckabee to handle the issue of abortion, according to a recent CNN poll. However, a series of statements from Carson’s campaign, and from Dr. Carson himself, have led to questions about the clarity of his pro-life views about when life begins, how RU-486 works, and his views on experimenting with aborted fetal tissue, among other issues.
On Tuesday, the Carson campaign defended his decision to refer women to abortionists if the child suffered from fetal deformities. (Read more from this story HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-15 01:31:422015-08-15 01:31:42Ben Carson Pro-Life? Candidate Makes Troubling Statements Regarding Aborted Fetal Tissue for Research, Vaccinations, Referred Women to Abortionists
The Obergefell decision was perhaps the most fraudulent Supreme Court decision in US history. The logic was non-existent, the arguments were phony, and the decision itself was a totally political one that, as Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, “has no basis in the constitution or this court’s precedents.” And the ramifications of this decision are disturbing, with significant impact on children, on American culture, on the institution of marriage and on the First Amendment rights of Americans — in particular churches, Christian-owned business, and religious schools. Justice Samuel Alito warned that the decision will be used to oppress the faithful “by those who are determined to stamp out every vestige of dissent.”
First, the issue of same-sex marriage should never have been before the Supreme Court. This is an issue our founding fathers would have insisted be decided by the democratic process. The Supreme Court can’t “interpret” something that is not addressed in the Constitution. Even more significantly, because marriage was NOT originated by human law, civil government has no right to redefine it.
Second, for same sex marriage to be ruled “constitutional”, then, obviously, those who wrote the constitution would have to have been in favor of it and would have indicated so in the Constitution. Neither is true. And the views of our founding fathers on this issue are the opposite of what the five elite lawyers in black robes claimed they were.
Indeed, homosexuality was looked upon by the founding generation as a deviant sexual behavior, which, by the way, continues to be documented by reams of social science research. The only time homosexuality is mentioned anywhere in the law by America’s founding generation is at the state and local levels; and then it was in defining the crime of “sodomy,” and always with steep penalties attached.
Third, the idea that the Supreme Court trumps the other two branches of our government is a bizarre notion with little historical evidence to back it up. The founders gave it the power to offer interpretations in cases brought before it, but never gave it the power to create policy. Many of our founding fathers – Washington, Madison, Jefferson, etc – mocked this idea as one that would destroy the democratic nature of our government. It wasn’t until the Marbury v. Madison decision and some subsequent decisions that the Supreme Court essentially voted to give itself more power. But Congress never ceded them this power; and even today, there exists nothing in our founding documents that prevents the States from simply refusing to obey a Supreme Court ruling. Nullification, as it is called, by a state was common in the past and should once again be used by the states to counter an out-of-control Supreme Court.
Fourth, Anthony Kennedy claimed in the majority opinion that homosexuality was something one is born with – “immutable” he said, a completely false notion. Genetic researchers have never discovered a “gay gene”; and the Human Genome Project, involving 150 of the world’s top geneticists, was not able to find a “gay gene.” None of the professional organizations like the American Psychological Association or even the pro-homosexual Kinsey Institute will claim that homosexuality is genetic. Kennedy made up this phony claim because if homosexuality is not genetic, and thus only a behavior, it is too flimsy of a foundation upon to redefine the ancient institution of marriage. What’s strange is that even the proponents of this case did not make the claim that homosexuals are born that way. Where is Kennedy getting this info? (Read more from “The True Reason Gay Marriage Was Legalized, and What It Really Means for the Future” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-15 01:29:372015-08-15 01:29:37The True Reason Gay Marriage Was Legalized, and What It Really Means for the Future
The leader of the Islamic State personally kept a 26-year-old American woman as a hostage and raped her repeatedly, according to U.S. officials and her family.
The family of Kayla Mueller said in an interview Friday that the FBI had informed them that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the emir of the self-proclaimed Islamic State, had sexually abused their daughter, a humanitarian worker.
Mueller’s parents said the FBI first spoke to the family about the sexual assault in late June and provided more details two weeks ago. The bureau pieced together what happened to the American from interviews with other hostages and the captured wife of a senior Islamic State figure . . .
The disclosure that Mueller was raped by Baghdadi adds to the grim evidence that the exploitation and abuse of women has been sanctioned at the highest levels of the Islamic State. The sexual enslavement of even teenage girls is seen as religiously endorsed by the group and regarded as a recruiting tool.
News of Baghdadi’s abuse of Mueller, who was from Prescott, Ariz., was first reported Friday by the Independent, a London newspaper. (Read more from “Leader of Islamic State Used American Hostage as Sex Slave” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-15 01:28:382015-08-15 01:28:38Leader of Islamic State Used American Hostage as Sex Slave
By Mark Hensch. A majority of Americans believe Hillary Clinton lied about having sensitive national intelligence on her private email server, a new poll finds.
Fifty-eight percent of voters believe Clinton “knowingly lied” last March by claiming her personal email server lacked any classified information, according to a Fox News poll released a Friday.
Another 33 percent believe there is “another explanation” for having “top-secret” information on the device.
Most also think the Democratic presidential candidate endangered the U.S. by using a private server while at the State Department.
The poll found that 54 percent feel Clinton’s use of the device jeopardized national security, while 37 percent don’t think her decision threatened America’s safety. (Read more from “Poll: Majority Believe Clinton Lied About Emails” HERE)
By Bradley Klapper and Ken Dilanian. Neither of the two emails sent to Hillary Rodham Clinton now labeled by intelligence agencies as “top secret” contained information that would jump out to experts as particularly sensitive, according to several government officials.
One included a discussion of a U.S. drone strike, part of a covert program that is widely known and discussed. A second conversation could have improperly referred to highly classified material, but it also could have reflected information collected independently, U.S. officials who have reviewed the correspondence told The Associated Press.
Still, it’s looking increasingly likely the issue of whether Clinton mishandled classified information on her home-brew email server will have significant political implications in the 2016 presidential campaign.
Clinton, who has been seen from the outset as the front-runner for the Democratic nomination, agreed this week to turn over to the FBI the private server she used as secretary of state. And Republicans in Congress have seized on the involvement of federal law enforcement in the matter as a sign she was negligent in handling the nation’s secrets.
On Monday, the inspector general for the 17 spy agencies that make up what is known as the intelligence community told Congress that two of 40 emails, in a random sample of 30,000 messages that Clinton gave the State Department for review, contained information deemed “Top Secret,” one of the government’s highest levels of classification. (Read more from this story HERE)
Clinton’s Team Went From Nonchalant to Nervous Over E-Mail Controversy
By Carol D. Leonnig, Karen Tumulty and Rosalind S. Helderman. Late last month, Hillary Rodham Clinton stood before a line of television cameras at a rural Iowa campaign stop to deny reports that she had sent sensitive information over her private e-mail system.
“I’m confident that I never sent or received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received,” Clinton said, dismissing claims to the contrary by federal intelligence officials as a bureaucratic dispute over what qualifies as classified.
The view from inside Clinton’s presidential campaign team was much the same: Clinton had done what she needed to do, there was nothing of real concern regarding the e-mails and, mostly, the whole matter was an annoyance in her efforts to win the White House.
The next week, however, law enforcement officials became interested, and the campaign’s apparent lack of concern began to turn into a sense of anxiety.
“They’re worried about it,” said a longtime Clinton adviser and confidant who agreed to discuss the mood of the campaign team only on the condition of anonymity. “They don’t know where it goes. That’s the problem.” (Read more from this story HERE)
F.B.I. Tracking Path of Classified Email From State Dept. To Hillary Clinton
By Michael S. Schdmidt and David E. Sanger. F.B.I. agents investigating Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email server are seeking to determine who at the State Department passed highly classified information from secure networks to Mrs. Clinton’s personal account, according to law enforcement and diplomatic officials and others briefed on the investigation.
To track how the information flowed, agents will try to gain access to the email accounts of many State Department officials who worked there while Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the officials said. State Department employees apparently circulated the emails on unclassified systems in 2009 and 2011, and some were ultimately forwarded to Mrs. Clinton.
They were not marked as classified, the State Department has said, and it is unclear whether its employees knew the origin of the information.
The F.B.I. is also trying to determine whether foreign powers, especially China or Russia, gained access to Mrs. Clinton’s private server, although at this point, any security breaches are speculation.
Law enforcement officials have said that Mrs. Clinton, who is seeking the 2016 Democratic nomination for president, is not a target of the investigation, and she has said there is no evidence that her account was hacked. There has also been no evidence that she broke the law, and many specialists believe the occasional appearance of classified information in her account was probably of marginal consequence. (Read more from this story HERE)
Hillary Clinton Jokes About Snapchat’s Disappearing Messages at Iowa Speech
By Ken Thomas. Hillary Rodham Clinton fiercely defended her use of a private email server as President Barack Obama’s secretary of state in a speech before influential Iowa Democrats on Friday, but made light of the simmering controversy as well.
The appearance at the annual Wing Ding, a Democratic fundraiser in northern Iowa that attracted three other presidential candidates, came days after she agreed to turn over to the FBI the private server she used as secretary of state. Republicans assert she was negligent in handling the nation’s secrets.
Clinton offered a light take on the email probe when she talked about launching a Snapchat social media account. “I love it,” she said. “Those messages disappear all by themselves.”
More seriously, she said she would “do my part to provide transparency to Americans — that’s why I’m insisting 55,000 pages of my emails be published as soon as possible” and turned over the server, Clinton said “I won’t pretend that this is anything other than what it is: the same old partisan games we’ve seen so many times before,” she said.
“So I don’t care how many super PACs and Republicans pile on. I’ve been fighting for families and underdogs my entire life and I’m not going to stop now.” (Read more from this story HERE)
By Timothy M. Phelps. Arizona Sheriff Joseph Arpaio lost another round Friday in his long battle against the Obama administration over immigration.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled unanimously that Arpaio, whose Phoenix-area department has been aggressive in trying to deport immigrants in the country illegally, did not have standing to sue.
Arpaio had complained that the administration’s deferred-deportation program — allowing up to 5 million immigrants to stay in the country — would serve as a magnet for others to cross from Mexico into his jurisdiction in Maricopa County. He contended that those crossing the border illegally would stay in his area and commit crimes.
But in her opinion for a three-judge panel, Judge Nina Pillard, a controversial Obama appointee approved by the Senate only after a change of rules, said Arpaio’s contentions are “unduly speculative” . . .
“The court correctly recognized that the constitution does not permit federal courts to hear lawsuits that rest on baseless speculation,” said White House spokesman Eric Schultz. “We will continue to work toward resolving the legal challenges so that the administration can move forward with implementing all of the president’s commonsense immigration policies.” (Read more from “Sheriff Joe Arpaio Loses Another Round in Court in Immigration Fight” HERE)
By Ian Hanchett. Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joe Arpaio reacted to a federal appeals court throwing out his lawsuit against President Obama’s executive actions on immigration by vowing “we’re going to the Supreme Court” on Friday’s “Your World with Neil Cavuto” on the Fox News Channel.
Arpaio said, “we’re going to Supreme Court. We knew it was a tough battle in that appellate court down in Washington, DC, but we’re way ahead of the judge in south Texas, when all those governors joined, and I guess the judge put that on hold. So, we’re already in the appellate court, and now going to Supreme Court on this very important issue.” (Read more from this story HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-15 01:22:462015-08-15 01:22:46Sheriff Joe Arpaio Loses Another Round in Court in Immigration Fight
North Korea on Saturday threatened South Korea with “indiscriminate” military strikes unless it halts cross-border propaganda broadcasts, and issued fresh nuclear weapons warnings against the United States.
The threats came amid escalating military tensions on the Korean peninsula following a landmine attack South Korea blamed on the North and ahead of a major South Korea-US joint military exercise condemned by Pyongyang.
They also coincided with celebrations in both Koreas to mark the 70th anniversary of the Korean peninsula’s 1945 liberation from Japanese colonial rule.
Initially there were hopes the anniversary might be an opportunity for some sort of inter-Korean rapprochement, but instead ties have spiralled downwards to the familiar accompaniment of angry rhetoric and mutual recrimination.
After three landmine blasts maimed two South Korean soldiers on border patrol, Seoul this week resumed high-decibel propaganda broadcasts across the heavily-militarised frontier, using batteries of loudspeakers that had lain silent for more than a decade. (Read more from “North Korea Threatens Imminent Strikes Against South, Warns US” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-08-15 01:20:082015-08-15 01:20:08North Korea threatens imminent strikes against South, warns US