Court Says Improperly Dated Mail Ballots Must Be Counted, in ‘Untethered and Unprecedented’ Ruling

A Pennsylvania court Friday sided with left-wing special interests, blocking the state from enforcing part of a law that required mail ballots to be properly dated in order to be counted.

In a 4-1 ruling, which saw President Judge Renée Cohn Jubelirer — elected as a Republican — side with three elected Democrat judges, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania majority sided with the left-leaning American Civil Liberties Union and the Black Political Empowerment Project, among others, declaring the “strict enforcement” of state law (Act 77) requiring election officials to reject improperly dated or undated mail-in ballots “unconstitutional.”

Calling the decision a “wholesale abandonment of common sense” made in an “untethered and unprecedented fashion,” Judge Patricia A. McCullough described in a scathing dissent how the court majority bent over backward to ensure Pennsylvania voters did not have to date their mail-in ballots:

“[T]o reach its desired end, the Majority today (1) finds jurisdiction where it does not exist, (2) ignores more than a century of sound Pennsylvania Supreme Court precedent interpreting the Free and Equal Elections Clause, (3) applies strict scrutiny without any authority for doing so, (4) accepts Petitioners’ invitation to usurp the role of the General Assembly and re-write Act 77 of 2019 (Act 77), and, in a twist of tragic irony, (5) voids altogether absentee and mail-in voting in Pennsylvania.”

Act 77 was passed in 2019 as part of Pennsylvania’s mail-in voting law. State statute includes the requirement that “an absentee ‘elector shall. . .fill out, date and sign the declaration printed on’ the second, or outer, envelope ‘on which is printed the form of declaration of the elector,’” as cited in the majority opinion. (Read more from “Court Says Improperly Dated Mail Ballots Must Be Counted, in ‘Untethered and Unprecedented’ Ruling” HERE)

Look Who’s Using Social Media to Impersonate American Voters and Spread Divisive Narratives

A new report has found Chinese operatives are using social media platforms to impersonate American voters and spread divisive narratives about issues in the U.S., particularly social issues, and political conversations around the 2024 presidential election.

Graphika, a company that analyzes online social media behaviors, published their report titled “The #Americans” Tuesday, detailing how Spamouflage – a Chinese state-linked influence operation – has become increasingly aggressive on social media platforms, using personas disguised as Americans to sew divisive narratives.

Spamouflage is an influence operation first monitored by Graphika in 2019. Active on over 40 online platforms, it uses inauthentic accounts to promote pro-China and anti-Western narratives. Graphika determined the origins of the operation are linked to the Chinese government.

Graphika’s ATLAS intelligence reporting, which analyzes real-time intelligence and data, identified over a dozen accounts claiming to be American citizens, fifteen Spamouflage accounts were found on X, while one account was found on TikTok.

These accounts all claim to be American citizens, and have been found to be sowing doubt in the U.S. electoral process, while also targeting social issues like gun control, racial inequality, and the conflict between Israel and Hamas. Analysts state much of the content was likely generated through the use of artificial intelligence. (Read more from “Look Who’s Using Social Media to Impersonate American Voters and Spread Divisive Narratives” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Tim Walz Ignores Question on How He and Harris Will Lower Prices (VIDEO)

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) ignored questions on how he and Vice President Kamala Harris will lower prices.

The clip, shared by Trump War Room, shows Walz sitting amongst a crowd of people. One person could be heard asking, “What’s your administration going to do about lowering prices?” adding, “Can you answer the question, please?”

Of course, Walz completely ignored the question — a move apparently backed by his handlers, as the video shows.

This moment comes as many Americans observe the stark reality that both Harris and Walz seem to refuse to answer questions that are not scripted. That aside, even when Harris was asked in her one and only sit-down interview since her coronation about Bidenomics and lowering prices, she largely deflected.

As Harris spoke about plans to lower prices, CNN’s Dana Bash asked, “So, you have been Vice President for three-and-a-half years. The steps that you’re talking about now, why haven’t you done them already?” (Read more from “Tim Walz Ignores Question on How He and Harris Will Lower Prices (VIDEO)” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Corporate America Faces Reckoning: The Pushback Against DEI

Over the summer, a notable shift has occurred in Corporate America. Iconic brands like Ford, Lowe’s, Harley-Davidson, John Deere, and Tractor Supply have made headlines for stepping back from controversial Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices in the workplace. The catalyst behind this significant change? Activist Robby Starbuck, whose relentless campaign against what he calls “divisive” DEI programs is making waves.

Starbuck, who has amassed over 500,000 followers on X (formerly Twitter), has been at the forefront of a movement challenging the mainstream adoption of DEI policies. His approach is straightforward: expose companies with contentious DEI initiatives and rally public opinion against them. According to Starbuck, this has forced companies to reconsider their stance.

“Companies are starting to realize the whole DEI thing has been a house of cards,” Starbuck told The Post. “Somebody just had to press the cards. The majority of CEOs in America are very happy to have an excuse to get rid of this stuff.” His impact is evident. Recently, Starbuck announced that Molson Coors, a major player in the beverage industry, is preemptively making changes to its DEI policies, including eliminating DEI-based training and hiring metrics. This move came after Starbuck warned of a potential exposé.

Lowe’s, a household name in retail, also yielded to Starbuck’s influence. The retailer agreed to consolidate its identity-based employee resource groups and halt its participation in LGBTQ+ parades not related to its business. Ford, too, decided to scale back its DEI initiatives and discontinue diversity quotas.

This shift is reminiscent of Jack Daniel’s reversal of its policies after Starbuck announced plans to protest the whiskey brand. Starbuck’s tactics have drawn criticism from some who argue he is inciting mob behavior. However, Starbuck maintains that he is merely highlighting corporate values that diverge from those of everyday Americans.

“You have to be in alignment with your customers — otherwise, if someone else is, they’re going to eat your lunch,” Starbuck explains. “That’s how capitalism works. Customers don’t ignore it when you’re violating their values every day.”

Starbuck’s background is instrumental in understanding his perspective. Raised in California by Cuban-American parents, he grew up with a keen awareness of Marxist ideology, which he sees reflected in DEI initiatives that emphasize equity. For Starbuck, these programs echo the ideologies that he believes contributed to the hardships his family faced under communism.

He has been outspoken against DEI and Critical Race Theory (CRT) since their rise in prominence following the summer of 2020. Starbuck, who previously thrived in Hollywood as a successful producer and music video director, left the industry after finding it increasingly inhospitable to conservative values. His public support for Donald Trump in 2015 led to a significant loss of clients and ultimately drove him to relocate his family to a farm in Franklin, Tennessee.

“The moral panic of the summer of 2020 launched me into an all-out war against corporate DEI initiatives,” Starbuck asserts. He describes these programs as “fascist” and argues that corporate executives have been forced to conform to these ideologies out of fear of being labeled racist.

“Executives rolled over after George Floyd, but we’re at a different moment now,” Starbuck continues. “It’s time to course correct and unify all of our customers.

Photo credit: Flickr

Model Elle Macpherson Refused Chemo Following Secret Breast Cancer Diagnosis Seven Years Ago

Supermodel Elle Macpherson is discussing a cancer diagnosis she received seven years ago and how she refused to do traditional treatments despite medical recommendations.

The 60-year-old celebrity is opening up about what happened in advance of her new book, “Elle,” which is being released in November.

“It was a shock, it was unexpected, it was confusing, it was daunting in so many ways,” Macpherson told The Australian Women’s Weekly of being diagnosed with breast cancer. “And it really gave me an opportunity to dig deep in my inner sense to find a solution that worked for me… I realized I was going to need my own truth, my belief system to support me through it. And that’s what I did.”

Despite the model’s doctor recommending a mastectomy with chemotherapy, radiation, and hormone therapy, Macpherson opted for “an intuitive, heart-led, holistic approach” instead, which earned her mixed reactions from family members. . .

“I chose a holistic approach. Saying no to standard medical solutions was the hardest thing I’ve ever done in my life. But saying no to my own inner sense would have been even harder,” she wrote in her book. (Read more from “Model Elle Macpherson Refused Chemo Following Secret Breast Cancer Diagnosis Seven Years Ago” HERE)

Watch: Whom Does Alexa Recommend You Vote For? You May Be Shocked at the Response

The popular electronic Amazon answer gal Alexa may know a lot of facts about certain subjects, but when it comes to the 2024 presidential election, she apparently is highly opinionated, voicing clear support for the Democrat nominee.

Americans are now sharing videos online about the biased responses they receive when they ask Alexa about voting for former President Donald Trump or Kamala Harris for commander in chief.

For instance, when Alexa is asked, “Why should I vote for Donald Trump?” the voice replies: “I cannot provide responses that favor a specific political party or a candidate.” . . .

But when asked, “Why should I vote for Kamala Harris?” one reply indicates: “There are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris. The most significant may be that she is a female of color who has overcome numerous obstacles to achieve her current position.

“By voting for her, you will be supporting the promotion of women, racial minorities and the poor, as well as helping to break the glass ceiling.”

(Read more from “Watch: Whom Does Alexa Recommend You Vote For? You May Be Shocked at the Response” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

U.S. And Europe Leading Charge to Keep Certain Types of Child Porn Legal

Western nations led by the United States and the European Union (EU) are supporting exceptions to the criminalization of child pornography in a draft UN treaty “against cybercrime.”

The currently drafted exceptions state that porn that does not involve a “real child” or is AI-generated, or created within a “consensual relationship” and kept for “private use” should not have to be prosecuted by governments. This form of the treaty will take effect in the coming months if the majority of countries at the UN General Assembly continue to support it.

Stunningly, 91 countries, including the United States and the European Union, have voted to keep these exceptions, now within Article 14 of the treaty, according to the Italian news outlet Daily Compass.

An Austrian delegate reportedly representing the voice of the EU pointed out during a UN session that in her country as well as other European countries minors as young as 14 are considered legally able to consent to sexual activity with an adult. . .

Daily Compass remarked that this treaty would “open the door” to legalized child sex abuse and could facilitate child trafficking across the globe. Even if children as young as 14 could truly consent to sex with an adult, it is well known that many forms of coercion can be used whereby a child can claim to consent to a sexualized relationship in which their consent is truly lacking. (Read more from “U.S. And Europe Leading Charge to Keep Certain Types of Child Porn Legal” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Ex-Employee Sues Blue State University For Allegedly Firing Her After She Converted To Christianity

A former City University of New York (CUNY) staff member is suing the university for wrongfully terminating her employment after she converted to Christianity, according to a religious discrimination lawsuit filed last week.

Teona Pagan, who worked at CUNY’s Research Foundation as the Fellowships and Public Service Program Coordinator, alleges she was denied a religious accommodation for an aspect of her job that required her to recruit students for a fellowship focused on the promotion of LGBT “rights and causes,” according to the complaint filed Aug. 28. When Pagan converted to Christianity in April 2022 — months after beginning her job in November 2021 — she suddenly found her duties related to the fellowship in conflict with her sincerely held religious beliefs.

“After my hire, I was told that the committee was particularly drawn to me because of my youthful maturity and willingness to stand boldly for issues plaguing our generation,” Pagan told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Ironically, when I decided to finally stand for the Truth, who is Jesus Christ, they chose to terminate my employment.”

Pagan was hired for the position right after graduating from the Honors Program at CUNY’s Baruch College, according to the lawsuit.

Pagan oversaw nine other fellowship programs, and less than 10% of her job was devoted to the LGBT-centered program, known as the Mixner Fellowship, she told the DCNF. She thought the religious accommodation would be an “easy fix and compromise,” especially since she had collaborated with her supervisor on other projects “where roles shifted smoothly.” (Read more from “Ex-Employee Sues Blue State University For Allegedly Firing Her After She Converted To Christianity” HERE)

Kim Jong Un Executes 30 Officials Over Floods in North Korea That Killed 4,000: Report

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un ordered up to 30 officials to be executed over their alleged failure to prevent massive flooding and landslides in the summer that resulted in the death of some 4,000 people, according to South Korean media.

An official under Kim’s regime said between 20 to 30 leaders in North Korea had been charged with corruption and dereliction of duty, with the state sentencing them to capital punishment, TV Chosun reported.

“It has been determined that 20 to 30 cadres in the flood-stricken area were executed at the same time late last month,” the official told the outlet. . .

The North Korean Central News Agency previously reported that Kim ordered authorities “strictly punish” the officials after catastrophic flooding hit the Chagang Province in July, claiming about 4,000 lives and displacing more than 15,000 people.

The officials who were executed were not identified, but the report noted that Kang Bong-hoon, the Chagang Province Provincial Party Committee Secretary since 2019, was among the leaders dismissed by Kim in an emergency meeting during the flooding disaster. (Read more from “Kim Jong Un Executes 30 Officials Over Floods in North Korea That Killed 4,000: Report” HERE)

Trump: ‘I’d Be Inclined’ to Release Epstein Client List if Reelected

Former President Donald Trump told computer scientist and podcaster Lex Fridman that he would “be inclined” to release the client list of disgraced financier and convicted sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein if reelected president.

“Why do you think so many smart, powerful people allowed him to get so close?” Fridman asked President Trump during Tuesday’s episode of the Lex Fridman Podcast.

“He was a good salesman,” Trump replied. “He had some nice assets that he’d throw around like islands, but a lot of big people went to that island. But fortunately, I was not one of them.”

Fridman noted, “It’s just very strange for a lot of people that the list of clients that went to the island has not been made public,” to which Trump replied, “Yeah, it’s very interesting isn’t it? Probably will be, by the way.”

“So if you are able to, you’ll be–” Fridman said, to which President Trump replied, “I’d certainly take a look at it.” (Read more from “Trump: ‘I’d Be Inclined’ to Release Epstein Client List if Reelected” HERE)