Mayor Bans White People From Holiday Party

The scandalous plans by the prominent Democrat mayor of Boston to have a “no-whites” holiday event has been revealed.

Commentator Todd Starnes wrote about the situation that was created by Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, who, he reported, “had wanted the party to be exclusively for “electeds of color.”

That, the report explained, meant only “non-white lawmakers.”

The scheme was uncovered when Wu’s office, apparently by mistake, sent the “exclusive invitation” to a long list of recipients. . .

It was Wu staff member Denise DosSantos who was on the hook, explaining, “I wanted to apologize for my previous email regarding a Holiday Party for tomorrow. I did send that to everyone by accident, and I apologize if my email may have offended or came across as so. Sorry for any confusion this may have caused.” (Read more from “Mayor Bans White People From Holiday Party” HERE)

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Border Closure Has U.S. Citizens Considering Illegally Crossing Rather Than Take 8-Hour Drive

American citizens say they’ve been trapped in Mexico by the closure of an Arizona border overwhelmed by migrants — and are considering crossing back into the US illegally themselves rather than making dangerous eight-hour round trips.

The border crossing at Lukeville has been closed since December 4 as border patrol agents are diverted to dealing with thousands of migrants arriving illegally in the area, some of whom cut down parts of the border wall to flood into the US.

The closure means those on the Mexican side of the border have to travel through ports of entry in Nogales or San Luis Rio Colorado to the east or west, turning a journey of 30 minutes or an hour into a six-to-eight hour odyssey.

“There’s so many people that are so upset seeing all these 10,000 illegals coming in a day, and they’re coming through a wall that the cartel cut a hole in,” real estate broker Robin Miller, who lives in the beach town of Rocky Point, told The Post.

“And they’re just coming in, coming in. Yet us people with passports [who] are legal to go to the states, we can’t go.” (Read more from “Border Closure Has U.S. Citizens Considering Illegally Crossing Rather Than Take 8-Hour Drive” HERE)

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Obstruction Charge Case With Implications for Trump

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether a man involved in events at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, can be charged for obstructing an official proceeding in a case that could have significant implications for the federal government’s prosecution of Donald Trump.

The defendant, Joseph Fischer, was indicted on seven charges after January 6, but the charge in question is a count under a provision enacted after the Enron scandal for anyone who “corruptly … obstructs, influences and impedes any official proceeding,” known as 18 U.S.C. 1512.

Trump’s allies argue that the provision was clearly intended to cover the destruction of evidence related to white-collar crime and that the Supreme Court’s decision to examine this issue is bad news for U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the government’s broad interpretation of the statute.

“Today was a bad day for Jack Smith, and a good day for the rule of law,” former U.S. Ambassador Ken Blackwell exclusively told Breitbart News.

Prosecutors say Fischer assaulted the police to disrupt the congressional certification of the results of the 2020 election and that his actions fit under 18 U.S.C. 1512. Although Trump is not part of Fisher’s case, the statute is a central piece of Smith’s criminal prosecution of the former president. (Read more from “Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Obstruction Charge Case With Implications for Trump” HERE)

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Trump-Bashing Federal Judge Folds, Issues Pause in President’s Case

A Trump-bashing federal judge who is hearing one of the Democrat-launched cases against President Donald Trump has announced a stay in the case.

That means nothing more will happen, no deadlines will pass, until there’s a ruling in an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court.

WND reported that the pending appeals already have complicated the agenda of partisan special counsel Jack Smith to take Trump to trial in Washington, D.C., on claims he tried to “overturn” the 2020 election.

The results of that election were marred by the $400 plus million that Mark Zuckerberg handed out through foundations to officials who mostly used it to recruit Joe Biden votes.

Further, that was the year the FBI interfered in the election, with its instructions to media corporations to suppress accurate – and devastatingly bad – reporting about the Biden family’s business dealings contained in a laptop abandoned by Hunter Biden. (Read more from “Trump-Bashing Federal Judge Folds, Issues Pause in President’s Case” HERE)

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

High School Student Fails Quiz for Answering ‘Only Women Can Get Pregnant’

A history teacher at a Seattle high school allegedly gave a student a failing quiz grade after he answered that only women can get pregnant and only men can have penises.

A 10th-grade Ethnic Studies World History teacher at Chief Sealth International High School administered the quiz. The test focused on “understanding gender vs. sex” and asked students to answer a series of multiple-choice and true or false questions. . .

Question 4 of the exam asked students to identify whether the statement “All men have penises” is true or false. The student marked the statement true, which was labeled as incorrect by the teacher.

Question 7 of the quiz similarly asked students to identify whether the statement “only women can get pregnant” was true or false. The teacher again marked the student’s answer incorrect when he said the statement was true.

Several other questions asked students to answer questions like, “When someone uses ‘they/them’ pronouns, what does that mean about their gender identity?” and “True/false: Transgender people are gay.” (Read more from “High School Student Fails Quiz for Answering ‘Only Women Can Get Pregnant’” HERE)

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Review: Obama-Produced Netflix Movie Can’t Decide How Much It Hates White People (VIDEO)

Netflix’s Leave the World Behind has a white people problem. The Wi-fi is out but that’s not it. The Tesla is acting funny, but also nope. The movie can’t decide how much it hates white people.

Sometimes, it’s a little, and sometimes, it’s a whole lot, like when Julia Roberts goes full Karen on the black family that shows up unannounced at the doorstep. Or when husband Ethan Hawke abandons a distraught Latina housekeeper on the roadside. Mostly, this apocalyptic thriller spends more than two hours trying to be artfully “ambiguous” about its Whiteness Studies specimens as the world comes crashing down around them.

The plot can be summarized as: White people problems become the problem with white people. Profound stuff. This is the kind of movie that lefty white Brooklyn-ites think they deserve and feel obligated to love — the former because they are self-loathing and the latter because the movie was produced by Barack and Michelle Obama.

In searching for material to turn into their first fiction feature for Netflix, the former first couple landed on a novel that ticks all the boxes of brand 44. Gay Bangladeshi-American author Rumaan Alam’s book is a thinly veiled Trump-era allegory that is set in 2019 and imagines an unspecified apocalyptic event that threatens humanity and sends an unnamed president scurrying into a bunker for safety.

But the end of the world is a giant red herring for the movie’s (and the Obamas’) central preoccupation — race.

(Read more from “Review: Obama-Produced Netflix Movie Can’t Decide How Much It Hates White People” HERE)

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

IRS Whistleblowers: Joe Biden Leads ‘Off the Table’ in Hunter Biden Investigation

New testimony from IRS whistleblowers, Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, reveals that during the Department of Justice’s criminal investigation into Hunter Biden, any potential investigative leads involving Joe Biden were deliberately excluded. The testimony, presented before the House Ways and Means Committee, discloses that the agents were prohibited from exploring leads that could have implications for the former Vice President.

Ziegler, responding to questioning from Republican Georgia Rep. Drew Ferguson, stated, “Well, that’s the complex part about this is at the end of the day, any questions that might have led to former Vice President, they were kind of off the table.” Shapley echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the limitations imposed on investigating financial transactions and communications between Hunter Biden and Joe Biden.

The IRS whistleblowers expressed frustration over their inability to pursue leads related to Joe Biden, citing the unusual nature of the investigative process. Shapley specifically referenced the infamous “10 held by H for the big guy” remark from Hunter Biden’s associate, James Gilliar, stating that such leads, which could have provided insights into financial transactions between father and son, were not allowed to be investigated.

The testimony from the IRS whistleblowers aligns with previous allegations of special treatment given to Hunter Biden during the DOJ investigation into taxes and firearms possession. The House Republicans’ report on December 5 substantiates key claims made by the whistleblowers.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf attempted to prevent Joe Biden from being included in a search warrant related to lobbying firm Blue Star Strategies. Documents released by the Ways and Means Committee in September reveal instructions to remove “political figure 1,” identified as Joe Biden, from the search warrant.

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Survey Reveals Alarming Levels of Fraud in 2020 Mail-in Voting, Contradicting Election Security Claims; Joe Miller interviews Dr. Frank

A recent survey conducted by Rasmussen Reports and the Heartland Institute unveils troubling statistics regarding the integrity of mail-in voting during the 2020 election. The survey, which questioned 1,085 likely U.S. voters from Nov. 30 through Dec. 6, 2023, indicates that more than 1-in-5 voters who submitted mail-in ballots admit to fraudulent practices. Specifically, 21 percent of respondents confessed to filling out a ballot on behalf of a friend or family member, a violation of election laws across the United States.

(Listen to Joe Miller’s interview several days ago with Dr. Douglas Frank, one of the nation’s foremost experts on vote integrity, below. They discuss why American voting cannot be trusted, why Alaska’s voting system is one of the worst, and how you can help fix the problem:)

Moreover, the survey reveals additional illicit activities, with 17 percent of mail-in voters admitting to casting a ballot in a state where they were no longer permanent residents and another 17 percent confessing to signing a ballot on behalf of someone else, both of which are violations of federal election law.

Justin Haskins of the Heartland Institute expressed astonishment at the survey’s findings, challenging the narrative that the 2020 election was the most secure in history. These conclusions are drawn directly from voters’ own admissions, refuting any claims of conspiracy theories or suspect evidence.

The survey also indicates that 10 percent of all voters personally know someone who admitted to casting a mail-in ballot in a state where they are not permanent residents, and 11 percent know someone who admitted to signing a mail-in ballot on behalf of another person during the 2020 election.

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Woman Claims Her Missing Son Was Found Days After His Disappearance and Buried Without Her Knowledge

This week, a Mississippi woman said in an interview that her son who was reported missing last year was discovered dead days after his disappearance and buried in a “pauper’s field” without her knowledge.

According to NBC News, Gretchen Hankins’ 39-year-old son Jonathan David Hankins left their home in May 2022 to spend the weekend with friends. He said he would return on Sunday. Jonathan Hankins never returned. . .

When her son never returned, Gretchen Hankins called the Rankin County Sheriff’s Office and reported her son missing. A search was announced on Facebook, through the local media, and posted on a national database. Volunteers began searching for Jonathan Hankins. . .

NBC News figured out what happened to Jonathan Hankins this fall by examining documents related to people being buried in a “pauper’s field” in Hinds County, Mississippi (via NBC News):

NBC News solved the mystery this fall in a matter of minutes. As part of an investigation into people being buried in a Hinds County pauper’s field without their families’ knowledge, reporters examined a register of all the recent burials and compared it with a publicly available list of missing Mississippians. Jonathan’s name was on both.

After obtaining documents through public records requests to confirm the match, NBC News visited Gretchen at home in Florence, Mississippi, on Dec. 4 and shared what reporters had learned: Jonathan had been found dead on May 23, 2022, three days after leaving home, in a hotel room in nearby Jackson. Investigators quickly verified his identity. But the Hinds County coroner’s office and the Jackson Police Department, which both responded to the scene, failed to tell his family, and the county buried him in a grave marked only by a number: 645.

(Read more from “Woman Claims Her Missing Son Was Found Days After His Disappearance and Buried Without Her Knowledge” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

‘Bill Clinton in a Blue Dress’: Senator Reveals Why He Thinks Dems Are ‘Blocking’ Epstein Flight Logs

Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz called out the Democrats allegedly behind blocking deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s flight log list Tuesday on Fox News, stating they are “freaking out” from Republicans pushing to obtain the information.

Cruz appeared on “Hannity” to discuss a slew of topics, including the push from GOP Congress members to reveal Epstein’s full flight logs. Fox host Sean Hannity asked the Texas senator why the Judiciary Committee Chairman and Illinois Democrat Sen. Dick Durbin would be “unwilling” to hand over the logs.

Crus responded by stating although Durbin claimed to not have known “anything” regarding the issue, he pointed out the Illinois senator was in fact at the hearings.

“Look, it’s an awfully good question. A Fox News reporter asked him in the hall of the Senate why Dick Durbin and the Senate Democrats were blocking the flight logs of Jeffrey Epstein’s planes. And he claimed, ‘I don’t know anything about it. I wasn’t there. I don’t know about it,’” Cruz stated.

“On my podcast yesterday, I played the video and said ‘yes, you were there. You’re the one.’ It was my colleague Marsha Blackburn. She introduced an amendment that I joined that would have subpoenaed the flight logs and said we need to see who was on that plane. If there are prominent politicians who were involved in molesting young girls, we need to know – don’t protect them.” (Read more from “‘Bill Clinton in a Blue Dress’: Senator Reveals Why He Thinks Dems Are ‘Blocking’ Epstein Flight Logs” HERE)

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.