Sealaska Board member guilty of illegal corporate donations

By YourAlaskaLink.com (ANCHORAGE, AK) – State Representative Bill Thomas will pay for campaign violations made last October during election season.

Republican from Haines, Thomas has agreed to pay $4,060 in penalties and take a mandatory candidate training class for him and his wife.

The Alaska Public Offices Commission (APOC) investigated a complaint from a well-known Anchorage blogger. She told APOC that a series of ‘thank you’ ads were in violation of Alaska’s ban on corporate campaign contributions.

APOC says the illegal ‘thank you’ ads for Thomas were bought by Haines businesses, but put together by his deputy treasurer.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at YourAlaskaLink.com HERE.

Chris Christie’s Out…Who’s In?

By Michael Fell.  Ann Coulter may be disappointed, but New Jersey gets to keep its governor.  Meanwhile, Republicans still must pick their Presidential candidate.  Despite what the “progressive” Party Pravda (aka the mainstream media) tells you, there are more than two options.

Rick Perry’s been a fairly successful governor in a State that’s created a lot of jobs during today’s depression.  Because of a business friendly political climate, lots of companies have relocated to Texas from States where economies are being destroyed by “progressive” policies.  However, there’s more to consider.  Thanks to a series of bumbling debate performances, Perry’s viability is increasingly in doubt.  An insistence on defending his State’s immigration policies remains a liability.  Border security is a major concern for most Americans.  A taxpayer funded magnet of “free stuff” for illegal aliens doesn’t fly with Conservatives.  Categorizing others as heartless for disagreeing with this position may not have been the best way for Perry to approach it.

Mitt Romney’s candidacy has not ignited passion, especially with grassroots Conservatives.  The Tea Party sees him as a RINO.  He’s the entrenched establishment’s (aka “progressives” in American clothing) ”next one in line” candidate.  To the Tea Party, he’s yesterday’s news.  Although he would love their support, the only way Romney will get Tea Parpty support is if he wins the nomination without it.  There’s more than one albatross around his neck.  The big one is romneycare.  How can a former Governor who signed an individual mandate into law possibly champion the drive to repeal obamacare because it features an individual mandate?  Then again, there’s that image of being a flip flopper fostered by his changing views on a variety of positions over the years.  Sure, he worked successfully in the private sector.  Yes, he turned the Olympics around financially.  But, does he really know how to create jobs on main street?  He’s corporate CEO kind of guy born with a silver spoon in his mouth.

Gary Johnson has good ideas about cutting taxes and reducing spending.  He understands that even if spending is cut, government can’t be trusted to apply the money to deficit reduction, that it’s more inclined to spend the money on wasteful projects.  However, his foreign policy views and ideas on social issues will cost him dearly with Conservatives.

With Christies’ withdrawal, Jon Huntsman, who’s betting his entire candidacy on New Hampshire, might experience short term benefits there with moderates.  However, his foreign policy positions have as much chance of attracting Republicans as do those of a better known candidate who also has no chance of winning the nomination.

Ron Paul has a remarkably devoted following, hence his strong fund raising abilities.  He also has some good ideas vis a vis the domestic economy.  But he disqualifies himself from being Commmander in Chief by virtue of his Code Pink like foreign policy views.  Besides, does any Republican really want a  President who’s openly teamed with Barney Frank in sponsoring legislation to legalize marijuana?

Michele Bachmann started out strong but has slowed.  She’s stuck to her guns and maintained her bona fide Conservative positions, but a series of gaffes have taken their toll, having a negative impact on her funding raising.  She remains in contention because she’s stood by her convictions, standing firm on national defense, support for Israel, denying taxpayer funded benefits to illegal aliens, defending parental rights, and leading the charge to defund obamacare and seeing that it’s repealed completely.

Newt Gingrich remains in the race primarily because he’s still churning out ideas, but his candidacy seems a long shot due to personal baggage.  Yes, he cheated on his wife with an interm while attacking Bill Clinton for doing the same.  Yes, that made him a hypocrite.  But to Gingrich’s credit, where Clinton lied, creating the now famous phrase ”it depends on what your definition of is is”, Gingrich admitted to it and resigned.  Gingrich can rightly claim that he knows how to balance the federal budget.  In fact, he’s the only candidate of any political Party who can make that claim.

Rick Santorum is strongly Conservative on moral issues, which is fine, but is probably not the quickest pathway to victory in a fiscal election.  He’s strong on foreign policy, Second Amendment Rights, and obamacare.  However, for Santorum to gain traction with voters, he should refocus his campaign on fiscal matters, especially Joe Biden’s favorite three letter word: J-O-B-S.

Herman Cain is a strong fiscal and social Conservative.  His 9-9-9 tax reform plan is revolutionary and could ignite private sector growth, something that’s badly needed.  Cain’s been an outspoken opponent of national healthcare ever since Bill Clinton tried to introduce it in the 1990′s.  While he shares the Libertarian view that America should not preemptively go into war, he falls short of crippling America’s defense capabilities by gutting defense spending.  Herman Cain enjoys grassroots support because he’s a real grassroots American, born and raised in the south to a low income family that refused government handouts.  He’s a prime example of the American “pull yourself up by your own bootstraps” way of life.  Best of all, he’s not a career politician.

Ann Coulter’s choice for the GOP nominations isn’t running…is yours?

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

About Michael Fell:  Michael is a former MCA recording artist and traveling minstrel from the seminal punk rock era who’s toured America from coast to coast. A Fine Arts student in college, he’s continued activity as a visual artist working primarily in oil on canvas. Today, Michael’s a leading voice in the new Tea Party Conservative movement. He’s been active since the February 2009 inception of the Tea Parties, and is a strong proponent for the bread-and-butter Conservative issues of lower taxes, reduced government and spending, strong national defense, secure borders and a return to the traditional American values of E Pluribus Unum, Liberty and in God we trust. He’s founder and Chairman of the Westwood Tea Party, a founding member of the Los Angeles Metro Tea Party Coalition, a member in good standing with the Tea Party Patriots, Vice Chairman of the Westside Republicans Club in Los Angeles CA, and an elected Republican delegate to the Los Angeles 47th Assembly District Central Committee. In 2010 he was Campaign Manager for a primary winning Congressional candidate, as well as working on campaigns for Santa Monica and Los Angeles City Council candidates.  Michael’s a nationally recognized Conservative blogger who’s a contributing writer for https://conservativedailynews.com/,  https://beforeitsnews.comhttps://www.redcounty.comhttps://www.uspatriotpac.comhttps://westsiderepublicans.com, as well as his footprint on both Facebook and Monica Crowley’s blog: https://monicamemo.com. His personal impressions, expressions and opinions on today’s news events and political climate can be found on his own blog: https://mjfellright.wordpress.com/

Director of Alaska Native Corporation charged with bribery in “one of most brazen federal contracting scandals in nation’s history”

By Del Wilber (Washington Post): Four people were arrested Tuesday in a complex contracting scam involving the Army Corps of Engineers, authorities said.

Charged in the District’s federal court with conspiracy, bribery and unlawful kickback were two Army Corps contracting officers, Kerry F. Khan of Alexandria, and Michael A. Alexander of Woodbridge.

Facing the same charges are Khan’s son, Lee, of Fairfax County, and Harold F. Babb, of Sterling, director of contracts for EyakTek, an Alaska Native Corporation with an office in Dulles, Va.

Federal law enforcement officials said the scam involved delivered and promised kickbacks of about $20 million on what they described as substantial contracts for critical technology services.

Ronald C. Machen Jr., the District’s U.S. Attorney, said in a brief interview outside of his office Tuesday that “as alleged, this is one of the most brazen federal contracting scandals in our nation’s history.”

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at the Washington Post HERE.

Can that ‘Joe Miller Magic Strike’ for Marc Scaringi in PA US Senate Race?

(By Randy DeSoto)  I was Joe Miller’s Communications Director during his Primary Campaign in last year’s U.S. Senate race in Alaska, and now I’m holding the same position for Marc Scaringi, who’s running for the U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania. I see some interesting parallels between the two races. The first is that Marc, like Joe, is undaunted by the challenge of taking on an incumbent Senator with a big family name, who appears to many unbeatable. That is how Lisa Murkowski looked heading into and throughout most of the primary election season last year. Originally, the seat had been given to her by her father in 2002, Alaska’s then newly elected governor Frank Murkowski. He had held the Senate seat the previous 20+ years and decided his daughter was the best person to take his place. Two years later, she managed to pull off a narrow victory when she ran for a full term, while her father remained sitting Governor of the state.

Up for re-election in the 2010, she had the requisite over 50% approval rating statewide, and over 70% among Republicans that should have made her a shoe-in for re-election. Those numbers did not deter Joe Miller. He saw that her voting record, despite her party affiliation, was liberal. In fact she had voted with the Democrats and against the majority in her party more than any other Republican Senator up for re-election: over three-hundred times on issues like government bailouts and other vast spending bills, and against the pro-life position. Joe decided no one should be automatically elected to office because of family name or position, especially when her votes were so contrary to the best long-term interests of the country, so he announced his candidacy on Lexington-Concord Day, April 19.

Joe then set about tirelessly campaigning all over our country’s largest state making the case that Lisa Murkowski was part of the Big Spending, Big Government problem in Washington. Though not someone of great means, he seeded his campaign with $50,000 to get the campaign off the ground. Donations were slow at first, so Joe reached down in June and put another $50,000 of his own money into the campaign. Steadily momentum built, then came Governor Sarah Palin’s endorsement, and the Tea Party Express jumped in on Joe’s side too. The Tea Party Express would spend about a half a million on the race in independent expenditures. The entire Joe Miller of U.S. Senate campaign would come in at just over $300,000 for the primary race. Lisa Murkowski meanwhile had $3 million in her campaign war chest, and she still enjoyed an over 30 point advantage in the polls in early July.

The Senator looked to be cruising to an easy re-election, but Joe’s campaign caught fire. We could feel his support growing, and there was a deep-seated faith among the staff that Joe could win this thing. By early August, Joe was just 11 points down. During the week heading into the August 24 Primary, everything seemed to click: commercials we produced with Murkowski in her own words giving contradictory statements on her position on Obamacare and others in which she sounds just like President Obama on the need for government spending aired on TV and radio throughout the state; Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin cut robocall ads for us, which went out to thousands of voters; meanwhile, our volunteers waved signs and canvassed Alaska for Joe. We got wind of an internal poll days before Election Day that had us just 1 point down. We knew the election may well be ours. The rest was history with Joe pulling off perhaps the upset of the whole primary season, “shocking” the political world, Rocky-style.

It’s interesting for me to see the same sort of race shaping up here in my home state of Pennsylvania. Joe Miller sees it too, and decided to endorse Marc last month.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at Redcounty.com HERE.

Bombshell revelation: US agent actually sold the guns to Mexican criminals

By Michael Walsh (NY Post):

This just might be the smoking gun we’ve been waiting for to break the festering “Fast and Furious” gun-running scandal wide open: the Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives apparently ordered one of its own agents to purchase firearms with taxpayer money, and sell them directly to a Mexican drug cartel.

Let that sink in: After months of pretending that “Fast and Furious” was a botched surveillance operation of illegal gun-running spearheaded by the ATF and the US attorney’s office in Phoenix, it turns out that the government itself was selling guns to the bad guys.

Agent John Dodson was ordered to buy four Draco pistols for cash and even got a letter from his supervisor, David Voth, authorizing a federally licensed gun dealer to sell him the guns without bothering about the necessary paperwork.

“Please accept this letter in lieu of completing an ATF Form 4473 for the purchase of four (4) CAI, Model Draco, 7.62×39 mm pistols, by Special Agent John Dodson,” read the June 1, 2010, letter. “These aforementioned pistols will be used by Special Agent Dodson in furtherance of performance of his official duties.”

On orders, Dodson then sold the guns to known criminals, who first stashed them away and then — deliberately unhindered by the ATF or any other agency — whisked them off to Mexico.

People were killed with Fast and Furious weapons, including at least two American agents and hundreds of Mexicans. And the taxpayers picked up the bill.

So where’s the outrage?

There’s none from the feds. Attorney General Eric Holder has consistently stonewalled Rep. Darrell Issa, Sen. Chuck Grassley and other congressional investigators.

In a constantly evolving set of lies, Holder has denied knowing anything about Fast and Furious while at the same time withholding documents from the House and Senate committees looking into the mess while muzzling some witnesses and transferring others.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at NYPost.com HERE.

Supreme Court says “No” to Mexican Roe v. Wade, State Personhood Amendment Upheld

By Keith Ashley.  The Supreme Court of Mexico ruled on Wednesday to uphold the state constitutional personhood amendment of Baja California. A similar decision in the San Luis Potosi case is expected. The Court’s most recent appointee, Justice Jorge Mario Pardo Rebolledo, sided with three members of the Court to reject an Action for Unconstitutionality submitted against the measures. Pardo Rebolledo was appointed last February and had yet to rule in an abortion case. His vote ensures that the Court will not reach the supermajority necessary to overturn the amendment.

“Pardo Rebolledo, as well as Justices Salvador Aguirre, Margarita Luna, and Guillermo Ortiz have our gratitude,” said Personhood USA Legal Analyst Gualberto Garcia Jones, J.D. “Thousands of Mexican girls and boys will, one day, be able to thank them personally for defending their very right to exist.”

In total, eighteen states have passed measures enshrining into law full personhood protections for preborn children. The amendments were passed in reaction to the legalization of abortion in Mexico City in 2009. The state measures received the support of 88% of the members of state legislatures including members of every major political party such as PAN, PRI, and PRD.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at PersonhoodUSA HERE.

Diebold voting machines can be hacked by remote control – for $10

A laboratory test shows how Diebold machines can be easily manipulated.  And Alaska’s Diebold machines, banned in California, can be manipulated in a similar way.  Read about that HERE.  Why did Alaska’s Lt. Governor certify a hand count of Murkowski’s ballots but certified a Diebold machine count of Miller’s ballots?  And why did the Lt. Governor refuse Miller’s repeated requests that he be allowed, at his own cost, to conduct a hand count?

By Brad Friedman

It could be one of the most disturbing e-voting machine hacks to date.

Voting machines used by as many as a quarter of American voters heading to the polls in 2012 can be hacked with just $10.50 in parts and an 8th grade science education, according to computer science and security experts at the Vulnerability Assessment Team at Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois. The experts say the newly developed hack could change voting results while leaving absolutely no trace of the manipulation behind.

“We believe these man-in-the-middle attacks are potentially possible on a wide variety of electronic voting machines,” said Roger Johnston, leader of the assessment team “We think we can do similar things on pretty much every electronic voting machine.”

The Argonne Lab, run by the Department of Energy, has the mission of conducting scientific research to meet national needs. The Diebold Accuvote voting system used in the study was loaned to the lab’s scientists by VelvetRevolution.us, of which the Brad Blog is a co-founder. Velvet Revolution received the machine from a former Diebold contractor

Previous lab demonstrations of e-voting system hacks, such as Princeton’s demonstration of a viral cyber attack on a Diebold touch-screen system — as I wrote for Salon back in 2006 — relied on cyber attacks to change the results of elections. Such attacks, according to the team at Argonne, require more coding skills and knowledge of the voting system software than is needed for the attack on the Diebold system.

Indeed, the Argonne team’s attack required no modification, reprogramming, or even knowledge, of the voting machine’s proprietary source code. It was carried out by inserting a piece of inexpensive “alien electronics” into the machine.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at Salon.com HERE.

Victoria Jackson: “Fishy politics in Alaska”

“It’s not who votes that counts, but who counts the votes.”

– Josef Stalin

By Victoria Jackson (WND):  I was dying to ask Joe Miller about the ridiculously “fishy” 2010 Alaskan Senate election. Driving from a Juneau tea party held in an empty room in a rundown mall, back to our WND Celebrity cruise ship, Joe, his beautiful wife, Kathleen, and our beautiful volunteer driver, homeschool mom/tea-party activist Barbara, were kind enough to oblige me.

“Miller ran on the tea-party platform of reduced taxes and government, opposition to abortion, repeal of the health-care law passed by the Democrats in 2010, and restriction of federal earmarks for local projects.”

Sounds like my kind of candidate. And, listen to his resume: Joe is an attorney, a U.S. magistrate judge, a faithful husband and father of eight, a 1997 graduate of Yale Law School, a combat veteran of the 1991 Gulf War and a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point where he received his bachelor’s degree in political science with honors, and where he was a member of the Officer’s Christian Fellowship, an organization that seeks to “develop career-long ‘ambassadors for Christ in uniform.'” Wow.

Joe Miller, please be the president.

“[T]o ensure voter confidence in the election process and transparency,” Joe Miller “filed two state court and one federal lawsuit and later one state supreme court appeal, claiming constitutional violations of equal protection, the election clause of the U.S. Constitution and voter fraud as well as violations of the state election statute.” Thank you, Joe.

I witnessed voter fraud at the Miami Shores Recreation Center in 2010. I went to vote with my elderly mom and dad. Mom (hard of hearing) said to my Dad (hard of hearing) loudly, “Oh! The last time we were at this polling place was when we voted for Reagan, right Jim?!” The poll volunteer glanced at us coldly and then spent 30 minutes looking for my name and address and handed me a form for the wrong district. When I corrected her, got the right ballot, and filled it out, she took it from me as if she were going to place it in the box herself (or not). I asked her if I could please place it in the ballot box myself. She made a face at me. I refused to leave until I could see her actually place it in the ballot box. I reported her to the poll supervisor.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read more at WND HERE.