You’ll Never Guess the Ridiculous Reason This Daily News Reporter Says He Has PTSD

/0 Comments/in , /by

Just a day after a radical Islamic terrorist took the lives of 49 Americans at a nightclub in Orlando, Gersh Kuntzman of the New York Daily News decided he was going to put his best liberal bias to task and show why AR-15’s are “horrifying, dangerous and very very loud.”

Kuntzman couldn’t fathom why anyone would ever want to own one of these “military style assault weapons,” so he traveled to a gun shop in Philadelphia and did what so many Americans have the right to do in their spare time: he shot a firearm in a safe setting, just for the fun of it. The results were highly entertaining:

“The recoil bruised my shoulder. The brass shell casing disoriented me as they flew past my face … The explosions — loud like a bomb — gave me a temporary case of PTSD … I was anxious and irritable,” Kuntzman journals of his poor little traumatized emotions!

O.M.G. L.O.L. Please excuse me while I compose myself …

Ok Mr. Kuntzman, time to grow some balls.

I’m a 135 lb. female and have absolutely zero fear of firing an AR-15. And. I can tell you, without a doubt, it does NOT sound like a cannon, nor does it feel like a bazooka.

In fact, I’ve been using firearms since I was 6 years old when my dad put a double barrel shotgun in my hands and taught me to properly fire it. It’s amazing how not terrifying something is when you’re taught to have a healthy respect of it.

These little girls don’t seem to have a problem firing their AR-15’s either:

And to be sure you know I’m not being sexist, here are two little boys who didn’t seem to have a problem firing AR-15’s:

As Erick Erickson notes, Kuntzman’s attempt at reporting is full of fabrications, fact distortions and flat-out overheated false narratives.

One last thing to note in this ridiculous garbage the Daily News calls “reporting,” the terrorist did not even use an AR-15. Why does the Left insist on using this terrorist attack to take away law abiding citizens’ ability to own these firearms?

So Mr. Kuntzman, in addition to revoking your man card, I’d like to also revoke your ethical journalist card. (For more from the author of “You’ll Never Guess the Ridiculous Reason This Daily News Reporter Says He Has PTSD” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Hillary Clinton: My Presidential Campaign ‘Belongs to’ Abortionists and Planned Parenthood

/1 Comment/in , /by

Hillary Clinton said her historic presidential campaign “belongs to” Planned Parenthood “staff” and abortionists.

“I’m grateful to the entire Planned Parenthood family. You made this campaign your own,” the Democratic presidential nominee said at a speech before the Planned Parenthood Action Fund in Washington, D.C., on Friday. After specifically referencing the 1,000 volunteers who showed up for a Planned Parenthood training event in Pittsburgh last month, she continued.

“It belongs to the staff, the donors, and to the providers,” she said.

She specifically mentioned Dr. Amna Dermish, an abortionist in Texas who was caught on video laughing as she said that removing a baby’s skull and brain intact is a goal she would “strive for.”

Clinton also singled out Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards, making a muffled reference to the mounting difficulties she faces as Planned Parenthood has become the center of multiple state and federal investigations into possible fetal organ trafficking. (Read more from “Hillary Clinton: My Presidential Campaign ‘Belongs to’ Abortionists and Planned Parenthood” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Media: We Would Cover Hillary Clinton’s Scandals If It Wasn’t for Trump

/0 Comments/in , /by

Video Transcript:

As Hillary Clinton’s email and foundation scandal worsens, you may be wondering where all the media coverage is.

CHUCK TODD: The last 10 days could have been about nothing but emails, nothing but negatives about Hillary Clinton. We could be talking about Democratic hand-wringing. But, there’s Donald Trump.

Morning Joe admitted as much also, saying it’s Trump’s fault they aren’t covering Clinton’s scandals.

MICHAEL STEELE: Unfortunately, if you had a different nominee or a nominee with a different mindset, not talking about a personal legal matter but rather talking about the 38,000 jobs from last month, talking about the IG report, talking about trade and other issues that have palpable impact on the Democratic nominee…

JOE SCARBOROUGH: Can I stop you there Michael? Can you believe the IG report that came out talking about Hillary Clinton? Playing fast and loose with information regarding drone strikes? As top secret as it gets. And we have a Republican nominee that doesn’t, he’s talking about Trump University. Are you kidding me? That would be dominating the week but for Donald Trump’s own self-absorbed campaign.

So instead of actually talking about the Clinton scandals, they berated Donald Trump for not talking about them. Apparently that counts as journalism these days.

(For more from the author of “Media: We Would Cover Hillary Clinton’s Scandals If It Wasn’t for Trump” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Pastor Jack Graham Answers the Question: How Do We Face the Growing Darkness?

/0 Comments/in , /by

James and Betty Robison recently sat down with Dr. Jack Graham, pastor of the 40,000+ member Prestonwood Baptist Church in Plano, TX. They asked him what he says to churchgoers distraught about what is happening in America. The full interview is scheduled for Sept. 6 and 8 on Life Today. Below are some sneak previews.

Facing the Darkness

Can Christians Vote for Those Who “Shed Innocent Blood?”

The Challenge for the Church to Stand Up to Those Who Are “Moving the Mark.”

James Robison emphasized the difference between living in a society affected by evil versus being part of a society “sold out to evil.” He and Graham then discussed those intent on “moving the mark” by working to remove Judeo-Christian norms and punishing those who speak out against their efforts.

“It Has to Start with the Pastors — We are compromised at many levels.”

We Have the Tools to Fix This.

They then discussed the way forward: not dependence on a political solution (though we need to vote). It is much more a rising to the Christian responsibility of speaking truth to power boldly, as Daniel, Joseph and the prophets did. That must be done by all of us, great and small.

Betty Robison, A Mother and Grandmother, Weighs in on the Urgency of the Times.

James asked his wife Betty to discuss her thoughts concerning the times. “We need to be weeping,” she said. “Our hearts need to be crushed.” She added that the church must fall on its face in prayer, then rise up with courage, strength and boldness and “march together.” (For more from the author of “Pastor Jack Graham Answers the Question: How Do We Face the Growing Darkness?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

This Pro-Hillary Ad Brutalizes Trump, but There’s One Problem

/0 Comments/in , /by

It is an effective attack on Trump. It is the first of many from the group. The Super PAC said, in the YouTube video description, “between now and Election Day we will share stories of middle-class Americans across the country and educate voters about why Hillary Clinton is the clear choice for President. We can and must stop Donald Trump.”

When you watch the ad, you immediately get the feeling you could be watching a pro-life ad. With a little tweak the ad could be a negative ad against Hillary Clinton. Right at the 23-second point, the mother says, “when I saw Donald Trump mock a disabled person, I was just shocked.” She could have just as easily said, “when I saw Hillary Clinton stand up and support disability selective abortions, I was just shocked.”

Last month, Clinton vocally and unequivocally came out against an Indiana Law that would ban disability selective abortions. The Washington Post reported:

“I will defend a woman’s right to make her own health-care decisions,” Clinton said to a few hundred supporters packed into a sweltering recreation center. “I’ll tell ya, I’ll defend Planned Parenthood against these attacks. And I commend the women of this state, young and old, for standing up against this governor and this legislature.”

She did not mention the details of the legislation, House Bill 1337, which bans abortions for several factors not deemed life-threatening. As enacted, the bill prohibits termination of pregnancy if the woman asking for it is motivated by the “race, color, national origin, ancestry, or sex of the fetus” or “diagnosis or potential diagnosis of the fetus having Down syndrome or any other disability.” [emphasis added]

Doctors routinely suggest that disabled children be aborted. This is something that even ABC News took note of this week. A fact that Clinton certainly must know.

While Donald Trump’s mocking of a disabled reporter was crass and inexcusable, he does not support killing children for having disabilities. Hillary Clinton, just last month, did. (For more from the author of “This Pro-Hillary Ad Brutalizes Trump, but There’s One Problem” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

White House Caught Lying About Scrubbing Public Record

/0 Comments/in , /by

Video Transcript:

The White House has now joined the State Department in being caught doctoring the public record.

KEVIN CORKE: Can you state categorically that no senior official in this administration has ever lied publicly about any aspect of the Iran nuclear deal?

JOSH EARNEST: No, Kevin.

The White House changed the embarrassing admission to say “inaudible” in the transcript.

BYRON TAU: ABC reported over the weekend that the White House scratched a line from a briefing transcript because reportedly, you said it was “inaudible.” I was in that briefing and I recall the question and it seemed pretty audible to me. The video also makes it pretty clear. I heard what was being said. Is the White House going to restore that line?

EARNEST: Well, Byron, I think what was true at the time is that there was a little cross-talk.

I don’t think so Josh. But let’s see if there’s cross-talk one more time.

CORKE: Can you state categorically that no senior official in this administration has ever lied publicly about any aspect of the Iran nuclear deal?

JOSH EARNEST: No, Kevin.

(For more from the author of “White House Caught Lying About Scrubbing Public Record” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Here’s How Clinton Answered When Asked If the Right to Bear Arms Is a Constitutional Right

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton declined to say if she thinks the Second Amendment guarantees the constitutional right to bear arms during an interview Sunday with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos.

Stephanopoulos asked Clinton, “Do you believe that an individual’s right to bear arms is a constitutional right, that it’s not linked to service in a militia?”

“I think that for most of our history, there was a nuanced reading of the Second Amendment until the decision by the late Justice Scalia, and there was no argument until then that localities and states and the federal government had a right, as we do with every amendment, to impose reasonable regulations,” she replied. “So I believe we can have common-sense gun safety measures consistent with the Second Amendment” . . .

“I said, do you believe that their conclusion that an individual’s right to bear arms is a constitutional right?” he pressed.

“If it is a constitutional right, then it, like every other constitutional right, is subject to reasonable regulations, and what people have done with that decision is to take it as far as they possibly can and reject what has been our history from the very beginning of the republic, where some of the earliest laws that were passed were about firearms,” Clinton said. (Read more from “Here’s How Clinton Answered When Asked If the Right to Bear Arms Is a Constitutional Right” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Watch: Sanders Blasts Clinton Foundation’s Donations From Foreign Government

/1 Comment/in , /by

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) slammed the Clinton Foundation’s acceptance of donations from foreign governments in an interview on CNN’s State of the Union Sunday.

Sanders was critical of the the foundation’s getting money from foreign governments, specifically Saudi Arabia. The Clinton Foundation has come under criticism in the past for taking donations from foreign governments while Clinton was Secretary of State.

Host Jake Tapper asked Sanders, who has previously held his tongue about the Clinton Foundation, how he felt about it taking money from foreign governments which don’t respect American values while Clinton was at the State Department.

“You have not been critical of the Clinton Foundation but there are those who say that there’s something inherently wrong with an American charity, especially one with ties to a secretary of state, taking money from the Saudis and other foreign governments that don’t represent our values. Is that a fair criticism?” Tapper asked.

“Yes, it is,” Sanders said. “If you ask me about the Clinton Foundation, do I have a problem when a sitting secretary of state and a foundation run by her husband collects many millions of dollars from foreign governments, governments which are dictatorships, you don’t have a lot of civil liberties or democratic rights in Saudi Arabia. (Read more from “Sanders Blasts Clinton Foundation’s Donations From Foreign Government” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Gun Shop Owner Confronts Obama: Why Take Guns From ‘Good Guys?’

/4 Comments/in , /by

A gun shop owner confronted President Obama at a town hall event Wednesday evening in Indiana, asking why the president wants more gun-control laws that ultimately hurt “the good guys.”

Doug Rhude’s question came after the televised portion of the PBS town hall in Elkhart, Ind., had ended.

“Knowing that we apply common sense to other issues in our society, specifically like holding irresponsible people accountable for their actions when they drink and drive and kill somebody, and we do that without restricting control of cars and cells phones to the rest of us, the good guys,” said Rhude. “Why then do you and Hillary want to control and restrict and limit gun manufacturers, gun owners and responsible use of guns and ammunition to the rest of us, the good guys, instead of holding the bad guys accountable for their actions?”

In response to the 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, Obama implemented 23 executive actions in an attempt to address gun access. He also supported gun control measures in Congress that would have reinstated the assault weapons ban passed in the 1990s, created universal background checks, and limited the ammunition clip sizes.

The legislation fell short in the Senate, with most Republicans opposing it and most Democrats supporting it.

Obama responded to Rhude’s question. “First of all, the notion that I or Hillary or Democrats or whoever you want to choose are hell-bent on taking away folks’ guns is just not true,” he said.

“And I don’t care how many times the NRA says it. I’m about to leave office. There have been more guns sold since I have been president than just about any time in U.S. history. There are enough guns for every man, woman and child in this country.

“What I have said is precisely what you suggested, which is, why don’t we treat this like every other thing that we use?” the president stated.

He went on to argue that those on the “no-fly list” should not be be allowed to purchase a gun.

Obama concluded, “So, sir, I just have to say, respectfully, that there is a way for us to have common-sense gun laws. There is a way for us to make sure that lawful, responsible gun owners like yourself are able to use them for sporting, hunting, protecting yourself, but the only way we’re going to do that is if we don’t have a situation in which anything that is proposed is viewed as some tyrannical destruction of the Second Amendment.”

Critics have pointed out that none of the changes the president seeks would have prevented any of the mass shootings in recent years, including Sandy Hook, Charleston, Chattanooga, Oregon or San Bernardino.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., and others have contended that Obama’s call to empower the DOJ to yank individuals’ right to purchase guns if they have been placed on the no-fly list is unconstitutional. The Constitution’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments require that Americans’ right to “life, liberty, or property” cannot be denied without due process of law.

In a congressional hearing in December, Gowdy pressed a Department of Homeland Security official about the proposal. “My question is what process is afforded a United States citizen before that person’s constitutional right is infringed?”

The former federal prosecutor continued, “[President Obama] is fine with doing it with the Second Amendment. How about the First?”

Several have been mistakenly placed on the no-fly list, including Weekly Standard senior writer Stephen Hayes.

Fox News listed eight ways Americans can be placed on the no-fly list, which occurs without their knowledge. (For more from the author of “Gun Shop Owner Confronts Obama: Why Take Guns From ‘Good Guys?'” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Watch: Obama ‘Trips Over His Tongue’ When He Goes off Teleprompter to Bash Trump

/0 Comments/in , , /by

President Obama, lauded as one of America’s premier orators when he was elevated to the White House back in 2008, had a stuttering moment Wednesday as he was trying to trash Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.

“If we turn against each other based on divisions of race or religion. If-if-if-if-if-if-if-if-if-if-if we, if we fall for, you know, a bunch of okie-doke, just because, you know it-it-uh. You know, it-it-it-it-it-it sounds funny or the tweets are provocative,” Obama said during an appearance in Elkhart, Indiana.

John S. Roberts, writing on Young Conservatives, noted that he was never impressed with Obama the orator in the first place.

“Barack Obama is usually known for being an eloquent speaker. I guess, right? That’s what people say,” Roberts wrote. “I mean, the man has used the word ‘uh’ more than anyone in recent memory.”

Roberts then called Obama’s inability to get through one sentence attacking Trump “tripping over his tongue.”

Jim Hoft wrote on Gateway Pundit, “Poor Barack. He wanted to sound more powerful. He really did! Unfortunately, it didn’t go as planned. He turned into a stuttering mess.”

Others noticed the rhetorical pothole as well.

“In the past I’ve pointed out when this guy stutters he is lying. Towards the end of his economic speech he was hinting to Trump and trying to slide in a cheap shot or two but that truthful Achilles heel kicked in!” wrote BMartin1776 on Saving the Republic. (For more from the author of “Watch: Obama ‘Trips Over His Tongue’ When He Goes off Teleprompter to Bash Trump” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.