Posts

HILLARY’S ROMNEY MOMENT: More Than 47% of Trump Supporters Are Scum, According to Your Abuela

/0 Comments/in , /by

Hillary Clinton is world-renowned as a “habitual and serial liar”. She’s also an exteremely arrogant woman who will continue Barack Obama’s divisive and hateful behavior, only she won’t be as charming about it. She appears nasty and aloof because that is who she is. And this latest video confirms it.

The sad thing is half the country is just fine with this. Hillary could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and it wouldn’t matter.

Her arrogance is why she had a personal server and continues to lie about it. The American people are beneath her.

At a New York fundraiser, she demonized “half” of Trump’s supporters as “baskets of deplorables” who are “racists, sexists, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it”. The rest are just “baskets” of pathetic people who think “the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them.”

She called Trump followers “irredeemable”.

How dare she characterize people that way — half are haters and the other half are childlike idiots That is so insulting and condescending, words hardly can describe it. She has given it new meaning.

The only thing that is deplorable is her arrogance. It’s breathtaking.

We no longer have immigration, we have a welcomed invasion of illegal immigrants and unvetted asylum seekers but if we complain, we’re xenophobes and racists. If we want a private bathroom, we’re homophobes, and if we say a thing about a woman, we’re sexists. Expect to hear a lot of that last accusation if she wins the presidency.

She tried to walk it back today, saying she was “grossly generalistic”. You simply can’t take something like that back.

Look at this next brief clip. The first is Hillary behaving incredibly arrogant towards a congressman. She failed to properly supervise her embassies, particularly a most endangered one and she’s arrogant about it. In the next, she throws her support behind Soros’s anti-police, deceitful and violent hate group, Black Lives Matter – calls them “dignified”.

This is “deplorable” for traditional Americans who are being disposed and replaced. (For more from the author of “HILLARY’S ROMNEY MOMENT: More Than 47% of Trump Supporters Are Scum, According to Your Abuela” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Hillary Declares ‘We Did Not Lose a Single American’ in Libya

/0 Comments/in , /by

Hillary Clinton is taking heat for saying that, in Libya, she “put together a coalition that included NATO, included the Arab League, and we were able to save lives. We did not lose a single American in that action.” She made this claim during Wednesday’s presidential forum on NBC.

Some would beg to differ, citing the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi on September 11, 2012.

Politifact investigated Hillary Clinton’s claim, and while deeming it “narrowly accurate,” acknowledges that it is also “so narrowly framed as to be misleading.”

Clinton is correct when she says that no Americans died in the coalition effort to oust Moammar Gadhafi over seven months in 2011, but the direct result of that coalition was a power vacuum in Libya that Islamic extremists have taken advantage of. Ted Bromund, a researcher at the Heritage Foundation, told Politifact, “In the forum, Clinton used ‘a very narrow definition, one custom-built to define away any of the larger problems with the Libyan intervention.’”

Exactly. Four Americans died in Libya — including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens — as a result of the power vacuum created under NATO while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. It’s misleading for Hillary Clinton to ignore these deaths when claiming no American lives were lost in Libya. (For more from the author of “Hillary Declares ‘We Did Not Lose a Single American’ in Libya” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Hillary Caught Wearing Earpiece to Get Instructions From Handlers; Mediaite Wrong Again

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Hillary Clinton was spotted wearing a nearly invisible earpiece yesterday during the NBC TV Town Hall event.

160908-earpiece

True to form, the dimwits at Mediaite are claiming this is all a conspiracy, first with urgent missives like “Fox News Now Reporting Anonymously Sourced Theory About Clinton’s ‘Earpiece’” and “Donald Trump Jr. Spreads Hillary Clinton Earpiece Conspiracy Theory on Twitter”, to name but a few.

Well, it turns out that Wikileaks actually captured an email from Huma Abedin to Hillary Clinton asking whether the elderly, infirm, and oft-injured catlady had remembered her “earpiece”.

160908-wikileaks

Josh Feldman, usually one of the few voices of sanity at the far left media-watching website, was quick to react to the Wikileaks revelation, offering up the ludicrous explanation that — not only are you imagining that earpiece in the photo, but — Hillary simply needed her “earpiece” for the United Nations General Assembly.

Pity Josh never bothered to actually look up what UN General Assemblies actually look like.

160908-un

Psst, Joshie: do an image search for united nations translation or un translation service and you’ll see what the headsets look like.

They’re not teeny earpieces that your Abuela forgets to bring to the UN. (For more from the author of “MEDIAITE WRONG AGAIN: Yes, Granny Catlady Wears an Earpiece to Get Instructions From Handlers” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Hillary: Saying I’m Too Serious Is Sexist

/4 Comments/in , /by

In one of her first press conferences since last year, Hillary Clinton today accused Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Reince Priebus of sexism for tweeting that Clinton appeared “angry” in last night’s national security forum.

“I’m going to let all of you ponder that last question,” said the Democratic presidential candidate after being asked about Priebus’ comments. “I think there will be a lot of PhD theses and popular journalism writing on that subject for years to come.”

Clinton went on to criticize both the RNC and her opponent, Republican candidate Donald Trump. “I don’t take my advice and I don’t take anything seriously that comes from the RNC. We were talking about serious issues last night. I know the difference between what we have to do to fix the V.A., what we have to do to take the fight to ISIS, than just making political happy talk. And I had a very short window of time in that event last night to convey the seriousness with which I would approach the issues that concern our country.”

“Donald Trump chose to talk about his deep admiration and support for Vladimir Putin. Maybe he did it with a smile, and I guess the RNC would have liked that.”

Priebus Tweeted that Clinton was displeased when asked about her continuing email scandals by moderator Matt Lauer. Clinton’s campaign responded in kind shortly thereafter.

Clinton’s verbal response to Priebus came thanks to a question from ABC News. A reporter asked if Clinton could “react to that,” and said that Clinton has “suggested that there is a double-standard. Do you think you’re treated different in this race because you’re a woman?”

Clinton surrogates and others have used the sexism card throughout the 2016 campaign, including against Lauer last night and Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) during his primary run against Clinton. Lauer was slammed by partisans on both sides, but especially Democrats for interrupting Clinton several times in what some said was a sign of sexism. Lauer also didn’t challenge Trump when the Republican falsely said he “was totally against the war in Iraq.”

Priebus’ Tweet was tame compared to one issued by then-Democratic National Chairwoman (DNC) Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) last year, when she accused Trump of “racism”:

Earlier this year, interim DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile accused Trump of “soaking up … hate and … spilling it back out.”

Partisan attacks are normal in election years, especially when the White House is at stake. Republican candidates are especially targets of vitriol by their political opponents. (For more from the author of “Hillary: Saying I’m Too Serious Is Sexist” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Hillary Cuts off Reporter After Being Asked About Clinton Foundation Conflicts

/0 Comments/in , /by

Hillary Clinton seemed visibly agitated on Tuesday after a reporter asked if her daughter’s continuing involvement on the Clinton Foundation board would present a conflict of interest if Clinton is elected president.

The reporter asked the Democratic nominee, “If Chelsea Clinton does stay on the foundation’s board — which the foundation has said very definitively that she will, or that that’s the plan currently — do you believe that could raise legitimate conflict questions, and does that mean –“

“No, I do not,” Clinton snapped. “I’ve said over and over again, doesn’t matter how many times you ask me, and how you ask me. These issues will be decided after the election, and we will decide the appropriate way forward.”

Clinton defended her family charity by insisting that every donor was disclosed, but she acknowledged that a lot of the work will have to be “spun off” because of support from foreign governments.

“We’re going to do what is right and proper to make sure that there is not even a question,” she said. “Let’s not pretend there will be conflicts, because there were not.”

During an ABC News interview with David Muir, the former secretary of state said that her husband, former President Bill Clinton, should not have to step down from his position before the election is over.

“I don’t think there are conflicts of interest,” she said. “I know that that’s what has been alleged and never proven. But nevertheless, I take it seriously.”

While Bill Clinton announced his plans to depart the Clinton Foundation board and stop raising money for the foundation if his wife becomes president as a means of addressing the “legitimate concerns about potential conflicts of interest,” Chelsea Clinton said she would not follow suit.

“As recently as this summer, the foundation was discussing with some allies plans for Chelsea Clinton to leave the board, along with former President Bill Clinton, if Mrs. Clinton should win,” The Wall Street Journal reported. “But on Wednesday [Aug. 24], foundation spokesman Craig Minassian said Chelsea Clinton plans to stay on the board.”

An Associated Press report late last month revealed that during Clinton’s term as secretary of state, more that half of those she met with outside the government had given money to the Clinton Foundation.

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has called the Clinton Foundation “the most corrupt enterprise in political history.”

His running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, has said the foundation should be “immediately shut down.” (For more from the author of “Hillary Cuts off Reporter After Being Asked About Clinton Foundation Conflicts” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Top 10 Findings From the FBI’s Hillary Labor Day Document Dump

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Over at the Washington Examiner, Ashe Schow boils down the FBI’s Labor Day weekend document dump to the bare essentials.

The top 10 revelations related to Hillary’s interview with the FBI?

10. Hillary Clinton is incompetent (part I): she claimed she didn’t know that a (C) marking on official government documents meant that it was classified as “Confidential”.

9. Hillary Clinton is incompetent (part II): she also claimed she didn’t know how document classification worked; say, that Top Secret, Secret and Confidential are the three basic levels of classified documents.

8. Hillary Clinton couldn’t recognize what documents should be protected: like emails regarding specific drone strikes, for instance. Hillary was fine with sending those over her unprotected, illegal, and bathroom-dwelling email server.

7. Hillary Clinton hid at least 18,000 work-related emails: far from turning over “all work-related emails”, she hid tens of thousands of government-related communications, because they were all about yoga lessons and Clinton Foundation bribes, but mostly bribes.

6. Hillary Clinton used more than a dozen mobile email devices for State Department business: so much for the using “one device for convenience” lie.

5. Hillary Clinton repeatedly lost her mobile devices: but there were just a bunch of state secrets on them, so what’s the big deal?

4. Hillary Clinton ignored government warnings not to use mobile devices for official business: “Clinton and her immediate staff were notified of foreign travel risks and were warned that digital threats began immediately upon landing in a foreign country, since connection of a mobile device to a local network provides opportunities for foreign adversaries to intercept voice and email transmissions…” — and Clinton and her immediate staff, of course, ignored such warnings.

3. Hillary Clinton was never authorized to conduct State Department business on her private server: she was required to solicit and gain approval from the government in order to conduct official business on her home-brew, bathroom email server. She failed to do so. She ignored all official guidance.

2. Hillary Clinton was terrified she’d been hacked: she had received a variety of phishing emails, including porn solicitations. No word on what category said porn fell into.

1. Clinton mass-deleted emails just after The New York Times revealed the private server: only three weeks after the Times revealed Clinton’s private email server, the “oh sh**” moment occurred, according to the FBI. Electronic shredding was the result.

(For more from the author of “Top 10 Findings From the FBI’s Hillary Document Dump” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Did Clinton and Her Cronies Destroy Email Server Evidence?

/0 Comments/in , /by

House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah (C, 78%), has requested an investigation into new evidence that suggests Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton or her employees obstructed justice by destroying evidence related to Clinton’s private email server.

In a letter to Judge Channing D. Phillips, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Chaffetz described how the FBI’s files “reveal evidence that an engineer at Platte River Networks, the company responsible for maintaining the Secretary’s third personal email server, deleted Secretary Clinton’s email archives in March of 2015, despite knowing they were subject to preservation orders and a congressional subpoena.” Further, information from those files “raises questions about Secretary Clinton’s involvement.”

Chaffetz called for an investigation to determine if Clinton or her employees/contractors “violated statutes that prohibit destruction of records, obstruction of congressional inquiries, and concealment or cover up of evidence material to a congressional investigation.”

Additionally, Chaffetz sent a letter to Platte River Networks, requesting information related to potential evidence destruction.

“In brief, the summaries of the FBI’s interviews with a PRN engineer show that within days of a conference call with Secretary Clinton’s lawyers, the engineer deleted archives of Secretary Clinton’s emails, despite knowing those records were covered by preservation orders and a subpoena from Congress.

[…]

The sequence of events leading up to the destruction of Secretary Clinton’s emails… raises questions about whether Secretary Clinton, acting through her attorneys, instructed PRN to destroy records relevant to the then-ongoing congressional investigations.”

House Republicans have also requested that U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch investigate Clinton for perjury, citing discrepancies between Clinton’s sworn testimony before Congress in 2015 and the conclusions reached by the FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s private server released in July.

Further, a recent FBI report indicated that Clinton used 13 different Blackberry devices and had State Department employees smash some with hammers, which isn’t suspicious in the least.

These allegations against Clinton follow what was an objectively terrible week for the Clinton campaign. With Republican candidate for president Donald Trump gaining a small lead in the latest CNN/ORC poll as of Tuesday, could Hillary Clinton’s corruption finally be catching up to her? (For more from the author of “Did Clinton and Her Cronies Destroy Email Server Evidence?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Mark Levin BLOWS up the Hillary Charade: Was She Sick, a Liar, or BOTH?!

/0 Comments/in , , , /by

Brand new information came out Friday detailing Hillary Clinton’s alleged health problems, and no this is not conspiracy peddling.

Hillary Clinton reportedly told the FBI that a concussion followed by a blood clot prevented her from recalling all her State Department briefings. That sounds like a pretty serious concussion and perhaps a prevailing medical concern, notes Mark Levin.

“Either she had a problem, or she is a liar, or both!” exclaimed Levin on his radio program Friday.

Remember, the FBI is, of course, releasing all of this important information the Friday afternoon before a holiday weekend. Now why would they do that? Could it be that they want to dump the information while the media is asleep at the wheel? Nooooo, can’t be.

Responding to the report, Levin called on the Clinton campaign to release her medical records and answer for the 2,000 occasions that classified material passed through her private server.

Will they? We doubt it. But someone ought to be demanding it because the FBI and DOJ won’t. (For more from the author of “Mark Levin BLOWS up the Hillary Charade: Was She Sick, a Liar, or BOTH?!” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Dr. Drew Loses Show After Discussing Hillary’s Health

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Dr. Drew Pinsky is so afraid of Hillary Clinton and her supporters, he won’t blame them for the cancellation of his show on HLN, the sister channel of CNN . . .

“Dr. Drew” was canceled eight days after Pinsky discussed Clinton’s health on a radio show, saying he was “gravely concerned not just about her health, but her health care.”

“CNN is so supportive of Clinton, network honchos acted like the Mafia when confronting Drew,” a source told me. “First, they demanded he retract his comments, but he wouldn’t.”

What followed was a series of nasty phone calls and e-mails. “It was downright scary and creepy,” a source close to Pinsky said. (Read more from “Dr. Drew Loses Show After Discussing Hillary’s Health” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

5 Events That Prove This Was Hillary’s Terrible, No Good, Very Bad Week

/0 Comments/in , /by

Hillary Clinton just had a terrible, no good, very bad week. A series of events have started to catch up with her and have resulted in Donald Trump closing the polling gap nationally and state by state. Here are five reasons why this is so:

1. Trump looked presidential in a foreign visit

Clinton’s main selling point is that Trump is an unhinged individual that will embarrass himself and the nation when dealing with foreign leaders. That was forcefully put to bed on Wednesday when Trump flew to Mexico for a meeting with President Enrique Peña Nieto. Following the meeting, the two held a joint press conference which had Trump looking and acting presidential. Sure there has been some quibbling over whether or not the two discussed payment for a wall across the US-Mexico border. But the underlying optics were of a cool controlled Trump, who sounded measured.

2. Press is getting irritable about press conferences

Today marks 273 days since Clinton has held a press conference. After this week Trump has held more press conferences in foreign countries than Clinton has held on American soil. The press is starting to take notice. Politico cataloged press reaction after Tim Kaine told CBS news that Clinton is very available to the media:

Co-anchor Norah O’Donnell, off-screen, asked, “Really?”

“That’s not true – no matter how you count her availabilities,” CNN reporter Dan Merica tweeted, cc’ing traveling press secretary Nick Merrill.

Trump spokesman Jason Miller retweeted the message.

“I bet the reporters who follow Clinton ‘everywhere she goes’ would beg to differ with Tim Kaine’s assertion here,” The Washington Post’s Philip Rucker wrote, to which Bloomberg Politics’ Jennifer Epstein responded, “We do.”

To borrow a phrase from CR’s Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin, Clinton’s “praetorian guard” is getting antsy at carrying her water. And they have started being very vocal about it.

3. Emails won’t go away.

This week we also learned that the State Department has uncovered 30 more emails regarding the Benghazi consulate from Hillary Clinton’s private email account. This calls into question whether Clinton was truthful when she said all work emails were turned over before using BleachBit to clean her servers. It is not just the Benghazi emails that are resurfacing, but details about the whole operation.

The Daily Caller reported that Clinton’s top aides at the State Department, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, were very weary of her use of a private email.

One aide worried that Clinton was giving her private email address “to everyone,” but the other aide assured her that Clinton was not widely distributing her address, but that she was receiving forwarded email from her prior Senate email address.

“Personally, I think it’s outrageous that staff go straight to her on this stuff,” Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin told Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills in an April 3, 2009, email exchange.

“This is unbelievable, and she also should not be giving her email to everyone – b/c she will get stuff like this,” a frustrated Mills replied.

The emails will continue to dog Clinton, and it will not be just from Wikileaks. A judge has ruled that a whole host of other emails must be released. As the public learns more, Clinton’s poll numbers continue to drop.

Late yesterday, the FBI released the report they sent to the Justice Department regarding Hillary’s use of a private email server. As Leon Wolf of Redstate noted on Twitter, “From the FBI’s notes they just released: 68 of the email chains they found on Clinton’s private server are still classified today.”

4. Increasing calls for the end of the Clinton Foundation

After Associated Press investigation alleging pay-for-play between the Clinton Foundation donor base and the State Department under Clinton, media publications have started to call for the Clinton Foundation to wind down fundraising operations. In an editorial, the New York Times called on the Clinton Foundation to stop taking donations immediately, saying:

The Clinton Foundation has become a symbol of the Clintons’ laudable ambitions, but also of their tangled alliances and operational opacity. If Mrs. Clinton wins, it could prove a target for her political adversaries. Achieving true distance from the foundation is not only necessary to ensure its effectiveness, it is an ethical imperative for Mrs. Clinton.

The Hill reported that experts have called into question the Foundation’s promise to end taking donations with a Clinton win.

Watchdog groups are poking holes into former President Bill Clinton’s promise that his family’s foundation will stop taking foreign and corporate cash if his wife wins the presidency.

They say it would be relatively easy for foreign governments or individuals to funnel cash into the foundation during a Hillary Clinton presidency without the American public ever learning of the foreign contributions — despite the former president’s promises outlined in an Aug. 22 open letter published on the Clinton Foundation’s website.

Rather than tamping down talk of the Foundation, the media are seemingly digging further into it. It will be interesting to see if the media back down on the Clinton criticism if she decides to hold press conferences, as this may just be a tool they are using to force her hand.

5. Favorability ratings nosedive

Clinton’s already high negatives have begun a free fall, as the public learns more about her shady dealings and probable corruption at the State Department. This week polling began to show her unfavorable rating ratcheting up from a percentage in the low 50s to a percentage pushing 60 percent. This has coincided with Trump’s unfavorable rating coming down from the mid-60s to the upper 50s.

The shift is also being shown in the polling as Trump has begun closing the post-DNC gap Clinton reached earlier this summer.

All in all this has been a brutal week for Hillary Clinton. Trump has once again seized the momentum, and is driving the message. With their first joint appearance on Wednesday evening, we will see if this momentum can hold. (For more from the author of “5 Events That Prove This Was Hillary’s Terrible, No Good, Very Bad Week” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.