Expert Who Correctly Predicted Last 9 Presidential Elections Says There Is Only One Way Trump Could Lose 2020

/0 Comments/in , , /by

By The Blaze. Professor Allan Lichtman, an American historian who correctly predicted the previous nine presidential elections, says President Donald Trump is heading to almost certain victory in 2020 — and there is only one possible roadblock to his second term. . .

Lichtman said on CNN that Trump’s only re-election roadblock will come if “Democrats grow a spine and do their Constitutional duty, and move into an impeachment inquiry.

“It’s a false dichotomy to say Democrats have a choice between doing what is right and what is constitutional and what is politically right,” Lichtman explained. “Impeachment is also politically right.”

Lichtman went on to debunk the idea that impeachment would backfire against Democrats, explaining the road to George W. Bush’s presidency — a major Republican victory — was paved by Republicans pursuing impeachment against Bill Clinton. . .

Politico reported last month that multiple election prediction models and election experts believe that if the election were held today, Trump would likely win in a “landslide” victory. The experts and their models analyze the economy and other factors — not political polls. (Read more from “Expert Who Correctly Predicted Last 9 Presidential Elections Says There Is Only One Way Trump Could Lose 2020” HERE)

_______________________________________________

Donald Trump Earns Presidential Image Through Successful Policy

By The Hill. Some politicians affect a certain style to distract voters from their lack of substance. Conversely, President Trump relies on substance to remind the American people what matters most of all, which is results. In a Gallup poll two years ago, only about a third of the country felt Trump had the personality and leadership qualities that a president should have.

According to a recent Gallup poll, that view is now held by 40 percent of Americans. with Republicans, Democrats, and independents all reporting a higher assessment of his leadership qualities. Incredibly, the percentage of Democrats who say Trump meets their presidential expectations has more than doubled since 2017, increasing from 6 percent to 13 percent. Even among Republicans, who have always had a high opinion of Trump ever since he entered office, his ratings are up by seven points.

The findings also shed light on the reason that Americans are so much more likely to view Trump as presidential today than they were two years ago, which is that he is winning people over with his successful policy agenda. According to the same Gallup poll, 47 percent of Americans now say they agree with Trump on the issues that matter most to them, a significant increase from the 39 percent who said the same thing two years. In contrast, only 45 percent of respondents agreed with President Obama on the important issues at the same point in his first term. (Read more from “Donald Trump Earns Presidential Image Through Successful Policy” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Federal Judge Hands down Defeat for Democrats Trying to Stop Funding for the Border Wall

/0 Comments/in , /by

By The Blaze. A federal judge handed down a decision that was a defeat for Democrats attempting to block the funding re-direction towards construction of President Donald Trump’s border wall.

Democrats were upset that the president called a national emergency on the U.S.-Mexico border and then ordered funds to come from the military in order to work around the will of Congress. . .

Judge Trevor McFadden disagreed with the Democrats and sided with the Trump administration.

“This is a case about whether one chamber of Congress has the ‘constitutional means’ to conscript the Judiciary in a political turf war with the President over the implementation of legislation,” said McFadden in the judgement. “[W]hile the Constitution bestows upon Members of the House many powers, it does not grant them standing to hale the Executive Branch into court claiming a dilution of Congress’s legislative authority. (Read more from “Federal Judge Hands down Defeat for Democrats Trying to Stop Funding for the Border Wall” HERE)

_______________________________________________

Judge Rejects Democrats’ Effort to Block Trump’s Border Emergency

By AXIOS. Context: Per the judge’s opinion, the House was attempting to block the administration “from spending certain funds to build a wall along our southern border. The House argues that this expenditure would violate the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution 2 and usurp Congress’s authority. This harm, the House suggests, constitutes an ‘institutional injury’ supporting Article III standing.”

The administration, meanwhile, argued that the court cannot intervene “because the Constitution grants the House no standing to litigate these claims.”

The judge sided with the administration, adding: “To be clear, the Court does not imply that Congress may never sue the Executive to protect its powers.” But he argues that House Democrats do not, in this case, overcome the constitutional burden to establish they have standing in this lawsuit.

(Read more from “Judge Rejects Democrats’ Effort to Block Trump’s Border Emergency” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Bernie Gets Called out for ‘Blatantly Dishonest’ Tweet

/0 Comments/in , /by

On Monday’s episode of “Dear America,” host Graham Allen called out Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.) after the 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful posted an intentionally misleading statistic about gun-related deaths on Twitter Sunday.

“That is blatantly dishonest, and I want to explain that to you,” Graham said. “Because the left wants you to think that there were 40,000 people who died due to mass shootings … because they want to push their agenda on gun control.” . . .

“What they blatantly leave out, on purpose, is that two-thirds of those deaths were due to suicide,” he said, emphasizing that it was not his intention to downplay the tragedy of suicide but to demonstrate the way the information had been presented to be misleading. . .

“The same people who want you to get rid of guns because of 40,000 gun-related deaths in 2018 … are pushing abortion rights, when over 70,000 babies were murdered in Florida alone last year,” said Graham. “So, you wanna come at me with some blatantly B.S. statistic that you lie about and try to tell me that you care about people when all you really care about is disarming America?” (Read more from “Bernie Gets Called out for ‘Blatantly Dishonest’ Tweet” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Accused Shooter Came to U.S. As Refugee

/0 Comments/in , /by

By Breitbart. The suspect accused of shooting four people and killing a woman in Cleveland, Texas, last week was a foreign refugee who entered the United States decades ago, Breitbart News has confirmed.

Last week, 65-year-old Pavol Vido was wanted by Texas police after he allegedly shot four people, including shooting a Liberty County Sheriff’s deputy in the neck and killing one woman. After a short search by police, Vido shot and killed himself.

A law enforcement official confirmed to Breitbart News that Vido entered the U.S. as a refugee in 1977 from the Czech Republic and lived in the country as a refugee until his death, never applying for a green card. (Read more from “Accused Shooter Came to U.S. As Refugee” HERE)

________________________________________________________

Suspect in Texas Shootings That Left a Woman Dead Has Killed Himself, Police Say

By NBC News. An hourslong search that began Wednesday morning after a 65-year-old man allegedly shot and killed a woman and injured a deputy in back-to-back shootings in Texas ended with the suspect killing himself, authorities said.

Multiple law enforcement agencies began searching for Pavol Vido after he allegedly opened fire around 7 a.m. at a plumbing shop in Cleveland, Texas, 45 minutes north of Houston. He then fled the scene and shot a deputy who had pursued him into the parking lot of a veterinary clinic.

Scent dogs with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice tracked Vido’s scent and found him hiding under a boat, the agency said in a Facebook post. Vido shot and killed himself after he was confronted by officers, according to authorities.

Liberty County Sheriff’s Capt. Ken DeFoor told KPRC-TV earlier Wednesday that Vido entered the plumbing shop and shot three people.

The woman, who has not been identified, was pronounced dead at the scene, DeFoor told the outlet. The other two victims were hospitalized. (Read more from “Suspect in Texas Shootings That Left a Woman Dead Has Killed Himself, Police Say” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Groping Case Against Pervert Kevin Spacey Returns to Court

/0 Comments/in , /by

By AP. Lawyers for Kevin Spacey are returning to court in the case accusing the former “House of Cards” star of groping a young man at a bar on the island of Nantucket.

A pretrial hearing is scheduled in the Nantucket District Court on Monday.

Authorities say the assault happened in 2016 at the Club Car, where the 18-year-old worked as a busboy. (Read more from “Groping Case Against Kevin Spacey Returns to Court” HERE)

__________________________________________________________

Kevin Spacey Pleads Not Guilty to Groping Young Man at Bar

By AP. Kevin Spacey pleaded not guilty Monday to groping an 18-year-old busboy in 2016 in the first criminal case brought against the disgraced actor following a string of sexual misconduct allegations that crippled his career.

Spacey’s court appearance came more than a year after former Boston TV anchor Heather Unruh accused the former “House of Cards” star of sexually assaulting her son in a bar on the Massachusetts resort island of Nantucket. . .

In court documents, Spacey’s lawyers called the accusations “patently false” and noted that prosecutors have no witnesses to the alleged groping. Spacey’s lawyers wrote that the teen lied about his age, “welcomed” drinks bought by Spacey, left the bar with him to smoke a cigarette and gave Spacey his phone number. (Read more from “Kevin Spacey Pleads Not Guilty to Groping Young Man at Bar” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Prosecutor Removed from Navy SEAL Murder Trial

/0 Comments/in , /by

The military prosecutor of a decorated Navy SEAL accused of murdering a wounded teenage ISIS prisoner in Iraq was booted from the case by a military judge Monday over unsanctioned tracking of the defense team’s emails.

Capt. Aaron Rugh ordered Cmdr. Christopher Czaplak removed from the case after lawyers for Special Operations Chief Edward “Eddie” Gallagher accused prosecutors of attaching tracking software to emails sent to them and a Navy Times journalist in a bid to find the source of leaks to the media. In his ruling, Rugh said it was not in his power to determine prosecutorial misconduct, but there was the possibility of a conflict of interest that required Czaplak to be removed.

It was not immediately clear how Rugh’s decision would affect Gallagher’s trial, which is scheduled to begin June 10. The judge has not ruled on whether to dismiss charges of murder and attempted murder against Gallagher. . .

“Chief Petty Officer Gallagher is entitled to a fair trial and the Navy is committed to upholding that principle,” O’Rourke said. The defense team has said that even if a new prosecutor is named, Gallagher can’t get a fair trial.

It is extremely unusual for a military judge to remove the prosecution or dismiss a case only days before the start of a trial. Rugh ordered Gallagher released from custody last week after the email tracking came to light. (Read more from “Prosecutor Removed from Navy SEAL Murder Trial” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Mexican Government Makes Terrifying Admission About Key Border Areas

/0 Comments/in , , /by

As of last year, the Taliban controlled or contested 46 percent of the districts in Afghanistan’s civil war. That was enough justification for us to keep our military perpetually engaged there in combat. What if you were told that 80 percent of Mexico’s territory is controlled by dangerous cartels, including all of the key smuggling routes at our border, and that the cartels are orchestrating all of the illegal immigration into our territory and bringing their members back and forth across our own border?

Several weeks ago, the Mexican investigative journal Contralínea posted a map of Mexico prepared by the government of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), showing that 80 percent of the country’s 266 districts recently targeted for enforcement by the Mexican National Guard in a new counter-cartel operation are either controlled (57.5 percent) or disputed (23.3 percent) by the cartels. “Only 53 (19.92 percent) enjoy a low level of violence, which means that control is exercised by the authorities,” reported Contralínea on May 4, citing the data on the color-coded map.

. . .Mexico looks awfully similar to Afghanistan in terms of how much is controlled by insurgent groups. The map of Mexico shows the districts in red fully controlled by the cartels, the ones in yellow in dispute, and the ones in green in control of the Mexican government. They all represent priority enforcement areas for a new Mexican National Guard operation against the cartels proposed by the AMLO regime.

It’s important to note that according to Jaeson Jones, retired captain of Texas’ Department of Public Safety Intelligence and Counterterrorism Division, the priority areas color-coded on the map are mainly the areas where people live, and the ones left out are simply not a priority, not because the cartels don’t control most of those areas, but because there is little infrastructure or population in those areas.

For example, the areas color-coded at the border are all the cities where people live, such as Tijuana, Mexicali, San Luis, Nogales, Juarez, Piedras Negras, Loredo, Miguel Alimen, and Reynosa (going west to east). And notice how every one of them is controlled by the cartels. All of the major smuggling areas leaning into California, Nogales, Arizona, El Paso, Texas, and the Rio Grande Valley of Texas are fully controlled by the cartels. The other areas are deserts with few people and no infrastructure, so they weren’t a priority for the Mexican government’s campaign, but they still affect our security because the cartels are sending large flows of migrants in areas like Antelope Wells, New Mexico, which are absolutely controlled by Sinaloa.

Thus, we now see from an internal document of the Mexican government an admission that Mexico has essentially lost control over every important populated area in Mexico outside Mexico City and a few others, and particularly the most sensitive areas of the U.S.-Mexican border.

So why do we not have Special Operations Command engaged in protecting our border from the cartels? Unlike the Taliban, cartel operatives come over our border all the time. Why do the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, and the State Department refuse to recognize the border issue as a military problem and agree to target the cartels as terrorists?

If the Taliban were orchestrating a flow of mass migration across parts of Afghani-controlled territory, strategically shutting down our security, and profiting from it, we would instantly take military action. When Mexican cartels are placing our own country in mortal danger, why is that not reason enough to treat this is a military threat instead of an immigration issue?

What is amazing is that Border Patrol and the National Guard are ordered not to engage the cartels and armed smugglers at all and cannot nab any of them even a few feet over our border for concern of violating Mexico’s sovereignty. We won’t even fight back when they detain and disarm our regular military units on our own side of the river. Yet, we now see that the Mexican government itself admits it has no sovereignty over that area. Why should we allow our sovereignty to be trampled by cartel figures going back and forth with impunity when fighting them won’t even violate Mexican sovereignty and will actually help it?

Our government is fully aware of this dynamic. This map of control was sent out by a federal agency to Border Patrol in a daily intelligence briefing on May 9. CR has obtained a copy of this briefing from a Border Patrol agent who must remain anonymous because he is not authorized to speak to the press. Why the relevant government agencies refuse to recognize the border as an insurgency conflict rather than simply an immigration issue remains a mystery.

Reps. Chip Roy, R-Texas, and Mark Green, R-Tenn., asked the president to designate the cartels as terrorists earlier this year. This move would open up new resources to target the cartels and to treat all of our border policies in a much different light than simply a domestic immigration problem. Yet the State Department continues to balk.

The cartels have long passed the stage of simply profiting from drugs. They are international organizations that are engaged in endless criminality, most prominently human smuggling, but they seek to control territory and terrorize populations as well. Mexican drug cartels seek to replace local governments by imposing their own law. The Mexican cartel culture is similar to the ideology of ISIS and al Qaeda in the sense that they seek “to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) or to effect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping,” which is the definition of international terrorism defined under 18 U.S.C. § 2331.

The day we solve our sovereignty issue will be the day our government finally prioritizes the security of America the way it prioritizes the security of the Afghani government. That will not happen until we take our sovereignty as serious as we do the sovereignty of the Mexican government’s ever-diminishing control over a handful of cities. (For more from the author of “Mexican Government Makes Terrifying Admission About Key Border Areas” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Mueller and Democrat Operatives Continue to Wildly Exaggerate Russian Election Interference

/0 Comments/in , /by

In order to sway the masses to believe that President Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election, the Clinton campaign and the Obama administration first had to convince the American people that Russia deployed a massive cyber intrusion campaign to swing the election in Trump’s favor.

This core contention, regularly echoed by Democrats (and many Republicans, too), that Russia deployed advanced cyber tools to interfere in our electoral politics, was regurgitated Wednesday by special counsel Robert Mueller in his press conference at the Department of Justice.

“As alleged by the grand jury in an indictment, Russian intelligence officers who were part of the Russian military launched a concerted attack on our political system,” Mueller said to begin his remarks.

He added:

The indictment alleges that they used sophisticated cyber techniques to hack into computers and networks used by the Clinton campaign. They stole private information, and then released that information through fake online identities and through the organization WikiLeaks. The releases were designed and timed to interfere with our election and to damage a presidential candidate.

And at the same time, as the grand jury alleged in a separate indictment, a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation where Russian citizens posed as Americans in order to interfere in the election.

“I will close by reiterating the central allegation of our indictments—that there were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election,” the Special Counsel said in concluding his remarks.

Mueller’s statement of a “sophisticated” cyber intrusion is not backed by the evidence that is publicly available to date. We do know that Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Clinton campaign officials were targeted by a primitive spear-phishing campaign. Both John Podesta (Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman) and DNC officials were not actually “hacked” according to the proper definition of the term. They fell for a widespread (and again, a very primitive) email phishing scam — which also targeted Republican political operatives — and delivered their passwords to the intruders on a silver platter. These “Nigerian prince”-style attacks have targeted hundreds of millions of email accounts. It’s safe to say that Vladimir Putin is not personally directing every one of them. Anyway, once the intruders obtained the passwords of these officials, they could easily scoop up a database of all of the target emails and perhaps access to other valuable items such as bank account numbers. This is what happened in the case of Podesta. He entered his password into a fake email form sent by the phishing scammers, who were posing as a Google security email team. The phishing scammers then had free access to observe all of his communications, which were eventually published by WikiLeaks.

As for the DNC and DCCC “hack,” the FBI was denied access to the DNC’s servers and had to rely on data from a third-party contractor to make its determination. The Clinton-tied third-party contractor Crowdstrike did not divulge how exactly the DNC servers were accessed, but the Mueller report said that these cyber intruders may have used credentials stolen from the Clinton campaign officials to access the DNC and DCCC servers.

By all indications, this alleged Russian campaign succeeded because the Clinton campaign and DNC failed to adopt even the most basic security protocols to stop intrusions.

It is a geopolitical reality that America’s adversaries will always try to exploit its weakness to their advantage. It is up to our officials to make sure the American system is shielded from more inevitable intrusion attempts. Ultimately, the Clinton campaign and DNC were grossly negligent of their security responsibilities. They only have themselves to blame for being vulnerable to the intrusions.

But that was not the story that the legacy media would tell. For the past three years, we have been told, through a narrative spread by Democrat typists in the legacy media, along with America’s highest-ranking politicians and intelligence officials, that the Russians attacked the very fabric of our republic.

Prior to the “Russia hacking” narrative’s explosion in the media, President Barack Obama himself dismissed the idea that the intrusion was some kind of high-level, massive cyber operation. He said that the “manipulations, which as I’ve said publicly before, were not particularly sophisticated,” adding that “this was not some elaborate, complicated espionage scheme.”

The alleged Russian hacking campaign, just like the Russian social media disinformation operation, was a low-level, low-resource (Russia spent approximately $100,000 on Facebook ads) campaign meant to sow general discord in the United States. But if you listen to the average Democrat politician or read the latest anonymously sourced dispatch from the New York Times or the Washington Post, the narrative continues that Russia dropped operations akin to a cyber nuclear bomb on America.

Now that the “Trump-Russia” collusion allegations have been proven false, it’s time to take on the core “Russian interference” narrative that spawned the Mueller probe in the first place. (For more from the author of “Mueller and Democrat Operatives Continue to Wildly Exaggerate Russian Election Interference” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Media Outlets Downplay, Cut Out Celebrity’s Credit to God for Cancer Recovery

/0 Comments/in , /by

In an interview with People magazine out Wednesday, Jeopardy! host Alex Trebek credited the prayers of millions of his fans for helping him in his fight against stage-four pancreatic cancer, now in “near remission.” Yet, while ABC’s World News Tonight touted Trebek’s praise, the CBS Evening News ignored that part of Trebek’s comments and NBC Nightly News edited it out of the quotes read and video clips they aired. . .

ABC anchor David Muir recalled how Trebek “vowed to fight it” by playing a soundbite of the gameshow host telling fans back in March: “With the help of your prayers also, I plan to beat the low survival rate statistics for this disease.” . . .

Now let’s look at NBC’s edits. Correspondent Joe Fryer played the same soundbite of Trebek’s vow. But in this one, the NBC reporter spoke over the prayer part so it sounded like this: “I plan to beat the low survival rate statistics for this disease.” And so the edit stood out.

Next came the part where Fryer skipped over Trebek’s credits in the People magazine piece: “He tells People, “I’ve got a couple million people out there who have expressed good thoughts… I told the doctors this has to be more than just the chemo.” For Trebek, that support is part of the answer.” Compare that to what Muir said and what People magazine wrote.

As for CBS, fill-in anchor and Face the Nation moderator Margaret Brennan only had a news brief on the story in which the only quote from the magazine was that Trebek thought the turnaround was “mindboggling.” (Read more from “Media Outlets Downplay Celebrity’s Credit to God for Cancer Recovery” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Large Numbers Coming to the Border from Ebola-Ridden Countries

/0 Comments/in , /by

There are 88 nations where the per capita GDP is lower than that of Guatemala, which stands at $4,471 as of 2017. That is likely well over one billion people living in similar or worse conditions than those coming to our border today, primarily from Central America. As such, it’s no surprise that once our government telegraphed the message to the world that our sovereignty no longer matters when someone invades with a child, people are now coming in large numbers from all over the world, including from the most disease-prone countries in Africa.

While Africans have been trickling over our border in recent months, on Friday, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced that “the first large group of people from Africa” were apprehended in the Del Rio sector of Texas. In total, 116 individuals were apprehended in this African caravan on Thursday morning, including 35 from Angola, one from Cameroon, and 80 from Congo.

This demonstrates that the global migration, at this pace, will be a bottomless pit, because even if we eventually empty out the northern triangle of Central America, there are unlimited regions in the world where poverty is pervasive and from which people will travel to seek the de facto amnesty being offered.

The per capita GDPs for Angola, Cameroon, and Congo are $4,247, $1,452, and $2,147 respectively – all below that of Guatemala. Would-be African migrants have so far largely lacked the family and friend ties the Central American and Mexican immigrants have after years of illegal immigration from those countries. Once the seeds from these newer countries are planted, there is nothing stopping the illegal immigrant chain migration phenomenon from spreading to other parts of the globe in the coming years.

But when it comes to countries like Congo, there is an entirely new dimension of concern – dangerous contagious diseases. While the problems of mumps, tuberculosis, scabies, and chicken pox from Central America are bad enough, the influx of African migrants takes the concern of contagious diseases to an entirely new level.

Congo is experiencing the worst Ebola outbreak in recent memory, with over 1,300 fatalities since last August. The Ebola virus is extremely deadly, and there are no vaccinations or reliable treatments for it. While CBP noted that the group of Africans was given a medical screening, the challenge with Ebola is that the initial symptoms are often unremarkable, such as such as fever, headache, and weakness, and are therefore difficult to diagnose shortly after the infection, according to the Centers for Disease Control. In fact, according to the CDC, “When someone gets infected with Ebola, they will not show signs or symptoms of illness right away.”

With family units being released within days, often within hours, how can our government be certain that Americans, not to mention Border Patrol and local health officials, are not being put in danger? This is why the law (8 U.S.C. § 1222(a)) requires the government to detain all migrants “for a sufficient time to enable the immigration officers and medical officers to subject such aliens to observation and an examination sufficient to determine whether or not they belong to inadmissible classes.” This was for all migrants. It was always presumed that we would never take in people from specific countries that were experiencing deadly epidemics.

I asked CBP’s press office whether CBP has a different protocol for dealing with migrants from Congo or other African countries with risk of diseases, such as not releasing the migrants as immediately as Central Americans. A CBP spokesperson replied that “the process is the same, officers and agents review all individuals they come in contact with for signs of illness and notify CDC as needed.”

Again, Ebola and many other illnesses are not apparent through immediate symptoms, and most of these aliens are not held long enough to fulfill the dictates of § 1222(a) given the incubation period required. It’s quite shocking that country of origin would not play a role in either making these aliens inadmissible or prohibiting their release from detention.

(Read my four-part series on the threat of diseases at the border here, here, here, and here.)

CBP did confirm that contrary to some internet rumors, as of today, there have been no confirmed cases of Ebola at the border.

The country of Cameroon is on Congo’s western border, and its migrants should also be a concern to us. According to the CDC, Cameroon is experiencing a measles outbreak, along with the long-standing problems of many other diseases, such as yellow fever, hepatitis, malaria, and typhoid. The same measles outbreak is also in Angola, which borders Congo to the south.

However, even Angola has shut its border to Congo in light of the Ebola outbreak. Yet, the United States has evidently not shut its border to Congo. It is quite shocking the Trump administration has not included Congo on the travel ban list in light of the concern of Ebola and other diseases.

The president has unilateral authority to shut off any or all immigration, even legal immigration, and refuse to process any asylum claims (even legitimate ones) when he determines that the migration is “detrimental” to U.S. interests. If the crime, drugs, poverty, and empowerment of the cartels are not reason enough to do so, one would think the public health concern would be more than sufficient. (For more from the author of “Large Numbers Coming to the Border from Ebola-Ridden Countries” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE