University Dumps Professor Who Found Polar Bears Thriving Despite Climate Change

Nobody has done more to sink the claim that climate change is endangering polar bears than zoologist Susan Crockford — and she may have paid for it with her job.

After 15 years as an adjunct assistant professor, Ms. Crockford said the University of Victoria rejected without explanation in May her renewal application, despite her high profile as a speaker and author stemming from her widely cited research on polar bears and dog domestication.

Ms. Crockford accused officials at the Canadian university of bowing to “outside pressure,” the result of her research showing that polar bear populations are stable and even thriving, not plummeting as a result of shrinking Arctic sea ice, defying claims of the climate change movement.

Her dismissal, which she announced Wednesday in a post on her Polar Bear Science blog, has spurred alarm over the implications for academic freedom and the rise of the “cancel culture” for professors and scientists who challenge climate catastrophe predictions. . .

Ms. Crockford cited numerous instances of the university promoting her interviews and work, including her participation in a 2007 PBS “Nature” documentary about dog domestication and evolution, as well as her appearances at K-12 schools and adult groups for 10 years through the University of Victoria Speakers Bureau. (Read more from “University Dumps Professor Who Found Polar Bears Thriving Despite Climate Change” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

School District Set to Demolish Boys, Girls Locker Rooms, Create ‘Gender-Neutral’ Facilities

A Pennsylvania school district is set to drop a hefty sum on a brand-new gender-neutral changing facility for students, according WTXF-TV. . .

The station reported that Garden Spot High School in New Holland will eliminate traditional boys and girls locker rooms with the $2.4 million project. Renovations are expected to be completed by December 2020. . .

The renovation project will include four “zones” that will make up a total of 48 private changing rooms and 76 private showers, according to Lancaster Online. The showers will also double as changing rooms when not in use.

District Superintendent Bob Hollister told the outlet that the four zones will not be designated by gender, but pointed out that he believes there will be a “natural selection.” . . .

“This District policy states that multi-user locker rooms and restrooms will be separated based on biological sex. But the idea behind the policy is much deeper,” the board at Eastern Lancaster County School District wrote in a statement on the matter. “We’ve worked hard to arrive at a solution that balances varied interests — which is why we’re systematically converting multi-user facilities into a series of single-user facilities.”

(Read more from “School District Set to Demolish Boys, Girls Locker Rooms, Create ‘Gender-Neutral’ Facilities” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Delusional? Hillary ‘Considering’ Entering 2020 Primary (VIDEO)

On the radio program Tuesday, Glenn Beck lamented the notion that twice-failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton might actually be considering another run in 2020.

According to The Associated Press, a top aide on Clinton’s 2016 campaign has predicted that the former secretary of state “will be out on the trail in 2020,” and the New York Times reported Monday that Clinton said she “would consider entering the primary,” if she saw “an opening.”

(Read more from “Delusional? Hillary ‘Considering’ Entering 2020 Primary (VIDEO)” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Manufacturing Executives Charged With Knowingly Hiring Illegal Aliens

Four executives at an Illinois manufacturing plant have been charged with knowingly hiring illegal aliens, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency reveals.

According to ICE officials, four executives at the sheet metal KSO MetalFab Inc. manufacturing plant in Streamwood, Illinois — a suburb of Chicago — have been charged with one count each of knowingly harboring illegal aliens and one count each of knowingly hiring illegal aliens.

The four executives include 81-year-old Dora Kuzelka, 62-year-old Kenneth Kuzelka, 56-year-old Kari Kuzelka, and 58-year-old Keith Kuzelka. ICE officials allege that the Kuzelkas knowingly hired at least 18 illegal aliens.

In 2017, ICE audited the company and discovered that more than half of the 67 workers employed had potentially used fake work authorization documents to obtain jobs. After being warned of the illegal alien hires, the executives fired the workers.

Later, though, ICE officials said KSO MetalFab executives rehired at least 18 of the illegal alien hires that had previously been fired through a staffing agency. (Read more from “Manufacturing Executives Charged With Knowingly Hiring Illegal Aliens” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Child Gender Transitions Are Wicked and Harmful — and Should Be Illegal

A horrific lawsuit in Texas is demonstrating that the biggest threat to the family and the welfare of children by an overreaching government is not coming from Washington, D.C., but from a jury of your peers.

On Monday, in the supposedly conservative state of Texas, 11 of 12 jurors stripped a father, Jeffrey Younger, of his parental rights and ruled that he cannot stop his ex-wife, Dr. Anne Georgulas, a pediatrician, from putting one of their seven-year-old twin sons through hormone treatments for gender “transition.” The jury’s decision, according to LifeSiteNews, gives Georgulas “full authority to start him on puberty blockers and eventually cross-sex hormones.” Younger also lost the right to make decisions about his sons’ medical care, education, residence, and other parental rights.

This case is part of a custody battle in which Younger argues that his ex-wife is “transitioning” their son James against the child’s will. Georgulas, who brought the lawsuit, contends that James is a girl, calls him Luna, and wants custody over him and his twin brother, Jude. She is not the biological mother of the children, as the twins were conceived via in vitro fertilization with an egg donor. Georgulas is also asking for Younger’s visitation times with the children to be limited and supervised and also wants him to be forbidden to call James by his given name and prohibited from bringing him around people who do not “affirm” the boy as a “girl.”

Testifying on Georgulas’ behalf were therapists and counselors who claimed James told them he is a girl. They argue that the correct and loving approach to James’ gender dysphoria is “affirmation” — giving the child puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to conform his body to his mind’s impression.

Younger, the biological father and an Orthodox Christian, is morally convicted that this is all wrong and is also concerned about the possible side effects of the hormone treatments his ex-wife plans to introduce to his son, which include lifelong infertility from chemical castration. He says that when James is with him, he identifies as a boy and “violently refuses to wear girl’s clothes at my home.” But he lost his case. As a result of the jury’s decision, Younger will likely be forced to take a class on transgenderism to correct his wrongthink.

This is America in 2019: Where the so-called experts purport to believe that a little boy can declare that he’s actually a girl and the supposedly loving and correct thing to do is give him puberty blockers, administer cross-sex hormones, and in the future possibly encourage him through “medical transition” — the surgical removal of his penis — which is, in layman’s terms, mutilation. Where eleven Americans sided with the “experts” against a father trying to protect his son and removed his ability to do so. Where government interference in the form of a court decision in a family dispute puts a child’s welfare at risk, in rebellion against nature, reason, and moral decency.

This jury decision is an outrage and an injustice. The revocation of Younger’s natural rights as a father is morally repugnant. The conviction of Dr. Georgulas and James’ therapists and counselors that a seven-year-old boy should be put on harmful, unnatural hormones to change his body and “treat” his gender dysphoria — a mental illness — is itself insane. And what these people are proposing to do to James is horrible, long-lasting child abuse.

Government should not be interfering with Younger’s attempts to stop this injustice. It should intervene on his behalf to protect James by stopping child gender “transitions” entirely.

It is past time for social conservatives to stop expressing shock as transgenderism becomes protected by American law and start changing the law to end the abhorrent practice of allowing children to be given hormone therapy. Conservatives may make the argument from reason — the dangerous health risks of puberty blockers are well documented, and so to protect children, at the very least, these hormone “therapies” should be outlawed for children under age 18. But we must press the moral argument. Transgenderism is against reason and against nature. It is against anything that’s good for human beings, which makes it immoral.

We are born with particular bodies, male or female. When the body is afflicted with a deformity, as in the case of missing or malformed limbs, deficient organs, or intersex characteristics, those are not rights by nature. We call them “deformities” because they are malformations — not normal, but abnormal. The treatment is to help such a person by correcting the deformity. No serious person truly believes it is better to live with a deformity than without, and so we have developed medicines and surgeries to cure deformity when possible.

In the case of someone struggling with gender dysphoria, there is no deformation of the body. Gender dysphoria is a mental affliction. The proposed cure from transgender advocates for this mental illness is not to correct the mind, but to deform the body with chemicals and mutilating surgery to affirm that illness.

This is obviously wrong. Wouldn’t the best way to help gender-dysphoric people, especially children, be to treat the mind? Shouldn’t a gender-confused child learn about the gender he or she was born with by nature? How can anyone seriously contend that it is good to use chemicals children’s bodies do not naturally produce to override their normal genetic makeup and irreparably change their bodies, ultimately through deforming surgery to conform the body to the delusions of a mental illness?

The moral choice is to accept nature. The wicked and harmful choice is to delude ourselves by pretending boy can be made into a girl by unnaturally blocking puberty and surgically removing his sex organs. That wickedness is compounded when the government removes a father’s right to prevent his child from being irreparably hurt in this way.

Advancing the moral argument will be costly. The progressive Left will attack conservatives, hurling accusations of bigotry and derisively claiming we’re evil and ignorant and don’t know what we’re talking about because we don’t have degrees in medicine or psychology. But hear this: If the doctors and psychologists are claiming that a little boy can be transformed into a girl by cross-dressing, taking hormones his body won’t produce naturally, chemically castrating himself, and ultimately being surgically mutilated, they’re the ones who are ignorant, delusional, and evil.

And conservatives shouldn’t be afraid to say so. (For more from the author of “Child Gender Transitions Are Wicked and Harmful — and Should Be Illegal” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

WATCH: GOP Intelligence Committee Members Sound the Alarm on How Secretly Dems Are Leading the Impeachment Process

Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee voiced their concern on Tuesday over how secretly Democrats have been conducting the impeachment process of President Donald Trump.

“This has been a closed-door, unfair, and unprecedented process. Tens of millions of Americans should know that their member of Congress has had no access to any of the transcripts. In fact, no member has been able to read every transcript,” Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) told reporters during the weekly GOP press conference.

Stefanik, a two term member of the Intelligence committee, revealed that to date, Democrats have only made the testimony from two witnesses even available to committee members — that of U.S. special representative to Ukraine Kurt Volker and U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch. Even then, Democrats have severely restricted the availability of transcripts.

“We were notified this week at our staff level that they would only be printing one transcript for every single member, whether you’re on the committee or not, and you would have to read it with a member of Democratic staff,” Stefanik explained. “That is unprecedented and unfair.”

The New York congresswoman further questioned how Democrats are able to voice their support for the impeachment proceedings when they do not even have access to the evidence. (Read more from “Watch: GOP Intelligence Committee Members Sound the Alarm on How Secretly Dems Are Leading the Impeachment Process” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Flashback: Remarks From Biden Surface After He Attacks Trump’s ‘Lynching’ Remarks

Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden was quick to attack President Donald Trump on Tuesday after Trump referred to impeachment as a “lynching,” which is the same term that Biden used in 1998 to describe the impeachment of then-President Bill Clinton.

“So some day, if a Democrat becomes President and the Republicans win the House, even by a tiny margin, they can impeach the President, without due process or fairness or any legal rights,” Trump tweeted. “All Republicans must remember what they are witnessing here – a lynching. But we will WIN!” . . .

In an appearance on CNN in October 1998, however, Biden referred to the Clinton impeachment as a “partisan lynching,” saying:

Even if the President should be impeached, history is going to question whether or not this was just a partisan lynching or whether or not it was something that in fact met the standard, the very high bar, that was set by the founders as to what constituted an impeachable offense.

(Read more from “Flashback: Remarks From Biden Surface After He Attacks Trump’s ‘Lynching’ Remarks” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Rolling Stone: ‘Hillary Clinton Is Nuts’

Hillary Clinton decided to use her name and allies to smear Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI). Tulsi endorsed Bernie Sanders in 2016. Clinton floated this insane theory that Rep. Gabbard was being groomed by the Russians to mount a third-party run to ensure a Trump victory in 2020. . .

While Rolling Stone suffered a knifing to the kidneys and heart over the University of Virginia rape story that turned out to be a total hoax which led to the magazine being sued and found guilty of libel, its analysis of the Russian agent paranoia that had engulfed the Democratic Party was pretty spot on. In short, the Democratic Party position on this subject is that we’re all Russian agents now. It’s ironic in two ways. First, the so-called intellectual elite, those who think that rural Americans and those without college degrees are trash, falling victim and being susceptible to digesting such tin foil hat garbage is priceless. These condescending and utterly revolting people appear to be so incapable of understanding why they lost in 2016 they’ve resorted to InfoWars-like cuckoo theories over why Trump is where he is at present. Second, remember when Democrats laughed at Mitt Romney about Russia being our biggest geopolitical foe? This was anachronistic, right? Well, post-2016, the Left has their own red scare brewing their minds, driving them insane, and leaving them spewing total insanity to the masses. The Russians were a joke in 2012, and now they’re everywhere. Oh, man—there is not enough popcorn for this show (via Rolling Stone):

Hillary Clinton is nuts. She’s also not far from the Democratic Party mainstream, which has been pushing the same line for years.

Less than a week before Clinton’s outburst, the New York Times — once a symbol of stodgy, hyper-cautious reporting — ran a feature called, “What, Exactly, is Tulsi Gabbard Up To?” The piece speculated about the “suspicious activity” surrounding Gabbard’s campaign, using quotes from the neoconservative think-tank, the Alliance For Securing Democracy, to speculate about Gabbard’s Russian support.

(Read more from “Rolling Stone: ‘Hillary Clinton Is Nuts'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

General Motors Employee Just Gave 2020 Democrats a Big Warning

Democrats say they’re the champions for the middle and working class. Beware of those evil Republicans; they’ll screw you over. For years, that’s been the playbook. And for the most part, it worked. Obama ran with that and won two elections. Mitt Romney was the perfect foil for this messaging attack, as many looked at Mitt and viewed him as the person who would fire you not hire you. The Obama ads slicing his time at Bain Capital resonated with the working-class areas of Ohio. . .

Yet, as the 2020 Democratic field vies for who can be the looniest of the loony bin, the professional, snobby, and over-educated elite that infest the party is starting to show. It’s quite simple. For liberals, if you’re not college-educated, you’re trash who shouldn’t be acknowledged or listened to because what could you possibly know, right? That has seeped into this cycle. Only the comfy, privileged liberal elites can think that “Medicare For All” is a good idea. Giving illegal aliens health care is a popular proposal, and decriminalizing border crossings is a tenet of inclusivity. Forced “Medicare For All” means the end of private insurance. No one likes giving illegals welfare, and open borders are not tenable. The Left’s intense hatred of fracking, which has created jobs, supercharged local economies, and has led the country to become more energy independent is also seen as another middle finger to the working class. Talk smart about jobs and the economy—they’ll listen. These folks are not die-hard Republicans. They’ve voted for Democrats before and they’re winnable for either party, but the Left’s left-wing thrust is forcing these folks into the GOP fold. One General Motors worker voiced his concerns in September, noting that Democrats really don’t know any working-class people and that their agenda, especially on health care, puts union workers’ plans on the chopping block. For all the fear tactics about the GOP taking away people’s health care, we have Democrats who want to do just that (via Detroit Times):

Matt Moorhead, a General Motors Co. employee who recently transferred to the Lansing Grand River Assembly Plant from the idling Lordstown plant in Ohio, said the health care under the current UAW contract “allows a freedom that a lot of people in society don’t have.”

“It scares me that (some Democratic candidates) don’t know working-class people,” said the 47-year-old self-described liberal who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. “It scares me that Democrats turn people away by some of the things they say… My fear is they will lose votes from working-class families who are union.

Government-run health care isn’t the way to do it,” Moorhead continued. “There are systems that run better. There needs to be government involvement, but there also needs be a free market, as well.”

(Read more from “General Motors Employee Just Gave 2020 Democrats a Big Warning” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

NEW WHISTLEBLOWER: George Soros Behind DNC Pressure to Fire Ukraine Prosecutor at Center of Impeachment Inquiry; Where Is The Original Whistleblower?

By The Blaze. [New Ukraine whistleblower, Andrii Telizhenko] was an adviser to former Ukrainian chief prosecutor Viktor Shokin, who was ousted during an investigation into Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company where former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, sat on the board. The Obama administration claims that the Ukrainian prosecutor was fired over alleged corruption. Biden even bragged, with cameras rolling, that he threatened to withhold a billion dollars in U.S. aid to Ukraine “if the prosecutor is not fired.”

According to Telizhenko, however, Shokin was fired because a George Soros funded non-governmental organization (NGO) wanted him gone. (Read more from “NEW WHISTLEBLOWER: George Soros Behind DNC Pressure to Fire Ukraine Prosecutor at Center of Impeachment Inquiry” HERE)

_________________________________________________

One Person Is Missing in the Democrats’ Impeachment Inquiry: The Whistleblower

By Reuters. Democratic lawmakers leading an impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump have heard days of testimony from a parade of senior government officials. But they have yet to hear from the whistleblower who sparked the probe – and may never do.

In the end, it may not matter, some Democratic lawmakers said, because the other officials who have testified, Trump’s own statements, a trove of texts between top U.S. diplomats, and other White House documents have largely substantiated the whistleblower’s complaint that Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate political rival Joe Biden.

Talks between lawyers for the whistleblower and representatives of the House of Representatives and Senate committees that want to question the intelligence official have all but deadlocked, three sources familiar with the negotiations told Reuters. (Read more from “One Person Is Missing in the Democrats’ Impeachment Inquiry: The Whistleblower” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE