New Autopsy Study: COVID Vax Likely Killed Millions

/0 Comments/in , , /by

As COVID-19 vaccines rolled out globally, concerns over their safety have been front and center. While initial trials – funded and conducted by vaccine manufacturers themselves – provided reassurance, reports of serious adverse events have sparked intense debate. A new study released two days ago delves into autopsy findings to explore whether these vaccines might have fatal consequences.

In a meticulous review of published autopsy reports, researchers unearthed troubling data. They analyzed hundreds of cases where individuals died shortly after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Shockingly, in 73.9% of these cases, the vaccine was either directly responsible for death or significantly contributed to it.

The most affected organ systems were the heart, blood, lungs, brain, and gut. Cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation (myocarditis), heart attacks, and clot-related complications were prevalent. Neurological problems and severe respiratory conditions also emerged, painting a complex picture of vaccine-related fatalities.

Scientists suspect the spike protein, a key component of COVID-19 vaccines, might trigger these adverse reactions. Its ability to induce inflammation throughout the body could explain why multiple organ systems are affected post-vaccination.

Most deaths occurred within a week of vaccination, raising alarms about the vaccine’s immediate impact on vulnerable individuals. This rapid onset suggests a need for heightened vigilance during the early post-vaccination period.

While autopsy studies have limitations, such as inherent biases in case selection and reporting, independent medical reviews validated these concerning findings. The study underscores the urgent need for more thorough investigations into vaccine-related deaths to better understand risk factors and prevent future fatalities.

In conclusion, this terrifying study highlights significant concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine safety. It calls for continued vigilance through autopsy examinations of vaccine recipients who pass away unexpectedly. Moreover, extended monitoring post-vaccination could aid in detecting and managing serious adverse events early on. But most importantly, think for yourself, never trust big pharma, and never trust the feds (especially Fauci).

Joe Biden Was Definitely Going to Attack Trump on This in the Debate. He Can’t Now.

/0 Comments/in , , /by

I would have never thought Snopes would be the one to drop an atomic bomb on liberal America like this—but here we are. One of the popular liberal myths about Donald Trump is the ‘both sides’ event after Charlottesville, where the media and Democrats for years have alleged Donald Trump was referring to the neo-Nazis that assembled during that Unite the Right rally, which left dozens injured and a woman dead after one white supremacist drove his car through a crowd of counter-protesters.

It’s the event that reportedly spurred Joe Biden to run for president. There is no doubt that Biden’s debate team was prepping him to sneak this attack line in the upcoming debates, and now they can’t. We’ll see who is truly prepared because Snopes shredded this liberal talking point, rating it “false.” We’ve known for years it was, as have you, but it’s now official: the ‘very fine people on both sides’ myth about Trump is dead (via Fox News):

The left-leaning fact-checking website Snopes acknowledged Saturday that former President Trump never called neo-Nazis “very fine people” during his press conference following the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally in 2017.

[…]

“While Trump did say that there were ‘very fine people on both sides,’ he also specifically noted that he was not talking about neo-Nazis and White supremacists and said they should be ‘condemned totally.’ Therefore, we have rated this claim ‘False,'” Snopes wrote.

(Read more from “Joe Biden Was Definitely Going to Attack Trump on This in the Debate. He Can’t Now.” HERE)

‘Surreal to Watch’: With Trump Ahead, Stolen Election Seen ‘In Crystal Clarity’

/1 Comment/in , , /by

With the 2024 presidential contest fast approaching, some high-profile political voices are sounding the alarm about a potentially rigged election in November.

Among them are Mike Benz, the executive director of the Foundation For Freedom Online, and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk. . .

Just two days ago, Benz, a former State Department cyber expert, had another eye-opening exchange with Musk regarding the upcoming election, focusing on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s targeting of Trump fans. . .

He was posting a warning from America First Legal which indicated: “Internal docs from Biden’s DHS show their plans to target Trump [supporters] as domestic extremists.

“The Brennan-Clapper intel group discussed how ‘most of the domestic terrorism threat now comes from supporters of the former president.'” (Read more from “‘Surreal to Watch’: With Trump Ahead, Stolen Election Seen ‘In Crystal Clarity'” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

CNN Silences Trump Campaign’s Karoline Leavitt: The Truth is ‘Triggering’

/0 Comments/in , , /by

In a startling display of media bias, CNN abruptly cut off Trump campaign national press secretary Karoline Leavitt’s microphone mid-interview on Monday. Leavitt’s crime? Daring to highlight CNN anchor Jake Tapper’s history of anti-Trump rhetoric ahead of Thursday’s presidential debate, which Tapper is set to co-host.

During a pre-debate interview on CNN, Karoline Leavitt made a brief reference to Jake Tapper’s extensive history of criticizing Trump. This point was particularly relevant as Tapper is one of the moderators for the upcoming debate. However, CNN’s Kasie Hunt, unable to tolerate the mention, abruptly cut Leavitt’s microphone, effectively silencing her.

Following the incident, Leavitt expressed her disbelief and frustration. “CNN cutting off my microphone for bringing up a debate moderator’s history of anti-Trump lies just proves our point that President Trump will not be treated fairly in Thursday’s debate,” she stated.

Speaking to Benny Johnson immediately after being cut off, she remarked, “I still can’t believe this happened. It is really shocking just how triggering the truth is to CNN.” She explained that her intention was merely to point out Trump’s boldness in agreeing to participate in a debate on a network that has shown clear hostility towards him.

“That’s all I was doing was pointing out the fact that President Trump is bold to go on a three on one fight on a network that is clearly hostile to him,” she said. Leavitt further criticized CNN, stating, “Let’s stop pretending like CNN is still the most trusted name in news. They are not, and I pointed out statements that Jake Tapper himself has made in the past.”

Kasie Hunt defended her actions by claiming that Leavitt showed disrespect to her colleague, Jake Tapper. “You come on my show, you respect my colleagues. Period,” Hunt stated.

This incident is more than just a technical glitch or a minor spat. It highlights a significant issue in the media landscape: the blatant bias against conservative voices and, specifically, against Donald Trump. “You cut off my microphone for bringing up the debate moderator’s history of anti-Trump lies. This proved our point that President Trump will not be treated fairly on Thursday,” Leavitt asserted.

Instagram Urges Users to Reconsider Following Tucker Carlson in ‘Insane Warning’

/1 Comment/in , , /by

Tucker Carlson has over 3.7 million followers on Instagram. On X, he has nearly 13 million followers. While his following on X is likely far more significant because it is the ostensibly less censorious platform where Carlson routinely uploads episodes of his new show, there may be another reason to account for the delta.

Ashton DeGroot, Blaze Media’s social media content coordinator, observed Monday that following Carlson is no easy feat on the Meta platform.

A perfunctory search for Carlson failed to turn up his verified account. Instead, impersonators and fan accounts flooded the results. After multiple tries, it appeared clear that Carlson’s verified account would only appear if his exact handle, @TuckerCarlson, was entered into the search bar.

Upon finding Carlson’s account, DeGroot found that Instagram put up one last barrier to engagement, imploring prospective followers to reconsider.

The pop-up reads, “Are you sure you want to follow tuckercarlson?”

“This account has repeatedly posted false information that was reviewed by independent fact-checkers or it went against our Community Guidelines,” added the pop-up. (Read more from “Instagram Urges Users to Reconsider Following Tucker Carlson in ‘Insane Warning'” HERE)

Former Fundraiser for Obama Leaves Democrat Party, Supports Trump

/0 Comments/in , , /by

A former fundraiser who helped raise millions of dollars for former President Barack Obama spoke about her “divorce” from the Democrat Party and how she is supporting former President Donald Trump.

During an interview on Fox News’s Jesse Watters Primetime, Allison Huynh explained that several issues had occurred leading up to her leaving the party.

Huynh created Willow Garage, a robotics company in 2006 with her ex-husband, Scott Hassan, who worked as a programmer for Google. Huynh and Hassan hosted dinners that cost roughly $50,000 to $100,000 a plate per person, according to the New York Post.

“Like any divorce, there’s not just one thing, there’s a series of things that led up to it,” Huynh explained during her interview with Fox News host Jesse Watters. . .

“The Democrats were policing the wrong things,” Huynh added. “The things that we need to police are violent criminals that are scattered throughout the streets of San Francisco, people defecating, shooting up heroin in front of me and my kids, and allowing criminals to go in and steal from our grocery stores, shutting down grocery stores.” (Read more from “Former Fundraiser for Obama Leaves Democrat Party, Supports Trump” HERE)

Biden’s Radical Judicial Nominee Just Busted Lying Under Oath—Sen. Kennedy Brought Damning Receipts (VIDEO)

/1 Comment/in , , /by

Sometimes, you witness a takedown so epic that it leaves everyone watching in utter amazement. That’s exactly what happened to Joe Biden’s radical left-wing judicial nominee, Karla Campbell. She’s a harebrained left-wing attorney from Nashville and Biden’s Marxist pick for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, and her judicial dreams might have just imploded. After being caught lying under oath, her hopes of becoming the left’s next activist judge may be over.

The controversy swirls around a radical left-wing extremist hate group known as “Workers’ Dignity,” which is known for advocating the abolition of all military and police forces. It turns out that Ms. Campbell had been a legal advisor for this unhinged group. When Senator Chuck Grassley questioned her, she flat-out lied, denying any involvement. Not the wisest move, because up next was Senator John Kennedy, armed with irrefutable evidence proving her very close and cozy ties to the group. The look on her face was absolutely priceless.

Senator Hawley also came after Biden’s nominee for lying under oath and also highlighted yet another serious blunder—a hefty donation she made to a hateful, violent far-left candidate. Ms. Campbell admitted to donating $1,500 to a neighbor who has labeled all 52 Senate Republicans, including Tim Scott, as “Jim Crow Senators” and accused them of colluding with the devil. When pressed on why she supported such a luntaic, Ms. Campbell’s only excuse was that she was just trying to be “neighborly.”

JNS:

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) pressed Karla Campbell, U.S. President Joe Biden’s nominee for the U.S. Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, on Thursday about her role of an advisory board at Workers’ Dignity.

“Workers’ Dignity has condemned Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestine. They have said that Israel is engaged in ethnic cleansing,” the senator said. “Do you agree with that?”

“No senator,” Campbell said.

“How can I believe you?” Hawley said. “You just lied under oath a
moment ago.”

“You’ve lied to us up and down on this committee,” he added. “This is a serious problem Ms. Campbell. I have to say, I’ve never seen a witness—never in five years in this committee—sit here and lie to us and change the story person to person.”

(Read more from “Biden’s Radical Judicial Nominee Just Busted Lying Under Oath—Sen. Kennedy Brought Damning Receipts” HERE)

WATCH: Ex-FBI Undercover Asset Risks All to Prove Jan. 6 Was a ‘Fedsurrection’

/5 Comments/in , , /by

For the last three and a half years, the FBI and federal prosecutors, in tandem with federal judges, have refused to disclose information regarding the extent to which the U.S. government deployed undercover informants in the crowd at the “Save America” rally in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6, 2021. . .

Ex-FBI confidential human source Derek Myers risks years of jail time for saying too much about his former employer. Yet despite the potential legal ramifications, Myers insists the FBI ran an operation involving hundreds of undercover informants on Jan. 6 to entrap and incriminate Trump supporters.

He would know. He was recruited for the assignment. . .

The public should know, Myers told WND in an exclusive interview, that confidential human sources were laced all throughout the Jan. 6 crowd and that they are considered above the law while on the job.

“I’m going to try and word this in a way without compromising the FBI’s contractual obligations. When we, as human assets, are signed into the program for the FBI, we typically must sign paperwork that says what we can and cannot do. Specifically, when it comes to being part of these rallies, or any sort of lawbreaking, we get a temporary designation by the District Attorney’s Office in the Department of Justice,” he said. “These designations are called ‘tier one,’ ‘tier two’ or ‘tier three,’ and it is essentially a ‘get out of jail free’ pass for a certain amount of time. (Read more from “Ex-FBI Undercover Asset Risks All to Prove Jan. 6 Was a ‘Fedsurrection'” HERE)

Trump’s Legal Team Pushes to Have Judge Arthur Engoron Thrown Off Civil Trial After New Development

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Former President Donald Trump’s legal team filed documents in court on Thursday seeking to have Judge Arthur Engoron thrown off the civil fraud case against Trump in New York after they discovered that he allegedly engaged in “prohibited communications” with an outside party about the case.

Trump’s lawyers are trying to get Engoron tossed off the case as they appeal his highly controversial ruling that Trump was guilty and needed to pay nearly half a billion dollars to the state.

In the court documents, Trump’s lawyers cited an interview that real estate lawyer Adam Bailey gave with a local NBC News affiliate in New York in which he claimed that he spoke to Engoron during the trial at the courthouse where it was taking place.

“I actually had the ability to speak to him three weeks ago,” Bailey said during the interview back in February, according to documents filed by Trump’s lawyers. “I saw him in the corner [at the courthouse] and I told my client, ‘I need to go.’ And I walked over and we started talking … I wanted him to know what I think and why…I really want him to get it right.” (Read more from “Trump’s Legal Team Pushes to Have Judge Arthur Engoron Thrown Off Civil Trial After New Development” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Today’s String of Supreme Court Decisions Blew Up Another Liberal Narrative (Again)

/0 Comments/in , , /by

The Supreme Court has not yet decided on the presidential immunity case involving former President Donald Trump, which could wreck the pending trials from Special Counsel Jack Smith on January 6 and classified document indictments. At the same time, the string of decisions today did unravel another trite liberal talking regarding our third branch of government: it’s a rogue, right-wing machine that’s out to destroy America.

The three decisions today obliterated that narrative. There were no 5-4 decisions, and some concurring and dissenting opinions were—wait for it—made up of diverse company. Law professor Jonathan Turley had a lengthy Twitter thread about today’s rulings:

..We have the first case. It is Moore!

…Another shattering of the narrative of a hopelessly ideologically divided court. 7-2 decision. This is the tax case that I thought we might get today. It addresses the scope of the taxation powers.

…Court rules that taxpayers who own shares in foreign corporations can be constitutionally required to pay a one-time tax on their share of the corporation’s earnings…In his dissent, Thomas notes that the Court avoided the “wealth tax” issue with a biting couple lines: “Even as the majority admits to reasoning from fiscal consequences, it apparently believes that a generous application of dicta will guard against unconstitutional taxes in the future. The majority’s analysis begins with a list of nonexistent taxes that the Court does not today bless, including a wealth tax.”…

[…]

..We have the second opinion. It is CHIAVERINI ET AL. v. CITY OF NAPOLEON, OHIO, ET, a Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution case.

…This is a Justice Kagan decision that holds “the presence of probable cause for one charge in a criminal proceeding does not categorically defeat a Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claim relating to another, baseless charge.”…

…Once again, the critics of the Supreme Court will be disappointed with the diverse majority of Roberts, Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett joining Kagan in the 6-3 decision…

…We have the third decision. It is Diaz v. US and authored by Thomas. Justice Gorsuch joins Sotomayor and Kagan in dissent.

The court holds that an expert testifying about how ‘most people” have a particular mental state is not an opinion about the defendant and therefore does not violate federal evidentiary rules.

(Read more from “Today’s String of Supreme Court Decisions Blew Up Another Liberal Narrative (Again)” HERE)