Posts

The Democrats Just Wrote Trump’s 2020 Ads for Him

Earlier this week, 44 Senate Democrats, including all six leftist senators running for president in 2020, voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act introduced by Senator Ben Sasse, R-Neb.

Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Cory Booker, D-N.J., Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., all voted against requiring doctors to save and care for a new baby born after an attempted abortion. Trump should hang this heinous vote around their necks at every campaign stop from now till Election Day.

Abortion was already a key election issue during the 2016 election, but after the third and final debate between then-candidates Trump and Hillary Clinton, Clinton’s extreme stance on late-term abortion put the subject at the top of the list. In fact, it was the top candidate-related Google search on Election Day.

A majority of Americans disagree with the position that all but three Senate Democrats took in this vote. In fact, most Americans think that abortion should be limited to the first trimester of pregnancy, and that includes a majority of folks who consider themselves “pro-choice.”

Given that Donald Trump’s pro-life positions drove a substantial portion of his voters to the polls back in 2016, when the controversy about his opponent’s position was only about late-term abortion, imagine what his numbers could look like if he’s up against a Democrat who voted against banning outright infanticide.

Sure, they could make the claim – as Planned Parenthood has – that this would somehow have restricted abortion access, which is nonsensical since the bill’s text places no limits on when a an abortion may be performed or what kind of procedure could be used.

They could claim – as Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., did before the vote – that the bill would have criminalized doctors who do not go to extraordinary lengths to save babies who were “non-viable” to begin with or that mothers would be put in danger. But the bill simply and unequivocally states that doctors should give the same reasonable standard of care to babies born alive as they would to any infant needing care.

They could claim – alongside their colleague Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va. – that this was a vote to criminalize something that was already illegal. But, as Alexandra DeSanctis points out over at National Review, no law specifically requires care for infants born in the context of abortion. But even if it there were one already, how much sense does it make to signal that you are against further protections for living human babies?

With a Democratic House certain to keep any pro-life legislation from making it to the president’s desk, the best hope for this week’s Senate vote was to find out where everyone in the upper chamber stands on the issue of infanticide.

Now that these 2020 candidates have made it clear that they have no intention of banning infanticide in America, the Trump campaign must never let voters forget it from here till November 2020. Then it will be up to voters. (For more from the author of “The Democrats Just Wrote Trump’s 2020 Ads for Him” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Beto O’Rourke Reveals He’s ‘Made a Decision’ Ahead of Expected Presidential Run

Former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke said Wednesday that he has made up his mind about his political future, raising expectations that he will be the latest Democrat to jump into the crowded race for the party’s 2020 presidential nomination. . .

The statement was first obtained by The Dallas Morning News, which reported that O’Rourke would not pursue a potential challenge to Sen. John Cornyn, the No. 2 Republican in Congress’ upper chamber. Cornyn responded to the report by tweeting: “Looks like Schumer couldn’t close the deal”, a reference to a recent report that O’Rourke and Schumer had met earlier this month to discuss a potential Senate bid.

O’Rourke made national headlines last year with his strong electoral challenge to Sen. Ted Cruz. O’Rourke was defeated by 2.5 percentage points, a surprisingly close margin in Texas, which has not elected a Democrat to statewide office since 1994.

O’Rourke had said for a week that he planned to make up his mind by the end of February — though how he will announce what he’ll do remains unclear. In addition to challenging Cornyn, O’Rourke also has suggested he could seek the Democrats’ 2020 vice presidential nomination.

While O’Rourke has continued to delay his decision, Democratic activists in states holding early presidential voting contests, including Iowa, Nevada and South Carolina, have formed “Draft Beto” groups that have raised money and tried to line up would-be supporters.

(Read more from “Beto O’Rourke Reveals He’s ‘Made a Decision’ Ahead of Expected Presidential Run” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Likely Prez Candidate Wants to Win Without Electoral College

By WND. Although Eric Holder hasn’t officially announced a run for the presidency in 2020, the former attorney general under Barack Obama says it’s time to abolish the Electoral College as the way to elect presidents. . .

In a separate tweet, supporting Colorado’s move to do eliminate the current method of choosing presidents, Holder said: “Change the Electoral College by having a state’s electoral votes go to the national popular vote winner – not the person who won the state. The candidate who gets the most votes – nationally – is elected. Real democracy.”

Holder’s comments came under immediate fire from Nick Searcy, the actor and director of the recent film “Gosnell.” . . .

Holder has said his decision on seeking the Democratic nomination for the White House would come sometime in March. (Read more from “Likely Prez Candidate Wants to Win Without Electoral College” HERE)

______________________________________________

Colorado Governor Will Sign Bill Aimed at Bypassing Electoral College

By The Hill. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) will sign a measure to award his state’s electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote, moving a countrywide coalition one step closer to circumventing the Electoral College.

In an interview Sunday, Polis called the Electoral College an “undemocratic relic” of the nation’s past, one he wants to see relegated to the dustbin of history.

“I’ve long supported electing the president by who gets the most votes,” Polis told The Hill. “It’s a way to move towards direct election of the president.”

Colorado will become the 12th state to join the national popular vote interstate compact. Those 12 states and the District of Columbia, which has also passed a popular-vote bill, account for 181 electoral votes, just under 90 shy of the 270 votes a presidential candidate needs to win the White House.

The compact will not go into effect until the coalition includes states that add up to 270 electoral votes or more. Once it does go into effect, states that are part of the coalition would award their electoral votes en masse to the candidate who wins the national popular vote. (Read more from “Colorado Governor Will Sign Bill Aimed at Bypassing Electoral College” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Surprise! Trump Triggered Liberals With This Remark About Elizabeth Warren

By Townhall. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) on Saturday officially launched her 2020 presidential campaign. President Donald Trump took to Twitter to comment on the latest Democratic challenger to enter the race.

Clearly, Trump’s tweet was meant to be read with sarcasm. Warren is the one who got herself in this mess. . .

Of course, liberals were triggered by what Trump said. Apparently referencing the Trail of Tears (because, you know, Warren is likely to be crying on the campaign trail) is suddenly racist, insensitive and down right disgusting.

(Read more from “Surprise! Trump Triggered Liberals With This Remark About Elizabeth Warren” HERE)

__________________________________________
EXAMPLE: Liberal Press Totally Freaks Out About Donald Trump, Jr.’s Follow-up Tweet

From Newsweek:

Donald Trump Jr. followed his father’s foosteps and used disparaging references to Native Americans in order to insult Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s recent 2020 presidential campaign announcement.

The president’s 41-year-old namesake took to Twitter and Instagram to tout his dad’s latest “Pocahontas” comment directed toward Warren’s past claim to minimal Native American heritage. The elder Trump was already being denounced by Native American groups last month for mocking Warren with Wounded Knee and Little Big Horn comments they said “descecrated” the memory of their ancestors. But Trump Jr. doubled down on the culturally insensitive negavitity by lauding a Twitter joke about “genocide” and calling it “SAVAGE!!!”

The term is frequently used in online banter to indicate a particularly nasty comment, but historically was used by white Americans and European settlers to refer to Native Americans.

__________________________________________
Trump needles new presidential candidate Warren on Native American claims

By Fox 5 News. President Trump wasted little time Saturday before needling newly declared presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren over her controversial efforts to align herself with Native Americans.

Warren, Democratic Massachusetts senator, officially announced her candidacy on Saturday in Lawrence. Touting a progressive agenda, she didn’t refer to recent controversies over her longstanding claims about having a Native American heritage.

No matter. Within hours, Trump made it clear he was happy to reference the issue himself, even if she wouldn’t. He did so on Twitter, where he made light of Warren and threw down a campaign gauntlet. (Read more from “Trump needles new presidential candidate Warren on Native American claims” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Warren Makes Insane Comment About Trump Being Jailed

By The Blaze. On her first full day of campaigning as a declared presidential candidate, Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) mused that President Donald Trump might be in jail by the time Election Day arrives.

“By the time we get to 2020, Donald Trump may not even be President,” Warren reportedly told voters in Iowa. “In fact, he may not even be a free person.” . . .

“But her campaign, which has faced more direct attacks from Trump than other Democratic candidates, appears to see the question about Trump’s own viability as way to stop engaging with everything he says,” the Washington Post reported. . .

“Every day, there’s a racist tweet, a hateful tweet, something really dark and ugly,” the Massachusetts senator also said. “And what are we, as candidates, as activists, the press, going to do about it? Are we going to let him use those to divide us?”

Warren launched her own controversy by claiming she’s Native American. She recently apologized to the Cherokee Nation for a DNA test that revealed she has just a tiny percentage of Native American heritage. Then, the Washington Post learned that Warren hand-wrote “American Indian” as her “race,” on a State Bar of Texas registration card from 1986. (Read more from “Warren Makes Insane Comment About Trump Being Jailed” HERE)

_________________________________________________

Warren: Trump ‘may not even be a free person’ by 2020

By CNN. President Donald Trump might be in jail by the time Election Day comes around, Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren said on her first full day of campaigning as a declared presidential candidate.

“By the time we get to 2020, Donald Trump may not even be President,” Warren said to voters in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, gathered at the Veterans Memorial Building. “In fact, he may not even be a free person.”

The moment marked a notable shift in tone for Warren, who has been reluctant to take on Trump directly by name since she announced her exploratory campaign on New Year’s Eve.

Warren elaborated on those comments to reporters at an event in Iowa City, pointing to the ongoing investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election by special counsel Robert Mueller. (Read more from “Warren Makes Insane Comment About Trump Being Jailed” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Poll: Trump Beats Kamala Harris Head-To-Head but Should Worry About Joe Biden

In a new 2020 general election survey by Optimus Consulting, President Donald Trump narrowly leads Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., the 2020 candidate who wants to eliminate private health insurance in America.

The poll of likely voters finds Trump beats Harris in a head-to-head matchup by one point, 45 percent for Trump and 44 percent for Harris, with 12 percent undecided. The caveat here: Polls this early won’t tell us much about where things will stand in a year and a half, when the presidential election kicks into high gear. What it does tell us is that even with President Trump’s favorability under water, 42 percent favorable to 51 percent unfavorable, the Democrats need to run a sane candidate to beat him soundly.

The same poll found that in a head-to-head matchup between Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden, Biden beats Trump 50 percent to 43 percent, with only 7 percent undecided. A leftist extremist like Harris will make it a close election. But someone who is not an out-of-the-closet socialist like Biden should make Trump very worried.

Lastly, if former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz runs for president as an independent, it looks like he’ll hurt the Democrats. Here is a series of three-way matchups between Trump, Schultz, and different Democratic candidates:

Joe Biden 45%, Donald Trump 41%, Howard Schultz 6%, undecided 8%

Donald Trump 42%, Kamala Harris 38%, Howard Schultz 7%, undecided 13%

Donald Trump 42%, Elizabeth Warren 39%, Howard Schultz 8%, undecided 11%

Donald Trump 42%, Beto O’Rourke 33%, Howard Schultz 9%, undecided 16%

Again, as with all polling, this is not a prediction of election results, and it is not a definitive statement on who is “winning” the 2020 presidential campaign. This is a snapshot of where things stand in February 2019, with at least a year before voters really start paying attention. What that snapshot tells us is that Democrats need to run a moderate candidate to have a good chance to beat Trump, because a far-Left candidate will make it a closer race and invite a third-party spoiler. (For more from the author of “Poll: Trump Beats Kamala Harris Head-To-Head but Should Worry About Joe Biden” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Howard Schultz’s Potential 2020 Run Is a Canary in a Coal Mine for Democrats

Socialist-leaning Democrats are promoting a new wave of wealth redistribution tax schemes that are setting the stage to tear the Democrat Party apart. The drive to loot and demonize wealth creators runs the risk of alienating pro-capitalism Democrats and forcing them to abandon the party.

The decision by former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz to contemplate running for president in 2020 as an independent is a canary in a coal mine for Democrats. Schultz is a progressive, but he believes in capitalism because it helped him live the American dream, going from a housing project in Brooklyn to billionaire.

The Democrats’ move to the socialist Left, ignited by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., during the 2016 presidential campaign, is gaining steam in 2019. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who recently established a 2020 presidential exploratory committee, is proposing a wealth tax. Warren wants a two percent annual tax on assets that exceed $50 million and a three percent tax for households with more than $1 billion in assets. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez D-N.Y., has another idea. She feels high-income earners who make more than $10 million should be taxed at a 70 percent rate.

Limiting higher taxes to very high-income earners or the very wealthy makes for a clever political scheme. It’s far easier to sway the masses to support the tax measures by narrowing the focus on a small and unsympathetic base of the very wealthy. According to the Washington Post, “16,000 Americans earned more than $10 million each,” and that represents “fewer than 0.05 percent of all U.S. households.”

Similarly, the wealth tax, or, as Sen. Warren calls it, the “Ultra-Millionaire Tax,” targets 75,000 families, meaning less than 0.1 percent of U.S. households, based on an analysis of Warren’s advisers, economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman of the University of California, Berkeley.

Based on public opinion surveys, a significant percent of the public are willing to take from the ultra-rich. A Morning Consults/Politico poll reported 61 percent of registered voters backed the Warren type of wealth tax, while only 45 percent favored the Ocasio-Cortez tax idea. Warren’s tax plan cuts across party lines, with 50 percent of Republicans and 56 percent of independents supporting her “Ultra-Millionaire Tax.” Almost three quarters of Democrats supported the tax.

A Fox News poll of registered voters on Ocasio-Cortez’s idea centered on very high-income earners also found broad-based political support. Seventy percent of those polled supported the tax, and the breakdown along political parties also showed significant support, with a whopping 85 percent of Democrats and a majority of Republicans at 54 percent. Taken together, the polls show that taxing the very wealthy is getting bipartisan backing, but the support among Democrats is overwhelming.

In political terms, the soak-the-rich mentality is so keen in the socialistic wing that they are pushing out the very wealthy from the Democrat Party.

A possible run for president by Schultz is a case in point. Schultz made it very clear that the tax-the-very-wealthy agenda was the motivating force behind his decision to consider runnning as an independent. During an interview on CNBC, Schultz said he respects the Democrat Party but that taxing at the 70 percent level, Ocasio-Cortez’s rate idea, is unacceptable.

Ocasio-Cortez hit back at Schultz on Twitter, essentially saying that billionaires should not jump to the top of the political ladder and run for president but need to start at the bottom rung.

Schultz was also criticized by Warren after he called her tax plan “ridiculous.” Warren responded on Twitter, “What’s ‘ridiculous’ is billionaires who think they can buy the presidency to keep the system rigged for themselves while opportunity slips away for everyone else.”

Schultz also fears that Warren’s idea is the first step toward socialism.

The left-wing media also joined in the bash-the-billionaire game. Mika Brzezinski, co-host of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” embarrassed Schultz because he didn’t know the cost of a box of Cheerios — a clear cheap-shot question aimed at making him look out of touch with Americans.

These high-tax ideas are also sending a powerful message to other Democrat CEOs in corporate America and liberals on Wall Street. It’s only a matter of time before the socialist Democrats initiate an attack on billionaire and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is also considering a 2020 run for president.

The Democrat Party the very rich helped create is about to eat its own. (For more from the author of “Howard Schultz’s Potential 2020 Run Is a Canary in a Coal Mine for Democrats” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Dem, Who Groped High School Friend Without Her Consent, Is Running for President

Well, mark this under not shocking. Those close to Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) said they were told by him that he was running for president. This was expected. The New Jersey Democrat planned to make it official during Black History Month, which starts today. This morning, as Leah noted, Booker formally announced that he was running. So, here’s to you, roamin’ hands Spartacus…I’ll get to that in a second. Yesterday, there was a lot of buzz that news of Bookers’ 2020 run would be coming soon (via The Hill):

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) on Thursday began calling members of Congress informing them he is running for president and is quietly making overtures to members for support, three congressional sources told The Hill.

“Yes, he is reaching out to members for their support,” said a former Democratic aide with direct knowledge of Booker’s intentions. “He’s going to do it during Black History Month,” which starts on Friday.

Now, Bernie Sanders is looking to mount another White House run, but he’s being criticized for how his 2016 campaign operated concerning the human resources department. It was reportedly a den of sexism and sexual harassment. For Booker, well, he straight up admitted to groping a high school friend without her consent. He detailed it in his school’s newspaper.

This story was unearthed during the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation hearings, where Democrats put on a great show of theatrics, smearing a qualified candidate for no other reason other than they didn’t like Kavanaugh or Trump for nominating him. It was a character assassination, but in the end, Kavanaugh persisted. (Read more from “Dem, Who Groped High School Friend Without Her Consent, Is Running for President” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Killer Kamala: Her Single-Payer Health Care Plan Would Slash Over a Million Jobs, Reveals EXTREME Idea for Gun Control Legislation

By Townhall. Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) is already gunning to be the candidate for the far left in the 2020 primaries. Her agenda calls for nearly $3 trillion in tax hikes, along with the single-payer health care. She made quite the announcement last night during a town hall event with CNN’s Jake Tapper. She wants to get rid of private health insurance. So, we’re nowhere near the Iowa Caucuses, and the far left is already working hard to give Middle America sticker shock for their trash economic agenda. . .To top it all off, Harris’ health care plan would nix over a million jobs (via NTK Network):

According to AHIP, which is a political advocacy and trade association for health insurance companies, Harris’s proposal would cost more than 1.4 million Americans their jobs. That’s according to AHIP’s 2017 report, which tracks those who were employed directly and indirectly by America’s private health insurance industry. . .

That’s over 1,420,000 Americans who could possibly lose their jobs because of Harris Medicare for all proposal. It’s not yet clear how many jobs Harris’s plan would create in a government-run system like Medicare For All.

(Read more from “Killer Kamala: Her Single-Payer Health Care Plan Would Slash Over a Million Jobs” HERE)

________________________________________________

Kamala Harris has an extreme idea to get gun control legislation passed

By AOL. While fielding a question about gun violence during a CNN Town Hall appearance, presidential hopeful Senator Kamala Harris called out Congress for the lack of gun control legislation.

And she even suggested “harsh” means to encourage Congress to introduce a new bill.Harris started her discussion about gun reform by saying: “You can be in favor of the second amendment and also understand that there is no reason in a civil society that we have assault weapons around communities that can kill babies and police officers.” . . .

Senator Harris became even more impassioned while discussing the inaction by congress following the 2012 Sandy Hook elementary school shooting that took the lives of 20 children between the ages 6 and 7.

She said: “I think somebody should have required all those members of Congress to go in a room, in a locked room, no press, nobody else, and look at the autopsy photographs of those babies. And then you vote your conscience.” . . .

While there was not a direct response to Senator Harris’s statements, in 2018 the National Rifle Association’s CEO Wayne LaPierre suggested armed guards instead of gun control to curb the problem, saying: “Evil walks among us, and God help us if we don’t harden our schools and protect our kids.” (Read more from “Kamala Harris has an extreme idea to get gun control legislation passed” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Public Feud Between Starbucks’ Schultz and Elizabeth Warren Escalates Quickly

With the announcement by former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz Sunday that he’s strongly considering running for president as an independent because both parties have devolved into myopic and destructive “revenge politics,” his fellow liberals have turned on him for fear that he might end up getting Trump re-elected — all because he’s an “egotistical billionaire a**hole!”

And it’s not only the radical left activists and Democratic operatives shouting out in crowds or complaining behind the scenes about Schultz toying with a presidential run, some big names have begun to speak out against his potential independent run, among them fellow billionaire Michael Bloomberg. Another public figure on the left who is clearly not excited about a Schultz independent candidacy is the first Democrat to officially declare her own intentions to run: Sen. Elizabeth Warren (MA).

In less than two days, potential candidate Schultz vs. candidate Warren has already gone nuclear. Speaking with NPR Tuesday, Schultz opened fire on Warren’s “ridiculous” proposal to impose brand new taxes on capital assets of the wealthy.

“When I see Elizabeth Warren come out with a ridiculous plan of taxing wealthy people a surtax of 2 percent because it makes a good headline, or sends out a tweet, when she knows for a fact that is not something that’s ever going to be passed, this is what’s wrong,” Schultz told NPR in an interview. “You can’t just attack these things in a punitive way by punishing people.”

Warren has since fired back. Asked by Talking Points Memo if she is worried that Schultz is going to screw up the Democrats’ plans to take out Trump in 2020, the senator went to her standard class warfare rhetoric. “We have a billionaire who says he wants to jump into the race and the first issue he’s raised is ‘no new taxes on billionaires.’ Let’s see where that goes,” she told the outlet. (Read more from “Public Feud Between Starbucks’ Schultz and Elizabeth Warren Escalates Quickly” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE