Posts

BOMBSHELL: The New York Times Dispels 3-Year-Long Accusation That Trump Bribed Fla. AG Bondi

The mainstream media has been breathlessly running headlines like this one from The Chicago Times, “Trump signed improper charity check supporting Florida attorney general,” alleging that Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump bribed Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi (another Republican) in order to avoid prosecution. For three years now, zealous reporters have tried to find a smoking gun revealing impropriety in Trump’s campaign donation.

Now The New York Times says there’s almost certainly no smoking gun to find.

A Matter of Days

The US Supreme Court recently held in the landmark public corruption case, McDonnell v. U.S., that bribery requires that the person giving the donation get something for it. According to the Federal Code (18 U.S. Code § 201), not only must something of value have been offered to a public official, but it must be shown to have influenced that public official’s behavior for the contributor’s benefit.

The train of events began when several attorneys general filed complaints against Trump a few years ago, claiming that he fraudulently marketed Trump University’s real estate and wealth-building seminars. On September 13, 2013, a Florida newspaper published the story that Bondi’s office was investigating Trump and might join the other attorneys general in a suit.

Four days after that, Bondi’s PAC received $25,000 from Trump. (Several months later, Trump threw a $3,000 a plate fundraiser for her at Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach and she’s become a prominent supporter.)

Complaints were filed with local authorities and the FBI’s public corruption unit alleging bribery to stop Bondi’s office from investigating him too. But after Bondi’s office released 8,000 documents in response to a public records request, even The New York Times admitted that the check had been written and signed four days before the story broke in the media that Bondi’s office was considering investigating Trump University.

Additionally, the Times reports about Trump’s donations in Florida that “he has contributed at least $375,000 to state and federal candidates and political committees here since 1995, accounting for 19 percent of the roughly $2 million he has given to campaigns nationwide, other than his own.” Bondi said she personally solicited the donation from Trump, who had already contributed $500 to her campaign in July.

The Times isn’t giving Trump a clean bill of health, however. The press had reported in 2010 that “the attorneys general of Florida and Texas had gotten complaints from Trump University students. “His contribution, therefore, could have been a pre-emptive investment to discourage Ms. Bondi from joining the New York case.”

No Evidence of Bribery

In the article , the Times said it could find no evidence in the released records that Bondi herself even was aware of the initial review being done by her office. This was not unusual. Most of the complaints came to her predecessor, who said he had not known about them, the Times reported, as did his two top deputies and others in the consumer protection division.

In fact, the chief of the consumer protection section wrote in an internal email in 2011 that the office was holding off on any investigation of Trump University. When Mark Hamilton, a lawyer in the consumer protection division, heard about the media outcry in 2013, he advised the office that any lawsuit filed by the New York Attorney General against Trump University would apply to Floridians, so there was no need for the Florida AG to duplicate the work.

Now, Trump did make a mistake in writing the check from his charitable organization, not his personal account, which he blamed on a staff clerical error, and reimbursed his charity with $25,000 in personal funds. He also paid a $2,500 fine to the IRS over the mistake.

Mac Stipanovich, who the Times describes as “a longtime Florida Republican strategist and lobbyist who disdains Mr. Trump and has never worked with Ms. Bondi,” observed, “The optics are terrible even though there is not a shred of evidence that Pam Bondi solicited a bribe or that Donald Trump provided one.”

Although the Times has (mostly) cleared Trump, most of the rest of the mainstream news outlets are still claiming he behaved improperly and they are exaggerating the seriousness of the check confusion. Fortunately for Trump, the top newspaper in the country, which is left-leaning, has told a different story. (For more from the author of “BOMBSHELL: The New York Times Dispels 3-Year-Long Accusation That Trump Bribed Fla. AG Bondi” please click HERE)

Watch a recent interview with the author below:

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Makes YUUUGE Pro-Life Commitment

By Bryan Fischer. Voters who have wondered where Donald Trump stands on the abortion issue need wonder no longer.

Trump today made perhaps the most pronounced pro-life move a presidential nominee has ever made by declaring a specific pro-life platform for his presidency and putting a prominent and unapologetic pro-life leader in charge of his pro-life coalition . . .

Here are [some of] the specific things he pledges to do if elected president:

Nominating pro-life justices to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Signing into law the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would end painful late-term abortions nationwide.

(Read more from “Trump Makes YUUUGE Pro-Life Commitment” HERE)

_____________________________________

Donald Trump Calls for Permanently Banning Taxpayer Funding of Abortions

By Steven Ertelt. Donald Trump today has issued a call to make permanent the Hyde Amendment that bans almost all federal taxpayer funding of abortions and is credited with saving the lives of over 1 million Americans from abortion. Trump-‘s call comes as Hillary Clinton is campaigning in reversing Hyde and forcing Americans to fund free abortions for women with their tax dollars.

Every year, Congress is forced to fight the battle to protect Americans from being forced to pay for abortions with their tax dollars. Democrats annually fight the pro-life budget provision and hope they can eventually reverse it should they take control of both the White House and Congress.

That has led to pro-life groups calling to the adoption of a permanent law putting Hyde in place long-term and making it more difficult for pro-abortion forces to reverse. Today, Trump announced his support for such a law.

The call for banning taxpayer funding of abortions comes in a new letter from Trump. Trump commits to a new policy: “Making the Hyde Amendment permanent law to protect taxpayers from having to pay for abortions.” (Read more from “Donald Trump Calls for Permanently Banning Taxpayer Funding of Abortions” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Critics See Potential for Violence in Trump’s Call to Disarm Clinton Bodyguards

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump ruffled a few feathers, including those of former congresswoman and shooting survivor Gabrielle Giffords, when he pointed out what he perceived to be rival Hillary Clinton’s hypocrisy on Second Amendment issues.

Giffords, who was a Democratic U.S. representative from Arizona when a would-be assassin shot her in the head, took exception to the rhetoric Trump used during a speech in Miami this week.

After insisting Clinton wants to dismantle the constitutional right to bear arms, Trump suggested the former first lady’s security guards should get rid of their guns first.

“They should disarm,” he told a crowd of supporters. “Right? I think they should disarm immediately. Take their guns away. She doesn’t want guns … let’s see what happens to her.”

He went on to assert the result would be “very dangerous.”

Trump made a similar point the same day on Twitter.

Along with her husband, astronaut Mark Kelly, Giffords put public pressure on the brash billionaire to apologize.

In a statement following Friday’s speech, the couple described Trump as “dangerously unfit” to serve as president, citing his comments about Clinton’s bodyguards as the latest evidence.

The joint statement noted Trump’s previous acknowledgement that he regrets some of his more incendiary rhetoric, expressing a desire he will “immediately renounce these comments, apologize to Hillary Clinton, and acknowledge that once again he has gone dangerously too far.”

Other public figures joined the couple in their dismay over the statement.

Giffords and Kelly, along with other Trump critics, implied the statements could prompt an unstable supporter to attempt violence against Clinton.

“They may provide inspiration or permission for those bent on bloodshed,” the statement concluded.

In the online debate that ensued over Trump’s campaign remarks, numerous comments expressed a much different interpretation.

The Giffords-Kelly statement was not the only official denouncement of its kind. In a statement from campaign manager Robby Mook, the Clinton campaign not only criticized Trump’s comments but alleged the GOP nominee “has a pattern of inciting people to violence.” (For more from the author of “Critics See Potential for Violence in Trump’s Call to Disarm Clinton Bodyguards” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Media Upset With Trump’s Honesty Around NY Bombing

Yesterday a bomb went off in the Chelsea section of New York City, after an earlier bomb went off in Seaside, New Jersey. Donald Trump announced the bombing at his next scheduled event. The media went into a frenzy because Trump called a bombing a bombing before city officials confirmed.

They even asked Hillary Clinton about Trump’s remarks right after she called the incident a bombing herself on her campaign plane.

It is not irresponsible to call a bombing a bombing. That is in fact what happened and what social media networks were calling it. What the media don’t realize is that Americans are sick and tired of being lied to.

Almost contemporaneously to Trump calling it a bombing, the mayor of New York, Bill DeBlasio, was quick to rule out terrorism even before authorities had conducted a full investigation. You don’t see Clinton attacking him. No, she’s talking about how she’s in contact with him.

So let’s recap the past 24 hours: a bombing at a Marine Corps 5K in Seaside, New Jersey; a bombing in the Chelsea area of New York City; the discovery of a secondary Al-Qaeda-style pressure cooker bomb in NYC; and a jihadist stabbing spree at a mall in St. Cloud, Minnesota. But of course the media aren’t incredulous at DeBlasio calling the bombing “intentional” but not terrorism.

Is there any wonder why Trump has taken a lead in the presidential race? People are hungering for their leaders to speak the truth about terrorism, not to continue to obfuscate and lie. (For more from the author of “Media Upset With Trump’s Honesty Around NY Bombing” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Just Had a Monster Polling Day

The first wave of polling after Hillary Clinton’s literal collapse over the weekend has started to be released. It’s a Trump rout. In the 11 polls released today, Trump leads seven and tied in two. Voters are reacting to their gut instincts after Clinton was caught lying about her health and giving Trump higher levels of support.

Here’s a quick snapshot of the recent polling as aggregated by RealClearPolitics.

big-polling-day-favors-trump

In that polling are some state jumps. The most significant being in Ohio and Iowa. Polls in both of those states have shown large gains for Trump versus prior polling.

The words “SHOCK POLL” are probably the most overused in the political commentary business. But what just got released in Iowa fits that bill. A Monmouth poll released today in Iowa shows Trump with an eight-point lead. This is a jump from its previous poll. The poll was taken from Monday, September 12 to Wednesday, September 14, 2016.

There have been three polls released in Ohio over the past two days. Trump leads in all of them. All of them were taken, at least in part, after Hillary’s collapse over the weekend. CNN/ORC and Bloomberg both show Trump with a five-point lead, and Suffolk shows the lead at three points. Clinton leads in only one poll of the state taken in September. That CBS/YouGov poll is looking more and more like an outlier.

Hillary Clinton’s comments calling half of Trump’s supporter “deplorables,” and her being caught lying about her health have combined to move the needle in Trump’s favor. What seemed like a sure thing for a Clinton win just three short weeks ago is now a competitive race. If the election were held today, it is anyone’s guess who would win. (For more from the author of “Trump Just Had a Monster Polling Day” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Contends Faith in God Key to Reuniting Country, Restoring Greatness

Donald Trump received a standing ovation coming and going at the Values Voter Summit in Washington, D.C., on Friday.

The theme of Trump’s speech was the centrality faith must play if America is to reclaim its heritage of greatness.

Academy Award winning actor Jon Voight introduced the candidate saying, “If God allows truth to be said and heard, we will see Donald Trump as the next president of the United States of America. He will lift the dark cloud that hovers over us now.”

“Our media culture often mocks and demeans people of faith,” Trump observed. “Your values of love, charity and faith built this nation.”

He promised, “In a Trump administration, our Christian heritage will be respected like never before. That includes religious liberty.”

Trump stated that faith in God has “the power to heal, the power to unite, the power to make all of us live better lives.”

“Our faith in God will lead us back to unity,” he believes.

A pledge that the GOP nominee made that particularly appealed to the Values Voter crowd was to repeal the so-called Johnson Amendment, which threatens churches and religious organizations with the loss of their tax exempt status if they take positions regarding political candidates.

Trump promised repealing the Johnson Amendment, which was passed in the 1950s, would be easy.

He joked that the repeal of the measure is “the only way I’m getting to heaven.”

Another issue that really resonated with the summit attendees was his commitment to support school choice.

“As your president, I will be the biggest cheerleader for school choice you’ve ever seen,” the candidate stated.

“School choice also means parents can home-school their children,” he said, which generated resounding applause.

Trump sees school choice as central to his new civil rights agenda, which he has proposed to help lift minorities out of poverty.

He said school choice is clearly the right thing to do, and there is one reason Hillary Clinton opposes it: “She is controlled like a puppet by special interests.”

Trump also addressed the future of the United States Supreme Court, noting that the next president will not only be replacing the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat, but as many as four others.

He contended if, “You pick the wrong people [for the high court] you won’t recognize your country.”

The candidate argued the stakes could not be higher: “It will determine whether we remain a constitutional republic.”

Trump closed reiterating that he believes the key to uniting a divided America is a renewal of faith, which recognizes that we are all God’s children, made in His image.

He stated, “Together we will make America believe again, we will make America united again, and we will make America great again.” (For more from the author of “Trump Contends Faith in God Key to Reuniting Country, Restoring Greatness” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

HILLARY’S ROMNEY MOMENT: More Than 47% of Trump Supporters Are Scum, According to Your Abuela

Hillary Clinton is world-renowned as a “habitual and serial liar”. She’s also an exteremely arrogant woman who will continue Barack Obama’s divisive and hateful behavior, only she won’t be as charming about it. She appears nasty and aloof because that is who she is. And this latest video confirms it.

The sad thing is half the country is just fine with this. Hillary could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and it wouldn’t matter.

Her arrogance is why she had a personal server and continues to lie about it. The American people are beneath her.

At a New York fundraiser, she demonized “half” of Trump’s supporters as “baskets of deplorables” who are “racists, sexists, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it”. The rest are just “baskets” of pathetic people who think “the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them.”

She called Trump followers “irredeemable”.

How dare she characterize people that way — half are haters and the other half are childlike idiots That is so insulting and condescending, words hardly can describe it. She has given it new meaning.

The only thing that is deplorable is her arrogance. It’s breathtaking.

We no longer have immigration, we have a welcomed invasion of illegal immigrants and unvetted asylum seekers but if we complain, we’re xenophobes and racists. If we want a private bathroom, we’re homophobes, and if we say a thing about a woman, we’re sexists. Expect to hear a lot of that last accusation if she wins the presidency.

She tried to walk it back today, saying she was “grossly generalistic”. You simply can’t take something like that back.

Look at this next brief clip. The first is Hillary behaving incredibly arrogant towards a congressman. She failed to properly supervise her embassies, particularly a most endangered one and she’s arrogant about it. In the next, she throws her support behind Soros’s anti-police, deceitful and violent hate group, Black Lives Matter – calls them “dignified”.

This is “deplorable” for traditional Americans who are being disposed and replaced. (For more from the author of “HILLARY’S ROMNEY MOMENT: More Than 47% of Trump Supporters Are Scum, According to Your Abuela” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Card? Republican Voter Registration a Bright Spot for Campaign

For all the attention on battleground polls giving Hillary Clinton the edge, Donald Trump enjoys at least one electoral advantage in his uphill climb to the White House: Republicans are outpacing Democrats in registering new voters in key states.

A review of registration figures shows that in the swing states that sign up voters by party, Republicans are seeing a significantly bigger boost since 2012. In states like Florida and Pennsylvania, the party has added tens of thousands of voters to the rolls at a time when Democrats have seen their base shrink.

“The numbers [in those states] … are a huge shift from what we’ve seen in 2012,” Republican National Committee spokeswoman Lindsay Walters said.

The surge doesn’t change the fact that Clinton leads, if only by a thin margin, in most battleground state polls, which presumably reflect the current voter make-up.

Fox News ratings show Clinton maintains the advantage in the Electoral College, while a Washington Post survey this week of registered voters in all 50 states reflects a similar dynamic. And in big swing states ranging from Florida to North Carolina to Pennsylvania, there are still more registered Democrats than Republicans. (Read more from “Trump Card? Republican Voter Registration a Bright Spot for Campaign” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump’s New Military Plan Will Gut One of the Tea Party’s Biggest Achievements

Donald Trump isn’t done killing the Tea Party yet. Today, he’s scheduled to propose repealing one of its signature achievements.

Trump’s advisors says he will propose ending the “sequester” for the military — one of the rare budget reforms signed into law by President Obama, born out of the debate over the 2011 debt ceiling increase.

Meaning, Trump’s — the self-described “King of Debt” — big plan for the military is more debt for America.

A quick trip down memory lane reminds that sequestration was brought to fruition largely by Tea Party-fueled members of Congress elected in the 2010 midterm wave. Sent to Washington by voters who were angry over the skyrocketing debt, those new members demanded more responsible spending. And President Obama’s 2011 request to increase the debt ceiling — the legal spending limit for the government — gave them the perfect opportunity.

The Democrats, as always, were resistant to any reforms. They said anyone who opposed the debt increase, for any reason at all, was threatening the “full faith and credit” of the United States government. They said the president deserved a no-questions asked, no-strings attached debt increase. Then, they said they would only be willing to talk if large tax increases were included in the deal.

Ultimately, a package of spending cuts was agreed upon in exchange for the debt ceiling increase that did not include any tax increases. The deal stipulated that Washington accept a series of spending cuts over the next 10 years in exchange for giving President Obama a $400 billion debt increase in 2011.

It wasn’t perfect because it a typical DC deal: spending, save later. But it was something.

The Heritage Foundation’s Steve Moore — now an enthusiastic Trump supporter — said the sequester “shrunk the size of government more effectively than any budget took in a generation” and that it “put an electric fence around the Left’s grand spending ambitions.”

Since it was enacted, efforts have been underway to undo the defense cuts by hawkish Republicans such as Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. (F, 30%) and John McCain, R-Ariz. (F, 34%). And, Trump is offering to turn off the electric fence for them.

“I will ask Congress to eliminate the sequester and immediately re-invest in our military,” he told an audience in Greenville, North Carolina yesterday. Aides say he will offer more details today in an upcoming military-focused speech at the Union League in Philadelphia.

That’s a change for Trump, who once praised the sequester in 2013 and called for even deeper cuts. A change that makes him sound a lot more like Hillary Clinton than a conservative.

“We cannot impose arbitrary limits on something as important as our military,” Clinton said at the American Legion in Cincinnati last week. “That makes no sense at all. The sequester makes our country less secure.”

So consider a debate over defense spending off the table for presidential debates. Both of them are in favor of nixing that particular Tea Party victory. (For more from the author of “Trump’s New Military Plan Will Gut One of the Tea Party’s Biggest Achievements” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Why I Applaud Trump’s Plan to Show Teachers the Door

There are not too many areas of policy on which Donald Trump and I agree. One of the few exceptions is on the topic of education policy, where Trump has rightly condemned the Department of Education as wasteful, meddlesome, and counterproductive. While the presidential candidate has waffled back and forth on whether he would eliminate the department outright or drastically scale it back, it’s clear that he has no love for the unconstitutional federal education bureaucracy.

Predictably, progressive groups are horrified at Trump’s proposal, and are scrambling to pull at the heartstrings of Americans, emotionally manipulating them into opposing this eminently sensible proposal. In this vein, the Center for American Progress (CAP) has released a policy paper claiming that eliminating the Department of Education (DoEd) would destroy jobs for nearly half a million teachers.

To which I can only respond: Good!

It’s time to punch a hole in this myth that teachers are some kind of noble, magical unicorns selflessly molding young minds out of the goodness of their hearts. While there are many good teachers who honestly want to help children learn, we need to get over this idea that every teacher is infinitely valuable simply by virtue of their chosen profession. Teaching is a job like any other, but unlike most other jobs, it’s one that has been badly corrupted by politics and government to the point where many teaching positions do more harm than good.

In particular, public school teachers have largely become glorified babysitters, tasked with crowd control, not education. And mandatory testing standards mean that many teachers are simply ”teaching to the test” rather than engaging in a genuine effort to enlighten their students. In some schools, the role of the teacher has been reduced to pressing play on a device containing a pre-recorded lesson plan. Yet these are the brave and noble souls that liberals think deserve special treatment compared to other workers.

Regarding the Department of Education itself, it’s important to note that the U.S. Constitution does not mention education as an enumerated power of the federal government, The Tenth Amendment makes explicit that anything not specifically given to the federal government is the sole province of the states, and the people. The Department of Education is therefore, by definition, illegal. Anyone who uses the argument that “we must uphold the rule of law” must likewise oppose the Department of Education, or risk falling into the fathomless abyss of hypocrisy.

Now that that’s out of the way, let’s take a pragmatic look at what the Department of Education actually does. The Department’s core function is awarding large amounts of money to state and local school systems in the form of federal grants, with inevitable strings attached that hamstring localities’ ability to set their own curricula, standards, or procedures. The massively unpopular Common Core standards are a prime example of the kind of mischief the DoEd gets up to, as states were lured into the restrictive standards by massive amounts of funding through the Race to the Top program, only to discover that any semblance of flexibility was the cost of the grants.

Federal control over local schools makes no sense, as bureaucrats in Washington have no idea what is needed to educate students in Alaska, Alabama, or Maine. Additionally, the money handed out by the DoEd has not resulted in any measurable improvement in education outcomes over the forty or so years of its existence.

If, as CAP alleges, scaling back teachers and funding will be catastrophic for student outcomes, why is it that we have seen absolutely no benefit from the steady increase of both these variables over the past several decades? This is how government operates; it endlessly piles up spending and staff that were never necessary to begin with, and then screams that disaster will occur if they are removed.

This brings us back to teachers. At this point, most people are familiar with teachers’ unions and how they prevent bad teachers from being fired. We’ve all heard stories about hopelessly incompetent or even criminal teachers staying on staff because of their union’s political power. A business that is unable to get rid of its worst employees is always doomed to failure, unless, of course, it is being propped up by endless revenue streams courtesy of the American taxpayer, as public school are. These people don’t care about students; they care about lining their own pockets.

This diversion of funds from the private sector, where people spend money on things they care about, and where they try to find good value for their dollars, to politically favored groups like teachers who bear no responsibility for doing a good, or even acceptable job, is a tremendous waste, not just of money, but of young minds as well. I have no doubt that many of these teachers who are propped up by funding from the DoEd would be much more valuable to society in other roles, where their worth is determined by the services they provide to the public, not the lobbying of special interests.

In summary, children in public schools, especially those under the thumb of the federal government, are not taught, they are controlled. They are not encouraged, they are discouraged. They are told what to think, not how to think. They are brainwashed to obey authority without question, and punished when they dare to think differently. In my view, the fewer people we have engaging in such irresponsible treatment of our children, the better. (For more from the author of “Why I Applaud Trump’s Plan to Show Teachers the Door” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.