Posts

SHE THINKS AMERICANS ARE VERY, VERY STUPID: Hillary Continues Shrieking Her ‘No Classified Emails’ Lies

During Monday’s Fox News town hall, Hillary Clinton repeated her outrageous claims that her private email server contained no classified material. Perhaps she could inform the FBI, the State Department, and various Inspectors General, which have designated more than 2,000 emails as classified, including 104 sent by Clinton herself, and 22 with a TOP SECRET designation.

During the town hall, Secretary Clinton faced a series of withering questions about her private email server. Among them was a quote from last year, in which Clinton claimed her private server contained no classified material.

On March 10, 2015, Secretary Clinton held a press conference at the United Nations in which she claimed that her private server contained no classified material.

CLINTON: “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material.

Clinton reiterated that outrageously false claim again today. But just last week, it was revealed Clinton’s email contained more than 2,000 classified emails, including 104 emails authored and sent by Clinton herself.

How stupid does Clinton think Americans are?

The answer, it would seem, very.

In fact, the American people have known for months that her private server contained classified material. With her willingness to tell baldface lies, it’s no wonder majorities of voters in primary states say they wouldn’t trust Clinton as far as they could throw her. (For more from the author of “SHE THINKS AMERICANS ARE VERY, VERY STUPID: Hillary Continues Shrieking Her ‘No Classified Emails’ Lies” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Record Immigration Will Buoy Hillary

Last October, I analyzed how record immigration is creating a permanent Democrat majority. Today, my friend Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies, published an insightful breakdown of immigration numbers from the most recent Census data, which further portends electoral doom for conservatives.

Immigration, like most other things in life, is good in moderation. That has always been our guiding principle, even during the most expansionist periods of our history — a point I plan to elaborate on further in my upcoming book. What is happening today however, the mass influx of immigrants predominantly from third world countries, is something we’ve never seen in our nation’s history.

As a way of quantifying the magnitude of this great wave of immigration, Camarota tallied the Census data of the immigrant population and their American-born children under the age of 18. Focusing just on the raw number of immigrants often overlooks the broader effect of mass migration, especially resulting from immigrants with high birth rates. He found that there are now 61 million immigrants living in America, including those minor children. Camarota’s best estimate is that 15.7 million of them are illegal immigrants and minor children born in the U.S. to at least one illegal immigrant parent.

This is unprecedented in our history. As late as 1970, just 13.5 million immigrants (including their minor children) were living here, representing just 6.6% of the population. Now immigrants and their children comprise 19% of our population.

Moreover, in some individual states, that number is much higher. Here are the states where the foreign born and their minor children comprise more than 20% of their respective population:

California – 37.4%

New Jersey – 30.4%

Nevada – 28.2%

New York – 27.5%

Florida – 25.3%

Texas – 25%

Connecticut – 24.4%

Maryland – 22.3%

Hawaii – 21.8%

Arizona – 21.3%

Massachusetts – 21%

Rhode Island – 20.8%

Illinois – 20.3%

Washington – 20.3%

Think about it: there are 14 states where more than one in five individual residents is either an immigrant or a minor child of an immigrant. More than one in three Californians fit this description! As I noted in my October analysis, this volume of immigration, particularly from the third world, is so precipitous there is no way for many of these people to assimilate into our political values. This is why so many of these states have turned hopelessly blue. It’s also why so many former red states are becoming purple or even light blue.

In states like Nevada, North Carolina, and Georgia, immigrants and their minor children have grown by 3,000% since 1970! Virginia’s immigrant family population has grown by 1,150%. Is there any wonder it’s so hard to win these states?

Unfortunately for conservatives, the trajectory is set to explode. By 2065, immigrants and their children will comprise 36% of the entire U.S. population.

Here is what Thomas Jefferson warned in 1780 with regards to mass migration:

They will bring with them the principles of the governments they leave, imbibed in their early youth; or, if able to throw them off, it will be in exchange for an unbounded licentiousness, passing, as is usual, from one extreme to another. It would be a miracle were they to stop precisely at the point of temperate liberty. These principles, with their language, they will transmit to their children. In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation. They will infuse into it their spirit, warp and bias its direction, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass. [Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 9]

Declaring love and admiration for immigrants in an abstract sense is not public policy. Of course we welcome immigrants. We always have. But how many and over what period of time? The devil is in the details, and in this case the details are the devil our founders warned about 230 years ago.

The Democrats understand exactly what they are doing. This is why someone as unappealing and corrupt as Hillary Clinton can still remain competitive in a general election. Unfortunately, the other party is merely an exercise in self-immolation. (For more from the author of “Record Immigration Will Buoy Hillary” please click HERE)

Watch a recent interview with the author below:

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Islamic NATO Commander? In Email to Hillary, He Used Muslim Religious Term

James Stavridis, who led the 2011 intervention in Libya as NATO’s 16th Supreme Allied Commander, used unusual terminology to express his hope that the United Arab Emirates would step up its involvement in the Libya war.

In an email forwarded to Hillary Clinton’s private server, Stavridis discussed a mission change that would put U.S. bombs on UAE aircraft for strikes in Libya.

“As to how long … inshallah, soon,” wrote Stravridis, a retired U.S. Navy admiral . . .

Stravridis was replying to an email sent from one of Clinton’s top deputies, Jake Sullivan, to Ivo H. Daalder, the U.S. Permanent Representative on the NATO Council.

“Any way to get the UAE suggestion that they will contribute aircraft for strike missions firmed up and announced by the SYG?” Sullivan asked. (Read more from “Islamic NATO Commander? In Email to Hillary, He Used Muslim Religious Term” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

BOOM: Huge New Developments in Clinton Email Scandal

Two extremely significant stories broke [recently] in The Washington Post and The New York Times regarding the FBI’s investigation into the Hillary Clinton email scandal. The deep-fat fryer is just heating up. Both stories are excerpted below, but here are the key new pieces of information:

• Bryan Pagliano, the IT employee who set up Clinton’s server and pled the 5th to avoid cooperating with investigators was granted immunity for cooperating.

• What the Clinton campaign has called a “security review,” but according to both reports, the FBI investigation has become criminal in nature. One official told The Post “There was wrongdoing.”

• According to The Times, “F.B.I. agents have sought to compare electronic timestamps on classified sources to figure out whether the aides reviewed the sources and then retyped the information into emails that were sent or forwarded to Mrs. Clinton’s private server.”

• The latter report said Clinton and her aides could be interviewed by the FBI “within weeks”

IN CLINTON EMAIL INVESTIGATION, JUSTICE DEPARTMENT GRANTS IMMUNITY TO FORMER STATE DEPARTMENT STAFFER

Washington Post, Adam Goldman, March 2, 2016

The Justice Department has granted immunity to the former State Department staffer who worked on Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email server, a sign the FBI investigation into possible criminal wrongdoing is progressing.

A senior U.S. law enforcement official said the FBI had secured the cooperation of Bryan Pagliano who worked on Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009.

As the FBI looks to wrap up its investigation in the coming months, agents will likely want to interview Clinton and her senior aides about the decision to use a private server, how it was set up, and whether any of the participants knew they were sending classified information in emails, current and former officials said… Spokesmen at the FBI and Justice Department would not discuss the investigation. Pagliano’s lawyer also declined to comment…

AS PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN UNFOLDS, SO DO INQUIRIES INTO CLINTON’S EMAILS

The New York Times, Steven Lee Myers and Matt Apuzzo, March 2, 2016

WASHINGTON —

As Hillary Clinton moves toward the Democratic presidential nomination, she faces legal hurdles from her use of a private computer server as secretary of state that could jar her campaign’s momentum in the months ahead.

Foremost among a half-dozen inquiries and legal proceedings into whether classified information was sent through Mrs. Clinton’s server is an investigation by the F.B.I., whose agents, according to one law enforcement official, could seek to question Mrs. Clinton’s closest aides and possibly the candidate herself within weeks.

It is commonplace for the F.B.I. to try to interview key figures before closing an investigation, and doing so is not an indication the bureau thinks a person broke the law. Although defense lawyers often discourage their clients from giving such interviews, Democrats fear the refusal of Mrs. Clinton or her top aides to cooperate would be ready ammunition for Donald J. Trump, the Republican front-runner…

(For more from the author of “BOOM: Huge New Developments in Clinton Email Scandal” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Justice Department Grants Immunity to Hillary Clinton’s Email Server Technician

Hillary Clinton’s email server technician is finally talking.

The Washington Post is reporting that the Department of Justice granted immunity to Bryan Pagliano in exchange for his cooperation with the FBI’s investigation into whether classified information was mishandled on Clinton’s private email server.

As one Justice Department put it to The Post: “There was wrongdoing. But was it criminal wrongdoing?”

Pagliano may hold the key to that question. The IT director on Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, Pagliano was hired as deputy chief information officer at the State Department in May 2009. Part of his job there was to manage Clinton’s server, which hosted her personal email address and was kept at her home in New York . . .

The New York Times reported Wednesday that FBI investigators have already interviewed Pagliano, who in December was reported to be the focus of the agency’s probe. The paper also reported that Clinton herself could be interviewed within weeks and that the investigation could be wrapped up by May. (Read more from “Justice Department Grants Immunity to Hillary Clinton’s Email Server Technician” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

At Least One Republican Senator May Endorse Hillary [+video]

During MSNBC’s Super Tuesday coverage, Chuck Todd said that he has heard that at least one incumbent Republican senator may endorse Hillary Clinton for president.

“I heard real, real speculation today from very informed people that at least one Republican Senate incumbent, if given the choice, might publicly endorse Hillary Clinton,” he explained. “There’s at least one that I’ve heard could end up doing that, making that choice.

(Read more from “At Least One Republican Senator May Endorse Hillary” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Obama and Clinton Reject a Future With American Oil

Saudi Arabia’s drifting dunes flow and ebb over 268 million acres of crude-filled desert, making it the oil-richest nation in the world.

America, once the richest nation in the world partly because of its own gigantic domestic oil reserves that flowed like our own rivers and lakes, is on its way to second-class status as a world power because the powers that be are choking off our new oil reserves, and letting the dollar-denominated debt flow instead.

At the core of this entire shift in power is a major change in players and ideologies leading up to our 21st century. And whether or not you think oil is the perfect fuel until a replacement can be found, or you want to see its obsolesce because of climate change, one thing is clear – An America that was once an oil leader has gone blind on oil.

Not to go all 7th grade history lesson on you, but remember that following World War II and under the tutelage of Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, Saudi Arabia clearly fell under influences of the United States. We exchanged state-of-the-art military technology and protection for oil security.

However, in a very few short years the smooth political relationship between Riyadh and Washington was beginning to frazzle. In 1965 OPEC – which was founded in Iraq, by the way, and whose headquarters since 1965 has been tucked safely away from the Middle East in Vienna (what does that tell you about what they knew was coming?) – believed it was giving away its non-renewable resource for pennies on the dollar. (Read more from “Obama and Clinton Reject a Future With American Oil” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Recently Released Hillary Emails Reveal Disturbing Ties to Muslim Brotherhood

A dispatch contained in the 1,500 pages of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails released last weekend provide insight into the level of support the U.S. was considering in 2012 for Egypt’s newly elected Muslim Brotherhood government.

On August 30, 2012, Robert D. Hormats, the under-secretary of state for economic affairs, wrote to Clinton’s then-Deputy Chief of Staff Jake Sullivan to update him on a meeting he held with Muslim Brotherhood Deputy Supreme Adviser Khairat al-Shater . . .

The email reveals Hormats and other U.S. diplomats discussed methods of cooperation with Shater, including an increase in American direct foreign investment.

Hormats wrote:

Anne Patterson, Bill Taylor, and I met with Muslim Brotherhood Deputy Supreme Guide Khairat al-Shater. He discussed broad principles of economic development based on 100 large infrastructure projects (over a billion dollars each) as part of Morsi’s Nadah (Renaissance Plan) Plan; ways of cooperating with the US to obtain support for these projects and for SMEs; and his hope for an IMF agreement and increased foreign direct investment from the US, the West, and the Arab world. He also noted that it was a priority for the GOE to build a true democratic system based on human rights and the rule of law.

(Read more from “Recently Released Hillary Emails Reveal Disturbing Ties to Muslim Brotherhood” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Watch: Hillary Caught Saying THIS About KKK Leader Back in 2010 – It Looks Terrible for Her

Despite mounting criticism for Donald Trump’s failure to disavow former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard David Duke’s support, Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton once heaped praise for late Klan leader Sen. Robert Byrd.

In a video uploaded to the State Department’s official YouTube page on June 28, 2010, Clinton commemorated late Sen. Byrd by saying, “Today our country has lost a true American original, my friend and mentor Robert C. Byrd.”

When Byrd was 24-years-old, he joined the Klan because he was worried that during World War II, he might have to fight alongside “race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.” Bryd wrote those words in 1944 to Sen. Theodore Bilbo, a staunch segregationist.

In Clinton’s commemoration of Byrd, she failed to mention the senator’s ties to the Klan, instead she claimed, “Senator Byrd was a man of surpassing eloquence and nobility. And I will remember him for many things, but most of all, for a heartfelt comment he made to me in the dark days following the attack on our country on 9/11. My state of New York was reeling and we were scrambling to provide support and relief. ‘Think of me as the third senator from New York,’ he said. And he meant it. Thanks to the leadership of Senator Byrd, who chaired the Appropriations Committee, New Yorkers and Americans got the help we needed. I will never forget his devotion and his friendship in that critical time.” (Read more from “Hillary Caught Saying THIS About KKK Leader Back in 2010 – It Looks Terrible for Her” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

State Department Just Made a Huge Claim About Clinton Email Scandal

Hillary Clinton received a small victory on Monday when the State Department announced that the Intelligence Community’s office of the inspector general “was not correct” in its initial assessment that an email she received in 2009 contained “Top Secret” information.

The email in question — which Clinton received on July 3, 2009 and discusses North Korea’s nuclear program — will be re-classified as “Secret,” according to State Department spokesman John Kirby.

He said it will be published on the agency’s website Monday evening, along with 3,800 new pages of Clinton’s emails. The release marks the 14th and final production of Clinton’s emails in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Vice News’ Jason Leopold.

“The document does not contain ‘Top Secret’ information,” Kirby told reporters Monday. “At the request of the Intelligence Community a limited amount of information in this document has been provisionally upgraded to ‘Secret’” . . .

The State Department and Clinton first disputed the email’s classification in July, when Intelligence Community inspector general I. Charles McCullough III informed the State Department of its assessment. (Read more from “State Department Just Made a Huge Claim About Clinton Email Scandal” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.