Shameless Media Peddling Democrat Propaganda on Court-Packing; Senator Says That Confirming Barrett ‘Constitutes Court-Packing,’
By Townhall. . .On Sunday, the Associated Press rolled out Newspeak, adopting a Democrat euphemism for court-packing, which is the Democrats’ plan to subvert the rule of law by transforming the Supreme Court into another legislative body via the addition of new judgeships. The AP published the following passage:
“[Gov. and Sen. candidate Steve Bullock (D-MT)] said that if Coney Barrett was confirmed, he would be open to measures to depoliticize the court, including adding judges to the bench, a practice critics have dubbed packing the courts,” reads the original AP story.
Only after sharp criticism from conservatives on Twitter did the AP remove its Newspeak. This is why Jack Dorsey and his liberal cohorts at Twitter are rolling out temporary speech codes to crack down on free speech and interfere in the election. . .
Free speech is under attack. The truth is under attack. Our constitutional republic is under attack. The media has been infiltrated by far-left activists working for the Democratic Party who are hellbent on indoctrinating the American people and destroying our system of government to advance the far-left agenda. The stakes couldn’t be higher this November.
No sane person actually takes the lib media seriously anymore. But if they did, their latest embarrassing gaslighting effort to redefine “Court packing,” is most certainly the last straw. They’re not even hiding it anymore, they’re just republishing Dem talking points verbatim.
— Dan Bongino (@dbongino) October 11, 2020
I see the word went out that “packing the court” has an inconvenient meaning for Democrats, so instead of backing off from their norm arson, they’ve just decided that words mean what they want them to mean.
— Inez Stepman ⚪️🔴⚪️ (@InezFeltscher) October 11, 2020
DEMOCRAT 1: “How do we get around the GOP bashing us for packing the court, like FDR tried to do?”
DEMOCRAT 2: “Hah. You think our dumb voters know what ‘court packing’ even is?”
— David Reaboi (@davereaboi) October 11, 2020
(Read more from “Shameless Media Peddling Democrat Propaganda on Court-Packing” HERE)
_______________________________________________________
Coons Says That Confirming Barrett ‘Constitutes Court-Packing,’ Sasse Responds That’s ‘Obviously’ Incorrect
By Fox News. Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Chris Coons said on Sunday that the Senate moving to confirm President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett “constitutes court-packing,” and called the nominee’s views “disqualifying.”
Coons, D-Del., made the comments during an interview with “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace. Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., also spoke with Wallace Sunday.
“I’m going to be laying out the ways in which Judge Barrett’s views … are not just extreme, they’re disqualifying,” Coons said of Democrats’ strategy for Barrett’s hearings. “It constitutes court-packing.”
Court-packing’s traditional definition is expanding the Supreme Court by law and then confirming justices to those seats, not what Republicans are doing, which is filling a naturally occurring vacancy. Sasse shot back that Coons’ definition of court-packing was “obviously” incorrect and accused the Democrat of using “Orwellian” language. (Read more from “Coons Says That Confirming Barrett ‘Constitutes Court-Packing,’ Sasse Responds That’s ‘Obviously’ Incorrect” HERE)
Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE