The Oral Arguments on Biden’s Vaccine Mandate Were a Total Disaster
On Friday, the Supreme Court heard arguments about the constitutionality of President Joe Biden’s Wuhan coronavirus vaccine mandates for private companies with more than 100 employees. In September 2021, Biden tasked OSHA with implementing and enforcing the mandates. In the time since, the administration has been sued by multiple parties.
During questioning, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a number of false statements about the vaccine’s ability to prevent transmission of the virus. While it may protect against death or hospitalization, the vaccine does not prevent transmission.
“They continue to work well for Delta, with regard to severe illness and death – they prevent it. But what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission,” CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said in an interview with CNN over the summer.
Many Supreme Court Justices have falsely stated today that the Wuhan coronavirus vaccine "prevents disease" and transmission in the work place. This is absolutely false and highly alarming they're using that point as fact to make their decision.
— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) January 7, 2022
Sotomayor falsely claimed the Omicron variant of the virus is just as deadly as the previous Delta version. This is false.
SOTOMAYOR: “We have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in serious condition, and many on ventilators.” pic.twitter.com/SyyztlpdDx
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) January 7, 2022
Breyer: "Hospitals are full almost to the point of the maximum."
These people know absolutely nothing. Zero. pic.twitter.com/F5z3Hzz6IR
— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) January 7, 2022
(Read more from “The Oral Arguments on Biden’s Vaccine Mandate Were a Total Disaster” HERE)
Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.
