Posts

Bloomberg Reportedly Approached Andrew Yang About Possible VP Pick

Democratic candidate Michael Bloomberg has approached former Democratic candidate Andrew Yang about a potential political endorsement, going so far as to raise the possibility of Andrew Yang joining the ticket as vice president, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.

(Via The Wall Street Journal)

Michael Bloomberg’s presidential campaign has made overtures to Democrat Andrew Yang, courting the former candidate’s endorsement and floating the possibility of Mr. Yang becoming his running mate, according to two people familiar with the discussions.

Aides to the former New York City mayor reached out to discuss ways the two entrepreneurs-turned-politicians could work together as Mr. Bloomberg seeks the Democratic nomination, these people said.

Mr. Yang, who dropped out of the race earlier this month, didn’t commit to join forces, as he considers his own political future, a third person familiar with the discussions said.

Mr. Yang didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. A senior Bloomberg aide said Mr. Yang wasn’t being seriously considered to be the former mayor’s running mate if he secured the nomination.

(Read more from “Bloomberg Reportedly Approached Andrew Yang About Possible VP Pick” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Dem Candidate Klobuchar Dodges Question on When Life Begins

Minnesota Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar evaded a question about when life begins during her Wednesday evening town hall on Fox News.

Klobuchar, who broke from her Democratic primary opponents when she said that there should be room in the party for pro-life Democrats, made it clear that she herself was pro-choice and made no move to answer a direct question from host Martha MacCallum about when life actually begins. . .

“So at what point do you think that life begins?” MacCallum asked directly. “If 20 weeks, post-20 weeks is acceptable, at what point do you think life begins?”

Klobuchar made no move to answer the question, instead saying, “Again, I follow Roe v. Wade, and what Roe v. Wade allows for is the protection of a woman’s decision — to make a decision about her own life and of course by the third trimester there’s some limits on it.”

“A lot of moderate Republicans and moderate Democrats think that’s a really moderate thing to vote for, post 20 weeks. Only North Korea and China and a few other countries allow what we allow here,” MacCallum pushed back. (Read more from “Dem Candidate Klobuchar Dodges Question on When Life Begins” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Lawsuit: 1.6k Dead People Registered to Vote in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

By Breitbart. A lawsuit filed against Allegheny County, Pennsylvania alleges that nearly 1,600 dead people are registered to vote in the 2020 election in the county.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation filed suit against Allegheny County, where Pittsburgh is located, for their alleged ineffectiveness in cleaning up their voter rolls. The lawsuit claims there are about 1,583 dead people still on the county voter rolls:

The Foundation reviewed birthdates from a portion of the County’s voter registration list against records in the Social Security Death Index. After matching other biographical information, the Foundation found 1,583 deceased registrants whose registrations should have been canceled, yet they remain actively registered to vote in the County. [Emphasis added]

Similarly, the lawsuit claims there are close t0 7,500 voter registrations that have been flagged as duplicates but that remain on the voter rolls. In one case, the lawsuit claims, an individual registered to vote up to seven times in one day while out of state. (Read more from “Lawsuit: 1.6k Dead People Registered to Vote in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania” HERE)

_____________________________________________________

New Bill Takes Aim at Voter Fraud; Raises Concerns About Voter Suppression

By The Orange County Register. A new bill from two Republican lawmakers in Orange County would require county courthouses to share juror information, including age and citizenship status, with election officials.

The lawmakers say the new rules would stem voter fraud in California, despite numerous studies showing that voter fraud is not a widespread problem.

Senate Bill 994 authors, State Senators Pat Bates and John Moorlach of Orange County, say the change could help elections administrators purge voter rolls of people who aren’t eligible to cast ballots because they’re dead, under 18, no longer live in the state or they’re undocumented immigrants.

“It is paramount that county voter rolls be carefully and accurately maintained to ensure only eligible citizens can vote,” said Bates, R-Laguna Niguel. “County voter rolls that include duplicate names and deceased individuals are susceptible to fraud and abuse, and SB 994 presents a simple fix to that problem.” (Read more from “New Bill Takes Aim at Voter Fraud; Raises Concerns About Voter Suppression” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

It’s Looking As Though One Super Tuesday State Is Setting Itself Up For Voter Fraud

By Townhall. While all eyes were on the Nevada Caucuses, people in Super Tuesday states started receiving their absentee ballots. In places like California, voters are encouraged to vote absentee. It’s been a way to garner greater political involvement and participation.

Adam Housley, a former correspondent for Fox News, said he received two ballots: one for non-party preference (NPP) and one for the libertarian ticket. What makes the scenario even more troubling? Housley said he has never registered as a libertarian.

In a state with millions of people, a small flub here and there is likely to happen, but it turns out Housley wasn’t the only one who received multiple ballots..

(Read more from “It’s Looking As Though One Super Tuesday State Is Setting Itself Up For Voter Fraud” HERE)

______________________________________________

Unthinkability Bias Comes for the Democrats

By Real Clear Politics. Voting in the Democratic Primary contest is getting ready to heat up, but the contest itself will be more-or-less over shortly after it begins. By the end of March, fully two-thirds of the delegates to the national convention will be awarded. Barring a major collapse in his poll numbers between now and then, Bernie Sanders is likely to win the lion’s share – perhaps even a majority – of these delegates. The results from Saturday’s Nevada caucuses certainly did nothing to suggest otherwise. At that point, denying him the nomination becomes an extremely tricky proposition.

If you are among those who believe Sanders is the strongest candidate Democrats could run against Donald Trump, then this is all for the good. If you think the outsider is a general election problem for the party, you may be wondering how it came to this, especially in an election where there seemed to be so many promising candidates. Particularly perplexing is the decision of the Democratic candidates to hammer Michael Bloomberg – who won’t be on the ballot for two more contests – at the most recent debate. . . Finally, beyond the enhanced fundraising and core of strong supporters, candidates like Trump and Sanders have benefitted from what I dubbed “unthinkability bias” in 2016. This is like a strong version of confirmation bias, where people set their prior probabilities of an event occurring to zero and refuse to update their priors because they just can’t conceive of the possibility coming to pass. In the summer of 2016, I wrote a series of pieces suggesting that Trump could win the general election; these were met such derision and invective that I took a month-long break from Twitter. In late 2019, I wrote a piece suggesting that people were underestimating Sanders’ chances of becoming the Democratic nominee. While the response was less angry, it was still met with a degree of skepticism that seems unwarranted today.

This is harmless in and of itself, but it has the potential to transform the trajectory of races. By writing off Trump and Sanders in the summer and fall before the election year, candidates allowed their candidacies to strengthen and their core bases of support to grow. In addition, by attacking each other, the more “traditional” candidates collectively weakened themselves, diminishing themselves compared to the insurgent. (Read more from “Unthinkability Bias Comes for the Democrats” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

American Workers Last: WH Chief Of Staff Mulvaney Thinks Record Immigration Is Not Enough

Are you sick of one administration official after another calling for even more foreign labor?

The more immigration we have, the more it feeds the insatiable appetite of the crony monopolies created by government for even more cheap labor – be it farm work or entry-level white-collar jobs. This culturally gerrymanders Americans out of these jobs, as foreign labor interests work with U.S. special interests to monopolize them with immigrant workers. But it apparently will never be enough for people like White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney.

The Washington Post reports that during a private speech in London, the top gun at the White House said the following. “We are desperate — desperate — for more people. We are running out of people to fuel the economic growth that we’ve had in our nation over the last four years. We need more immigrants.”

Did Hillary Clinton hack into the White House?

Amid the sudden clamor for more foreign labor, Trump returned to Phoenix, Arizona, this week for a campaign rally, the home of his famous immigration speech on August 31, 2016, when he promised to put American workers first. “While Hillary Clinton meets only with donors and lobbyists, my plan was crafted with the input from federal immigration officers, along with top immigration experts who represent workers, not corporations,” charged Trump at the 2016 rally.

In point 10 of the plan that Trump laid out that night, he said, “We will reform legal immigration to serve the best interests of America and its workers.”

Some might say he was only referring to low-skilled manual labor, not high-skilled foreign workers. However, there are two problems with this excuse.

First, the administration is pushing more low-skilled labor as forcefully as calling for more “high-skilled” labor, aka nothing more than entry-level IT and nursing jobs. The vice president and the agriculture secretary are rumored to be pushing for massive amnesty for illegal aliens working on farms and the creation of a permanent underclass of indentured servants on H2 visas that will depress wages beyond anything Trump warned on the campaign trail. Moreover, this administration has increased the existing H2 visas for low-skilled migrant workers more than any other administration – to the point that even Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., signed on to a bipartisan letter telling him to slow it down.

“Well, Americans just don’t want to do those jobs” is the typical mantra from purveyors of mass migration. The problem with that assertion is that our willing suspension of disbelief dissipates the minute these same people suddenly demand more giveaways for Indian workers in IT and nursing. Really? Americans can’t or don’t want to pursue basic white-collar jobs like that? So they don’t want blue-collar or white-collar jobs?

When seeking the votes of these very forgotten Americans, Trump’s campaign recognized the truth. “We graduate two times more Americans with STEM degrees each year than find STEM jobs, yet as much as two-thirds of entry-level hiring for IT jobs is accomplished through the H-1B program,” stated Trump’s immigration policy outline for the 2016 campaign.

Again, Trump understood the reality that the same way low-skilled foreign labor drives down hourly wages for blue-collar jobs, the endless supply of foreign IT labor will drive down annual salaries of entry-level white-collar jobs too.

“More than half of H-1B visas are issued for the program’s lowest allowable wage level, and more than eighty percent for its bottom two,” observed the Trump campaign white paper. “Raising the prevailing wage paid to H-1Bs will force companies to give these coveted entry level jobs to the existing domestic pool of unemployed native and immigrant workers in the U.S., instead of flying in cheaper workers from overseas.”

These are not hypersensitive specialties dealing with rocket science that are only magically found in other countries. These are entry-level IT, nursing, or almost any other white-collar job.

One would think that with record high immigration and visas, it would be enough. But no. Hiring Americans is not even an option when they have the boundless visa pork and the ability to lobby for more.

The Indian contract companies like Infosys, HCL, Wipro, Cognizant, and Tata have already successfully used the vast pipeline of H-1B, L-1, F-1,and Optional Practical Training (OPT) to own Silicon Valley and the American tech companies with a supply of cheap labor, boxing out Americans and treating the Indian recruits as indentured servants.

This is the same thing we are seeing with low-skilled labor. The same self-fulfilling prophecy of meat-packers only relying on African refugees and farm conglomerates only relying on Latin American laborers has created a culture and climate that is discriminatory toward Americans getting into the industry. Indian companies are using the “high-skilled” visas to do the same to Americans in everything from IT to banking.

As the Perry News reported this week regarding one Tyson Foods plant in Iowa, “The company currently employs 1,368 workers at the Perry plant, and about 800 of the employees are refugees, with 400 each of Africans and Asians. … Some nine languages are spoken among Tyson’s refugee workers.” Once such a dynamic is in place, manipulated by immigration policies that are harmful to the country for numerous other reasons, Americans have no ability to break into that culture, even putting the wage depression aside. Don’t think for a minute that this isn’t occurring in Silicon Valley too.

It’s for good reason that Congress banned contract labor immigration in 1891. Sections 3 and 4 of the Immigration Act of 1891 prohibited all companies and travel agencies from marketing or soliciting for any immigration with the promise of employment. Our Founders wanted productive Americans who would come to assimilate into our political system and work anywhere they wanted; they had no interest in running a foreign labor mill.

What is truly disgusting is that because the OPT program is completely lawless without statutory backing, the lobbyists who pushed for its creation benefit from their crime. OPT workers, who are largely foreign students remaining here indefinitely (illegally, according to statute) to work are hired without payroll taxes. So why would any company hire an American fresh out of college when they can hire a foreign student OPT counterpart and save 16% on payroll? Trump should immediately abolish the lawless OPT program, which he can do overnight the same way he can get rid of DACA. Then see what the labor market looks like.

As the Trump campaign wrote in 2016, “Every year, we voluntarily admit another 2 million new immigrants, guest workers, refugees, and dependents, growing our existing all-time historic record population of 42 million immigrants.” That number is now up to 45 million. The number of foreign-language-speaking residents is now over 68 million, roughly 20% of the population, and much higher in certain states and cities. We now bring in 1.3 million foreign students a year, which creates a pipeline for cheap labor to compete with Americans for jobs, as hundreds of thousands of them are given defector permanent status under the OPT program. As Neil Munro estimates, there are now one million contract workers just from India alone in this country who remain here indefinitely.

At what point is enough enough? As Trump said recently, “We’re full.”

Well, full should mean full.

The administration has already moved away from cutting the numbers, has moved away from the no-amnesty pledge, and has moved away from mandatory E-verify. Meanwhile, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has become the most popular governor by touting it and the proposal enjoys supermajority support.

What exactly happened to putting Americans first, and what exactly is waiting for us on the other side of this election? Inquiring minds would like to know. (For more from the author of “American Workers Last: WH Chief Of Staff Mulvaney Thinks Record Immigration Is Not Enough” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Democrat Debate: Michael Bloomberg Being Attacked From All Sides by Candidates

By USA Today. Bernie Sanders slammed Michael Bloomberg’s wealth in an extended debate over taxes and what he described as the “grotesque level of income and wealth inequality” in the United States.

“That’s wrong, that’s immoral,” Sanders said, noting that Bloomberg’s wealth vastly overshadows the earnings of virtually all Americans.

The back-and-forth was ostensibly over the nation’s tax code, and a desire from Sanders and Elizabeth Warren to raise taxes on the wealthy. Bloomberg said he was proud of the money he has earned – “I work very hard for it,” he said – and added that he strongly opposed the tax proposals supported by the liberal wing of the party. . .

In a question about how his policies would affect small, minority-owned businesses, Biden brought up the discriminatory housing practice known as “redlining.”

It wasn’t redlining, but the greed of Wall Street, that caused the 2008 financial crisis, Biden said. That was an allusion to comments Bloomberg made in 2008 in which he said the crisis was started because banks were pressured to end redlining. (Read more from “Democrat Debate: Michael Bloomberg Being Attacked From All Sides by Candidates” HERE)

___________________________________________________

Bloomberg Under Siege at Chaotic Debate Debut, as Warren Attacks Field in Bid to Revive Campaign

By Fox News. Elizabeth Warren shamed Mike Bloomberg for allegedly calling women “fat broads.”

Amy Klobuchar asked Pete Buttigieg if he was calling her “dumb.”

Bloomberg swiped at Bernie Sanders by quipping that “the best-known socialist in the country happens to be a millionaire with three houses.”

The Democrats’ showdown Wednesday night in Las Vegas repeatedly put Bloomberg in his primary rivals’ crosshairs as the surging billionaire made his debate-stage debut. But the conflagration quickly expanded into an all-out melee and easily the most aggressive debate of the nomination season to date, as each of the candidates took sharp and often personal shots at one another.

The fight started out white-hot when, in her first turn at the microphone, Warren asserted that she would support whoever wins the nomination, but warned that Democrats “take a huge risk if we just substitute one arrogant billionaire for another.” (Read more from “Bloomberg Under Siege at Chaotic Debate Debut, as Warren Attacks Field in Bid to Revive Campaign” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump Campaign Reacts to Report Bloomberg Could Tap Hillary to Be His VP

President Donald Trump’s campaign reacted to rumblings of Mike Bloomberg considering Hillary Clinton as a running mate Saturday, arguing that the Democratic establishment was “once again” trying to “steal” the nomination from Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Trump’s campaign and White House teams presented a united message on the news, which was first reported by Matt Drudge. . .

“Hillary apparently can’t resist trying to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders a second time,” said Erin Perrine, deputy communications director for the Trump campaign.

“It appears that Bloomberg is colluding with Hillary to once again steal the Democrat nomination from Bernie,” Republican strategist and former White House official Andy Surabian told the Daily Caller. “Did anti-establishment Dems really think the establishment oligarchs in their party were just gonna roll over in the face of Bernie’s revolution?”

Many Democrats accused Clinton’s 2016 campaign of stealing the nomination from Sanders, resulting in some reforms to the Party’s 2020 primary process. Central to the controversy were the party’s super-delegates, who enter the national convention free to vote for any candidate, whereas other delegates are bound by the results of their state primaries. (Read more from “Trump Campaign Reacts to Report Bloomberg Could Tap Hillary to Be His VP” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Democrat Drops out of 2020 Race Following New Hampshire Results; Here’s the Dem Front-Runner; Things Aren’t Looking Good for Biden

By Daily Wire. Democrat presidential candidate Andrew Yang dropped out of the presidential race on Tuesday after early returns from the New Hampshire primary showed another poor outing for the far-left candidate.

“I am a numbers guy,” Yang told The Washington Post. “In most of these [upcoming] states, I’m not going to be at a threshold where I get delegates, which makes sticking around not necessarily helpful or productive in terms of furthering the goals of this campaign.”

“If I become persuaded that there’s a particular candidate that gives us a superior chance of beating Donald Trump, and I think it’s important to make that opinion known, then I would consider it for sure,” Yang continued. “Anyone with a crystal ball would have regarded Iowa as a bit of a sinkhole. If we could do it over again, of course, we would not have sunk so much energy and time and resources in Iowa. We would have been fighting it out here in New Hampshire. And then we probably would have been on the air in Nevada or South Carolina.”

Yang added, “I’m not someone who wants to take people’s donations, support, time and dedication if I don’t think we have a chance to win or advance our goals in the right direction.” (Read more from “Democrat Drops out of 2020 Race Following New Hampshire Results” HERE)

______________________________________________________

Sanders Edges out Buttigieg to Win New Hampshire, as Klobuchar Surges to Third

By Fox News. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has won the New Hampshire primary, Fox News projects, catapulting the 78-year-old self-described democratic socialist to the front of the still-crowded Democratic presidential primary field.

Sanders had been leading top rival Pete Buttigieg and several other candidates as results came in throughout the evening, though only by a fraction of his 22-point margin of victory over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 New Hampshire primary. Buttigieg, meanwhile, touted his strong performance as a sign that his campaign was “here to stay.”

“Thank you New Hampshire,” Sanders told cheering supporters late Tuesday, saying his campaign had won a “great victory.” . . .

New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation presidential primary came days after Sanders won the popular vote in the botched Iowa caucuses. Buttigieg took home more delegates from that contest, however.

At the same time, Buttigieg wasn’t the only Democrat standing between Sanders and the nomination. A late-surging Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar landed in third place in New Hampshire as votes continued coming in. (Read more from “Sanders Edges out Buttigieg to Win New Hampshire, as Klobuchar Surges to Third” HERE)

______________________________________________________

Biden vows comeback in South Carolina, after distant New Hampshire finish

By Fox News. Former Vice President Joe Biden vowed a comeback Tuesday as he hosted a kick-off rally for what could be the make-or-break leg of his campaign in South Carolina, after a distant finish in New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation primary.

Biden abruptly announced Tuesday morning that he wouldn’t spend primary night in New Hampshire as planned and would instead host the event in South Carolina — the state he’s long considered his campaign firewall.

But even after early New Hampshire results posted — showing him badly trailing the leaderboard of Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn. — the former vice president still confidently asserted Tuesday night that he would be able to pull out a win.

“We just heard from the first two of 50 states. Not all the nation. Not half the nation. Not a quarter of the nation. Not 10 percent,” Biden said at his South Carolina event. “Where I come from, that’s the opening bell, not the closing bell.” . . .

Neither Biden nor Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., was positioned to finish in the top three positions in New Hampshire, according to an early Fox News Voter Analysis. (Read more from “Biden vows comeback in South Carolina, after distant New Hampshire finish” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Democrats Prefer Meteor Wiping out Humanity Over Trump Re-Election; Dems Experiencing High Anxiety About Beating Trump

By Newsweek. Nearly two-thirds of likely New Hampshire Democratic primary voters said they would prefer a life-extinguishing meteor strike against the Earth over President Donald Trump being re-elected in November.

Sixty-two percent of Democrats in New Hampshire, whose primary will take place on Tuesday, responded to a University of Massachusetts-Lowell survey by saying they’d prefer human extinction over a second Trump term. An even higher percentage (69 percent) of people making less than $50,000 a year and female voters agreed that a giant meteor is preferable to the president getting re-elected on November 3, 2020. Independent voters surveyed also expressed relatively large support for the meteor strike, with just over half supporting Trump over extinction.

The UMass-Lowell survey of 400 likely Democratic primary voters asked respondents: “Which of the following outcomes would you prefer to occur on November 3, 2020? – Donald Trump wins re-election or a giant meteor strikes the earth, extinguishing all human life?” . . .

Only thirty-eight percent of those who responded chose Trump over the deaths of themselves and all of humanity. Seventy-two percent of those polled who identified with a “conservative ideology” said they would prefer the president is re-elected later this year. Only 31 percent of moderates said they would favor Trump’s re-election. (Read more from “Majority of Democrats Prefer Meteor Wiping out Humanity Over Trump Re-Election” HERE)

__________________________________________________

In New Hampshire, High Anxiety About Beating Trump

By The Hill. New Hampshire Democrats are on edge ahead of Tuesday’s primary and feeling immense pressure to pick the candidate with the best chance of defeating President Trump.

The anxiety over who is best equipped to defeat Trump has blotted out the policy battles and put electability at the forefront of voter minds to an unusual degree.

At town halls and forums across the state, the presidential candidates are being challenged by voters, who above all want to be convinced that their contenders have the ability to go one-on-one with the president.

The new fears about beating Trump come after one of the president’s best weeks since he took office; he was acquitted by the Senate in his impeachment trial, and polls show his job approval rating reaching new highs amid voter optimism about the economy.

Democrats, meanwhile, are fresh off the Iowa caucus debacle and facing the potential for a long primary fight. (Read more from “In New Hampshire, High Anxiety About Beating Trump” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Driver in Florida Plows Van Into Trump Voter Registration Tent

Authorities in Florida were searching Saturday night for a driver who they claim drove his van into a Republican Party voter registration tent in a shopping center parking lot, just missing six volunteers working there.

The suspect, described as a white man in his 20s, then got out of his vehicle and recorded video of the smashed tent, and flashed a middle finger to the startled voter-registration volunteers before driving off, FOX 30 of Jacksonville reported.

Photos posted by the Republican Party of Duval County showed Trump-Pence placards and bumper stickers strewn around the parking lot, along with the toppled tent. Another photo showed an older model brown-and-tan van driving away from the scene. . .

Jacksonville authorities said the driver intentionally tried to strike the tent with his vehicle, the Florida Times-Union reported.

“We are investigating this as an aggravated assault,” Lt. Larry Gayle of the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office told the newspaper. “Several people were in the area and could have been seriously hurt.”

(Read more from “Driver in Florida Plows Van Into Trump Voter Registration Tent” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE